Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

The Credits: "The Devil Inside"

What is it that drives Kobe Bryant? How does he compare with Lebron James? After Wednesday night's win over the Utah Jazz, Lakers Coach Mike Brown was asked to compare this season's top two scorers:

"LeBron [James] is a guy who is still learning and still growing, and the reality of it is that being down there with Dwyane Wade has helped him," Brown said. "They're different personalities. LeBron, he's a guy who likes to laugh and joke. He knows obviously there's a time to be serious, but he's youthful.

"Kobe is not as much. Kobe's more serious-minded and so on and so forth. But Kobe knows how to have fun in his own way, too."

There are different ways to take this. There will be some who will claim Kobe is obsessed with himself, that his obsession is a detriment to the team.

It's always been about the "40" with him. Yes, he's super "serious-minded," but to what individual end? For years, Phil Jackson chafed at Bryant for preferring to look the 40-dropping martyr in a loss over a marginalized cog (at least, that's how Kobe probably took it) in a win, and even 15 years into his career Bryant is still working under his same showy, soap-opera guidelines. Every shot has to be the "three … two … one … Bryant for the win …"-type that kids take by themselves while shooting away on the playground.

This is why both men are unsuccessful.

To many, he can do no right. Doesn't shoot efficiently? He's old and losing his ability. Leads the league in scoring? He's a ball hog and hurting the team. In many ways, Kobe and Lebron are on the same boat. Every move, every shot, every free throw, scrutinized endlessly. As a Laker fan, I'm just glad Kobe's still in the conversation. It shows the league is still afraid of him. Unsure of what he is capable of. They criticize because they are insecure of what they believe in. Kobe Bryant defies all convention. Leader in scoring? After 16 years in the league? On a swollen, ugly, torn, wrist? The hell is wrong with him?! All I know is Kobe Bryant is a killer, and it's been entertaining as hell.

More Links after the jump....

Star-divide

Lakers.com/ NBA.com:

LA Times:

OC Register:

ESPN LA:

Other Lakers Links:

Around The League:

Comment 217 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

That article made me nonsensically mad. I seriously just had to stop reading it.

He had the audacity to call Kobe Unsuccessful? Seriously? Seriously!? I just don’t understand.

by Jevon O on Jan 13, 2012 8:53 AM PST reply actions  

I need him to define what successful is.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 9:03 AM PST up reply actions  

He wouldn't know.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Kobe never walked on the moon

Unfortunately that’s the measure of true success

by Grabmeone2 on Jan 13, 2012 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, fuck him then!

EYE’M KNOW LONGUR A PHAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1one

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

what are you saying?

it is a fact that Kobe is unsuccessful…

at trying to be something he’s not

"One thing LeBron James has won that Kobe Bryant never has, and never will: A bronze medal."- Josh Tucker
"Fisher's defense is called escort service in my country, just accompany" -Ibou

42-1 on Barebones TDM classic ... BEAT THAT XBOXERS

by madmaxx350 on Jan 13, 2012 3:12 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

Kelly Dwyer didnt deserve a FP quote.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 8:56 AM PST reply actions  

nah you good :)

It was directed more at him than anything. Sorry

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 9:37 AM PST up reply actions  

I made a mistake reading that crap that Kelly Dwyer wrote.

My only reaction was “WOW”. Kobe can’t do no right for him. Always nitpicking what bad thing Kobe did even after a great game. Whatever. I won’t make the same mistake of reading from him again.

"You have to figure out a way to get it done. There's no time to make excuses. If I play bad or have one bad game like I did in Denver, everybody cries for a change, or cries for the fact I'm too old ... I make adjustments and go from there."
-- Bryant on his performance against the Suns

by BoneCruncher24 on Jan 13, 2012 9:04 AM PST reply actions  

I have this shirt :)

"In this league, you gotta learn to run on empty. Fuel level at zero, but still you run." -KB

by PoPs_737 on Jan 13, 2012 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

It's awesome

I got it for christmas. I put it on the second I opened it LOL

"In this league, you gotta learn to run on empty. Fuel level at zero, but still you run." -KB

by PoPs_737 on Jan 13, 2012 10:17 AM PST up reply actions  

lemme gess...

…did she get that tooo???

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

i want this shirt

Coach Harbaugh is the truth!!

by chris z on Jan 13, 2012 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

lucky

I saw it at the mall but was too broke to get it.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

broke...heh

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

yup I was but not now. I'm going to get it today.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

just read the Dwyer article.

never read hate so clearly in an article.

THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.. THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.....

by imposibol on Jan 13, 2012 9:37 AM PST reply actions  

I smelled something burning while I read it

probably just some brain cells catching fire…..don’t worry im ok

by Grabmeone2 on Jan 13, 2012 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Here we go...

I’m ready to take your bombardment, because I LOVED Dwyer’s piece.

I’m begging you folks, read it again. Read the whole thing, and remove emotion from your mind as you read it. THE PIECE IS NOT EVEN ABOUT KOBE BRYANT. Or LeBron James. It’s about how what makes them tick is both their strength and their weakness. It’s about how, when talking about the people who are in the top .00001% of any trade, the things that drive them also destroy them. It’s about how the two players are both polar opposites, and yet both poles are capable of being both strength and weakness. Take Kobe and LeBron out of the equation entirely. This could have been written about artists, musicians, writers, CEOs. It’s about how the best are the best because they are so maniacal, and their mania is also what causes their downfall. Personally, having read it three times to make sure my interpreted message makes sense, I think its one of the best things Dwyer’s ever written.

Yes, Dwyer writes “This is why [Kobe] is unsuccessful.” and the concept of Kobe being unsuccessful overall is laughable. But Dwyer’s not saying that. What he’s saying is that when Kobe is unsuccessful, this is why. And he’s absolutely right, because when Kobe fails it is because the monster inside that drives him takes over too much. Dwyer goes on to say, just three paragraphs later, that this is also why Kobe is successful, too. He’s NOT digging at Kobe here. He digs on Kobe in the first two paragraphs, but the digs are perfectly legitimate. I don’t care one iota that Kobe swears a lot during press conferences, but I understand why somebody might care enough to mention that he doesn’t understand it. As for the chucking, there are plenty of us right within Lakers Nation that have a problem with that from time to time. Besides, since these are intro paragraphs, they aren’t even the point of the piece. They are simply setting the scene for Dwyer to point out how obsessive Kobe is about basketball, which leads into the overall point.

This is the type of post that takes a truly discerning eye, and an open mind. Seriously, read it again. There is so much there that you are giving Dwyer credit for.

OK, Commence Onslaught

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 9:45 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

damn it. i have to go back.

THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.. THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.....

by imposibol on Jan 13, 2012 9:51 AM PST up reply actions  

I'll be honest, after hearing so many negative comments about Kelly D. I've never

even given him a chance or have ever read his article. He is no Bill Simmons but it has the same tone to it. He is actually pointing out something that I have talked shit about all season and that is that he should make more use of Bynum and Gasol instead of “chucking” up shots.

If you look at the article in terms of writing quality, it is very good. I think what happens with most of us who love Kobe, we find it hard to accept someone talking about him in a negative way. Personally, I think he is a very good writer and the article pointed out some interesting points. I liked the following comments he made about Kobe:

He was also the guy practicing jumpers until everything hurt. He was also the one hurt the most by Phil Jackson’s seeming indifference and supposed preference for Shaq’s talents once The Guy Who Coached Michael came to Los Angeles. Ticked off, he just skulked back to the gym for another thousand made jumpers; developing a mettle so strong he’s still dropping 40 on back-to-back nights 15 years into the longest 15 years we’ve ever seen an NBA player endure, with one arm. Can’t even tie his shoes, people. Still drops 40.

This is such an awesome comment.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

i always enjoy reading his behind the boxscores, entertaining writer

but he grew up a diehard MJ fan, so i can understand his picking and prodding at kobe’s legacy.

Follow me: @theshmoes.

by theshmoes on Jan 13, 2012 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

oh shit...thnx for letting me know that. I didn't know he grew up a die hard MJ fan

those type of fans will never give any other player compared to MJ any credit. The conversation will go like this:

Me: Who was better, MJ or….(gets rudely cut off)

MJ Fan: MJ!!!!

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

We all have bias

Of course KD is biased towards MJ, for the same reasons we’re biased towards Kobe. In personal interactions I’ve had with him, and sometimes through his writing, KD is up front about acknowledging the bias. I only get pissed off when folks purport to not be biased at all. Otherwise, it’s just a natural by-product of everyone being raised in the isolated environment of your own head.

That doesn’t mean that everything KD writes will be biased towards MJ and anti-Kobe. You still need to read it all and form your own opinions

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 10:25 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes, I completely agree

I definitely have bias with any comparisons to Kobe. As far as KD I don’t think that he is that much off in terms of saying the very same things that many Laker fans think about Kobe. He takes jabs at him of course, but that doesn’t take away from the points that he is trying to make and he makes valid arguments. Regardless of whether or not I agree with the Kobe bashing. You can always appreciate the quality of writing without agreeing with every point.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:32 AM PST up reply actions  

That's your fault.

I’ve read his articles and given him his chances. And I don’t agree with C.A. I’ll also gladly go on disliking articles that are written the way Dwyer repeatedly writes them. Once in a while it’s fine, but repeatedly writing like that takes away your credibility.

I’m not just talking about “Kobe bashing,” I’m talking about his style and how he sounds over judgmental on every single thing he discusses. I’m talking about how it seems like he’s just talking with no real point, and how several sentences in the article leave the reader with a blank stare because they cannot discern the point of the sentence, and later, the point of the paragraph.

I do, however, like his box score recaps when he can keep it clean.

by Jevon O on Jan 13, 2012 2:33 PM PST up reply actions  

His writing is also very arrogant. We discussed this last season.

He writes as if he is the only one who sees things because he has a degree in journalism and watches a lot of basketball, which means he knows exactly what is going on and what everyone thinks and feels. The rest of us, on the other hand, are morons who know nothing and just have to take his word for it.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

The problem with this guy, who I never read anymore, is that unlike this blog which is a Laker fan blog, he writes for a public forum. His writing should be neutral, unbiased, not so clearly defined by his personal feelings about things. He writes with an agenda, his, but it’s presented as fact to a mass audience. ESPN is guilty of the same clear bias across the board against west coast sports and accomplishments.

by fins on Jan 13, 2012 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

No I mean Dwyer. It was mentioned on one of his posts last year.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

He must have just earned it then.

I was under the assumption that he didn’t finish college. That would also explain his constant need to seem smarter than the rest of us.

Silver Screen and Roll

Follow me on Twitter: @wondahbap

by wondahbap on Jan 13, 2012 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I hadn't read the piece, but after reading your comment here

and reading the piece, I can see what you’re saying.

The Drive is what allows them to succeed and to fail.

how you doin'
Twitter: @bluefalcon916

by bluexfalcon on Jan 13, 2012 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

i dont necessarily disagree with some of the things he was TRYINg to say

the way he was trying to say it is what gets me. his articles are very hard to follow and i often dont see his point. but he definitely has a hardon for MJ and constantly tries to take kobe down a notch whenever he can. its very obvious. whether subconsciously or not. it definitely resonates and bothers many readers who are quick to let him know in the comments. everything he writes about has to be brought back to some comparison with his 90’s bulls and it gets old.

"i look skinnier in HD" - charles barkley

by j squared on Jan 13, 2012 10:02 AM PST up reply actions  

So i read the article and i just dont see what you are saying.

He makes some baseless accusations.

You heard me. This is why, and not because of a glaring lack of depth, that the Lakers fell in 2003 and 2004. They could have taken the Spurs and Pistons in those years. This is why things didn’t work out last May, against Dallas (Los Angeles couldn’t grab one game? Come on) in the playoffs.

If he is going to say the above, then he should also have the presence of mind to say he is the reason they were successful in 2009 &2010, shit even during the 2006&07 seasons. Kobe willed that team to the playoffs with a core that cant even make it anywhere in the NBA. Why put all those loses on Kobe and the victories on others. The double standard is alarming.

Why the fuck is Lebron crowned to win anything. Another baseless assumption

And once LeBron wins it — and he will win it, someday — his lighter touch will be the reason why.

There are more but i am too upset to even articulate my points.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:02 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

right on

"i look skinnier in HD" - charles barkley

by j squared on Jan 13, 2012 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Go LG! And I agreed with you as well.

"You have to figure out a way to get it done. There's no time to make excuses. If I play bad or have one bad game like I did in Denver, everybody cries for a change, or cries for the fact I'm too old ... I make adjustments and go from there."
-- Bryant on his performance against the Suns

by BoneCruncher24 on Jan 13, 2012 10:17 AM PST up reply actions  

too many hits on kobe.

THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.. THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.....

by imposibol on Jan 13, 2012 10:18 AM PST up reply actions  

But he does though ...
This is, of course, why both men are successful.

Yes, Kobe had three rings by the time he was LeBron’s age, mostly because he played alongside that preening amalgam of Andrew Bynum and Dwight Howard in Shaquille O’Neal. But he was also the guy calling up Tex Winter for advice in Chicago as he watched Shaq and Kurt Rambis fritter away the lockout season in 1999, always looking to learn and overcome.

He was also the guy practicing jumpers until everything hurt. He was also the one hurt the most by Phil Jackson’s seeming indifference and supposed preference for Shaq’s talents once The Guy Who Coached Michael came to Los Angeles. Ticked off, he just skulked back to the gym for another thousand made jumpers; developing a mettle so strong he’s still dropping 40 on back-to-back nights 15 years into the longest 15 years we’ve ever seen an NBA player endure, with one arm. Can’t even tie his shoes, people. Still drops 40.

These paragraphs, which directly follow the ones you quoted, are explaining that the reason Kobe is Kobe at all is because of the same madness that drives him to do the things that were criticized in the paragraphs you quoted. The Kobe who drops 40 on back-to-back nights with one arm after more basketball than just about anyone is the same one who’s madness drives him to believe in himself so strongly that Kobe can sometimes let the beast consume him. No, he doesn’t specifically come out and say “Kobe has won 5 championships for the same reasons”, but it seems pretty clear that Dwyer is acknowledging that the amazing things that Kobe has done are because of the same reasons that Kobe sometimes fails. “This is, of course, the reason why [Kobe] is successful.” Everything Kobe has done is encapsulated in that. The championships, the scoring, the team leading, all of it.

As for the second point, I don’t understand what makes that baseless. It’s an opinion, sure, but it’s hardly baseless. LeBron is one of the most effective players in the league, he’s playing on a team that has the most talent in the league, and his team is favored to win the championship for this and probably the next few seasons. That’s a pretty strong base with which to state the opinion that LeBron will win a championship someday. The Heat were in the NBA Finals last season and didn’t lose a single player that played a prominent role in that team.

And, again, “LeBron’s lighter tough will be the reason why” is acknowledgement that all the success LeBron will have will be because of LeBron’s lighthearted nature. LeBron disappears in the clutch because his mentality is not as strong as Kobe’s. Kobe takes on too much because of his manic obsessiveness with his own legacy. And yet, both players have had or will have very successful careers, and it is because of these reasons that they will do so.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 10:19 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

LOL, it's like he just can't bring himself to say it outright, he can only imply it.
No, he doesn’t specifically come out and say "Kobe has won 5 championships for the same reasons", but it seems pretty clear that Dwyer is acknowledging that the amazing things that Kobe has done are because of the same reasons that Kobe sometimes fails. "This is, of course, the reason why [Kobe] is successful." Everything Kobe has done is encapsulated in that. The championships, the scoring, the team leading, all of it.

Personally, I think he gets off on the hate and the bashing he takes. As for him owning up to his bias, I never see that in his writing. I must have missed it.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

KD is one of the rare prestigious writers

that get paid to simply cause controversy.

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Huzzah!

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:37 AM PST up reply actions  

That comment is without doubt my biggest issue with any Shaq-Kobe argument and the worst part is that

many Laker fans believed and still do. You can tell by all the Heat-Shaq jerseys at Staples and the boos that Kobe received that day. FROM FUCKIN LAKER FANS!!

I guess many people forget that without Kobe’s performance in game 7 against Portland that the lob to Shaq would never have been possible. Or his performances against Sacramento, Portland and most of all the Spurs and Indiana. Shaq’s stats were not even that big of a difference compared to Shaq. On top of that, he had to carry shaq in crunch time and be the one who carries the team because Shaq was a liability. Kobe was NEVER a sidekick.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

* compared to Kobe

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Why even try to divvy up the credit?

They won it together, we dont have evidence that that laker team would have won it without either of them. So lets just let it go. Kobe went on to win 2 after shaq, shaq went on to win another. So yes they both are capable and together they won 3.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:41 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree 100%. But anytime someone tries to give more credit to Shaq

that shit drives me nuts.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

With a piece with this much depth, you have to be very careful about how you read the words

Kobe won three rings by the time he was LeBron’s age because he played with the super human center Shaq. It’s extremely rare for someone to enjoy the type of success that Kobe did by the time he was 25. Kobe won rings because he played with Shaq, and that’s true, just like it’s true that Shaq won rings because he played with Kobe. But Kobe was successful because (as the next sentence states) “he was also the guy calling up Tex Winter for advice in Chicago as he watched Shaq and Kurt Rambis fritter away the lockout season in 1999, always looking to learn and overcome”.

As for why to make the comparison, you make it because it’s fascinating to observe that two players with such polar opposite mentalities are both highly successful. LeBron hasn’t won a championship yet, but he has been highly successful and if (KD uses when, which is his choice) James does win a championship or three, it will be affirmation that both poles are capable of greatness or failure. Personally, I find that point to be fascinating, and its why I don’t think Kobe and LeBron are even the subjects of the post, just the methods of delivery of a piece of writing that is simply about greatness.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 10:45 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I think one of the things that bugs me most, as LG pointed out, is that you never EVER hear "Shaq won because of Kobe."

Never ever ever ever ever ever ever. It’s always a knock against Kobe that he won playing with Shaq, but never the other way around. That’s what makes the whole argument ridiculous.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:47 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I see where you are coming from but i guess i see Kobe differently

A lot of guys have great teachers that they call upon all the time yet they are not winning championships.

he was also the guy calling up Tex Winter for advice in Chicago as he watched Shaq and Kurt Rambis fritter away the lockout season in 1999, always looking to learn and overcome"

I didn’t even see it as a piece about greatness. I guess that makes it even worse for me

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

This yahoo comment kinda sums up my feelings

I’m not trying to hate, but I just sat here and read this entire article and I have no idea what you were even trying to say. Kobe is serious, LeBron isn’t, but both are successful and unsuccessful, though LeBron can be serious, but Kobe wants to be Michael Jordan and LeBron has the same understanding that Jordan had? Did I get this all right? What does this even mean?

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:51 AM PST up reply actions  

LOL, exactly.

And to say a Yahoo! comment made sense is scary in itself.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:53 AM PST up reply actions  

I know right?

I hardly ever read the comments…

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:56 AM PST up reply actions  

That is a great comment

which is indicative of the complexity of the writing. Great writing doesn’t implicitly state meaning, it makes you work for it and come to your own conclusions. You could read KD’s piece and come to the conclusion that I did, which is that there is no one path to greatness, and yet all the paths to greatness can just as easily fall prey to failure. You could read it as saying that Kobe is the pure form of MJ’s killer instinct, and LeBron the pure form of MJ’s understanding of the game. Or you can take it as another KD hating on Kobe piece. It requires interpretation, and I think that’s what makes it awesome.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 11:04 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You're far too kind

I think such great writing really exists when the said topic hasnt been beat to death by the same writer.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:25 AM PST up reply actions  

FTR

I didnt take it as KD hating on Kobe. I just didnt understand what the heck he was trying to say. When he was saying good things, they were back handed compliments.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Back Handed.

All through the entire piece.

by Jevon O on Jan 13, 2012 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

see, I can't agree

First of all, I don’t think this is great writing, or even particularly insightful writing. I mean, what Dwyer writes (valid as it might be) is stuff we’ve already heard countless times. Kobe’s skills make it possible to dislodge our jaws sixteen years into his career, but his insistence on being the man makes his team less efficient. LBJ’s more nuanced approach makes his team more efficient, but he lacks Kobe’s one-tracked approach to maximizing his skills. Is any of this even remotely new?

And I don’t agree that great writing doesn’t explicitly state meaning (I assume you meant, since “making you work for it” suggests “implicitly”). Some great writing doesn’t, but by no means is that true of all great writing. Certainly one cannot logically or practically flip that on its head and use the lack of explicitness as the mark of great writing. And it’s not as though Dwyer is writing Joycean prose, which is expected to be kaleidoscopic and polymorphic and all that. He’s writing basketball exposition, and there ought to be a premium on clarity. One can be poetic and clear all at once; it’s challenging, but meeting that challenge, that is the mark of great writing.

For instance: “Yes, Kobe had three rings by the time he was LeBron’s age, mostly because he played alongside that preening amalgam of Andrew Bynum and Dwight Howard in Shaquille O’Neal.” That is capable of two different interpretations, both reasonable, but only one of which is likely to raise the ire of halfway reasonable Lakers fans. The first interpretation is that the difference between Kobe’s ring count and LeBron’s (at comparable ages) is attributable mostly to LeBron’s lack of an all-lifetime center to play alongside. The second interpretation is that Kobe’s ring count (as of 2003) is due mostly to Shaq (and by implication, only secondarily to Kobe).

Now, I submit that there is no good reason to leave that assertion so ambiguous. That sentence could have been written no less succinctly, and left no doubt about which he meant. So, either a) Dwyer is incapable of noticing and/or fixing the ambiguity, b) Dwyer did it just to raise a fuss, or c), he genuinely feels both interpretations are true. Although, if it’s c, he should just come out and say so; it’s still a form of ambiguity.

In the interests of self-disclosure, I should point out—in case anyone has any doubt about the matter—that I am of course a fan of Kobe. However, I don’t particularly enjoy reading Kobe apologists; I find the viewpoints expressed in the Twenty Second Time-Out to be enormously one-sided and generally embarrassing. It’s a rather annoying (I won’t go so far as to say “depressing”) commentary that people would typically prefer to write (and to read) grand statements that might be true, than modest statements with a firm grounding in fact.

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 11:33 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Hear hear!!!

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Exactly, to my point about Kobe's rings being due to Shaq, but not the other way around.

I disagree that David Freidman is a Kobe apologist, though.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

you must not be reading the same David Friedman as I am

I can’t remember the last time he seriously criticized Kobe for any of his tactical decisions. He will admit that Kobe has bad games (it would be hard to seriously assert otherwise), but he will say that these are inevitable in anyone who plays substantial time. That’s true, but he won’t say that certain bad games from Kobe weren’t inevitable, but were the result of poor decision-making on Kobe’s part.

On the contrary, he is always ready to defend Kobe against any kind of criticism, reasonable or otherwise. His most recent post, “Kobe Bryant’s Tank is Not on ‘E’,” is an undisguised apotheosis of the man’s first 20 percent of the season. His second and fourth most recent posts, “What if ESPN’s Main Basketball Blogger Wrote About the Chicago Bulls/Miami Heat the Way that He Writes About the L.A. Lakers?” are undisguised skewers of Henry Abbott. His fifth most recent post, “Kobe Bryant’s Shot Selection Endlessly Fascinates Self-Proclaimed Experts,” is meta-criticism, focused on the intense scrutiny Kobe faces on his shot selection. “Self-Proclaimed Experts” leaves no doubt as to which side Friedman falls on.

Honestly, that’s a lot of writing about Kobe, all of it positive (about Kobe). Abbott doesn’t write as much about Kobe as Friedman does, and he might be more even-handed about it, too.

There’s a reason why people like Abbott and Friedman continue to write the way they do: There are enough people who enjoy it. It’s not wrong to enjoy it, either, but I take pains to point out that I, personally, simply don’t enjoy reading categorical assertions about Kobe, good or bad. I can never bring myself to believe that there’s much substance behind them.

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 12:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Come on, his skewering of Abbott isn't about Kobe, it's about Abbott and his total bias.

I read that in the same way people read Chris’ skewering of Abbott last season. And I didn’t say you should enjoy it, just that I disagree with your assessment. Friedman doesn’t actually write a lot about Kobe. He can go weeks without anything—believe me, I do the Credits—but those articles all came out in the last couple of weeks because of all of the talk about Kobe and his game in Denver and what’s transpired since. As for Abbott, he will have something negative to say on an almost weekly basis. He’s even-handed in that he doesn’t apologize for it.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think Friedman's skewering of Abbot was about Kobe

But I also didn’t think it was very good. As someone who has traveled that road, I thought the satirical nature of what Friedman wrote was so contrived that it weakened his overall point. He used the most insanely small statistical differences to make grand proclamations that weren’t even close to being justified by the numbers presented. Yes, it was satirical, yes it wasn’t meant to be taken seriously, but it portrayed Abbot’s writing as not even being able to understand how to do statistical analysis. If there’s one thing Abbot does know how to do, it is statistical analysis. You can fault him for being unable to divorce reality from the numbers. You can even fault him for using selective statistical samples, as I did. His opinions about basketball rarely agree with mine. If Friedman had satirically attacked those things, he would have written a much better piece.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree with this,

as some one who is constantly frustrated by Abbott and his exposure, and as some one who loved the “How to be statistically biased” piece a year or two back, I also thought Friedman’s piece was over the top, and off base. While Abbott isn’t a good analyst, none of his flaws were pointed out by Friedman, at all.

by Aethereal on Jan 13, 2012 1:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually, if I'm honest, I'm pretty sure its the other way around

I think the only reason Friedman is such an ardent supporter of Kobe is because of his hatred for Abbott and Abbott’s opinions of Kobe. The enemy of my enemy and all that

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

You have somewhat of a point.

Abbott’s take on Kobe tends to be the focal point of Friedman’s hatred of Abbott, but there’s more to it than Kobe. It goes deeper.

Silver Screen and Roll

Follow me on Twitter: @wondahbap

by wondahbap on Jan 13, 2012 3:15 PM PST up reply actions  

This is possible too since his favorite player of all time is not even a Laker.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 3:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think so

Friedman has been writing well of Kobe before Abbott or dwyer existed as major players.

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that's what I said.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

LOL, I know.
Come on, his skewering of Abbott isn’t about Kobe

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

hmm

I think…I think we’re going to have to agree to disagree. (Well, I agree to do so, anyway, heh heh.) I’ve read enough Friedman to detect what I consider to be a sort of chip on his shoulder about Kobe. There are enough pro-Kobe articles that don’t centrally involve Abbott.

As far as Abbott is concerned, I’m not sure what we can agree we dislike about his pieces, other than his fixation on Kobe and the Lakers. (I’ve talked with him about this, and I’m frankly bewildered by his refusal to accept that he posts too much about Kobe and clutchness. I mean, it’s not even that his points are invalid. It’s that every piece he writes about clutchness involves Kobe. Is there no other ball dominator in the league anymore?) Is there anything else we dislike about TrueHoop? I’m not so sure about that.

Yes, I would agree that he’s more certain about statistical analysis than he should be. He’s certain that advanced stats can only add to the discussion, they can’t subtract from it. I would disagree with that, but on the other hand, he is far far far from the only blogger to make that mistake. I would sooner point the finger at Hollinger, who should know better, than Abbott.

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 3:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Friedman generally doesn't speak badly of players

in general if what they are doing is playing the roles on their teams. He only skewers Lebron because of a few games, but still overall has stated he has been the best player in the league since 2009

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

To back this up

despite Rose’s fg%, TOs and everything in the Miami series. after the season, he stated Rose was the best guard below 6’4 in the league over Wade because of his effectiveness IN HIS ROLE. he also mentioned CP3 and others, but noted that they play a different role and that didn’t always lead to the same level of success especially since CP3 had his knee surgeries. He talked about rose’s defensive improvement and how it will need to continue to improve and how he can pick his poisons better, but he’s a generally positive writer about the players in this league unless they don’t play their role well

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Agree to disagree.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair points all

Yes, I meant explicitly … oops.

You are correct that there are different forms of great writing. It can be clear, distinct, and with great quality of prose. It can be complex, ambiguous, and make you do the heavy lifting to come to your own conclusions. Just like the theme of the original post (at least, as I interpret it) there’s more than one way to skin a cat.

I’m jumping around here, because I want to end with my main point, but to the point about the ambiguity in referencing Shaq, you say that that line could have been written no less succinctly and left no doubt about his intended meaning. I disagree, with a great deal of personal experience backing up the disagreement. Perhaps you are simply a much better writer than I am, but I constantly struggle with decisions regarding whether I need to explicitly state every single little detail so as to avoid confusion in my writing (making it clunky and less readable), or assuming that people will understand what I’m trying to communicate (making the writing read better, but be more prone to misinterpretation). It can be a fine line

You are correct that both interpretations of that line you presented are plausible (although I see both interpretations as the same until the part where the second statement implies that Kobe’s first rings are only secondarily due to his own efforts). And many people point out KD’s “history” of Kobe bashing as justification for believing in the second interpretation. But look where that line comes … in the section of the piece KD starts by saying that Kobe is successful because of his tremendous drive. Why would he say that Kobe is successful because of his drive, only to immediately counter that point by saying “Actually, Kobe is really successful because he was lucky to play with Shaq.” That makes no sense, and leads me strongly to believe in the first interpretation.

Finally, we get to what I think is the crux of the matter, the insight of the piece. Particularly insightful is an ambiguous phrase, so I’m interpreting that to mean you didn’t find the piece insightful enough to be considered as “great” on the merits of its insight. I disagree. I think your distillation of the piece isn’t completely fair. I don’t think Kobe’s skills are at all the focus of what KD was communicating. What I took from KD’s piece is that Kobe’s drive is why he has the skills to leave our jaw dropped after 16 years, and Kobe’s drive is why he insists on being the man and making his team less efficient. Kobe fails, from time to time, because of this drive. But when he succeeds, and he has done so a great deal, it’s the same drive that sustains it. Left alone, this is not particularly insightful. ;-)

The same can be said of LeBron’s section. That Lebron is a successful player by being, essentially, the anti-Kobe, not as driven and more willing to play a balanced game, but that his light heartedness and desire to be liked are also what causes him to shrink from big moments isn’t revolutionary either.

But you put them together, juxtaposed by Mike Brown’s comments on how the two different players approach the game, and comment on how both players are great because of who they are, and both players fail because of who they are, and one can interpret the conclusion that both players are the same, even though they are so obviously different. Maybe that overall message has been said before about others, or even about Kobe and LeBron individually, but the comparison and the message that I was left with is that there are many paths to greatness, and one of the greatest dangers to achieving greatness is following too blindly the very path that leads to it in the first place. It’s just my opinion, but I find that pretty damned insightful.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 1:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, for this:
But look where that line comes … in the section of the piece KD starts by saying that Kobe is successful because of his tremendous drive. Why would he say that Kobe is successful because of his drive, only to immediately counter that point by saying "Actually, Kobe is really successful because he was lucky to play with Shaq." That makes no sense

This is exactly what everyone means by backhanded compliments. Why is there even a mention of shaq as a reason Kobe is successful if you’re trying to paint a picture of Kobe’s success as a function of his drive? It takes away from the very point you are arguing. Similarly, the reason why everyone points out EVERY SINGLE TIME he does that is because he leads EVERY SINGLE COMMENT about Kobe with something like that.

Here’s an example of making a proper statement to talk about the Lakers: “Sporting the best frontline in basketball…” a debatable comment in and of itself is left unsubstantiated, unqualified, and said as absolute despite multiple other frontlines performing very well. this leaves no doubt the writer’s intent is to say that the Lakers have the best frontline in basketball regardless of what other teams are doing.

An entire piece devoted to Kobe success coming from his drive is left with many qualifiers of his success and 0 qualifiers of his lack of success. That type of duplicitous writing leaves people confused as to the intent because all positive outcomes of success are qualified with statements that take away from the overall argument while none of the negatives are qualified with such statements that would weaken the argument. As an argument about Kobe’s drive making him successful, this piece was weakened significantly by qualifying his success in such a way. It’s maddening really. The thing about this argument IS that we have heard it all before and this nuanced way of looking at it has now been tainted with qualifiers of one’s success as if that painted the picture clearer when really it has only been further muddied when it really could have been inciteful

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 2:14 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I can definitely see what you are saying

I can’t speak to the purpose of whatever backhanded compliments KD hands out to Kobe in his other writings. I do think KD holds Kobe to a higher standard than he does other NBA players, although personally, I think he does so because of his respect for Kobe’s game, not his hatred of it. I think, above all, KD is one of the world’s biggest basketball fans, and he thinks that if Kobe could just “get it right”, we would all get to see something truly transcendent on the court. But then, I tend to see the good in folks. Regardless, this is a tangent the conversation doesn’t need.

Regarding this specific piece, and this specific statement, the problem I have with your thinking is that it is entirely centered on Kobe. Kobe is not the sole focus of this piece (if you read my first comment, I don’t even think he’s a focus at all, I think the whole thing is meta-commentary on the pursuit of greatness itself). Instead, he’s using the different paths that Kobe and LeBron have taken to get where they are as a comparison. In order for the comparison to work, he needs to establish that Kobe and LeBron are similarly great, or more appropriately, are on similarly great trajectories with Kobe further along the path. And the response to that, from a great deal of Lakers fans, is always “But Kobe has rings”. In order to make the comparison valid, KD has to qualify Kobe’s rings. The important point here is that qualifying the rings does not qualify the success. Rings does not equal success. They are often intertwined, but you can have one without the other.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

There is one problem with your thinking on this piece though.

Qualifying rings doesn’t qualify success usually and I can see where you’re going with that, however, there is no other fully thought out definition of their successes put forward in this piece. He doesn’t talk about their MVP seasons, he doesn’t talk about regular season campaigns pretty much at all. He talks about the way in which they lead their teams and conduct themselves on the floor, and for some reason how Kobe speaks in interviews. He talks about their way as leaders of the team. And then he uses their postseason success or failure as the defining characteristic of their success in their ways. By qualifying the one definition of success he put forward, he did in fact qualify success as it pertains to the only guy in the equation who had achieved success as he knowingly or unknowingly defined it.

This problem is only highlighted when it leaves Lebron with a modest outline of his playoff shortcomings in 2009, 2011, and a random Clipper game before bringing up the fact that he will win because he gets the game of basketball better than Kobe. He compares Kobe to Jordan as a chucker with the Wizards and Lebron to Jordan at his best. Kobe is the one being psycho-analyzed here as a guy who just want to be “the guy”. He’s the one being scrutinized and in fact blamed for the shortcomings of any of his teams because of his style of play. Lebron is being told that his shortcomings came from playing the game the right way and making the right play too often and that soon he will reap the benefits of playing in that manner.

Look at the paragraphs on their lack of success:

You heard me. This is why, and not because of a glaring lack of depth (positive qualifier for his point, negative qualifier for Kobe’s style), that the Lakers fell in 2003 and 2004. They could have taken the Spurs and Pistons in those years (again, qualifier in the positive for this point, negative qualifier for Kobe). This is why things didn’t work out last May, against Dallas (Los Angeles couldn’t grab one game? Come on) (was this even necessary) in the playoffs.
This is why LeBron fell, in 2009. This is why he failed against Dallas last June. This is why he falls down on Wednesday night, against the Clippers in Los Angeles. (He lost because he played the right way? I thought it was because he missed free throws)

There is 0 mention of Lebron’s shortcomings up to this point, so we’re left to assume that he is losing and has been unsuccessful because he’s not as serious as Kobe. But then, this appears:

like Jordan, he understands that the court tilts. That things have to flow away from the apparent focal point and that you have to use a defense’s aggression against itself at times. Whether this is because James boasts some innate understanding of basketball at a high level or because he’s backed into this isn’t the point. (I know what he’s getting at here, but if James knows the game and plays the right way, he shouldn’t be backing into anything. This is an unnecessary qualifier of nothing but the affirmation that Lebron will win a title whether as the focal point or not, in which case wouldn’t we then need to qualify his winning at that time by who he was passing to be the focal point instead of him as we did with Kobe two seconds ago) He’ll be just as at home winning a title by hitting a jumper in the final seconds as he will be scoring a series of hockey assists as the team pulls away early in the third quarter of the deciding game.

So what we have here are two definitions of play style. One is the chucking man who costs his team titles by always trying to be the guy in the spotlight. The other is a guy who loses games because he too often plays the right way. But really, neither of them is so stark as to be seen this way and the fact that he makes them so is the least maddening aspect of this piece. They both want to win and he’s attempting to chronicle how and why they do or don’t. The problem is that there is only one profoundly negative way to view Kobe after reading this piece that leaves you in a position to love the drive of Kobe, but have distaste for the style and manner which success is gained because it comes at the expense of even greater success. With Lebron, it seems to brush aside what were the problems of his teams, unlike the blatant calling out of Kobe as the problem, and that he will win because he plays the right way and is comfortable being either guy, but never being a chucker who costs his team games, only the guy who helps them win it.

We could say this is a parable for the pursuit of greatness, but that isn’t what this is. It’s a commentary on their pursuits, but one way is clearly the antagonist in the story regardless of the awe of the antagonist’s drive. This is what I saw.

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 5:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I suspect the reason is

Dwyer wants to dispense with the notion that Kobe is better than LeBron simply because he has more rings. He doesn’t want to have to fight that bias. And that’s fair. I think Kobe did have a leg up on LeBron because of Shaq. That’s true no matter how much you think Kobe and Shaq respectively contributed to their three titles together.

I believe Dwyer wants to make the point that they’re in some sense two sides of the same coin. They both have within them a force that could deliver them success, or hand them failure. It happens to be different forces between the two of them, but they both have that double-edged quality to them.

My feeling about Dwyer’s piece is that it doesn’t really spend enough time on this, for whatever reason. So his point, however valid it might be, is weakened because we don’t really see enough to make a determination about whether it is valid after all. Secondarily, it’s sloppy enough to obscure the point in the way you pointed out. Whether or not one could figure out what he legitimately meant, empirically, you (and others) were misled. If he was willing to risk that for the small pleasure of tweaking Kobe fans—well, I can’t agree with that tactic. But I’ve no real idea whether he intended that or not.

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I know what he's trying to do

but since when does he respond to what people write about him. He’s only specifically made an article for this once and he has long since learned to stay out of the comment section with his condescending script. He always tries to throw jabs at the people he considers wrong in his pieces and he really needs to get over that if he is to ever grow as a writer on the main page of a big time blog. I cannot emphasize enough how childish that is

I agree with the conclusion of the first point though. My biggest issue with Dwyer in many of his pieces is that he spends so much time qualifying his statements and writing in the same condescending drawl that the piece at times run long and less time is spent on the subject than him patronizing his readers on facts.

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

well, then I would say

He didn’t make that very clear.

Incidentally, I would say that “particularly insightful” isn’t ambiguous. But it is pretty arbitrary, I will admit. :)

I have no idea which of us is the better writer, or if that comparison even makes sense. We are different writers, that is trivially true. I tend to focus on science writing, so I’m keenly aware of the need to explain things clearly. I’m willing to sacrifice some poetry to the god of clarity. I may not always succeed, but that does tend to be my emphasis.

But let us not talk of generalities, and get down to brass tacks. For the sentence in question, we can clarify things very easily by adding three simple words: “and LeBron didn’t.” That makes it clear that it is not a comparison between Shaq and Kobe (second interpretation), but a comparison between LeBron and Kobe (first interpretation). That is the distinction between the interpretations, and why I would argue they really aren’t the same, even forgetting about the add-on about Kobe’s role in the early 2000’s.

We could also dispense entirely with “that preening amalgam of Andrew Bynum and Dwight Howard in.” We can argue whether we think that prose is poetry or purple, but I think it’s fairly clear that it’s incidental to the point. We can just say he is all-world and that is to the point—Kobe had a playing partner at a level that LeBron hasn’t had. (I think that’s true, by the way, and a substantial factor in why we lionize Kobe in a way that we don’t for LeBron.)

I don’t say all this about one little sentence just to nitpick Dwyer, but because I think by talking in generalities, we can run around all day and never get anywhere. I don’t argue that my change makes Dwyer’s piece more poetic, or more insightful, but it does, in its own small way, make his insight clearer. That can only be for the good. I agree with you that the first interpretation is what Dwyer meant, but I still maintain there is no good reason for him to make me read on to the next few sentences in order to be sure. He can make it clear right there. Otherwise, as we’ve seen, Kobe fans are liable to take it the wrong way. Is he unaware of that? Or does he just want to tweak Kobe fans? I’m not sure either possibility is all that flattering.

In the end, I don’t think Dwyer’s piece is garbage, or great. There’s potential there, but it’s way too short for him to make the kind of sweeping point about drive and achievement and greatness that he’s trying to. It ought to have been maybe a couple-of-thousand-word essay…but I’m not sure Dwyer’s up to that, frankly. I’d rather see you take a crack at it. :)

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I really believe he knows exactly what he's doing and loves doing it.
Otherwise, as we’ve seen, Kobe fans are liable to take it the wrong way. Is he unaware of that? Or does he just want to tweak Kobe fans? I’m not sure either possibility is all that flattering.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

it's possible

I’ve just never seen him exhibit enough control of his writing to be sure.

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

For the most part, this is becoming an exercise in preference of style

One of the things I’ve been taught to do as a writer is to remove as much as possible from my work as long as it makes sense to do so. Obviously, you don’t think it made sense to avoid being absolutely clear about this point, but you said yourself that reading further down the page helped you to further confirm the interpretation. It makes you work, but its there to be found if you want to. This is further by the fact that I’m pretty sure he’s not even supposed to write the kind of long-winded broad sweeping stuff that I have the license to write. Dude puts up 10 posts a day, I’m pushing it to do three a week. Does that make the writing better, because it’s more succinct, or worse because its more muddled? I say potato, you say potato … which really doesn’t work in text.

Otherwise, as we’ve seen, Kobe fans are liable to take it the wrong way. Is he unaware of that? Or does he just want to tweak Kobe fans? I’m not sure either possibility is all that flattering.

How about a third option – he chooses not to weaken his writing (in my estimation, and lets assume for the sake of the argument, in his as well) just to cater to a group of fans who are likely going to be unwilling to listen to his overall message anyway. And really, why should he? Why should he have to jump through hoops and dot every i and cross every t just so that at the end he can say “See? I’m not hating on Kobe.” If I’m sure of anything the least bit negative about Lakers Nation, it is that we are over-sensitive when someone outside the family has a go at Kobe Bryant. I’m not saying it isn’t partially justified, because of how relentlessly some folks want to tear Kobe down. All I’m saying is that I can see why KD might not care to make the effort to pacify our fanbase, because his efforts to do would probably be wasted.

If somebody reads that piece and thinks it’s a Kobe rip job, that’s their right and interpretation. I think such a reaction is off-base, both because it contains plenty of positive commentary towards Kobe, and because I don’t think ripping or praising Kobe is the point of the piece either way. But I don’t think KD bears the responsibility to ensure the first interpretation is impossible to reach, because there will always be people willing to reach that interpretation anyways.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I've read a lot of the comments on many of his posts and it isn't just Lakers fans who bash him.

There are also plenty of people who dislike the Lakers, and Kobe in particular, who will call him out for some of the things he writes simply because his bias in a given piece is over the top. The “backhanded compliment” comes up quite often. Of course he shouldn’t weaken his writing just to pander to a fanbase “unwilling to listen to his overall message anyway.” He should strengthen his writing so people will be willing to listen to his message, whether they disagree with him or not. He’s becoming the writer who cried wolf.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 4:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Crying wolf in regards to what, exactly?

I’m not trying to be flip, it’s just I want to make sure you are saying what I think you are saying before responding

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

ker-chunk

This is me, burying the hatchet. :)

FWIW, I don’t think it was a rip job. Moving on…

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 5:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I never thought you did

And I was enjoying myself. :)

You made great, valid points. I responded where I saw opportunity to disagree. It was lots of fun.

by C.A. Clark on Jan 13, 2012 5:13 PM PST up reply actions  

me too

Enjoying myself, that is. I didn’t mean to cut off the fun prematurely, but I do sense that we’re beginning to argue matters of taste, and…well, de gustibus and all that.

by Brian Tung on Jan 18, 2012 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

But he chooses to weaken his writing with qualifiers at all times

that do not do anything to substantiate, but more obfuscate his point. he doesn’t only qualify with Kobe. He qualifies in other pieces as well. It happens in the majority of his pieces. I don’t see the piece as a rip job. I’m just calling it out for blatant bad writing.

And I disagree. It is KD’s responsibility to make the piece as clear to what interpretation should be had as possible. That way you don’t spend hours debating the point of the entire piece. That way when folks do reach, you call them for what they are doing which is reaching.

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 6:05 PM PST up reply actions  

DAMN

Wow.

That’s all I can say to that post.

You can write, man.

by Jevon O on Jan 13, 2012 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think KD writes things with the intent Abbott does.

When KD makes grammatical “errors” on statements that could be taken more than one way, I believe they’re unintentional. Abbott’s are done w/ skill.

Silver Screen and Roll

Follow me on Twitter: @wondahbap

by wondahbap on Jan 13, 2012 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

heh

I disagree. I’ve talked with Abbott about his points, and I’m pretty certain (on statistical matters) he’s throwing haymakers. Every now and then, he’ll connect, but it’s pretty much shotgun analysis. He tends to way, way, way downplay criticisms of advanced stats. Either the criticisms are off base, or they’re missing the big picture. Well, sometimes, neither of those is true. There’s insufficient restraint there.

Dwyer just seems to wax poetic. He has a certain facility at it, I think, but he tends to speak with a vague nebulosity that I find offputting. In the end, I find myself reading things that are either trivially true or are so ill-defined I can’t decide whether I think it even makes sense to say they’re true or false. Maybe I’m insufficiently hip. :)

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

when it comes to making an argument

you’re argument should be clear, though. KD is a terrible writer when it comes to making his opinions because he tries to qualify everything he says, which makes the reader go, wait didn’t you just say the opposite of this. This is one of the failings of many bloggers when they write is that they to encapsulate everything they’re saying in one article. it confuses your audience and that is why regardless of how many articles Dwyer writes about Kobe, we always come back to the same thing, WHAT WAS THE POINT OF INCLUDING THIS LITTLE BIT POINT THAT TAKES AWAY FROM YOUR LARGER POINT

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

stop making sense man

ill still ignore your posts though.

"One thing LeBron James has won that Kobe Bryant never has, and never will: A bronze medal."- Josh Tucker
"Fisher's defense is called escort service in my country, just accompany" -Ibou

42-1 on Barebones TDM classic ... BEAT THAT XBOXERS

by madmaxx350 on Jan 13, 2012 1:04 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

LOL

THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.. THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.....

by imposibol on Jan 13, 2012 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

lets not make dwyer to be some sort of basketball Camus now...

it’s basketball for god’s sake…

When will people learn.. the greatest of all time wore number 32 and wore purple and gold....

by lenxo on Jan 13, 2012 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

No, CA

You can’t give Dwyer credit for saying things he didn’t say and instead Implied (and only in your opinion, did he imply it). I applaud your work when you say what happened during the game not when you imply that someone had a good game without actually saying it.

by Jevon O on Jan 13, 2012 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

lets go lg!

Are you free tomorrow?
"No. I'm friggin' expensive."

by crushmybones on Jan 13, 2012 6:53 PM PST up reply actions  

thats right LG

Coach Harbaugh is the truth!!

by chris z on Jan 13, 2012 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

In a way he is...

but apparently Kobe is unsuccessful and has been.

When will people learn.. the greatest of all time wore number 32 and wore purple and gold....

by lenxo on Jan 13, 2012 2:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I've read the article a few moments after he released it.

Quite frankly, KD caught me off guard with some of the things he mentioned in the article and they were a few fine points but clearly when a writer has written a myriad of inane contemptuous articles against a figure over some of the same things he mentioned in this article, it’s bound to dismissed lightly. Even in this article, he was able to squeeze a few of his jabs towards both players.

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Have you

read all of KD’s articles on Kobe or his comparisons of Kobe and Lebron? Over the years it’s becoming pretty glaring.
Thus, unfortunately for him, he’s portrayed himself as such a biased writer that he’s lost a lot of credibility and therefore any article he writes on Kobe is immediately interpreted as yet another “Kobe sucks. James is the best.”

Whether consequence or not, he seems to write slightly more positive on him when he’s clearly out performing the field. And reversely, writes slights when he’s not.
Adrian Wojnarowski seems to be a little on the pro-Kobe side, but in general, is a solid writer.

by reed'sravens on Jan 13, 2012 10:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Woj might be "pro-kobe"

but not a kobe homer unlike kd who can’t suck up to lbj enough

When will people learn.. the greatest of all time wore number 32 and wore purple and gold....

by lenxo on Jan 13, 2012 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

My biggest problem with the article

is that there always seems to be a double standard regarding Kobe and Lebron whenever mentioned by the same writer anywhere. In this case, it’s completely pro-Lebron.

Dwyer spends the first two paragraphs digging at flaws with Kobe, and then takes jabs and digs at him throughout the piece, before begrudgingly admitting that Kobe’s obsession makes him successful. And then he excuses Lebron’s failures, twice.

He first says that Lebron had a terrible team in Cleveland-Which isn’t true. You can’t win 66 games in the NBA with a terrible team and one good player, and the simple idea that you can is ridiculous.

He later says that Lebron’s going to win a ring some day, and I saw that lower down the line you think there’s a base for that assumption. All that said, people have been excusing Lebron for years: He’s has had two 60 win teams, and been to the finals twice in his career, with deep playoff runs EVERY year since ‘07. Lebron hasn’t proven, at all, that he’s going to win a championship. He definitely has a chance, I’m not gonna sit here and say that the Heat aren’t incredibly good, and I doubt many people will. But it’s unreal that after years of him coming up short, which he has at some point or another in 4 of his 5 deep playoff runs since ‘07, people are still willing to speak as if he’s sure to do it sooner or later.

As an aside to the above: Dwyer mentions ‘09 as a Lebron failure. That’s crap. Lebron didn’t have a marvelous playoff series against Orlando, by his standards, but he played well enough, and this is the only playoffs Lebron’s ever had where I legitimately felt as if he didn’t let his team down. I don’t mean to imply that all the blame is at Lebron’s feet for all of his other playoff losses, but in every other series that he’s lost since ‘07, he’s been seriously below his par.

But here’s the big thing: His first excusal of Lebron is something he directly contradicts in regards to Kobe later on. Obviously, since Lebron’s team was so bad that it could only win 66 games and then follow that up with 60 wins in the regular season, he couldn’t win. It was all on his team. But Kobe’s failures last year, when he was the only Laker who seriously seemed interested and competitive, are at his feet, and the reason he’s unsuccessful. Ditto with ’04 and ’03.

Dwyer dismisses Kobe’s accomplishments, (Giving claim to the 3 championships that Shaq won as Shaq’s. I’m sure you can read it differently, but this is a played out argument, and there’s no real reason to bring up Shaq unless you’re making an excuse for why Bryant has been more successful than Lebron) then dismisses Lebron’s failures. He makes jabs at Bryant throughout, with one “jab” at Lebron paired with a ton of praise for both. He says, outright, that Kobe’s going to fail if he plays Lebron’s Heat, and that Lebron will, but only if he plays Bryant’s way. This is pretty heavily implying that Bryant’s way of playing is less successful, and I don’t think I’m reading too far into it. That’d be all fine and good, except for the part that it has produced more success for Bryant than for Lebron.

I’m just sick of this double standard with these two, in favor of Kobe or Lebron.

by Aethereal on Jan 13, 2012 12:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I read it 2 more times after having read it 2x yesterday...

and clicking on it while reading the credits….

it’s still reeks like a hit piece… i’m not sure what glasses you are wearing but you might need to change them…

When will people learn.. the greatest of all time wore number 32 and wore purple and gold....

by lenxo on Jan 13, 2012 1:23 PM PST up reply actions  

It is ALWAYS good to read Anti-Kobe articles, comments and quotes.

They are are meaningless and more comical if anything. Moving on.

What I really liked is the Mike Brown quote. Thank you for putting that up their. My interpretation of the comments:

LeBron, he’s a guy who likes to laugh and joke. He knows obviously there’s a time to be serious, but he’s youthful.

Interpretation: Lebron still doesn’t take the game serious enough and is not mature enough yet. Really? Kobe has taken the game serious since high school. How many years has lebron been in the league now? We (Laker fans) have always said that the difference between Kobe and Lebron is in their personalities and dedication to getting better. I want to see what happens to Lebron when he can’t rely on speed and strength.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 9:46 AM PST reply actions  

I think your interpretation is a bit unfair to LeBron

I mean, when I read it, I took it simply as “LeBron takes it less seriously than Kobe.” That’s all. Nothing about that implies “not serious enough.” I think LeBron loves the game of basketball, like he loves his kids, or his favorite foods. Kobe, on the other hand, loves basketball like he loves to breathe. I think it’s pretty easy to argue that one could be a bit less serious about basketball than Kobe, and still easily be serious enough.

And more to the point, I think LeBron is serious enough. He has the dedication that one needs to be successful, in the championship sense. Whether it’ll happen (and I do hope it happens, once Kobe retires, heh heh), that’s still to be decided. Honestly, I don’t think his problems are predominantly on the basketball court. His most glaring issue from my perspective is that he’s surrounded himself with an entourage that makes him feel good about himself but has left him almost wholly ignorant of good PR. I still don’t think he understands what he did wrong in The Decision. He recognizes that he did something wrong (or at least, that many folks think he did something wrong), but not what about it that was wrong.

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

This

Kobe, on the other hand, loves basketball like he loves to breathe

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:50 AM PST up reply actions  

He might prefer basketball over breathing, in fact, but since he needs one to do the other...

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 11:52 AM PST up reply actions  

LOL, right?

I just wish people will watch him and appreciate his game.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Instead of nitpicking every fucking little thing he does, down to how he ties his shoes.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

And how he cusses in his interviews

smh

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:59 AM PST up reply actions  

whatever

he still tries to be something he’s not… I mean seriously its been 16 years and he still hasn’t learned …

"One thing LeBron James has won that Kobe Bryant never has, and never will: A bronze medal."- Josh Tucker
"Fisher's defense is called escort service in my country, just accompany" -Ibou

42-1 on Barebones TDM classic ... BEAT THAT XBOXERS

by madmaxx350 on Jan 13, 2012 12:13 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

LMAO

Classic!

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Psssh, kids today.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree with you for the most part but I completely disagree with the majority of the 2nd paragraph

The first with the comment that Lebron has the dedication that one needs to be successful. He has the god-given skills to get him there but I definitely don’t think he has that extra motivation to do the extra things needed to push a team to a title. He might do it with Wade because he is more dedicated to getting better than Lebron. This is just my opinion but I think that Lebron’s success to this point has been as a result of his natural athleticism and less as a result of his dedication.

Now in terms of your comments of him off the court I completely agree. He has people around him who are just used to saying yes to him so that they can get a piece of the Lebron financial pie.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I think perhaps you are giving too much weight to rings

I think LeBron has been pretty successful so far. He has done well. His team has done well. They were one Game Two collapse from taking a 3-2 lead in the finals, which would have made them overwhelming favorites to win the title. If the Heat had won last year, would that mean that he now had the dedication to succeed? If not, at what point would you say that his dedication was enough?

Here’s my point: None of us is close enough to either of these players to witness, first hand, their level of dedication. We can only go by what we see on the court. And either with Cleveland or with Miami, he has been right there, a few times. To me, that’s an indication that his level of dedication is probably enough. When it comes right down to it, whether it’s fair or not, dedication isn’t the primary factor. If it were, a million five-hours-a-day pickup ballers would be killing it in the NBA right now. Skill and athleticism are the main factors, and he has more than enough of those. As long as he has more dedication than, say, Gilbert Arenas, I think he’ll be just fine in that department.

We can’t all be Kobe Bryant. Personally, I’d be exhausted, and I don’t personally like being hated. He can handle it, and that’s him.

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 3:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Best credits ever !!!

At first I was like “this aren’t the credits” and then I found myself clicking through the links….nice job shmoes.

"El Hombre es esclavo de lo que dice y Amo de lo que calla"

by Jonny 4 F1ng3rs on Jan 13, 2012 10:05 AM PST reply actions  

I like to call it vintage

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:12 AM PST up reply actions  

whatever!!!

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

LOL

THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.. THE POWER OF SHAW COMPELS YOU.....

by imposibol on Jan 13, 2012 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Watching the TNT OT replay

Kenny was preachin’ last night!

how you doin'
Twitter: @bluefalcon916

by bluexfalcon on Jan 13, 2012 10:28 AM PST reply actions  

how/where are you watching it?

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

NBA.com

http://www.nba.com/video/

Under the “TNT OT” category

how you doin'
Twitter: @bluefalcon916

by bluexfalcon on Jan 13, 2012 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

sweet. thnx. I'm going to watch it.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 10:40 AM PST up reply actions  

hey schmoes good job on the creds bud

…next time jus know whose article you’re borrowing lines from

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:33 AM PST reply actions  

He knew.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

but did you know?

that ur sarcometer is fluctuating?

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Yours needs recalibrating.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Where've you been, anyway?

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

the dreaded question lol

I’ve been extremely caught up with training.

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Is that what we are calling it now?

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

lol hush you

nah i’ve been being asked that nearly by everyone i’ve bumped into lately even off of here.

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:42 AM PST up reply actions  

;o)

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

how you've been? and oh!

did the marathon happen yet?

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Sunday, March 18

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I

heard one of the announcers say that no player averaged more than 15 or so points a game in their 16th season.

On ESPN radio, they talked about how Kobe’s taking two more shots than anyone else at the distance of 15-22 ft. Which is regarded as the hardest shots to make. And yet he’s making them at a near 50% clip.

One thing I never thought Kobe got credit for— how incredibly difficult 90% of his shots are that he makes on a consistent basis. And since everyone likes to compare Bron’s stats to Kobe’s to show how much superior Bron is— they had a stat on ESPN showing that Bron has a shooting percentage in the low 30s for the same distance mentioned.

And yet, rather than working on that jump shot and becoming possibly the greatest overall player to play the game, he’s instead adding “tricks” to his post game and becoming more one-dimensional.

Maybe that’s why I don’t like Lebron. Hm.

by reed'sravens on Jan 13, 2012 10:58 AM PST reply actions  

don't get down on yourself meng

you’ve got more lofty reasons to dislike Lebron than most of us here lol

"If you’re afraid to fail, then you’re probably going to fail. You know what I mean? Fuck it." -- Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

by jXn on Jan 13, 2012 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

well, Kobe doesn't get credit for his difficult shots

because he can get easier ones

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 12:25 PM PST up reply actions  

stop making sense marty

if you see that 48 pts game you can see how east kobe can get shots. I definitely believe he would be the most efficient guard of the league if he picked better shots which he is capable to get but its kobe and I enjoy his game.

BTW I’m still ignoring your posts.

"One thing LeBron James has won that Kobe Bryant never has, and never will: A bronze medal."- Josh Tucker
"Fisher's defense is called escort service in my country, just accompany" -Ibou

42-1 on Barebones TDM classic ... BEAT THAT XBOXERS

by madmaxx350 on Jan 13, 2012 1:09 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

lmao

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

He can?

Interesting, knower of what shots Kobe can get person.

by Jevon O on Jan 13, 2012 2:52 PM PST up reply actions  

lol

well, Kobe does pass up easy shots for difficult ones at times. And Kobe does take on a lot of double teams when he doesn’t need to. And Kobe does take a lot of shots at an insane degree of difficulty when better plays are available. I just happen to love him for all of it regardless lol

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

We need to get on that player interviews bandwagon.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 11:21 AM PST up reply actions  

I dont agree

LOL

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:24 AM PST up reply actions  

With the choice? Me either, but Darius is cool, so meh.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah luckily he is cool peoples

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

KD's Bias is very obvious..

KD’s articles are always biased towards MJ and the Bulls. As for MJ….he has been put up in a pedestal that no writer wants to question him…it has almost reached a point that if someone does that he would probably be blackballed within the basketball writers community at large…..its interesting that everyone in the advanced stat community (and KD is cut from this same cloth) take Kobe to task for all his shooting and efficiency..but If you go back and look at MJ’s last three playoff performances…and apply the same stats it’s modest at best…even in the final Jazz game everyone remembers his shot over Byron Russell…but his shooting throughout that game was awful…if this had happened to Kobe..the entire advanced stat community would be up in arms…

The other thing that pisses me off is that even when KD is complimenting Kobe there is always a backhanded slight at the end of the article…

I think even now at the current position Lebron from a stat standpoint is better than MJ…does KD have the gall to write an article comparing and stating that…no of course not…

by Jonty on Jan 13, 2012 11:12 AM PST reply actions  

Thank you Jonty

So true. I’ve never such revisionist history than what is supposedly Jordan’s legacy. He was the best player of the 90’s but never had any competition, individually or team wise, unlike Kobe or Magic or Bird or Kareem or LeBron. He failed more than he succeeded as does every player.

by fins on Jan 13, 2012 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I wonder who would rasheed sign with if he does return

"They’re a very special group of men. Cherish them, you will not see their like again."

by chaucer on Jan 13, 2012 11:24 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Kelly Dwyer is a joke.

"They’re a very special group of men. Cherish them, you will not see their like again."

by chaucer on Jan 13, 2012 11:27 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Dwyer, Abbott and Simmons: they are what they say they hate

Abbott’s pod cast today is another “clutch” thing, and the lead-in includes the usual passive-aggressive slam at Kobe’s character: When the Clippers face the Lakers on Saturday, it’s not just a battle for the L.A. bragging rights. It’s also a landmark in the evolution of how we think about crunch time in the NBA. Is it about being the guy, or is it about making the best basketball play?

The problem with these guys is simple: they do the same thing that they think Kobe does, which is forget that basketball is a team game, for the same reason they think Kobe does it: They are obsessed with Kobe Bryant, his shots, and his fans.

Kobe is one guy. Any time he is on the court, there are nine other guys out there with him, who affect the outcome. To pick one example, 2003, the Lakers didn’t get it done that year because:

Mitch didn’t do a good job with the bench
Shaq shot up to about 400 LBS and couldn’t defend P/R. The 2003 Lakers were 19th in defensive rating. They couldn’t stop San Antonio, and they lost. San Antonio went on to win the title. San Antonio was a better team.

The next year, with Payton and Malone on the team, the defense went up to 8th. The offense was about the same, and quite good, both years—4th in 2003 (when Kobe was wrecking it) and 6th in 2004.

Kobe played poorly in the 2004 Finals, and he shot too much, but the Pistons were too good for the Lakers, particularly after Karl Malone went down. If Kobe had shot 10 times a game, the Pistons would have won the series.

But, because they need to be "smart, and because Kobe is a Laker, because he acts like he does, because of Colorado, because they like teams whose fans hate the Lakers, and (for Abbott and Dwyer) because they like page hits, they go on and on about the same things, unable to just say:

I just don’t like this guy.

Which would be fine. We know, fellas, we know.

by rreducla on Jan 13, 2012 12:01 PM PST reply actions  

Exactly

Instead of all that BS about numbers and being objective and understanding the way the game should be played. Some of the criticism is well deserved. Does he shoot his team out of games sometimes? yes. Does he try to play hero ball sometimes? yes. But i know he also never gives up. I know that on the second night of back to back when nobody has it and is content losing the game, he is not. I know that he plays through a myriad of injuries, i know i wouldn’t be getting out of bed with some of the things he plays with. Above the numbers, if i had to chose someone to go to battle with it will be Kobe. All day every day.

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

So....you're a Kobe fan?

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes. Are you jelly?

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 12:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe : )

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

see he's making you say things that you normally don't say

“Go into battle”? “Never give up”
I see his tendency of trying to be something he’s not is rubbing off on you eh?

that chucker…. smh.

"One thing LeBron James has won that Kobe Bryant never has, and never will: A bronze medal."- Josh Tucker
"Fisher's defense is called escort service in my country, just accompany" -Ibou

42-1 on Barebones TDM classic ... BEAT THAT XBOXERS

by madmaxx350 on Jan 13, 2012 1:14 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

LOL. Shut up

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 1:18 PM PST up reply actions  

The thing about Abbot's thing is

if this is the tagline of the podcast for the day:

It’s also a landmark in the evolution of how we think about crunch time in the NBA. Is it about being the guy, or is it about making the best basketball play?

Then why did Chris Paul throw up a floater with time expiring while being guarded by a much larger player and draining all of the clock as opposed to running the offense and making the right basketball play. it wasn’t a bad shot and hell it almost went in, but no one did a referendum on CP3’s abilities in crunch time because he missed a shot he’s proven himself to be able to make

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Nobody gets analyzed more than Kobe

For all we know he probably eats this shit up….shoves his ass in the faces of all the haters every game

by Grabmeone2 on Jan 13, 2012 12:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I think there is a new formula for generating more talks in The Credits

Quote in the FP + Kobe Hate = Comments bomb.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 12:59 PM PST reply actions  

LOL...Yep

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

It's good healthy conversations. Its great to know that we can all be fans

disagree, and still be mature about it. All together it adds to the greatness of this site.

Either way, for me, I love the Kobe hate and I don’t take it too serious. Yeah, it pisses me off a bit. but cool to read.

I don't consider myself a hoarder just a person who loves to save things

by Jelly Bean on Jan 13, 2012 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I say CA instigated this whole thing

Twitter

Faith is remaining certain in the face of doubt. You’re not sure how it’s going to end, but you’re constantly of the belief that it will end the way you want it to and the way you always believed it to end, and that’s on top - Derek Fisher

by lakergirl on Jan 13, 2012 1:19 PM PST up reply actions  

so after almost 10 years in the association lebron...

is Wade’s apprentice?

When will people learn.. the greatest of all time wore number 32 and wore purple and gold....

by lenxo on Jan 13, 2012 1:14 PM PST reply actions  

I have often agreed with Dwyer's take

on Kobe’s excessive shooting and selfish play, but this article peeved me. First, he is just so overbearing and dramatic. The cryptic one-liners – “This is why both men are unsuccessful” – have to stop. And the vignettes of Kobe’s and LeBron’s character based on little more than the same footage and interviews we fans can access undermine his credibility. (Do we really know that Kobe was the one hurt the most by Phil’s indifference? Are you telling me he put himself through those summer workouts because he wanted Phil’s respect, and not because he’s always wanted to be great?)

Finally, Dwyer completely abandoned his empirical eye by claiming that Kobe’s play was responsible for Lakers’ fall against the Mavericks in last year’s playoffs. No. Also, I watched the Miami Heat game against the Clippers, and their loss had nothing to do with LeBron’s selfishness or serious-mindedness. He and rest of his team were shooting atrociously from the charity stripe.

Dwyer writes decent stuff from time to time but this article got away from him.

by surk14 on Jan 13, 2012 1:40 PM PST reply actions  

didn’t kobe shoot nearly 50% during the series against the Mavs?

by reed'sravens on Jan 13, 2012 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

kobe wasn't himself during the mavs series due mainly to injuries

and even then Kobe wasn’t the reason we lost

"One thing LeBron James has won that Kobe Bryant never has, and never will: A bronze medal."- Josh Tucker
"Fisher's defense is called escort service in my country, just accompany" -Ibou

42-1 on Barebones TDM classic ... BEAT THAT XBOXERS

by madmaxx350 on Jan 13, 2012 3:10 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

Nah, I think he was at around 43%

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

btw

Lost in all this discussion of the Dwyer piece is a winner piece of humor by Zach Harper on Hoopspeak. You can get to it via “Kobe Bryant is a killer,” above, or here’s the URL:

http://hoopspeak.com/2012/01/the-rejuvenation-of-death/

It’s pro-Kobe, and a good time. It might also take a few liberties with the truth. :)

by Brian Tung on Jan 13, 2012 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

lol it is pretty hilarious

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
"I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence." -Lupe Fiasco

by Marty Mart on Jan 13, 2012 6:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I know why there is hate for Kobe.

When he came into the league a lot of people pointed out that he was stand-offish, unapproachable, cocky, elitist. Guess what. He was. I would be too had I one tenth the skill Mr. Bryant had out of high school.

People hate Kobe for Colorado. It still shows up. Read some other blogs.

They hate Kobe for the Shaq-Fued. They hate Kobe because he keeps playing, winning, going. People just hate Kobe.

For me, the thing that is so sweet is being a fan of the Lakers and having had the experience to enjoy watching the pure grace that embodies Kobe’s game. Sure, he’s getting older, but his footwork, his hustle, his guts. I’m sorry, this is something only one, maybe two players in a generation have. They have IT.

Michael had it. Larry, Magic, they had it. Kobe has it.

Lebron does not. This is what pisses people off. This is what gets the naysayers going, the PER analysts up in arms, the win-share gurus in a tizzy. They know, they just know that Lebron has to be better than Kobe. Look at the guys efficiency, his rebounds, etc. Lebron HAS to be better than Kobe. Problem is, Lebron doesn’t have IT, and never will.

Lebron will win a championship, maybe even multiple. Who knows. He will win more MVPs. But he will never be Kobe, and he will never carry that killer instinct to persevere, that drive to better himself. How do I know this? Because Lebron hasn’t done it yet; his 4th quarter let downs, decision to jump ship to another star’s team. Nine years into his career and the guy has yet to develop a post game, yet alone the drive that pushes the greatest onward.

I’m sorry, I’ve never cared about Lebron vs. Kobe, or even MJ vs. Kobe for that matter. Sure I get defensive every now and then, but I know the truth. You see, I’ve had the greatest pleasure over the last 16 years just watching Mr. Bryant do work, and in doing so, know the truth. Kobe is better.

For me its the consistent inconsistency that concerns me - PAGFL
It's always AMMO Time, in spirit- DexterFishmore
lebron should just lock himself away and not talk for the rest of forever-LA32

by 99bc99 on Jan 13, 2012 5:43 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Right

Imo thats where the Lebron isnt as motivated as Kobe feeling comes from. From year 1 to year 9 we’ve always seen the same thing from Lebron, Runaway freight train to the basket. Kobe on the other hand has put in the extra work to add more to his game, consistently reinventing himself and u see it on the court. Take away Lebrons athleticism and what does he have? What kind of true skills does he have to fall back on? That imo is why he’ll never be better than Kobe..chucker n all lol

See me on Twitter follow me @ EddieCheeze, Catch me on FB friend me Eddie Cheeze, See my group on youtube listen to us Hood Platinum, want me ta kill a track email me Cheeze2k11@gmail.com....Im errwhere

by EmmCeee on Jan 13, 2012 6:19 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

The sad thing is that we laker fans are seemingly only ones who think kobe is better than lebron.

"They’re a very special group of men. Cherish them, you will not see their like again."

by chaucer on Jan 13, 2012 6:42 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

So true.
People who hate Kobe now…

…have always hated Kobe. They felt justified after Colorado and Shaq. Those same people felt justified in saying that Kobe was responsible for the Lakers not winning in ‘04 (or any time since) and for Phil Jackson leaving, and for global warming, and for everything that is wrong with the world. People who hate Kobe now have always hated Kobe. It has nothing to do with the internet. I have never liked Michael Jordan (I’m old enough to have seen him play) and I never will. I don’t deny that he was a great player, just not one I liked; I feel the same way about LeBron James. Even if one of them wins the Nobel Peace Price, my feelings aren’t going to change. People who hate Kobe now have always hated Kobe.

by SoCalGal on Oct 30, 2009 5:44 PM PDT

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jan 13, 2012 6:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Gasol for Rondo? I might do it.

"They’re a very special group of men. Cherish them, you will not see their like again."

by chaucer on Jan 13, 2012 6:39 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

interesting credits :D

Are you free tomorrow?
"No. I'm friggin' expensive."

by crushmybones on Jan 13, 2012 6:59 PM PST reply actions  

and a really lively discussion afterwards

Are you free tomorrow?
"No. I'm friggin' expensive."

by crushmybones on Jan 13, 2012 6:59 PM PST up reply actions  


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Schwarzenegger-arnold-photo-arnold-schwarzenegger-6202204_small
A response to Andy Hutchins' Kobe/Jordan piece
Images_small
Rockets and Gasol Redux
Grpbzshu_1__small
Burn it Down - Who Stays and Who Goes?
Kobelogo_small
Observations from the Nosebleeds
Small
Flagrant Foul: The Last Resort

Recent FanPosts

2012_la_marathon_medal_small
At The Bar - 5/24/12
2012_la_marathon_medal_small
At The Bar - 5/23/12
269791_251807884833897_100000140615173_1189794_2843345_n_small
Rebuilding Lakers Means Fire Sale Now
Iran_green_hope_small
Here's to Shooting and Speed and Not Shuffling Deck Chairs on the Titanic
Small
Demarcus Cousins anyone???
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Mike Brown...Needs to hit the Road?
Ryan_2008_small
Could Bynum Become the Best?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Brain3_jpg_small DexterFishmore

Editors

Ohkeedokelogolakers_small wondahbap

2012_la_marathon_medal_small SoCalGal

Beat Writers

Lakers_small vikas_s24

Img_0056_small Ben R

Udontsay_small bluexfalcon

Umad_small theshmoes

155_small Actuarially Sound

5449_1185754491845_1467777039_30486370_3889376_n_small Mark Travis

Nba_g_kbryant_sy_576_small TheGreatMambino

Small Robert Karpeles