Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Newcastle Battle Injury Woes Ahead of Tottenham

Predicted Lakers Stats for Next Season


I saw the attempt by another poster to predict the Lakers stats for the upcoming season. Some of his assumptions looked like they were a bit unrealistic so here is my attempt.

The method I used was to look at each players per minute stats for the last 3 years.  I then made selections for the upcoming season's per minute stats.  I then made a selection for the number of games a player would play next season and how many minutes they would play.  I then multiplied the per minutes stats by number of minutes they will play to get the per game stats.  Here are the results:

Player G MPG FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
Kobe Bryant 75 34 9.1 19.4 47.1% 1.3 3.8 35.0% 5.2 6.1 85.0% 0.9 3.8 4.7 4.3 1.2 0.3 2.6 2.3 24.8
Pau Gasol 74 33 6.7 11.9 56.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 3.9 5.0 79.0% 3.1 6.4 9.5 3.0 0.6 1.4 1.8 2.0 17.3
Andrew Bynum 70 30 6.3 10.8 58.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 3.0 4.2 73.0% 2.8 5.5 8.2 1.3 0.4 1.6 1.8 2.9 15.6
Lamar Odom 80 28 4.1 8.6 48.4% 0.5 1.6 32.0% 1.9 2.7 68.0% 2.0 6.2 8.2 2.8 0.9 0.8 1.6 2.6 10.6
Ron Artest 74 30 3.7 8.8 42.0% 1.4 3.8 38.0% 1.4 2.0 71.0% 1.1 2.6 3.7 2.8 1.3 0.3 1.3 1.9 10.2
Matt Barnes 78 23 3.3 7.2 45.7% 1.0 3.1 33.0% 1.2 1.6 74.5% 1.1 3.7 4.8 1.9 0.6 0.3 1.3 2.0 8.8
Steve Blake 78 23 2.8 6.5 42.5% 1.4 3.3 41.0% 0.5 0.6 78.0% 0.3 1.7 2.0 3.8 0.6 0.1 1.3 1.3 7.4
Derek Fisher 78 24 2.2 5.9 37.6% 0.9 2.4 37.0% 1.1 1.3 85.0% 0.3 1.5 1.7 2.1 0.9 0.1 0.9 2.3 6.4
Shannon Brown 76 16 2.4 5.6 43.2% 0.6 1.8 33.0% 0.9 1.1 82.0% 0.3 1.6 1.9 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.1 6.3
Sasha Vujacic 70 9 1.1 2.8 39.5% 0.5 1.5 35.0% 0.4 0.5 85.0% 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 3.1
Luke Walton 10 7 0.8 2.0 40.1% 0.1 0.4 32.0% 0.2 0.3 70.0% 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.6 2.0
Devin Ebanks 30 7 0.6 1.4 43.7% 0.1 0.2 30.0% 0.4 0.5 77.0% 0.3 0.9 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.6
Derrick Character 30 7 0.6 1.2 51.8% 0.0 0.1 27.0% 0.3 0.5 68.0% 0.4 1.2 1.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.6
Theo Ratliff 45 9 0.6 1.3 46.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.4 0.6 68.0% 0.7 1.1 1.7 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.3 1.0 1.5
Total 39.0 82.0 47.5% 7.1 19.8 36.0% 18.4 23.7 77.7% 11.7 32.4 44.1 22.4 7.1 5.0 13.0 19.2 103.4

Comment 49 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As a Starter I really hope Fisher does better than this prediction

And as a 5mil a year player Sasha BETTER fuckin perform at a higher ppg than 3.1

"That means no more coming into camp fat and out of shape, when your team is relying on your leadership on and off the court. It also means no more blaming others for our team's failure, or blaming staff members for not overdramatizing your injuries so that you avoid blame for your lack of conditioning. " Kobe on Shaq being a leader

by Jelly Bean on Sep 2, 2010 8:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Don't get your hopes up...

Fisher shot 38.9% on 2P shots last season and took 5.4 per 36 minutes. He also shot 34.8% on 3P while taking 3.6 per 36 minutes. For the upcoming season I don’t see his 2P% increasing and will likely decrease slightly as he continues to age and won’t be able to finish inside but I think he will take sightly fewer attempts too (probably 5.2 per 36 minutes). I have his 3P% increasing to 37% as last year was a down year for him. I have no change in the number of 3pt attempts per 36 minutes though. Take those numbers and percentages and adjust them to 24 minutes per game and you have what I posted above.

As for Sasha, he is tough to predict. He could struggle with his shot again and then fall out of the rotation and then be traded before the deadline to save on luxury taxes… or he could regain his form from his last contract year where he contected on 43.7% of his 3’s. If he does that then he will likely get more minutes (meaning less for Brown though) and will certainly put up better stats than I have predicted above. But if he does struggle and is traded then the stats above could be too optimistic. Sasha is one of the toughest players to predict this season.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 2, 2010 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Jelly Bean, respond to your email messages ;)

Just because you throw someone a pass, and they score, it doesn't mean you made them a better player.

by LakerUNLTD on Sep 2, 2010 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does it matter really?

Mitch signed fish for April, May, and June. Who cares what he does against the Bucks in November.

Everyone in this room is now dumber. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

by pharoah on Sep 5, 2010 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

yes it does matter

his performance can dictate home court advantage.

"That means no more coming into camp fat and out of shape, when your team is relying on your leadership on and off the court. It also means no more blaming others for our team's failure, or blaming staff members for not overdramatizing your injuries so that you avoid blame for your lack of conditioning. " Kobe on Shaq being a leader

by Jelly Bean on Sep 6, 2010 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Kobe has that high a FG percentage and 3 point percentage

then wouldn’t he probably be scoring closer to 27 or 28 ppg? Maybe even higher? With the percentages you have I think Kobe’s points per game seem a little low.

I’m actually thinking that Fish has a rebound year. I think his FG percentage will be a bit higher than what you have. At any rate, he should be scoring more than his backup, so I should hope he does better than this prediction. I’m not asking for much. 8-9 points per game out of him would be more than enough with the rest of this roster.

I hate all Boston sports teams

by nyyrocks29 on Sep 2, 2010 9:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Not with a decrease in minutes...

I actually have Kobe shooting better on 2P shots (50% this year compared to 48.4% last year), better on 3P shots (35% compared to 32.9%), and better on FTs (85% compared to 81.1%). I think he will be more efficient since he won’t be dealing with the hand injury as much. I also have him taking 20.5 shots per 36 minutes, up from the 19.9 he took last year. I have a slight drop in FTA from 6.9 per 36 minutes to 6.5 as he continues to age a little. The result is that I have his points per 36 minutes going up from 25.0 last year to 26.2 this year, but I have his minutes droping from almost 39 down to 34. That is the reason he won’t hit 27 to 28 points… He would have to play 37 to 38 minutes to do so.

As for Fisher, he scored 9.9 points per 36 minutes last year and I have him projected to be at 9.6 this year due to taking fewer shots (specifically pull up jumpers early in the shot clock). Even if he reverted back to 12.0 points per 36 minutes like in the prior year when he hit 39.7% from behind the arc, if he only plays 24 minutes then the most points he will score is 8.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 2, 2010 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

id say this is a pretty good prediction, however..

thinking Kobe Bryant is gonna sit for 14 mins a game is crazy. older? yes, more wear and tear? of course. but i doubt even phil can get him to sit for that long. id add a few more mins and a few more ppg for him, bringing our total ppg up around the 106-107 range. im not sure of the exact stats from last year but i feel our O should be much more consistant this season with our solid bench.

the BIGGEST 3 in the NBA-Phil Jackson, Mitch Kupchak and Jerry Buss. plus i heard jack just signed a 50 year extension..when are we retiring his jersey??

by jack's happy,im happy on Sep 2, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

agreed

I don't do it for your thanks, I do it because I had a calling, but I do love the support you give me and my Soldiers.

by Sarge Clemins on Sep 2, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kobe's points were tough to predict....

Kobe’s numbers were ones that I really struggled with in selecting. I have him being more efficient than any prior years (as he was on pace to do that last year before the broken finger), so I am comfortable with that part of the model. The two tougher parts are how many minutes is he going to play and how aggressive will he be to get his shots.

The last two years he has taken 16.7 (2009) and 16.1 (2010) two-point attempts per 36 minutes. I chose 16.5 for this season. He took 4.1 (2009) and 3.8 (2010) three-point attempts and I chose 4.0. So I have him taking 20.5 FGA per 36 minutes would be the 3rd highest rate of his career! He took over 23 FGA per 36 minutes in the 2005-06 season where he averaged 35+ pts per game because the offense had no other options. The only other time he took more than 20.5 per 36 minues was in 2008-09 when he took 20.8 so 20.5 seems pretty close to a maximum in FGA per 36 minutes for him. I should point out however, that the 2008-09 season corresponded to him only playing 36 minutes so perhaps he looked more for his shot to keep his points up with the reduced playing time. If so, he could increase to a similar 20.8 again but I don’t see it going much further given the options he has around him.

Minutes were the other tough one. Originally I had him at 36 (similar to 2008-09) but when I totalled the teams minutes they were too high in total so I had to revise a few of the guys to make the totals reasonable. Last season Kobe played almost 39 minutes per game primarily because in addition to being the starting SG, he was also our back-up SF as Walton was out almost all year. This year we have depth at the SF position with Artest, Barnes and even EBanks so I don’t see Kobe playing 15+ minutes at that position. Given he played only 36 minutes per game in 2008-09 I figured a further reduction of 2 minutes seamed reasonable given the depth on this team.

Also, last year there were numerous games in which the bench blew a lead and our starters had to re-enter the game and close it out. With our improved bench I don’t think that will happen as often and thus I don’t think we will have to put Kobe back out on the court to help close a game that was a 15 point lead at one point. So that is why I took him down to 34.

Again, Kobe was tough because when I put the numbers together the 24.8 was so low but when I look at the pieces being increased efficiency, increased aggresiveness in trying to score, and then a reduction in minutes due to having a deeper team it is tough to see what I would change to result in a higher point per game.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 2, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

impressive breakdown

very in depth and intelligent, you convinced me bro. obviously if were winning, the less kobe plays in the regular season the betterfor the team,and im more then happy to have a fresher kobe in the playoffs..but i have a feeling kobes will to play is gonna edge sashas 9 and shannons 16 projected mpg down a bit and kobes probally up a little, maybe if only to 36mpg like 08/09,maybe increasing his ppg a little, however we’re splitting hairs. overall…wellplayed sir, wellplayed.

the BIGGEST 3 in the NBA-Phil Jackson, Mitch Kupchak and Jerry Buss. plus i heard jack just signed a 50 year extension..when are we retiring his jersey??

by jack's happy,im happy on Sep 2, 2010 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with the Sasha part...

As a Laker fan I would love to see Sasha regain his shooting stroke and be upwards of 37% from behind the arc. The Lakers were one of the worst 3pt shooting teams last season and need all the help they can get in spreading the floor.

However, my guy opinion is that Sasha will not find his stroke and get trade to a team under the cap at the deadline. This will free up a few more minutes for Kobe and Shannon.

That being said, I didn’t want to put the stats together assuming he gets traded so I did them assuming this team stays as assembled for the entire season.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 2, 2010 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

With regards to scoring....

Last year the Lakers scored 101.7 points per game, good for 13th in the league. In terms of offensive effciency (points per 100 possessions) the Lakers were 11th in the league. So basically the Lakers were a slightly better than average offensive team last year.

My projection has them increasing to 103.4 points per game (an increase 1.7) which would have placed them 6th in the league!

Puting the Lakers as 6th in the league offensively and top 3 defensively seems pretty reasonable to me.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 2, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

very reasonable

yet with this team, my personal expectation is top 3 in both. exept unlike you, i have absolutely no stats to back it up with lol..again, well stated.

the BIGGEST 3 in the NBA-Phil Jackson, Mitch Kupchak and Jerry Buss. plus i heard jack just signed a 50 year extension..when are we retiring his jersey??

by jack's happy,im happy on Sep 2, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

ok

this is more accurate.

Adam Morrison has more rings than Lebron, Bosh, and Wade combined?

by shaqfor3 on Sep 2, 2010 10:13 AM PDT reply actions  

except Kobe will beast at more than 25 pts per game IMO......yeaaah!

I don't do it for your thanks, I do it because I had a calling, but I do love the support you give me and my Soldiers.

by Sarge Clemins on Sep 2, 2010 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

i concur

i say around 27-29 ppg next year

3 Heat can't stop the 3peat.

by LAL32 on Sep 2, 2010 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

agreed

I don't do it for your thanks, I do it because I had a calling, but I do love the support you give me and my Soldiers.

by Sarge Clemins on Sep 2, 2010 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOL BC

I don't do it for your thanks, I do it because I had a calling, but I do love the support you give me and my Soldiers.

by Sarge Clemins on Sep 2, 2010 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

so rec

3 Heat can't stop the 3peat.

by LAL32 on Sep 2, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol

Adam Morrison has more rings than Lebron, Bosh, and Wade combined?

by shaqfor3 on Sep 2, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

lmao!

ammo-homie!

"E-Coaches are heavy in here tonight! Take E-Sasha and put him on the E-bench on your fantasy league, that’ll show him!" - Jevon O

by altree on Sep 4, 2010 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

A good chunk of these look somewhat deflated

For one, I doubt Kobe will dip below 25 ppg until he’s getting into his mid-30s, as his gradual migration towards the post will be beneficial for his overall percentages and point totals. I also think that Gasol isn’t going to surrender nearly all of the career high he set in rebound rate (17.1) last year and Bynum, per the typical development of a young player, should probably get a slight uptick in minutes and overall statistics as a result. If anything, Odom’s minutes should take a slight dip.

Out of curiosity, how did you project Ebanks’ and Caracter’s statistics? They look about right, but I’m curious as to the method behind them.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Sep 2, 2010 12:43 PM PDT reply actions  

agreed

I don't do it for your thanks, I do it because I had a calling, but I do love the support you give me and my Soldiers.

by Sarge Clemins on Sep 2, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

That is the result of the depth of the team....

The issue (if you can call it that) is that the Lakers are very deep with talent. Because of this there just isn’t enough minutes in the game to give everyone the playing tame they normally would get. For example… Derek Fisher and Steve Blake both played 27 minutes per game. They obviously can’t do that this season as that would be 54 minutes per game! The result is that everyone gets a slight reduction in minutes and thus their per game stats decrease.

The thing to focus on is the team totals. I have the Lakers at 103.4 pts per game, an increase of 1.7 from last season. I have them at 44.1 rebounds per game which is a slight drop from the 44.3 last season, however the drop is coming solely from offensive rebounds as the Lakers won’t have as many as their shooting effiency is increasing. Assists are 22.4 compared to 21.1 last year. The rest of the stats are almost identical to last year. So the totals add up, it is just that there are the same number of minutes now being split by more talent and so everyone’s per game stats take a hit.

I have Gasol coming in at 9.5 rebounds in 33 minutes. Given the lakers pace this translates into a rebound rate of 16.2. This is much closer to is career high of 17.1 than his career average of 14.4 so it seems reasonable. In fact, the last time Gasol had a jump of roughly 3% in rebound rate in one year he followed it up with a 3% drop back down to his career average.

I originally thought the same thing as you with regards to Bynum… he should improve right? Well, in 2009 he scored 17.8 points per 36 minutes, in 2010 guess what he scored? 17.8 again… no change. How about rebounding? 9.9 per 36 minutes in 2009 and then 9.9 in 2010. His FG% in 2009 was 56%, in 2010 it was 57% (I have it increasing again to 58%). The point is… he really didn’t improve (at least in the traditional box score) between 2009 an 2010 so I don’t see him making any significant leaps this year. He has improved on defense though which isn’t in the box score. I didn’t increase his minutes over last year only because last year he played a significant number of minutes when Gasol was out. If Gasol stays healthier (I have him missing 8 games instead of 17), then Bynum won’t play as many minutes.

As for Ebanks and Caracter… I basically used their position and player types as a guide. Ebanks is probably similar to Artest and Barnes, and Caracter is closer to a traditional PF (think Odom without the assists and worse 3p shooting). I based it on those players and then adjusted for typical rookie things like, “foul prone”, “turnover prone”, etc… For minutes and games I used Josh Powell as a guide.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 2, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I for one think Sasha will regain his touch

after those confidence boosting free throws in Game 7.

Magic made me a Laker fan.

by thestuff01 on Sep 2, 2010 10:37 PM PDT reply actions  

I actually think those free throws in Game 7 will be his downfall..

He’s going to believe he can make those shots all year…that thought really frightens me; because at least when he was under confident he’d limit his shot attempts a little bit. Now it’s free reign for the Machine to destroy the world with his shooting and quite possibly our offensive sets a few times per game.

Can you imagine Duncan and Kobe playing on the same team? They'd win championships just by staring at people - "yogi"

by MexcNguy1 on Sep 3, 2010 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah

it could either be the a bad or a good thing for LA… hopefully the latter.

3 Heat can't stop the 3peat.

by LAL32 on Sep 3, 2010 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

the game 4 debacle vs Ray Allen scarred him for life

Adam Morrison has more rings than Lebron, Bosh, and Wade combined?

by shaqfor3 on Sep 4, 2010 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

he rebounded pretty well in game 7

he’ll regain his touch. less comp on the bench. confidence boosting ft’s, another ring, another shot at a ring, another year with the master(s). He’ll be alright.

I used to be one of the hardest on him, but not as hard as I was on Odom and Gasol. I’ve chilled after the way they stood up as a team and took it to the C’s in game 7. Big time, confidence boosting performance. The Lakers will be a confident bunch next year from top to bottom, unless injuries or something brings them down.

Magic made me a Laker fan.

by thestuff01 on Sep 6, 2010 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

another year with Maria...

"E-Coaches are heavy in here tonight! Take E-Sasha and put him on the E-bench on your fantasy league, that’ll show him!" - Jevon O

by altree on Sep 8, 2010 5:41 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

after dealing with his shit for 3 too many seasons,

id rather have brown in the game at this point. with a healthy thumb on his shooting hand, i think he will have a much better year than mr sharapova.

"I work my ass off every day in practice. How many other guys can say the same thing? Not many. I'm fighting against becoming soft. That's the worse thing you can say to a basketball player." - Dennis Rodman
"When life slips you a Jeffrey, stroke the furry walls." - Aldous Snow

by LakersFoEva on Sep 7, 2010 7:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Machine

Bring him back!!!

" We made a connection, a full on chemical reaction brought by dark divine intervention...yeah you are shining light...."

by monkeektarr on Sep 3, 2010 9:42 PM PDT reply actions  

Those actuarial exams have messed with your head

What if you add a franchise deductible of $500 to these stats?

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gil Meriken on Sep 3, 2010 10:01 PM PDT reply actions  

+1

that shouldn’t be a surprise, right?

"E-Coaches are heavy in here tonight! Take E-Sasha and put him on the E-bench on your fantasy league, that’ll show him!" - Jevon O

by altree on Sep 6, 2010 3:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Come on everyone saw the movie.

And that probably shortened all our lives by at least 8.6 years.

"There are no "Kobe Lovers", just people who are right." - Gil Meriken
"ANY ONE WNAT SOME OF THIS MONEY, IN IF YOU WANT SOME COME ON IN GET SOME" - the Legendary LEWIS MONROE

by SoCalGal on Sep 6, 2010 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're not the only one

Exam 4 has me looking at these numbers in pure credibility terms =x

by FromDowntown on Sep 7, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice to see some actuaries on here...

Good luck with exam 4! I thought exam 4 was much easier than exam 3… at least when I took it.

I am in the middle of studying for exam 9.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 9, 2010 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exam 4 wasn't so bad

I took my first attempt this past August, thought it was pretty straightforward, but we’ll see the results in 2-3 weeks =x. Are you pretty near your FCAS? Hopefully the whole syllabus change next year doesn’t affect your travel time.

by FromDowntown on Sep 10, 2010 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

I read time travel. Now I want in.

"When will you learn that the only difference between my life and porno, is that my life has better lighting?" - Sarge

Sweet 16

by bluexfalcon on Sep 10, 2010 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good analysis

My only problem is trying to figure out how many minutes new players will play, and their role in the offense. Using stats to predict what a player will do in a new location is fine, if their role and minutes remain the same. Blake, Ratliff, and Barnes are likely not going to be doing the same thing they did last year (even Theo).

A clear case of how the new players throws you entire system out of whack is that your total minutes projected for the entire team is about 283 minutes over. I do realize minutes are usually rounded up (play 15 seconds, you get a minute of PT on the sheet). In comparison, the Lakers only gathered 150 extra minutes last season.

Real technical issues could be raised on other things, like the 475 minutes that need to be filled at PF, according to these estimations. In an NBA season, the front court positions (C&PF) log no less than 7872 minutes, yet after Bynum, Gasol, Odom, Ratliff, and Character still got their minutes, there’s 475 that remain unfilled. By comparison, last season, the totals for Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Powell, and Mbenga are actually over by 29 minutes, meaning Odom played almost half a game at SF, and this doesn’t even account for the couple of times Artest and Walton played the 4 position.

All in all, I do like the effort you put in, but I think you need to examine it all a bit further than you already have.

Twitter | Facebook

"The problem actually is that PER is a extra-long, double high wagon load of horse crap." - timbo (7/3/09)

by tandur on Sep 6, 2010 12:01 PM PDT reply actions  

addendum

For the 3 wing positions, the total minutes for a season should be no less than 11,808. The predictions here give our 9 wing players (Bryant, Fisher, Artest, Blake, Barnes, Vujacic, Brown, Walton, and Eubanks) 12356 minutes, or about 548 too many.

This can all be easily explained away by simply saying “Well, Artest and Walton play more PF this year than before.” That’s a cop-out, and I can ask “Why?” when we arguably have to better backup bigs than we had the previous 2 in Character and Ratliff.

Twitter | Facebook

"The problem actually is that PER is a extra-long, double high wagon load of horse crap." - timbo (7/3/09)

by tandur on Sep 6, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here are some additional details regarding minutes.

As for total minutes I have the Lakers at 19,755 for the season. Last year they played 19,830. A regular season with no overtimes would be 19,680 minutes (5×48×82). Each overtime contributes 25 minutes to the total (5 guys for 5 minutes each). Last year the Lakers played in 6 overtime games and thus played 150 minutes more than the 19,680. I have the Lakers only playing in 3 OT games this season as I think they will be healthier and deeper so they won’t be in as many close games.

As for positions… I will start with Center and move down to the PG position. Note that last season’s percentages do not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding (82games.com does not show decimal places on the positional minute percentage).

Last year the minutes at center were split by the following:
Bynum: 49%, Gasol: 37%, Mbenga: 8%, Powell: 3%, and Odom :1%
I have the following projected this year:
Bynum: 53.2%, Gasol: 34.4%, Ratliff: 10.3%, Odom: 1.1%, and Character: 1.1%

Basically Bynum is healthier so he gets more time, Gasol gets less time due to Bynum’s health (more time at PF), and Ratliff and Character take Mbenga and Powell’s minutes.

Last year the minutes at PF were split by the following:
Odom: 61%, Gasol: 22%, Powell: 11%, Artest: 3%, Walton: 1%
I have the following projected this year:
Odom: 55.6%, Gasol: 27.4%, Artest: 11.5%, Character: 4.3%, Walton: 1.2%

Here Odom sees a decrease primarily due to playing fewer minutes as I am assuming Gasol and Bynum are healthier this season. Artest is now the 3rd string PF and takes Powell’s minutes, Character is the 4th string and plays what Artest did last year as the 4th string, and then Walton gets a few minutes when healthy.

I thought long and hard about the 3rd string PF position and I decided that Artest would probably get that spot over Character for the following three reasons: 1) Phil typically doesn’t like rookies as much as veterans, 2) Artest played the PF position for 23% of the minutes in SAC so it is not a new job for him, and 3) I don’t see Artest playing fewer than 30 minutes per game and given the log jam at the SF spot I had to give him some time at the PF spot.

Last year minutes at the SF were split by the following:
Artest: 62%, Bryant: 19%, Walton: 5%, Morrison: 5%, Odom: 3%, Brown: 3%, and Sasha 1%
I have the following projected this year:
Artest: 44.7%, Barnes: 43.4%, Kobe 6.1%, Ebanks: 5.3%, Walton: 0.5%

Artest will get fewer minutes as the Lakers have more depth at the position and he will play a little more PF instead. Barnes will step in as the primary back-up SF. Kobe will see very little time at the SF position as he is no longer the back-up. Ebanks will get the clean-up minutes that were taken by Morrison last season.

Last year minutes at the SG were split by the following:
Kobe: 52%, Brown: 35%, Vujacic: 10%, Walton: 1%
I have the following projected this year:
Kobe: 58.4%, Brown: 22.9%, Vujacic: 15.9%, Barnes: 2.0%, Blake: 0.7%

Kobe will see his time at the SG go up because he won’t be playing SF as much. Brown will see his minutes decrease as Kobe plays more and Sasha will have a better season than last year (it can’t get worse right?) and thus get a few more minutes there. Barnes and Blake will likely get an odd minute hear or there as well as Phil experiments with line-ups.

Last year minutes at the PG were split by the following:
Fisher: 56%, Farmar: 37%, Brown: 3%, and Vujacic: 3%
I have the following projected this year:
Fisher: 47.4%, Blake 44.7%, Brown: 7.9%

Fisher will see his minute reduced now that the Lakers have a solid back-up in Blake. Brown will likely get whatever minutes are left over as a 3rd string PG when one of the other two guys gets injured.

So that is what I have and it seems fairly reasonable to me.

You can check the numbers and they will sink up with the per game numbers from above.

For example: the Lakers will play a total of 19,755 minutes so they will play 3,951 at each position. Kobe will play roughly 58.4% of the minutes at the SG position and 6.1% of the minutes at the SF position. That means he will play around 2,307 minutes at the SG position and another 241 at the SF position for a total of 2,548 minutes. I have him playing in 75 games so that mean he will play 34.0 minutes per game (which is what I have in my original post).

If you do that same calculation for all the players the minutes per game for each player will match what I originally posted, the total minutes will add up 19,755, and each position will have 3,951 minutes assigned to it.

by ActuarialSound on Sep 9, 2010 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know I could do the math for everyone

but I think I’m good. lol.

These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the end game. - Charlie Wilson

by Marty Mart on Sep 11, 2010 7:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Kobe System: Lebron James Joins the System.
Kobe_small
Hey, You. Create Humor. Now! 2/2

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Things Lakers Fans Say (h/t @LD2K)

Recent FanShots

Lakers Slip In Pursuit Of Dwight Howard
Metta World Peace Sniffs Coach Brown!
Source: J.R. Smith Joining Lakers
Long before there was LBJ, there was another physically talented power forward prowling the hardwood.

This is a great video of one of my favorite players, Chuck, King Charles, Turrible, however you know him, meet him again here. He loved the game, and was AWESOME!

Disclaimer:
Hip-hop background songs contain curse words and other words that may offend.
David Stern contains mustache that may offend.
Mike Brown Diplomatically Compares Kobe & LeBron
I love you Lakers... BTW, check out Ammo's war face!
Miami Game Will Have Repercussions
Kobe's Like Rick Barry? Lebron as Magic? Durant as Baylor? Please
Finals Preview In Miami?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Brain3_jpg_small DexterFishmore

Editors

Ohkeedokelogolakers_small wondahbap

Calvin_hobbes_small SoCalGal

Beat Writers

Spt_kevin_small WildYams

Lakers_small vikas_s24

Img_0056_small Ben R

09_finals_wallpaper_mvp_1920_small Saurav A. Das

Stencil_small bluexfalcon

Umad_small theshmoes

155_small Actuarially Sound