Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Player Report Card: Pau Gasol

In a season that had quite a few themes for the Los Angeles Lakers, we finally arrive to pass judgment on the player central to the most important one.  The Lakers are Kobe Bryant's team, and they will most likely remain so until he hangs up his low-tops for good, but it is a title borne out of legacy and will power, and no longer because Kobe is the central piston in the Laker engine.  That piston, at least last season, was Pau Gasol

Just in case you aren't a car person, or are still too traumatized by the fact that Pixar finally made a bad movie to think in these terms, let me put it more clearly: Pau Gasol was the most important player on the Lakers roster last year.  This isn't about shots or touches.  The offense ran through Kobe first, just like it always does.  The defense belonged to Andrew Bynum and Lamar Odom and Ron Artest.  Gasol's place in the team hierarchy, in all facets of the game, was unchanged from prior seasons.  What changed was how important his role became.  What changed is how reliant the team became on what Pau Gasol brings to the table.  And in the end, what changed was the team's inability to deal with the fact that Gasol couldn't cook every night.

Pau Gasol was central to the team's performance, and the team failed miserably.  It doesn't take an advanced level of cognition to come to the conclusion then that Pau deserves a lion's share of the blame for the season's flameout.  For that reason, many of you were particularly looking forward to the review of Pau's season, I suspect out of some love of bloodsport, but you will most likely be disappointed if you were anticipating a bloodbath.  After all, Pau Gasol had many labels over the course of this season; MVP Candidate, Possible Narcoleptic, Resurgent Force, Tired Ninny, Insecure 2nd Banana, and Tin Man (Wizard of Oz burrrrrn).  But the final, and most apt, label given to the big Spaniard, the one that has stuck with him all offseason, is Scapegoat.

Star-divide

Pau Gasol did not have a great season, but he didn't have a terrible one either.  He played terribly in the playoffs ... and was joined in that regard by the vast majority of his teammates.  He failed terribly to live up to expectations ... which were created from a baseline that should never have been considered square one.  It bears repeating: Pau Gasol did not change significantly in any way from this most recent season to the previous one.  What changed is that the Lakers needed more from him than he was apparently capable of giving.  Don't believe me?  Let's take a look at the man's numbers (certain less important stats have been removed so that it can all fit).

Season MP FG FGA FG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST BLK TOV PTS
2008-09 2999 7.1 12.5 56.7% 4.1 5.3 78.1% 3.1 6.2 9.4 3.4 1.0 1.9 18.3
2009-10 2403 6.8 12.6 53.6% 4.3 5.4 79.0% 3.6 7.4 11.0 3.3 1.7 2.1 17.8
2010-11 3037 7.0 13.3 52.9% 4.2 5.1 82.3% 3.2 6.7 9.9 3.2 1.5 1.7 18.3
What you are looking at is Pau's minutes adjusted performance over the last three seasons.  Notice anything strange?  Like maybe the complete lack of a difference between Pau's overall numbers from last season (when we were ready to pack his bags) and the seasons before (when we were all singing his praises for being the best 2nd banana in the league).  Look at those stats and tell me exactly what we're supposed to be so upset about.  The marginally decreased shooting percentage?  The marginal decrease in rebounding?  Over the course of the entire season, Pau Gasol attempted more shots per minute than he ever has as a Laker (which we've been wanting), turned the ball over less than he ever has, and maintained averages which have previously been deemed stellar while doing it.  Did you know last season was Pau's highest PER season as a Laker?  His highest Win Share season ever?  This is what has us yelling and screaming?

No, of course not.  What has us so angry at Pau is the inconsistency he displayed all season.  His first six weeks were as good as any player in the league, which means he spent at least six weeks in mediocrity to maintain the statistical balance presented above.  What has us so angry is the complete disappearing act he pulled in the playoffs, where his statistical performance is much more in line with what we'd expect from "The Man Who Is At Fault."  Statistics are not the whole story.  They never have been, and we're a long, long way from a time in which they might be. 

But they are also not to be ignored completely.  As we here at SSR have always done, the statistics must be married with what we observe.  We observed Pau Gasol play like trash far too often, playing with what we perceived to be a lack of effort, a lack of confidence, and what we know was a lack of results.  We saw him get beat to countless rebounds, play help defense that seemed more like help offense, and get caught flat footed.  And the worst crime he committed was failing to exploit the only weakness to Dirk Nowitzki's game in a series in which Dirk was exploiting our entire team.  We can surmise that Pau was tired, fatigued, insecure, distracted, but there is no point to making excuses, no point in hypothesizing.  All we know about Pau Gasol is that he is a basketball player, and all too often, we saw him do so well below the standard he set for himself, that we set for him, especially when it mattered most.

But perhaps that standard was set too high.  Perhaps we adjusted to "MVP Pau" too quickly to realize that it was a false hope.  Pau Gasol failed this team, and because of it, the team failed to reach their ultimate goal.  But even if Pau played to his averages, even if he rose to the occasion, would it have been enough?  Would 20 and 10 have been enough to turn a sweep in defeat to a glorious victory?  Personally, I doubt it.  The Lakers failed at almost every turn against Dallas, a cataclysmic ball of fire that consumed all.  In case you haven't noticed there aren't a whole lot good grades being parsed out this year, and that is because nobody lived up to the billing.

Does Pau Gasol deserve your ire?  Sure.  Does he deserve all of it?  Not even close.  Final Grade: B-

Previous Grades

Sasha Vujacic.... F
Trey Johnson.... C
Joe Smith.... D+
Theo Ratliff.... D-
Devin Ebanks.... C-
Derrick Caracter.... D+
Luke Walton.... F
Shannon Brown.... C
Steve Blake.... C-
Lamar Odom.... A-
Derek Fisher.... C-
Ron Artest.... C+
Andrew Bynum... B+

Comment 38 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Just right.

In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. - Coco Chanel
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jul 8, 2011 9:03 AM PDT reply actions  

Now I'm starting to think that Pau and LO exchanged 'consistencies' this year.

Always Lurking. Always. Yes.

Tim Duncan wins championships. Vince Carters fills the arenas.
Kobe Bryant does both. -- from some Yahoo! column, I think it was Steve Kerr.

The ideal way to win a championship is step by step.
-Phil Jackson

by imposibol on Jul 8, 2011 9:07 AM PDT reply actions  

How can you honestly think that Pau is the most important player on the lakers? I can kind of understand this from kobe haters or the casual fan, but from a laker fan? This is ridiculous. Kobe had to every so often tell Pau to play harder and more aggressively. Why does Pau need this reinforcement? And when’s the last time Phil punched someone during a game and was that adamant with Pau’s performance as during this year’s playoffs? Pau is still nowhere near the player that Kobe is, and this is evident. Can’t believe you can’t see this.

by express34texas on Jul 8, 2011 9:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Because when Pau couldn't deliver, everything else went to shit. He's not entirely to blame, but he should carry a huge load of it.
Pau Gasol was central to the team’s performance, and the team failed miserably

And Phil didn’t “punch” Pau, he thumped him in the chest. We all see that Pau is not the player Kobe is. How can you not see that we all see that?

In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. - Coco Chanel
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jul 8, 2011 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

You've got to admit though

That “punch”, “thump” or whatever was so uncharacteristic of Phil that he must have been extremely frustrated (irritated?) with Pau. I think that alone speaks basically volumes about not only our expectations, but the expectations of the greatest coach ever. WAKE UP PAU!

By then it was too late. Fair grade, I would have probably given him a C+…

For me its the consistent inconsistency that concerns me - PAGFL
It's always AMMO Time, in spirit- DexterFishmore
lebron should just lock himself away and not talk for the rest of forever-LA32

by 99bc99 on Jul 8, 2011 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry but I disagree with this.

Just because the team loses horribly because Pau plays like shit isn’t indicative of him being the most important player. It’s indicative of his inconsistent play. And that’s all there is to it.

People have been going on and on about Lamar Odom being the “x-factor”, and if he were to play consistently, the Lakers would be nearly unbeatable. What was our record for this season? 57-25, one Laker fans should know quite well. Lamar Odom wasn’t the x-factor people thought he’d be, just like Pau Gasol isn’t the Lakers most important player. That’s baloney.

"Well, she laughed at me when I said I was a vegetarian who ate meat."

by Carnivorous Vegetarian on Jul 9, 2011 1:06 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You're welcome to your opinion.

In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. - Coco Chanel
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jul 9, 2011 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why don't you go ahead and read the link up there...

Which talks about how Kobe is still the most valuable player on the team, even if Pau is the most important.

When Pau plays well, the Lakers play well. When he doesn’t, the Lakers don’t. Kobe’s play does not have nearly the same sort of causal relationship. Kobe is this team’s heart, and it is under his leadership and guidance and will that the Lakers can hope to achieve success. But if Pau doesn’t play well, the team doesn’t win. And the same can not be said, as consistently, about Kobe.

by C.A. Clark on Jul 8, 2011 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

rec

"That took some ovaries to do" ~ Danica Patrick

by Cup Noodles on Jul 8, 2011 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because if Kobe was Gasol size.....well I'm not gonna go off if's

But good point CA I agree wish Gasol just played with Kobe heart fire and passion, we’ll never lose

"Hardwork beats talent when talent fails to work hard"-Norm Nixon

There are basic Fundamentals that are needed to move forward in this game. Always keep your guard up at all times to avoid being caught in a trap. Overcome the fouls that will be committed against you REBOUND AND PRESS ON. ADJUST to the Limelight: ALL-STAR PLAYERS ARE ALWAYS THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. Know what your role is and play your position. Find a game plan and execute it. REMEMBER YOU ONLY GET OUT OF THE GAME WHAT YOU PUT INTO IT.

I'm on it so let's tweet: @B_M_Bizness

by BrittneyM on Jul 8, 2011 2:32 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

There are much more underlying causes other than simply one person playing bad compared to another.

I can’t go into this because I admit it’s a rather vague statement, but I’m sure anyone here can think up ways of why a person playing badly on a team might be a causality other than the catalyst.

"Well, she laughed at me when I said I was a vegetarian who ate meat."

by Carnivorous Vegetarian on Jul 9, 2011 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

because Pau is the reason...

this team went to the finals three years in a row and is the reason we have two more championship banners hanging now.

Kobe may be the best player on his team and the league but the addition of Gasol is why the Lakers got over the hump ( They were off to a great start with the surprise emergence of Bynum in 2008 but were declining fast in the standings after his absence due to injury. )

Pau came in and made this team what would become the three time finalist. It’s a hard thing maybe for some die hard Kobe fans to choke down but he most positively is the most important player on the Lakers.

What do you call three Celtics trying to make an oreo out of Fisher? "...AND ONE! "

by Captain $hugg on Jul 8, 2011 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

He and Kobe are equally important reasons why we got anywhere.

Losing Pau hurts because we have no depth of competent big men for Bynum and losing Kobe hurts because we have no one who can replace everything he does on the perimeter. We keep trying to say one or the other is more “important” but the fact of the matter is that if either one of them were to disappear as Pau did in the playoffs, you see the results. All factors held together and Pau plays well, but Kobe plays bad all around like Gasol and not just in terms of fg% then it would be the same result.

These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game. - Charlie Wilson

The key to championships = SIGN LUTHER HEAD!!!!!!!!

by Marty Mart on Jul 8, 2011 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'm sorry but that's just untrue.

The reason we won the second championship was because of Ron Artest. He is our most important player.

"Well, she laughed at me when I said I was a vegetarian who ate meat."

by Carnivorous Vegetarian on Jul 9, 2011 1:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

No he's not.

In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. - Coco Chanel
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jul 9, 2011 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

With the exception the OKC series and a handful of other games

This statement is definitely untrue.

@brosales12

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself. -- Sun Tzu

by Ben R on Jul 9, 2011 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Go read Ron's report card.

In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. - Coco Chanel
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jul 8, 2011 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pau gasol can be said to be one of the best players in the LA Lakers. Too bad his game hasn’t been improving over the last couple of weeks. Did you see him in the play offs, he was terrible.

Halloween World

by champion-michael on Jul 9, 2011 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a bit surprising to see that Pau's stats

have been relatively the same for the last 3 years and we (or most of us) thought that he sucked.

Always Lurking. Always. Yes.

Tim Duncan wins championships. Vince Carters fills the arenas.
Kobe Bryant does both. -- from some Yahoo! column, I think it was Steve Kerr.

The ideal way to win a championship is step by step.
-Phil Jackson

by imposibol on Jul 8, 2011 9:26 AM PDT reply actions  

I think 20-10

would’ve absolutely helped change Dallas around, but that’s just me. A lot happens to an engine when a major piston busts. I actually don’t think he’s being scapegoated by everyone at all. Artest is getting blamed. Bynum has been receiving blame for some reason. Even Kobe has been receiving blame. However, the fact of the matter is while some of these folks have more or less done what they did, but less effectively in the postseason. Pau played NOTHING like what he had played like before. 3s? Really? He was playing so bad, the team resorted to trying to just get him any open look.

I don’t think it’s fair to scapegoat him and I think your grade is pretty much where I’d have him, somewhere between C+/B- (I’d actually lean toward C+ because his interior D still leaves much to be desired after previously showing the capability to play it as an effective shot alter). But, I don’t think expectations of Pau in the postseason were for MVP Pau. I think they were just for Pau Gasol and not whoever his confused, tired, and awful twin was on the floor. As you said, his postseason numbers dipped much lower. So I don’t think even you wanted to see MVP Pau. I think we all just wanted to see the Pau who had been capable the last 3 years of going up against any post opponent and playing them even or many times better. Are you saying that too much to ask? Cuz I think some more inspired play on offense from Pau could’ve changed the series in Dallas and helped to negate the lack of 3-pt shooting as his play has always done throughout the season.

These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game. - Charlie Wilson

The key to championships = SIGN LUTHER HEAD!!!!!!!!

by Marty Mart on Jul 8, 2011 9:26 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I think you overestimate Pau

because the triangle depends on the spacing that three point shooting threats create. We had no reliable three point shooters this postseason and four players in Pau, Bynum, Kobe, and Artest that all work best from the post. I’m sure we would have done much better if Pau had played up to his usual standards, but you can’t overlook how the team collectively failed to play well. And ultimately this is a team sport.

by Madrak1 on Jul 8, 2011 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't say Pau was all at fault

but those games were still close despite him not playing well and us getting no 3-pt help. I think he could’ve made a difference. Not saying, we would’ve won if he had 20-10, but it greatly increases our chances if he’s an effective cog in the triangle

These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game. - Charlie Wilson

The key to championships = SIGN LUTHER HEAD!!!!!!!!

by Marty Mart on Jul 8, 2011 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with you,

Im sure that the 20-10 would have atleast put some pressure on the D to maybe slack off a little on someone else. In the scheme of things scoring a little more and rebounding a little is attention grabbing when the other team has to deal with it.

"They call me the Muffin Man"

by true_lakerfan on Jul 8, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Stats lie

Pau became a spot up shooter and nothing else. While his FG% on jump shots has always been very good, this season he became worthless in the post. In 08-09, 41% of Pau’s shots were jumpers. In 09-10, Pau took a jump shot on 39% of his attempts. This year… 55%!! FIFTY-FIVE PERCENT!! His numbers may be similar, but how he got them changed and that hurt the team’s offense significantly. We know Lamar wont get in the post, so with Pau now moving out to 18ft almost exclusively, the team lacked any post presence when Bynum was off the floor. With no post game, and no 3pt threat we had awful spacing that led to long droughts offensively and put too much pressure on an already inadequate defense.

Dustball!

by dustball on Jul 8, 2011 10:14 AM PDT reply actions  

This may have something to do with Bynum playing more this year than he has the last two years. Bynum taking up the lane caused Pau to step out and shoot more. Granted this isn’t entirely the explanation because during the playoffs especially Pau tried to bail himself out with way too many fade-away jumpers, but may have something to do with it.

I agree with the grade, but Pau’s collapse in the playoffs was shocking to witness. Many of the players sucked as well, but Pau was the only one of those players who I would trust with the rock. Hopefully the season will start relatively on time and he’ll shake off the playoff bust label be worked his ass off to disprove over the previous 2 years.

by SV Narine on Jul 8, 2011 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

If you can find these numbers,

can you also post his ppp and/or fg% on post-up shots and jump shots? Can you also get the numbers of his post-up opportunities with Bynum on and off the floor.

Also, what caused this change in philosophy? The offense got simpler to incorporate new parts. However, it shouldn’t have change that much to make Pau into a that much of a mid-range shooter. He started the year in the post. What do you think happened to make that change? Is it as simple as playing with Bynum for more of the season? How were his possessions treated when Bynum was off the floor? These are all questions that must be answered before we state that there was no post game because Pau is a very capable offensive post player. In fact, he was infuriating at times in the post this year as he wasn’t nearly as quick or methodical down low as he was in the past. I believe C.A. actually wrote a post on Pau’s play in the post during the year talking about that very thing.

These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game. - Charlie Wilson

The key to championships = SIGN LUTHER HEAD!!!!!!!!

by Marty Mart on Jul 8, 2011 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lol I agree 100%

"Hardwork beats talent when talent fails to work hard"-Norm Nixon

There are basic Fundamentals that are needed to move forward in this game. Always keep your guard up at all times to avoid being caught in a trap. Overcome the fouls that will be committed against you REBOUND AND PRESS ON. ADJUST to the Limelight: ALL-STAR PLAYERS ARE ALWAYS THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. Know what your role is and play your position. Find a game plan and execute it. REMEMBER YOU ONLY GET OUT OF THE GAME WHAT YOU PUT INTO IT.

I'm on it so let's tweet: @B_M_Bizness

by BrittneyM on Jul 8, 2011 2:30 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

So are we gonna skip over Matt Barnes or something? I don't think we've done him yet.

"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess." - Kobe Bryant

http://twitter.com/asianmon

by Lupe24 on Jul 8, 2011 10:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Patience, my friend. He's coming up. ;-)

In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. - Coco Chanel
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jul 8, 2011 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I suspect out of some love of bloodsport

Ku-mi-te… Ku-mi-te… Ku-mi-te…

Can't spell "Colletti" without LOL.

by D4P on Jul 8, 2011 12:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Freaking fraking fudging FFF all year long, I don't care

His tall wimpy ass

"Hardwork beats talent when talent fails to work hard"-Norm Nixon

There are basic Fundamentals that are needed to move forward in this game. Always keep your guard up at all times to avoid being caught in a trap. Overcome the fouls that will be committed against you REBOUND AND PRESS ON. ADJUST to the Limelight: ALL-STAR PLAYERS ARE ALWAYS THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. Know what your role is and play your position. Find a game plan and execute it. REMEMBER YOU ONLY GET OUT OF THE GAME WHAT YOU PUT INTO IT.

I'm on it so let's tweet: @B_M_Bizness

by BrittneyM on Jul 8, 2011 2:28 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

LOL, was waiting for you to show up.

In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. - Coco Chanel
Tweetness

by SoCalGal on Jul 8, 2011 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lol you know it was coming

"Hardwork beats talent when talent fails to work hard"-Norm Nixon

There are basic Fundamentals that are needed to move forward in this game. Always keep your guard up at all times to avoid being caught in a trap. Overcome the fouls that will be committed against you REBOUND AND PRESS ON. ADJUST to the Limelight: ALL-STAR PLAYERS ARE ALWAYS THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. Know what your role is and play your position. Find a game plan and execute it. REMEMBER YOU ONLY GET OUT OF THE GAME WHAT YOU PUT INTO IT.

I'm on it so let's tweet: @B_M_Bizness

by BrittneyM on Jul 8, 2011 7:05 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

No man is an island

and Pau is no different. Kobe was less effective and the 3 point shooting was terrible. You might notice when Pau was the “MVP” for the first 6 weeks that the role players were hitting the outside shot, after that the double teams came and the opposing defenses didn’t feel threatened to leave the other Lakers alone. Since you’re grading each player individually…fair enough. But if you look at the whole scheme of things every judgement must be tied into the rest of the team.

by BaldBilly on Jul 9, 2011 8:48 AM PDT reply actions  

Pau's decline after the first six weeks was fatigue more than anything else

Defenses were already throwing the kitchen sink at him before that and it didn’t matter a whole lot. The disappointing part wasn’t that particular decline, as the front office and coaching staff deserve blame for not signing a body to relieve him on the court or just playing him less minutes respectively, but his failure to reclaim any of his former mojo after Bynum came back and his minutes became more reasonable. How everyone else is playing doesn’t explain why he suddenly became completely incapable of backing his man down in the post, making a fluid series of post moves, or bringing anything really on defense.

@brosales12

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself. -- Sun Tzu

by Ben R on Jul 9, 2011 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Schwarzenegger-arnold-photo-arnold-schwarzenegger-6202204_small
A response to Andy Hutchins' Kobe/Jordan piece
Images_small
Rockets and Gasol Redux
Grpbzshu_1__small
Burn it Down - Who Stays and Who Goes?
Kobelogo_small
Observations from the Nosebleeds
Small
Flagrant Foul: The Last Resort

Recent FanPosts

2012_la_marathon_medal_small
At The Bar - 5/24/12
2012_la_marathon_medal_small
At The Bar - 5/23/12
269791_251807884833897_100000140615173_1189794_2843345_n_small
Rebuilding Lakers Means Fire Sale Now
Iran_green_hope_small
Here's to Shooting and Speed and Not Shuffling Deck Chairs on the Titanic
Small
Demarcus Cousins anyone???
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Mike Brown...Needs to hit the Road?
Ryan_2008_small
Could Bynum Become the Best?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Brain3_jpg_small DexterFishmore

Editors

Ohkeedokelogolakers_small wondahbap

2012_la_marathon_medal_small SoCalGal

Beat Writers

Lakers_small vikas_s24

Img_0056_small Ben R

Udontsay_small bluexfalcon

Umad_small theshmoes

155_small Actuarially Sound

5449_1185754491845_1467777039_30486370_3889376_n_small Mark Travis

Nba_g_kbryant_sy_576_small TheGreatMambino

Small Robert Karpeles