/cdn.vox-cdn.com/photo_images/614506/GYI0060242390.jpg)
Okay, first some general notes on the game before I get into what I really want to talk about:
- In the first half, the starting frontcourt was getting whatever they wanted. The Thunder were simply too small to deal with them, whether playing small-ball or going with their regular lineup. They had some dominating stretches on the boards, and easy baskets. However, we only actually isolated Pau down low (excluding the pinch-post) 5 or 6 times, and Bynum maybe twice. Not acceptable, especially when the other options are jumpers from the likes of Shannon Brown, Jordan Farmar, Lamar Odom, Derek Fisher and Ron Artest.
- To be fair, however, Pau still can't handle a double-team, and as such passes out of them, losing the opportunity to score. Still, when Pau passes out of the double team, last season the guards would quickly repost him, this season he's lucky to get the ball back even 10% of the time.
- Kobe hit shots early (meaning the second). That's not good, as that tends to lead to him believing he's gonna keep hitting shots for the rest of the game, and that was evidently not the case, considering he was 2-10 in the fourth.
- The Lakers still aren't showing anywhere near full effort or focus, their close-outs on shooters were virtually nonexistent until shit got real late in the third; and other than Pau and Fish, everyone else seemed casual. Hell, Kobe was even laughing from time-to-time. I want Mr. Grumpy back.
- Speaking of those two, Fisher was showing great intensity and focus, and his facial expression mirrored that. However, he was getting too angry at his own teammates early in the third, and thus his words ended up being water on a duck's back. And Pau, Pau has quietly stepped it up to ridiculous levels. He's made no 'step it up' speeches, no 'intense' face, nothing. All he's done, really, is morph from the awkward-looking player earlier on in the season to possibly the best big man in the last month to two months, and probably a top 10 or even top-5 player in the league over that time period.
- Lamar Odom needs to be more aggressive inside. Sure, his speed and versatility are not as much of an advantage against the likes of Jeff Green as they are against conventional power forwards, and his shoulder is still hurting, but he needs to cut the perimeter crap.
- Also on the bench, Brown and Farmar played surprisingly under control.
- Free throws, you say? They played more aggressive than us, plain and simple. They didn't settle for outside jumpers and only go inside when it was painfully easy, like we did. They forced the issue, and were rewarded thusly. Hell, I even saw Andrew Bynum settle for a midrange J.
- Westbrook can get past Fisher literally whenever he wants. When the Thunder outside shooters are bricking, the Lakers can simply pack the paint, and get Fisher to funnel Russ into our bigs. When the Thunder snipers are hitting like they were today, however, we're pretty much screwed. In such scenarios, I'd generally say put Brown or Farmar out there on Russ or switch Kobe onto him, but Harden was on fire himself, and Kobe was needed there; and Fish's offense this game was comparatively too good to sub him off too much.
- Someone needs to put a GD body on Durant. The kid's tall, but lanky as hell, and a simple box-out would have cut out half of his rebounds, and thus a good dozen Thunder fast break points.
- Some have said that Bynum should have had more minutes, especially considering how woefully Odom was underperforming, and OKC's lack of size or an answer for Bynum, but we must keep in mind that he is still coming back from injury - hell, he had to skip training the day before to get treatment on his Achilles. One must temper expectations regarding Drew.
Now, on to the real issue:
You want me to be plain and simple about it? The Lakers can't execute in the crunch. They panic, they flail. They fail. I remember at the beginning of the season, what seems a whole millennium ago now, the Lakers had a ridiculous record in close games, undefeated or close to it. Nowadays they're at best equally likely to win or lose. I honestly can't remember how much of that was due to crisp execution and a raise in effort as a team, and how much was simply Kobe's own heroics. But, it would be a fair assumption to state that they were better back then.
There are several reasons for this issue, and its deterioration over the season. The first to jump to mind is how Kobe has been rendered mortal by the basketball Gods. He simply can't turn it on nearly at will like he used to. Sometimes, like in the second quarter last night, he will get hot, but he can't control when it happens, and even when it does, it's not as dominant and dazzling of a performance as it used to be. Normally, one might think 'well, we're talented enough for other guys to step it up in his absence'. A nice thought, really.
Sadly, in reality, quite the opposite occurs, and the Lakers flail around like a Stinger missile that's lost its heat signature, moving aimlessly before falling to the Earth and destroying themselves. Last night, this sequence presented itself abnormally early, towards the end of the third quarter, and while the scoresheet still implied a close game, upon watching that macabre display, and knowing of the lack of resiliency present in this current incarnation of the Lakers, I switched off before the fourth quarter.
This sequence was essentially primarily three straight scores from OKC to close out the third. First, a sick Russell Westbrook dunk where he effortlessly stepped away from Fisher in semi-transition before going up for what initially seemed to be a lay-up, but ended up being the best dunk of this series so far. This was followed by a wide-open Harden three in transition, and then a contested Kevin Durant deep three which he drained with ice veins.
All these plays were in transition or semi-transition, and that last Durant shot was defended well, and just a great player making a great play. As such, defensively it was not as if it was a major breakdown or anything. We must instead turn our eyes in the direction of the element of the Lakers' game which has been a continual let-down over the season: the Los Angeles offense.
Now, I'm no professional by any means, but last I checked, the Lakers' primary offensive playbook is that of the Triangle, an offense that has won more rings than the three team captains put together. When executed well, it's poetry in motion. Now, the Lakers have had well-documented struggles in executing to even a mediocre level, but even at a mediocre level the Triangle is most certainly preferable to Derek Fisher winging it on the perimeter, jacking up bad long twos and threes.
The execution, as mentioned, was nonexistent, and the low post was not given a single look in this sequence, but more disturbing was the players' complete lack of presence of mind through this scenario. The Oklahoma City Thunder were pushing the ball on every possession. This was because, 1. They were grabbing long rebounds, 2. They are a young team, and 3. They wanted to fire up the home crowd and thus feed off its energy. The Lakers had NONE of these factors in their favour, and yet still attempted to push the pace.
The Lakers no longer have the speed and athleticism to penetrate the paint in forced transition, and thus this attempt to push the pace led to pull-up 20-footers, which caromed off the rim back out to 15, 20 feet, thus allowing the Thunder to once again push the break and get easy scores. This cycle of bad offensive possessions was what allowed Oklahoma to score those 8 straight points to close the quarter. Even Durant's shot, was only made in a 'sense of the moment' zone.

Reality must have come as an abrupt shock to them. Oklahoma City DID go on a serious run, and when the Lakers tried to flip the switch and hit big, quick-striking shots, they reached only to find that it had been so long since they had actually used the switch, that they had forgotten where it was. This arrogance and laziness from the Lakers, though present all of this season and much of last season, is always alarming.