Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lance Berkman Could Have Torn ACL

Kirk Hinrich Is Hurting My Brain

Photo

I've been having trouble developing an opinion about the Kirk Hinrich rumors. Not about their credibility, concerning which I've not the slightest clue. More about whether the suggested trades make sense for the Lakers. The uncertainty, I've decided, arises from not knowing how adding Hinrich would actually affect the Lakers' guard rotation.

Everyone seems to agree that the Lakers "need to upgrade their point guard position." But upgrades have been available for a while now. They're sitting right there on the bench. Both Jordan Farmar and Shannon Brown are more productive players than Derek Fisher. You could improve the team tomorrow by knocking Fish down to backup minutes and giving more playing time to the other two. But it hasn't happened.

Are we really so sure it would happen just by having Kirk Hinrich around?

Star-divide

What's beyond doubt at this point is that the Lakers have a massive institutional commitment to Derek Fisher. He's held his starting job despite long stretches of terrible play. The guy was awful in the playoffs last year. So bad that we at SS&R were begging Phil Jackson to sit him down. Fish came through with some moments to remember, of course, but our point was valid. More often than not, he was hurting the team on the court.

He hasn't really been any better this year. The Lakers' stars are so good that they can usually get by in spite of Fish's shortcomings, but let's be honest. He doesn't do much except break up the rare 3-on-1 fast break and shoot, and he's not really much good at the latter anymore. Nobody thinks Fish is an even half-decent solution at the point.

Nobody, except maybe Phil. I'm just guessing here, but what Phil values in Fish is what he doesn't do. Fish doesn't bust the offense with jacked-up threes early in the shot clock or wild drives to the rim. He doesn't piss off Kobe by forgetting his place in the D. Fish is predictable. Fish is ballast.

In any event, Phil's the one who keeps running Fish out there for 27 minutes a night. And if acquiring Hinrich doesn't change that playing time allocation, the deal will be of only marginal benefit. Hinrich's a big upgrade over Fisher but only a mid-sized one over Farmar and Brown. If you're just acquiring him to take bench minutes from the young guns while leaving Fish ensconced in his tenured starting job, I don't see how you've improved your championship odds that much.

03farmar1

I find myself thinking back to the 2003 offseason, when the Lakers signed Gary Payton. Fish started all 82 games in the 2002-03 campaign, but when Payton joined the team there was no doubt who'd be the starter. Fish had to move to the bench because this was Gary freaking Payton. (Turns out the Glove was pretty washed up, but we didn't realize that at the time.)

This, I suspect, would roughly be the effect of a trade for Devin Harris. Fish would remain the starter, but purely in a ceremonial sense. Harris has enough star wattage that Phil would have to give him starter's minutes. You don't acquire a guy like Devin Harris and keep him on the pine 60% of the game.

Would Hinrich have the same ability to disrupt Phil's inertial devotion to Fisher? I'm not so sure. Next year, maybe. The year after that, certainly. Fish has to get his Viking funeral at some point, right?

But in the home stretch of a title-defense season? A change that radical would be very un-Phil-like. Again I can only guess what's going on in Phil's head, but I fear that a deal of Adam Morrison and Sasha Vujacic for Hinrich would simply mean even fewer minutes for Brown and Farmar. That would improve the Lakers, sure, but just slightly and at what price?

1111992886_medium

Every trade the Lakers make has an opportunity cost. Putting it another way: we only get to trade Adam Morrison once. He's the linchpin to any midseason Laker deal. If he goes to Chicago, you can forget about Chris Bosh (at least until the summer). Maybe Bosh isn't available to Lakers this season anyway, but he's definitely not if a Hinrich trade goes through.

I'm not driving at a hard, "trade for Hinrich / don't trade for him" conclusion here. I'm just unpacking some of the considerations. Shedding light on the various moving parts in this machine.

Fish is pretty bad, and Hinrich's pretty good. That much we know. Would that we also knew why Phil's so devoted to Fish, and how far that devotion will stretch.

Comment 133 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It doesnt look like NJ will move Harris until they have Wall on draft day,

but I would rather wait on Harris than go and get Hinrich. Hinrich isnt the answer in my eyes. Yes, he plays good defense, but has been terrible behind the arch this season and is in his 30’s. We are fine with the current roster we have. I just think Phil should cut Fisher’s minutes down to 18-20, and let shannon and jordan get the rest of ’em.

I think we could get a much better piece to the bench with the expiring contract of Adam Morrison. I keep saying, what about Salmons from Chicago? He could play the 2 or 3 and give Kobe and Ron-Ron some much needed rest. I would def make our bench alot deeper.

"A true laker fan is the only one in the room who believes there is still a chance, even though there is only .4 seconds left on the clock." - CG

by LakersFoEva on Jan 28, 2010 9:42 AM PST reply actions  

another thing, Hinrich's contract is ridiculous. He is way over-paid.

"A true laker fan is the only one in the room who believes there is still a chance, even though there is only .4 seconds left on the clock." - CG

by LakersFoEva on Jan 28, 2010 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

o eff

hinrich is already in his 30s? fo get it then. i always assumed he was some young gun.

by suzie-q on Jan 28, 2010 10:07 AM PST up reply actions  

well technically not yet.

he is 29. he will be 30 next year.

"A true laker fan is the only one in the room who believes there is still a chance, even though there is only .4 seconds left on the clock." - CG

by LakersFoEva on Jan 28, 2010 10:18 AM PST reply actions  

I've been baffled over the lack of a PG controversy for the Lakers...

Fisher is, I do believe, the worst starting PG in the NBA — but nary a peep.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jan 28, 2010 10:32 AM PST reply actions  

Veterans get the light touch in general

Fisher is also very well respected as a human being, so no one is going to blast him.

I’ve always thought the best thing to do is to start him, but play him no more than 15 minutes, but including the closing minutes of tight games, where his experience and free throw shooting would best serve the team.

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gils_Keloids on Jan 28, 2010 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Duhon defends much better

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

baron davis is much worse

than derek fisher, also andre miller is worse,

we are talkin about Captain Fish here, mr .4, mr 3 in yo eye

its rediculas the amount of disrespect fisher gets. and personally i hope you all apoligize and may god (phil jackson) forgive you

i cant spell right now but i can see that hate is in the air.

the numbers might say fish is the worst starting PG but look at this

YOU CAN PUT IT ON THE BOARD YES!
www.reverbnation.com/czheckproductions

by Czheck on Jan 28, 2010 3:39 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I love D-Fish

He brings toughness and is an ice-blooded killer when he has to be. I’d like to keep seeing him start, but bring Brown and Farmar off the bench earlier. He’s Kobe’s guy too, and we won’t see D-Fish leaving any time soon.

In fact, I expect to see some more heroics from Mr. Fish this season during the playoffs.

by 99bc99 on Jan 29, 2010 12:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Captain

should be reserved for Kareem. No doubt that D.Fish has been amazing for the Lakers and he will always have a place in Laker Lore…BUT, that doesn’t mean we can’t be critical of his current performance.

by King J77 on Jan 29, 2010 11:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Forget about Hinrich

I want to hear more about that fellow behind him in that photo over there.

Kuwabara Kuwabara

by J. B. Maddox on Jan 28, 2010 10:52 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

He's off limits

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gils_Keloids on Jan 28, 2010 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Fisher is the best option for the Lakers...

As long as Phil is the coach on this team and they run his system Fish will be the best PG for the Lakers. As fans, we tend to fall in love with highlights like Shannon dunking or Farmar’s speed. To the eye that is "sexier" but not the best solution. Yes, the team might be better stats wise but not leadership wise. Can anyone tell me of a player on the Lakers who has what it takes to put Scola on the floor. Farmar? Please! He is so caught up with "getting his own" that it’s not even funny. If the Lakers were in a fight for a ring I would take Fisher on my team any day of the year over Farmar, Devin Harris, Brown. Pound for pound he has the most heart, veteran leadership than any player on the Lakers not name Kobe.

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 10:52 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

AMEN TO THAT

Re-referencing the “rotisserie league” Lakers of Payton, Malone, Shaq, and Kobe, just lining up as many All-Stars as you can afford gives you…an All-Star team. And those don’t tend to play very well together, do they (also see 1999-2000 Portland Trailblazers)? You must have players who understand the entire system, the big picture, and their place in it. We do need to do something, and SOON, about the starting PG situation, but I don’t think Farmar is the solution, for exactly the reasons you mention above, P&G. But I don’t think Heinrich is, either. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t he a shoot-first PG anyway? EXACTLY what we don’t need. The Harris deal seems to be another pipe dream, but Captain Kirk isn’t the guy to lead this starship. I loved your comment on DFish’s toughness and leadership. Intangibles, and crucial to a championship team.

by Whipp on Jan 28, 2010 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes P&G you got it he is the Balance in the squad that Phil puts out there, he that guy the one that isn't the greatest but glues the team together

Yea like phil is going to let some PG come in and run the Triangle right away, not going to happen. How long has Phil had a guard that was said to be old and washed up run his teams.

by so.cal.native1952 on Jan 28, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

And textbook case

Of sentimentalism getting before all other considerations.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 1:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Although I do think

that the contributions of Farmar and Brown are vastly overrated. Brown shouldn’t even be considered a backup option; he is a 2-guard through and through, and (while I love him) would not bring the triangle knowledge and stability needed to run our offense.

Farmar, this year, has been much better than Fish (cough *contract year), but last year the gap wasn’t quite as large.

by Snoopy2006 on Jan 28, 2010 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Brown is

this teams Smuch Parker, IMO. I’m sure a lot of you will disagree but it’s my opinion.

by King J77 on Jan 28, 2010 2:01 PM PST up reply actions  

minus the attitude problem

In my opinion that counts for a whole heck of a lot.

by BrianTung on Jan 28, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

blasphemy!

Smush* Parker was a terrible point guard, and a disgrace to the lakers uni. He has now moved on to assaulting female parking lot attendants. good for him.

shannon on the other hand is an absolute killer on the court, with ridiculous hops (soon to be the new dunk contest winner), an ability to drive the lane, quickness enough to defend anyone, and the brute strength to overpower any PG in the league.

the two are nothing similar

by soldoutlakeshow on Jan 29, 2010 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, they have been overrated

But compare them against Fisher and they look like a panacea for our problems. I’m also actually happier that Brown looks better at two guard because he solidified that part of the rotation and made it possible for us to revisit the three guard lineups with Kobe at the three.

As for Farmar, yeah, it’s contract year syndrome. It’s why I’m supportive of moving him for a long-term solution because I really don’t see him as a great fit for the future.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

panacea?

lol…

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 28, 2010 6:25 PM PST up reply actions  

What, big words a problem for you?

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 6:28 PM PST up reply actions  

no....

I just find your need to use them funny.

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 28, 2010 6:29 PM PST up reply actions  

They tend to be part of my regular diction

Per the level of papers I have to write. And if you find it funny, you can keep it to yourself.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 6:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I am a big fan of PAGFL’s sig.

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 28, 2010 6:43 PM PST up reply actions  

And I find your attempt to correlate

The use of big words with attempts to express my intelligence as very tenuous.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 6:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for the pontification.

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 28, 2010 10:59 PM PST up reply actions  

You are a dork..lol

where have you been man?

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 8:04 PM PST up reply actions  

moving, working, reading big words....

the usual

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 28, 2010 10:59 PM PST up reply actions  

lol...

dam! still moving? that’s crazy.

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 11:05 PM PST up reply actions  

still unpacking, not moving

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 29, 2010 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

and of the Laker tradition

of giving veterans the chance to defend their championships. Harper, Fox, Horry, etc. But I can’t deny that you’re right (at least in my feelings about Fish). But NOT Heinrich…please…

by Whipp on Jan 28, 2010 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Rec'd

Finally somebody agrees. D fish might not bes the best pg in the west or on the lakers but D Fish is my boy and im going to be wearing his jersey when i go to the game in april

i would create more accounts just to rec this more but that seems foolish

YOU CAN PUT IT ON THE BOARD YES!
www.reverbnation.com/czheckproductions

by Czheck on Jan 28, 2010 3:41 PM PST up reply actions  

i still say that team was the greatest team of all time

i cried everyday till june 14th last year.

alot of people say that if malone wasnt injured we would have easily won that series.

we are in the middle of a six peat so everything is all gravy

YOU CAN PUT IT ON THE BOARD YES!
www.reverbnation.com/czheckproductions

by Czheck on Jan 28, 2010 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

For a Phil team they lost the aspect of team, it was great watching them but they just imploded.

Payton just couldn’t give an inch he had to be the center and really _ucked up the Chemistry, the thing is I thought that GP was the greatest until after that season.

by so.cal.native1952 on Jan 28, 2010 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 5:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm sorry but Farmar could not do this...

2 for 5 in the game. I’ll take those odds as long as the player shooting is Fisher…

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 5:36 PM PST up reply actions  

And if we have a better PG

Then we don’t even get to that situation. It’s a moot point.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 5:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe yes maybe no

But these situations in which another player has to step up are inevitable in the playoffs/finals. Stever Kerr, John Paxson, Horry come to mind. That being said, what other PG in the NBA would you trust making this shot? I can’t think of any PG in the league making five mil a year who could fill in for Fisher in those moments.

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Uh, no

We won despite Fisher. We essentially had the worst starting PG in the playoffs, and had enough talent (and good Farmar and Brown band-aid moments) to get through.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 6:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes, but trying to argue

That Fisher has more value because he has a knack for hitting big shots is just silly. Being a liability for the other 47 minutes matters a lot more in the greater scheme of things than hitting one or two big shots. Cruising through the playoffs a la the ‘00-’01 team is far more preferable than having our playoff hopes hinge on last-second heroics.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 6:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Are you going to address any part of my argument

Or ignore it in favor of lame personal attacks that are completely irrelevant?

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 6:40 PM PST up reply actions  

lol

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 28, 2010 6:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Where do I indicate that I "hate" him?

Please, show me. And yeah, trying to insert a snide remark that doesn’t address anything besides trying to bait me is a personal attack.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 7:07 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not just his knack for hitting shots

It’s the fact that he is the only PG the Lakers have that can actually run the triangle. It’s his ability to be an extension of Phil on the floor. It’s everything that doesn’t show up on the stat sheet. In other words, everything else that Farmar can’t do.

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 8:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh, the running the triangle bit is slightly overrated

Considering that we go away from it so often, but whatever. Staying with the offense only matters so long as you’re actually making positive contributions within in it, and Fisher can’t hit the hugely wide-open, no defender within 10 feet shots, then he’s a liability whether he’s running the triangle or freelancing. Is Farmar a perfect solution? Obviously not and he belongs on the bench. Is Hinrich a perfect solution? No, but he definitely downsizes Fisher’s role to 10-15 minute shifts every night. I’d take a crunch time lineup of Hinrich/Kobe/Artest/Odom/Gasol any day (and honestly, look at it — it would be ridiculously difficult to score on that lineup).

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 9:12 PM PST up reply actions  

if Fisher can't*

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 9:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Honestly

you make a very good case for that line up. Can’t disagree there. I defenitely agree that Fisher is a liability on defense and offense but it is impossible to ignore the other non-stat positives that he brings for the team. The one thing that I don’t think we will ever agree with is that the Triangle is overrated. I can’t run with the notion when it has been responsible for making Jordan the GOAT which he didn’t become until he decided to accept it. And when Kobe failed to win a title and helped him become a top 10 player of all time simply by following not just the triangle offense but the idea of sharing the ball. Just can’t say I agree with that.

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 10:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, no, I'm not saying the triangle is overrated

That’s beyond reproach. The gigantic gap between the ‘04-’05 and ‘05-’06 Lakers teams speaks for itself.

My main point was that Fisher running the triangle doesn’t really mean that much because he’s not exactly doing a whole lot within the offense — if he was making shots at a 40% clip from three, none of us would be having this conversation. Sure, you’re creating the necessary spacing and ball movement the triangle prescribes, but you’re not getting a lot out of it if you’re not maximizing the opportunities available. So yeah, the “Fisher runs the triangle” bit made a lot of sense the last two years, but definitely loses a bit of weight this year.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 10:42 PM PST up reply actions  

exactly,

remove the liability in the first 47 minutes and you probably don’t need the heroics in the final minute.

by King J77 on Jan 29, 2010 11:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Yah I guess if you go back in every game and change the Line-up that could happen.

Oh I forgot once you play the game it’s over, where is Micheal J. Fox and the Doc when you need him.

by so.cal.native1952 on Jan 29, 2010 1:25 PM PST up reply actions  

ya, but...

fisher aint a liability. except for maybe hes too slow on defense when one of these speedy kids tries to drive the lane, but thats why we’ve got the help of some talented big guys.

fish brings more to the table a lot more than stats. he knows how to run the triangle offense better than most anyone. he sets up plays, whether it reflects on the stats sheet or not. he certainly aint hurting them, unless he misses 5 times in a row, which he has never been greedy nor dumb like that.

and his free throw shooting is still one of the best

by soldoutlakeshow on Jan 29, 2010 3:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, he's not dead weight

But a good portion of the time, the positives he brings aren’t making up for the negatives. It’s not just speedy point guards nowadays: he’s getting beat of the dribble by basically everyone, and especially has problems following guards around through screens. Part of that is yeah, on the bigs to help, but you can only ask so much of them. It’s different if you have someone like Dwight Howard, who is so ridiculously athletic that he can cover the dribble penetration and recover back to his man, but we really don’t have anyone like that (unless you count Mbenga, but Mbenga is a little too enthusiastic on his help). ‘07-’08 Bynum could do this, or at least come close to it, but nowadays, neither he, Gasol, or Odom can cover that much ground. A lot of the times that we criticize Bynum or Gasol for being late on a rotation is because the perimeter player (and this isn’t just Fisher; it’s Kobe and Artest gambling too, but most of the time, it’s Fisher) was just completely beat off the dribble and the big simply doesn’t have adequate time to rotate.

Replace Fisher with a point guard like Hinrich, for example, and this becomes less of a problem because Hinrich can stay in front of the penetrating guard and gives our bigs much more time to rotate, and in a lot of cases, trap the guard. Now, this isn’t a “OMG, we need to fix this or our championship hopes are over” issue, but it’d be nice to plug what basically is the only big hole left in what is more or less now an elite defense.

As for Fisher running the offense well, that’s true, but it’s a knock on Farmar and Brown more than anything. If Phil could rely on either of them to consistently run the offense, Fisher would be playing 15-20 minutes a night. Like I told PaGfL above, it’s great that he’s running the offense, but part of doing so is hitting a decent percentage of the wide open looks he gets, and he’s not doing that.

As for his free throw shooting, I can’t fault you there. Only thing I suppose is that Fisher drawing free throws means that he’s attacking the basket, and besides Artest, Fisher is the last person on the team that should be attacking the basket (or maybe Powell also, seeing as he can’t finish).

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 29, 2010 7:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Fisher is not the worst PG in the league

To a novice, you might see fish messing up; but he works inside the offense well. Without him playing for us against Houston, we might have Lost that series. His flagrant 2 was legendary.

by Jevon O on Jan 28, 2010 11:04 AM PST reply actions  

What?!?!

Fisher almost single-handedly lost 2 games because of his inability to guard Brooks and run the offense through our bigs.

Granted I agree his flag-2 was much needed to wake the Lakers from their soft/finesse attitudes.

by 81 Witness on Jan 28, 2010 11:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I think that because this is a team game..no individual player can be held accountable

for the lack of success of any team. I defenitely agree with you on the part that Fisher is killed by quicker pg’s. the only difference now and the three peat is that Shaq’s ability to clog the lane on defense masked Fish’s lack of speed. therefore, I think that this is a team game some of the blame also belongs to Bynum, LO and Gasol for letting players simply attack the paint with ease.

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 28, 2010 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

That's true, but having a PG that could somewhat cover Brooks

Would have fixed a lot of those problems in the rotations. As it was, Fisher wasn’t even remotely able to stay in front of Brooks, and you can only ask so much from the bigs in their rotations.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 9:24 PM PST up reply actions  

If we had a better PG that series would not have been dragged out to 7 games

Fisher showed the entire league how to dismantle the Lakers – a quick, penetrating point guard. We still have trouble with those same rockets for the same reason.

by LongLiveLA on Jan 28, 2010 12:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Shannon should be the starter he is more stronger and can come up with steals better, overall, better defender and energy guy with his dunks.

Farmar at times makes bad descisions and overall, plays no Defense(maybe a steal or 2). I would trade him for Heinrich, its all about the D. The O is in Kobe, Bynum, and Pau, and quite a few times in Artest. Theres not many touches to go round, so all we need is a Defensive PG.

The RaiderLaker

by Raider9 on Jan 28, 2010 11:36 AM PST reply actions  

Shannon is not a Defensive PG

Too often he goes off and attempts to create his own shot…doesn’t understand how to control the pace of an offense and doesn’t shoot well. He is an entertaining guy to watch but not as a pg….i like his as a backup 2 guard though.

by King J77 on Jan 28, 2010 2:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Thats why, but neither is Farmar, and Fisher for that matter, so we need to trade Farmar for a defensive PG.

Neither did I say he was, I just said he is the better defender which says alot.

The RaiderLaker

by Raider9 on Jan 28, 2010 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

farmar

is looking like good trade bait to me

by soldoutlakeshow on Jan 29, 2010 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

plus fish has been the mainstay for the triangle

he’d be needed to guide harris (if we need him)

by eLrEiEc on Jan 28, 2010 11:39 AM PST reply actions  

Jordan Farmar's looking more and more like a starter these days

He’s hustling hard, playing with confidence, and his three ball is looking a lot better.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jan 28, 2010 12:00 PM PST reply actions  

im sure alot of his recent play

is mostly cuz its a contract year for him. Ive seen this movie too many times….

by desecrator09 on Jan 28, 2010 12:03 PM PST up reply actions  

If Farmar really wants to take his agme to the next level

he will have to pick up his defensive intensity. He’s almost as bad as Fisher in this regard.

by LongLiveLA on Jan 28, 2010 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Yah Jordan is playing smarter of late, is it the fact that he mostly runs with Brown instead of Sasha.

I have always felt that Sasha and Jordan were fighting to look better than the other in Phils eyes, not playing together.

by so.cal.native1952 on Jan 28, 2010 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Biiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnggggooooo

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 1:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Whatever it takes I guess.

Trevor Ariza earned a a big contract last year…along with a championship ring…so I have no real problem here :)

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jan 28, 2010 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Just as long as the FO doesn't give out big contracts ala

Sasha and Luke based off of contract year performance and it comes to bite their buttocks in the long run.

That being said, Ariza’s upside is soooo so much better than Sasha or Luke’s combined.

Lakers 2009 Road to Redemption: TREVOR, DEREK, LAMAR, PAU & KOBE.
Play the game of which Lakers reminds you of: TA - TI, Shannon Brown - Chris Brown, Pau Gasol - Jesus, Machine - Luis Scola/Russell Brand, PJ with mustache and beard - Colonel Sanders.

by PeanutButterSpread on Jan 28, 2010 11:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I think that the Lakers learned to use "market value" over expectations..

see LO and Ariza. They tried to play hardball and you see what happened to them…those days are over in my opinion.

"If you want to find the dumbest guy in the room just find the first guy to tell you how smart he is." - JG

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jan 29, 2010 9:03 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't care who they trade for unless Phil really wants it to happen, the player isn't going to play that much.

Just going on past mid season guard trades the guy really never gets to play, Phils excuses is always Triangle. Really do the lakers really need Hinrich I mean are we losing games, we have one of the best records. It’s just fans wanting the prefect team and the last time the lakers had that we lost to the Pistons.

by so.cal.native1952 on Jan 28, 2010 12:58 PM PST reply actions  

what about this?

we trade sasha vujacic for minnesota’s ramon sessions. this trade actually works well both ways. their salaries are almost even, lakers get a more reliably guard in ramon, kurt rambis gets a player who already knows the triangle. sasha would become a key player, something he probably won’t get here in la.

by akb24b on Jan 28, 2010 1:27 PM PST reply actions  

Ugh, Sessions

Great player, horrible fit for the triangle. He can’t shoot, needs the ball in his hands, and isn’t a big defensive improvement on Fisher.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's good

But not against the speedy point guards that plague us. He has basically the same problems as Fisher there.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 6:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Guys...

no one wants Sasha. Not unless they’re getting rid of their own garbage too.

by Snoopy2006 on Jan 28, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

A couple things

Fisher’s continuing playing time is yes, due to more or less, getting out of the way and not doing stupid things (relatively, as his botched fast breaks and PUJITs indicate), but I would argue, more a reflection on Farmar and Brown, both of whom Phil doesn’t trust fully to subsume their games and play within the offense.

Putting Hinrich in that dynamic (and first, Farmar will be traded in any prospective deal, or at the very least, he’ll be dumped for a pick afterwards) is different, namely because Hinrich largely doesn’t play outside his means, and his game is a much better fit for the triangle than either Farmar or Brown, and after a month or so learning the offense, I’d fully expect Phil to get the overall picture and give Hinrich 30+ minutes.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 1:29 PM PST reply actions  

Good point. This trade works if Phil plays Hinrich more than Fisher. Otherwise, its a complete waste.

Farmar and Brown are playing well of late, probably the reason that no deal is imminent. This is probably the Lakers doing their due diligence since the Bulls are obviously trying to clear cap space.

I think its a win-win for both teams. Bulls get a point guard in Farmar and expiring contracts. Lakers get starting caliber point guard in Kirk Hinrich, albeit expensive, for spare parts.

I don’t think Jerry Buss is gonna pony up in the end. As Kobe would say, this is good banter. :-)

by E-ROC on Jan 28, 2010 1:38 PM PST reply actions  

And I'm still not convinced about his shooting

For a player who’s supposedly a solid-to-good shooter, he goes into absolutely horrific slumps far too often. What if one of those slumps came in May/June for us?

And yes, I realize often times those slumps coincide with injuries. So? What’s the guarantee moving to LA would cure all ails?

by Snoopy2006 on Jan 28, 2010 1:53 PM PST reply actions  

heinrich frees up trades

isn’t it possible that if we get heinrich we can trade farmar and bynum for bosh? or something crazy like that… could be a trade with a nod to the future…

by _logan_ on Jan 28, 2010 2:17 PM PST reply actions  

Too much salary

If Buss is going to make any moves to add payroll, it definitely will be as marginal as possible. In any case, I doubt we make multiple trades because of the triangle — it’s one thing to fit in one player in the middle of the season, but a bunch of players, especially ones expected to play key roles, would be too much.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 9:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Can we trade Derek Fisher for Derrick Rose?

I mean, since their names sound the same, maybe they would do it?

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gils_Keloids on Jan 28, 2010 2:47 PM PST reply actions  

You forget Fish's other skill

He is one of the best “floppers” in the league. That has benefited this team many times. I don’ t think Farmar is the answer and Brown is better at the 2.

by keefer on Jan 28, 2010 3:03 PM PST reply actions  

Anyone got an opinion on John Salmons...

Id rather go get him with Morrison’s expiring contract. He can help out our depth bench and help get Kobe & Ron some rest. I really dont like the gamble with Hinrich, especially for the amount of money he is due. Plus, he is almost 30 years old.

I mean you cant be perfect at every position. (well, not until we get Harris next year – crossing my fingers). Our team is pretty stacked at every other position. yes, we struggle at pg on defense, but you just need help defense from the other 4 guys on the floor. Im sure the front office knows about our pg problems, and Im sure they are working on something to happen in the near future.

Well, what do you think – Salmons for Morrison

"A true laker fan is the only one in the room who believes there is still a chance, even though there is only .4 seconds left on the clock." - CG

by LakersFoEva on Jan 28, 2010 3:30 PM PST reply actions  

As a Bulls fan...

I would do that in a heartbeat…but it would require us play Jannero Pargo or Adam Morrison on a regular basis

by VDNFTL on Jan 28, 2010 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

You could always sign someone from the D-League to fill in like Reggie Williams or Morris Almond.

I think those players would mesh well with Rose or Hinrich because of their ability to spread the floor and score in other ways. Neither is known for their defense, though Williams has made strides in that area.

by E-ROC on Jan 28, 2010 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

It works. I think Bulls would do it because Salmons has a player option that he will surely exercise.

The Bulls want cap space to sign a big name free agent this summer. They wouldn’t hesitate to give up Salmons for an expiring contract, even if the trade is one-sided.

by E-ROC on Jan 28, 2010 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

That's a fair question

Who would be worse at this point, Pargo or Morrison?

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

If we do get Salmons

It will be more or less as Kobe’s backup at either spot on the wings. I don’t think Phil would like to play Kobe and Salmons in the same backcourt because you’re essentially asking Kobe to guard point guards in that scenario, which isn’t a great matchup for Kobe (barring point guards that can’t shoot that he can lay off of).

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 28, 2010 9:30 PM PST up reply actions  

sometimes i feel that criticism about fisher is exagerrated. i think it is the malacusstomed, or better yet, spoiled side of our fanhood speaking. we are used to greatness, we demand it all the time. fisher is a general and he deserves respect. that said, i agree with dex. i think the lakers should look to their bench (regardless of fisher’s accomplishments) for an upgrade before looking elsewhere.

by chaucer on Jan 28, 2010 4:13 PM PST reply actions  

surely, chemistry isn't everything..but it's a big factor..

obviously, fisher isn’t as good as kirk. but i also think that kirk would better be with the bulls than LA. Fish may sucked up at times but they’re a team. not to mention a family. and everybody knows that family comes first. that maybe the reason why Phil didn’t see counting Fish off an option. (just my opinion)

by KaRL87 on Jan 28, 2010 5:17 PM PST reply actions  

Im so tired of statics as being a measuring point.

How many times does a team attempt to make 1 single player beat them. Good god people its as if you were witnessing a house burn down right in front of you, just completely engulfed in flames….yet the second some stat guru walks up and tells you 80% of houses in this type of situation have the fire put out and survive you consider the situation to be manageable. Stats do one and one thing only they give grounding. They dont produce a start nor a finish but rather more the middle of any story.

If you had the ability to truly be honest here eliminate the stats and be able to say Fisher doesnt deserve to start with this team. As it stands I think Fisher is the only one capable of the amount of respect required to deny Kobe the ball which is something to value not dismiss.

by IheartLA on Jan 28, 2010 10:54 PM PST reply actions  

Oh, you're gonna get it now....

Stats tell the whole story, haven’t you heard?

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 28, 2010 11:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Not if Im sitting there

watching the fucking house burn down they dont =)

by IheartLA on Jan 28, 2010 11:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Lest we forget

After how many years of basketball there is no singular statistic that properly gives indication of the impact of any one player.

You can pull any statistic you want and I promise you it can just as easily be dismissed – or have we forgotten PER vs Kobe? Or Clutch players stat? Or Etc Etc

by IheartLA on Jan 28, 2010 11:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Everything about this comment befuddles me

What’s with the anti-stats rant? Who here is making a stats-heavy argument? I have no idea what this is in reference to.

And “How many times does a team attempt to make 1 single player beat them”? I don’t know. How often? Sometimes? Never? I neither know the answer to this apparently rhetorical question nor understand its significance.

I don’t find it promising that your first comment at SS&R is incoherent bitching. I hope you’ll improve significantly and soon.

by DexterFishmore on Jan 28, 2010 11:18 PM PST up reply actions  

In all fairness it is late...

To be truthful though I frequent quite a few Laker boards and find the call of benching fisher to be in abundance, albeit not completely uncalled for. My stats argument is in direct reference, we all follow stats (myself included) as when the Lakers fail to equate a high assist to field goal ratio I become discouraged that we arent moving the ball well enough. But I also try to keep things in perspective, Im not trying to hate on stats and its a shame it came across that way as it was not my intention but rather a hope that we could see beyond what the stats say which doesnt always appear to be the case.

In any given stat situation an argument can be made against it not to say that a stat doesnt say something but it doesnt say everything. Basically Im just curious beyond any given statistic signifying fisher as the worst possible PG in the league what else is there?

by IheartLA on Jan 28, 2010 11:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree whole heartedly

Some people are statistic, fact and logic driven decision makers and some people trust their intuition, feeling, and experience. Perhaps PG is that kind of a person, but most likely somewhere in between, which would probably be the best, as balance and moderation in anything tend to yield the greatest results.

by thestuff01 on Jan 29, 2010 5:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Stats are overrated as a fan of the lakers since 1965 I really never care about stats but the end result.

Fisher does his job in coach Jackson’s team aspects and that is alright by me, win or lose. The lakers are entertainment and nothing else, my life doesn’t change if they win the championship or not. I really can’t even waste the time to watch a regular season game all the way thru 4 quarters. KNow in the playoffs I will make time and commitment to watch the whole game.

Now when I was younger it was different, for some reason I felt it was important to me and matter in my life if they won or lost. But as I have gotten older I understand it’s just entertainment and thats it, so I really don’t into the fray. Now Fisher my take is that he works for what he is and how Phil needs him to fall into team concept. As a ex-player and coach I know how the team aspect works and STATS don’t really figure into that period.

by so.cal.native1952 on Jan 29, 2010 6:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I told you, you were going to get it =)

Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."

by pslakerfan on Jan 29, 2010 11:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Eh it was my fault...

I clearly came accross as somewhat “bitchy” at first I thought I recovered decently enough though =\

by IheartLA on Jan 29, 2010 12:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I read much bitchier comments than yours on this site

I understood what you meant that teams sometimes choose to allow statistically poor shooters to get open looks because they’re likely to miss, but we’ve seen teams get burned by that time and time again. Just as teams that used to try “hack-a-Shaq” at the end of critical games ended up getting burned.

“Statistician: A man who believes figures don’t lie, but admits that under analysis some of them won’t stand up either…Statistics: The only science that enables different experts using the same figures to draw different conclusions. (Evan Esar, 1899-1995)

Magic made me a Laker fan.

by thestuff01 on Jan 31, 2010 9:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Before going for a trade....

Experiment a few games with Farmar getting 30 mins a game with Fish starting/playing crunch time as necessary. See how Farmar responds. I think Farmar will play better if given the increased responsibility: he might adopt a “I need to manage this game” mentality as opposed to a “I need to come off the bench and make things happen” mentality.

by ai07 on Jan 28, 2010 11:00 PM PST reply actions  

opps I mean start Farmar, have Fish in for crunch time

by ai07 on Jan 28, 2010 11:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh, sample size problem

We’re pretty damn close to the trade deadline.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Jan 29, 2010 1:35 AM PST up reply actions  

For me it comes down to

this: which PG combination gives our team the best chance of competing for a championship, Fisher/Farmar or Fisher/Hinrich? Given those two options, I’d take the latter, and I think this is probably the best way to maximize Morrison’s expiring deal (that we’ve heard about, anyway).

The money is basically a wash when considering Hinrich-for-Morrison/Vujacic actually constitutes a salary reduction this season, and, next year, Hinrich + Fisher at the Vet’s Minimum < Vujacic + a resigned Farmar + Fisher at the Vet’s Minimum. The front office wouldn’t really see much salary variance over the status quo until the last year of Hinrich’s current deal.

by Mr. Diamond on Jan 29, 2010 10:37 AM PST reply actions  

fish has 4 rings

All with Kobe & phil

I call BS on ripping Fish’s playoff contribution last year. The huge hit on Scola when the
Rockets were getting out of control…The big three he hit in Finals…running the triangle..keeping guys focused. Phil trusts him, Kobe trusts him, and he knows what to do at the end of games.

He will stay in LA and retire in LA. Period.

by mr_hoops on Jan 29, 2010 2:09 PM PST reply actions  

Amen.

I hope so.

Magic made me a Laker fan.

by thestuff01 on Feb 2, 2010 4:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Other solid PG

I’ve contemplated the Heinrich deal months ago but I don’t think he is worth the amount of money they would have to pay him for the remainder of his contract. LA needs the help at pg but not at that cost. I’m mean realistically no player coming in to play pg for LA is going to be asked to score a bunch. Just play solid defense, run the offence accurately and shoot the three ball well. I think the Lakers should set their sights on a player like Randy Foye who has a lot more upside, is quicker and is 6’4" height which Phil likes. He has potential and would only be worth 5 mil plus will be a restricted FA this summer. But I agree getting rid of Sasha is a no brainer and Farmar is not the answer for this team either. I also think that if LA has a chance of landing Bosh for Andrew Bynum and Farmar they should pull the trigger even though that would make the team a bit older since Bynum is only 22. But c’mon Bosh for Bynum is a no brainer! Move Pau to the low post and Bosh could be great defensive, rebounding PF we lack.

by fastbr8k on Jan 29, 2010 2:45 PM PST reply actions  

i dont think the lakers should trade anyone on the team. the players they have now the lakers are bound to win the finals this year and years to come.

by AMac3 on Jan 30, 2010 12:41 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Kobelogo_small
Observations from the Nosebleeds
Small
Flagrant Foul: The Last Resort

Recent FanPosts

2012_la_marathon_medal_small
At The Bar - 5/21/12
Ryan_2008_small
Could Bynum Become the Best?
Monopoly_pub_crawl_small
One fan's random thoughts.
2012_la_marathon_medal_small
At The Bar - Weekend Edition
Lamparduefachampion_small
UEFA Champions League Final Fanpost: Bayern Munich v. Chelsea
Lamparduefachampion_small
SSR Awards - The REAL Experts: 2011-2012 Defensive Player of the Year
Lamparduefachampion_small
SSR Awards - The REAL Experts: 2011-2012 Most Improved Player
Lamparduefachampion_small
SSR Awards - The REAL Experts: 2011-2012 Sixth Man of the Year

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Brain3_jpg_small DexterFishmore

Editors

Ohkeedokelogolakers_small wondahbap

2012_la_marathon_medal_small SoCalGal

Beat Writers

Lakers_small vikas_s24

Img_0056_small Ben R

Udontsay_small bluexfalcon

Umad_small theshmoes

155_small Actuarially Sound

5449_1185754491845_1467777039_30486370_3889376_n_small Mark Travis

Nba_g_kbryant_sy_576_small TheGreatMambino

Small Robert Karpeles