Silver Screen and Roll: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

Richard Jefferson to Spurs: What Does it Mean for the Lakers?

After the Lakers won the 2009 NBA Finals in dominant fashion, the buzz began to build about this team's potential to win a couple more over the next few years. It wasn't just that the Lakers won the championship this year, it was how they looked doing it. They looked like a team that had figured it out. They looked like a team that would make easy work of the regular season Lakers that won 65 games. And they did it without Andrew Bynum, Jordan Farmar, or Sasha Vujacic being major contributors, let alone "deciding factors."

As for the rest of the league, it quickly became clear that the rest of the West, in particular, is now faced with the challenge of figuring out how to match up with the Lakers. The first to make a strong move towards that end are the San Antonio Spurs, who have reportedly traded for Richard Jefferson without giving up any of their "Big 3."


Click on through for more thoughts on the implications of this trade, particularly as it affects the Lakers...

Star-divide

The Trade

As reported by ESPN's Chad Ford, the Spurs sent Bruce Bowen, Kurt Thomas, and Fabricio Oberto to Milwaukee for Jefferson. While what they're giving up isn't quite nothing, the fact that they managed to acquire a 20+ points per game player without giving up any of their Big 3 is impressive... and scary. The Spurs would now seem to have a Big 4 – as if three wasn't enough.

Meanwhile, Spurs blog 48 Minutes of Hell is surmising that the Bucks will buy out Bowen's contract, allowing him to re-sign with the Spurs before training camp. How fortunate for San Antonio...


The Implications

For Lakers fans, this trade raises some questions:

  1. Have the Spurs once again become the Lakers biggest challengers?
  2. How much does this affect the Lakers' odds to repeat?
  3. Should the Lakers and Spurs meet in the playoffs, who would win?
  4. If Manu Ginobili is healthy come playoff time, will the Spurs be the favorites?

Meanwhile, other teams are now looking at an incredibly steep Western Conference hill for the next few years. The Lakers are incredibly good, and the Spurs were one decent piece and some good health away from being serious contenders. Both teams have the experience, and are proven winners. Teams like Denver, Portland, Houston, Utah, and New Orleans have talent and are looking to take those last couple steps to become legitimate contenders – but now they have to worry not only about the Lakers, but also the Spurs.

For my part, I think the Lakers remain Top Dogs in the West, with San Antonio nipping very closely at their heels, and everyone else crying themselves to sleep at night. I think Denver needs to get rid of some of their knuckleheads and replace them with more solid contributors, and I think Portland's window just got a bit smaller, their wait a bit longer. And yes, I do expect that if the Lakers get to the Finals next year, they'll be going through the Spurs to get there. What would happen in a series matchup between our Lakers and the revamped Spurs? Frankly, health may be the biggest factor.

This is the fun part: What do you think this all means? Does this push San Antonio over the top? Between the Lakers and Spurs, who is the favorite? If health is the biggest factor, do you think the aging Spurs can be healthy at the right time next year?

UPDATE:  At TrueHoop, Henry Abbott makes the case that this is far from a "sure thing" for the Spurs.

Weigh in, answer the questions, and ask some of your own... In short: What do you think this means for the Lakers and the rest of the West?

0 recs  |  Comment 93 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Silver Screen and Roll

The Credits: "Balance of Power"

Mar 2010 by wondahbap - 22 comments

The Credits:  "Confidence"

Mar 2010 by wondahbap - 0 comments

The Credits "The Big Fix (?)"

Mar 2010 by wondahbap - 6 comments

Comments

Display:

Hopefully it means an intense Lakers.

I want to see teams push the Lakers into all-time great level of play.

by wondahbap on Jun 23, 2009 12:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Not ready to run for the hills just yet...

RJ has always struck me as one of those “i only get 20 ppg because I play on a lottery team” guys. He’s like a Jason Richardson (Richard Jasonson???). He will give the Spurs a boost and they didn’t have to give up much for him, but he’s not going to shoot them back into title contention. The Spurs are still dealing with major problems: Manu’s and Tim Duncan’s health. Richard Jefferson or no Richard Jefferson, the Lakers are still a clear cut better team than the SA Spurs.

Also, they gave up some bigmen and got even thinner on the front line. You can’t go up against the Lakers without a frontline and expect to win a series. They also gave up a defensive “Kobe-stopper” in Bruce Bowen. He was admittedly a step slower this season, but they probably haven’t gotten any stronger defensively with this trade. Now…are these problems that still can be addressed in the offseason? Yes. Time will tell.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jun 23, 2009 12:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Definitely clear cut better.

But it’s always better for a team with Championship pedigree to try to improve.

Plus, Richard Jefferson plays the best defense on Kobe that I’ve ever seen.

by wondahbap on Jun 23, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bruce Bowen is no longer their Kobe stopper

Ime Udoka inherited that role this year.

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...1...CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

by Josh Tucker on Jun 23, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ime wun even be back. In fact he never was much of anything except for an occasional series here and there.

by LionZion on Jun 23, 2009 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Regardless

Bowen as Kobe stopper ended in 2007-08, and even then it was already getting pretty iffy.

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...1...CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

by Josh Tucker on Jun 23, 2009 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nobody was ever a Kobe stopper. Bowen just made him really inefficient. And still prob can do it in spurts which is all that is needed.

by LionZion on Jun 23, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not quite

Made him “really inefficient”? You might want to double check that assertion.

The correct statement is that Bowen made him work really hard. Which is true. But he hasn’t ben at that level in about a year and a half.

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...1...CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

by Josh Tucker on Jun 23, 2009 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

I acknowledged he was a step slower this year, but my main point was that this trade makes them weaker defensively, no matter how you slice it.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jun 23, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He shuts Kobe down.

I’m not happy about that.

by wondahbap on Jun 23, 2009 12:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ahh. No one is taking the bait.

Obviously, I don’t believe the nonsense I posted above.

I was trying on my devil’s advocate hat.

by wondahbap on Jun 23, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

going for the whole "more comments = more traffic" thing?

:).

PS: I miss the Lakers. When does preseason start????

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jun 23, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i wanted to see them play longer as well. but hey, we’re the champs and that’s all that matters. they need the rest. get ready for football season.

by chaucer on Jun 23, 2009 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So what was really wrong with Tim and his knees throughout the season? Was it just tendinitis (sp?) or…?

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 12:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Not throughout the season. Second half of season. Josh has it down pat. This is all very interesting. The regular season games will also be really fun.

But really it comes down to health in the post season. And if we are all lucky to have two healthy teams, man, win or lose, that would be one series for the ages.

by LionZion on Jun 23, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was wondering more along the lines of was there any specific reason that Tim’s knees started to hurt?

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe its tendonosis which is just short of tendenitis. Something like that. There’s not much coming out of the FO regarding Tim’s knees. So we will all see next season. As it stands, there is hope that its not too bad. But during the middle of the season, Tim just aged overnight.

So no guarantees until playoffs start.

by LionZion on Jun 23, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tendonosis is like an advanced, degenerative, much worse version of tendinitis. No guarantees that Duncan will ever regain his form. However, even the very limited version from the end of last season is an all-star caliber player.

Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies. --Andy Dufresne

by tomasito on Jun 23, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do you get tendonosis? Is it just from the general wear and tear of being a big man in the NBA?

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s like tendinitis—it comes from repeated stress and injury. The difference is that with tendonosis, your body essentially stops trying to heal the injured area, so it takes a looong time to heal (and might never get better).

Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies. --Andy Dufresne

by tomasito on Jun 23, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks tomasito.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that sucks. tim should call it a career. he’s a tall and heavy guy. he needs his knees to carry his weigh for the rest of his non-basketball life. if he retired now, he’d be a hall of famer. he’s a 4 time champ. he’s one of the best big men to ever play the game. walk away, while you still can.

by chaucer on Jun 23, 2009 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He still has a contract he needs to abide by, and I don’t think hes THAT old. Way too soon to just call it quits. As long as he can get his body right in the off season he’ll be okay

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Defenitely not worried

Actually, what does this mean to the Spurs? How are they going to guard the length of Bynum, Pau and Odom? Offensively the look good. But that is it.

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jun 23, 2009 12:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe the Spurs will try to pick up either Gortat or Rasheed?

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope they don’t somehow get Camby from the Clippers…..

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He’d be a good backup coming off the bench for them

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

or maybe odom or ariza. scary thought.

by chaucer on Jun 23, 2009 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ariza loves LA.

The money will be there.

by wondahbap on Jun 23, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not worried about the Spurs UNLESS Bowen gets cut by Milwaukee and manages to return there. That would suck.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 23, 2009 1:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think that’s going to happen.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, what's RJs role gonna be like when Manu is on the court?

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jun 23, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what do u mean? it’s not like richard is a shooting guard. she should do what he does best—score. gregg is a great coach. he’ll find a way to throw him into the mix without affecting anyone else’s play.

by chaucer on Jun 24, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

why are u guys all worried about bowen? did u not see last season at all? the guy hardly plays. check out his profile and look at his game log. he’s too old to contribute. he’s a non-factor.

by chaucer on Jun 23, 2009 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he’s one of the fan favorites..

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bowen's got old legs but his mind is still there

Remember Bowen was never athletic to begin with but he honed his defense through intense preparation and study. He was already taking George Hill under his wing and if goes back to San Antonio and becomes kind of a player-coach, imagine what Jefferson would be like. It would be a poor man’s Artest and Battier on another Texas team.

by hertagnism on Jun 23, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thank you. i’m trying to figure out what all the buzz about bowen is. the guy is done.

by chaucer on Jun 23, 2009 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Summer League Schedule.

http://www.nba.com/lakers/news/09summerleagueschedule.html

Day Date Time Opponent Location
Friday July 10 5:00pm Lakers vs. Raptors Cox Pavillion
Saturday July 11 3:00pm Lakers vs. Cavs Cox Pavillion
Monday July 13 5:30pm Lakers vs. Clippers Thomas & Mack Center
Tuesday July 14 5:30pm Lakers vs. Thunder Thomas & Mack Center
Thursday July 16 3:00pm Lakers vs. Rockets Cox Pavillion

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 2:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This definitely makes the Spurs better overall, but ...

I think it actually decreases their chances of beating LA in a playoff series.

Bringing in Jefferson makes them more formidable on offense, and is insurance if Ginobli doesn’t fully recover from his ailments. It will mean the Spurs will probably be much improved in the regular season.

But this trade just killed San Antonio’s front court depth. The Spurs are essentially down to two big men, Duncan and Matt Bonner. I don’t think Bonner is worthy of starting consistently in the league, and to make matters worse, Duncan certainly seemed to take steps back due to age last year. Unless they plan on playing Ime Udoka or Richard Jefferson as (VERY) undersized 4’s, the Spurs have to fill those holes somehow. Considering how much money has to be tied up in the new big 4, it’s hard for me to imagine that they can offer anything over the MLE ( can someone verify this?) to the multiple free agents they would need to bring in to fill the holes. Which means they would probably need to bring in at least one player via the draft or another trade to play important minutes at the 4 or 5, or be left with inferior talent at those positions.

Of the rest of their players, I don’t see a whole lot of stuff that teams will be lining up for in terms of trades. Roger Mason Jr. doesn’t suck and Hill has some potential, and that’s pretty much it. None of their wings, outside of the recently acquired Jefferson, are worth much on the trade market either.

It will be interesting to see what else the Spurs front office does to round out the team, and analysis of it before the book is finished can be kind of pointless. That being said, I don’t really understand the strategy here. The Spurs struggled last year because they didn’t have the depth to handle down/injury plagued years for their two aging stars. And yet, instead of trying to add more depth, they’ve subtracted a lot in favor of one more big name.

Then again, this is the Spurs we’re talking about. I’m sure R.C. Buford and Popp have this all figured out and the Spurs will surely be formidable next season if Manu and Tim get back into form.

by C.A. Clark on Jun 23, 2009 2:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Good points

I agree with most of your thoughts (though I still think that, when you factor in the savvy at the coaching, PF, SG, and PG slots, they’re still second best in the West, without a doubt).

Unfortunately, that last paragraph of yours makes equally as much sense as the rest of the post!

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...1...CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

by Josh Tucker on Jun 23, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

A short summation of my post would look like this:

“The trade made San Antonio a better team, but decreased their chances of beating LA in a playoff series, and therefore having the opportunity to win a title.”

Sometimes the main point can get lost in the analysis.

by C.A. Clark on Jun 23, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But you'd still have to add...

“However, with Buford and Pop, you never know.”

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...1...CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

by Josh Tucker on Jun 23, 2009 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still think the Nuggets, Blazers, and Rockets are more of a threat to the Lakers

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jun 23, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some answers to my own unknowns, courtesy of BDL.

With this trade, the Spurs have $70 million committed next season to 9 players. According to KD, both Bowen and Obierto are likely to be cut by the Bucks (although he only mentioned Bowen as likely to find his way back to the Alamo).

For a small market team like the Spurs, it seems awful hard to imagine just how much further into the luxory tax they can go to fill out their roster.

I don’t think the Spurs are done with off-season moves yet. With that as a premise, do you think its possible this deal was done with the idea of moving Manu as well? He’s had a rough couple of years injury wise, is on the wrong side of 30, and he could certainly be used to bring in some quality big man talent and a backup guard, with Mason Jr. sliding into starters minutes.

by C.A. Clark on Jun 23, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This analysis is great, but it’s not based on the reality of the Spurs.

  • Front court depth is a worry, but Oberto hardly ever played in the last season, and his heart problems would probably keep him off the court in this season too. We basically have to compensate for Kurt Thomas, and at least Mahinmi is finally ready to play. In short, it’s a worry, but not more so than last season.
  • In terms of athleticism and rebounding, Jefferson is a definite improvement over Bowen and Finley.
  • Duncan had a good first half of the season, actually, carrying the Spurs without Manu or Tony, and this is the first time in many years that he will have the entire offseason to get healthy. We’ll see.
  • Depth might be an issue (I’m not sure, since during the playoffs our rotations usually involve 7, 8 players at most), but again, Oberto and Bowen hardly change our situation. And Bowen might be back. So we might actually end up with one more active player than last season, and a starter at that. Minute per minute, I think we’re actually “deeper”.
  • It’s been rumored that the Spurs plan to bring Gist as RJ’s backup. He’ll cost little money, so that’s one fewer hole to fill.

It all comes down to us finding a serviceable center. Bouroussis was promising, but that seems a pipe dream right now.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Jun 24, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and for the record, one of your (Gils? Josh? timbo?) always used to say in the playoffs game thread that more talent was better than less talent.

Well, RJ means more talent. And that’s better than three beloved mummies, less talent.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Jun 24, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't me

But I agree!

I just don’t always agree on the quality of the talent that’s being discussed.

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gils_Keloids on Jun 24, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just visited Celticsblog.

Of course there are some loons who think the Spurs will be take out the Lakers if they can get a big. Celtics fans are too funny. They can’t put aside their Lakers hatred to ever think clearly. I hate the Celtics, but at least I can give them respect when it’s due. It’s like some of them don’t bother to watch. I argued all year with some about the Spurs having no chance at beating the Lakers this year. Sure enough, they lost in the 1st Round.

The Spurs are no where close to being as good as the Lakers. We have proved that over the past 2 seasons, and have given them tons of trouble before we became elite again. Even when we had Smush. Richard Jefferson and a big wouldn’t be enough.

by wondahbap on Jun 23, 2009 2:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Good optimism :)

by LionZion on Jun 23, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

regarding the celtics and spurs

I’m confused on why the Celtics would have even considered shopping Rondo and Allen.

I mean, it’s only been a year since they won a championship. The team as it is currently constructed with the Pierce-Allen-KG core should be kept mostly intact. Even if it’s an older team, they’ve definitely will be in the east contending for at least 2 to 3 more years, so it’s strange that they would consider breaking that core.

Are the reports of Rondo being difficult really true? And why would they shop Rondo, I thought he was their "future" point guard? Unless, they don’t have enough money to pay him?

It just doesn’t make sense to me. They should be adding players to strengthen their bench… not shopping Allen or Rondo.

And regarding the Spurs (assuming Bowen, Thomas and Oberto don’t return), their lineup against the Lakers (assuming LO, TA and UPS re-sign) would look like this:

Tony Parker / George Hill – D-Fish / UPS / Jordie (advantage TP)
Finley / Ginobli / Roger Mason – Kobe / Sasha (advantage kobe)
Tim Duncan – Pau Gasol / Josh Powell (advantage Pau, he’s younger)
Richard Jefferson / Ime Udoka – Trevor Ariza / Lamar Odom (advantage LO)
Matt Bonner / Drew Gooden – Drew / DJ (advantage Drew, even if he becomes the Human Fouling Machine)

I’m not too worried about the Spurs. Their center and forward positions are really lacking. I’m sure either LO or TA (which ever resigns – hopefully both) can contain Richard Jefferson. Pau usually does a great job guarding Timmy. Drew should win against Matt Bonner. Kobe might have his plate full guarding Ginobli, but vice versa. Tony Parker might be the only area where they have a clear cut advantage over the Lakers.

Otherwise, I’m not worried one bit. Unless the Spurs find a really good big man. But I still won’t worry too much only because who knows how RJ will work in the Spurs system.

Control yourself
Take only what you need from it

by PeanutButterSpread on Jun 23, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Regarding the Celtics:

I think what they were trying to do was preserve championship contenderness, while still open up the books for the free agents of 2010. I believe Rip Hamilton and Prince are on expiring contracts. It would have been a pretty good trade for them if everything fit. Stuckey is a pretty good pg and might actually fit with them better given Rondo’s rumored “attitude” problems. Prince would have to come off the bench in a contract year which might have caused issues.

The biggest thing that worries me about the Spurs is Greg Poppovich. He’s such a good coach that you can never really count them out. If anyone else was coaching the Spurs, they might be a lotto team in the West.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jun 23, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that makes sense.

I suppose the trade would have given the Celtics more depth and financial freedom in 2010, but Rip is 31. Tayshaun is 29 and not nearly half the defender he used be in 2004 and I’m not convinced that Stuckey would have been an upgrade over Rondo.

Also, I wonder how Allen and Rondo will play now. Knowing the team was shopping them. It’s not going to bode well for team chemistry.

But anything to mess up either the Pistons or the Celtics will be fine with me. As long as they make life difficult for Orlando and the Cavs. It’d be fun to see an Eastern battle between those four teams.

For the Western Conference, the Lakers will have the Nuggets, Rockets, Blazers and the resurrected Spurs nipping at their heels.

Suffice to say, it’s going to be an interesting 2009-2010 season.

Control yourself
Take only what you need from it

by PeanutButterSpread on Jun 23, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, Shannon Brown’s dad is named Chris Brown…

http://my.lakers.com/blogs/2009/06/23/browns-basketball-roots/

His dad talks about him growing up, etc.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 3:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

UPS for the Dunk contest

I want Shannon to participate in the dunk contest next year.

Control yourself
Take only what you need from it

by PeanutButterSpread on Jun 23, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since Lebrons going to be in the dunk contest next year it’d be like deja vu.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

redemption for UPS

I want Shannon to upset and win the whole thing. He should have won the last time they met.

Control yourself
Take only what you need from it

by PeanutButterSpread on Jun 23, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another guy I want to see in the dunk contest is Mike Taylor. He’s on the Clippers though, so I doubt he would get voted in or get selected to be in it. I’d like to see guys win because of their dunks and not because of the costumes ala Superman / KryptoNate. Given, both Dwight and Nate’s dunks were nice, but the costumes just seem very contrived and a way to get more votes etc.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think this is a great trade for the lakers. yes, the lakers. i congratulate the spurs for making their team better. at the same time, i thank them for pushing laker management to resign the key free agents in order to stay ahead of the pack.

by chaucer on Jun 23, 2009 4:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The Washington Wizards have acquired Minnesota Timberwolves guards Randy Foye(notes) and Mike Miller(notes) for Etan Thomas(notes), Oleksiy Pecherov(notes) and Darius Songaila and the fifth pick in Thursday’s NBA draft, a league executive with knowledge of the deal told Yahoo! Sports.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=ApPnjWmLeZkL6Rl9eQP.2da8vLYF?slug=aw-wasmintrade062309&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 4:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

and to follow that up

In an effort to clear more salary cap space, the Detroit Pistons have sent forward Amir Johnson(notes) to the Milwaukee Bucks for newly acquired Fabricio Oberto(notes), a league executive told Yahoo! Sports.

The Pistons plan to buy out Oberto’s deal and make him a free agent. The San Antonio Spurs sent Oberto to the Bucks as part of a four-player trade for Richard Jefferson(notes) earlier on Tuesday.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm still waiting for a Lakers trade

No one wants Adam Morrison’s lovely stache?

Really? Really?!

Control yourself
Take only what you need from it

by PeanutButterSpread on Jun 23, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather keep Ammo and trade Sasha.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wizards got a great deal

Foye and Mike Miller will help them along with Agent Zero and Caron Butler.

Can’t help but feel T-Wolves got shafted in that deal.

Control yourself
Take only what you need from it

by PeanutButterSpread on Jun 23, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A great offensive team thats for sure. I think the Timberwolves gave up too much for essentially just the 5th pick.

by intuitive on Jun 23, 2009 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think so.

They were obviously willing to let go of 2 people who didn’t fit in their future plans to get a guy who can grow with a nice young team.

by wondahbap on Jun 23, 2009 6:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Well the trade

makes me like the Spurs as second favorite in the WEST next year but I have to see how they work collectively before I can totally say the Lakers better watch out. My one concern is who will help Duncan defend Gasol and Bynum, Spurs got thin at big man with this trade so I’ll have to wait and see.

There are basic Fundamentals that are needed to move forward in this game. Always keep your guard up at all times to avoid being caught in a trap. Overcome the fouls that will be commited against you REBOUND AND PRESS ON. ADJUST to the LimeLight: ALL-STAR PLAYERS ARE ALWAYS THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. Know what your role is and play your position. Find a game plan and execute it. REMEMBER YOU ONLY GET OUT OF THE GAME WHAT YOU PUT INTO IT.

by BrittneyM on Jun 23, 2009 9:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

no way.

There’s no way this trade alone makes the Spurs 2nd in the West next year.

Houston, Denver, Portland are still ahead of them. As of right now, the Spurs have NO frontline.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on Jun 24, 2009 4:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lakers have nothing to worry about.

This trade doesnt effect the lakers. If we get odom and ariza back theres no one to stop us. Odom finally silenced all his critics by finally stepping up to be that 3rd option. I firmly believe odom will comeback more confident than ever. Both those guys could easily shut down the combo of manu and rj.

Health is the spurs biggest concern. TD is already sitting out backtoback games, and Manu hasnt been right for 2 years. Coming in at a close second is the size problems they have now. The spurs meanwhile, like every NBA team, have some serious size problems facing the lakers, losing oberto and thomas did not help their cause.

by robi s on Jun 24, 2009 12:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That Speedy Claxton is a game changer.

Acie Law just might be the best PG in the West now! Chris Paul has nothing on him!

by wondahbap on Jun 24, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see what the big deal is...

The Spurs are still the same aging group they were last year. They lose Oberto who is a decent big and get Jefferson…a little improvement but nothing to worry about whatsoever.

by BallerBabe on Jun 24, 2009 11:39 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

what’s up with this rumor about phil coaching only home games, and rambis coaching road games. what do u guys think about that? i’m not so certain anymore about phil coming back. it’s sounding like he may seriously retire. i was very confident he’d be back. not so sure anymore. if he does leave, who should replace him? are u guys comfy with rambis?

by chaucer on Jun 24, 2009 2:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

does it really matter?

this team is great. the guys all get along. Kobe got his ring w/o shaq. phil is great with working with volatile personalities. The lakers have nothing but love right now for eachother. I would definately give jackson alot of credit for never losing back to back playoff games this past year, and never losing three in a row. But truth be told, this laker roster could be coached by anybody. we are just too versatile, and give opponents too many matchup problems. Teams adjust to us, we dont adjust to them. sure i would be more comfortable with phil at the helm, but i wouldnt be jumping ship if shaw or rambis had the gig.

by robi s on Jun 24, 2009 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i will never jump ship. i am not a bandwagon fan. but i care about who coaches this team. the very fact that this team is arguably the most talented is precisely the reason why there has to be careful and thorough consideration when evaluating the next possible coach. not any guy can come in and handle this group, especially led by the fervent kobe bryant

by chaucer on Jun 25, 2009 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t worry if Phil decides to come back he already agreed with Mitch he would coach both home and away games.

by intuitive on Jun 25, 2009 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

definately Agree

Portland is one of the few teams that can matchup with our length, and give us matchup problems of their own (orlando and boston being the other 2). Portland is fast, tall, and their backcourt (namely roy) pretty much cause havok on the offensive end. rudy fernandez is almost an even better version of ariza. odom and gasol have HUGE trouble dealing with przybilla and aldrige. bynum and oden cancel eachother out. Im just praying portland doesnt get a upgrade at the point, otherwise i would really worry.
Houston presents some problems, cuz scola, battier, and yao have alot of heart and fight in them. throw in brooks, landry, artest, and mcgrady into the mix, houstons got a great team.

Denver, unlike houston, is full of losers. I say that cuz melo, kmart, smith just arent on the same level as the lakers (kobe, gasol, odom). chauncey a few years ago would give fish hell, but he’s definately lost a step.

Spurs…my most hated/respect team in the west…. sorry to say though, their window is done, and the RJ trade is desparate. I still dont think TD, Manu, and Parker can stay healthy. Manu hasnt been healthy for like 3 years. TD is already sitting out games in the season, and parker cant keep beat up driving to the hoop for 82 games. They are simply too old, and not deep enough.

by robi s on Jun 24, 2009 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Manu hasn’t been healthy for a year and a half.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Jun 24, 2009 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

meh

excuse the exageration.

by robi s on Jun 25, 2009 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not that worried

Largely because San Antonio’s frontcourt is paper thin now. Unless they take on more salary by signing Gortat to the MLE, they’re in quite the precarious situation against our frontcourt (assuming we bring back Odom) if all they have to backup Duncan is a set of replacement-level bigs. The game against San Antonio this past January was probably the best example of a hypothetical frontcourt scenario when we have a healthy Bynum — we positively wrecked San Antonio because they simply couldn’t guard our post players. Even Duncan was having a hard time against Bynum and whoever Duncan wasn’t guarding was getting torched. I don’t think they can realistically expect Matt Bonner to defend Gasol or Odom. And when Duncan takes a breather? Rough times for San Antonio.

All this said, San Antonio needed to make this trade to stay in contention. They needed a fourth scoring option to take the load off their big three, and Jefferson is probably as good a player they could have gotten at this time. Granted, they’re now giving up on 2010, but unless Chris Bosh decided to sign with them, I find it difficult to imagine they would have gotten a player good enough to catapult them into contention. He plays solid defense when motivated, shoots the corner three well, and is for all intents and purposes fits very well into the Spurs’ current system. Big question will be how they address their frontcourt needs in the coming months.

by Ben R on Jun 25, 2009 12:29 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Well said

SA adding RJ didnt do anything to help their matchup problems vs the Lakers. What they needed was to go back to the twin tower formula. This laker team is the longest team in the league. This trade only made them shorter, not to mention probably made Kobe smile since Bowen is no longer around to pester him. RJ is not known for his defensive prowess, and I foresee taking it to him and dishing to whoever duncan isnt guarding.

you’re 100% correct when u noticed duncan having trouble with bynum. The spurs are just flat out old. They acquired a guy who thrives on running, a game plan i never see the spurs attempting.

This trade was just a desperate move to put a glimmer of hope in the Spurs rapidly closing window in the Duncan era

by robi s on Jun 25, 2009 2:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't undercut Jefferson

He’s an underrated defender and does a decent job on Kobe because of his length and his quickness. I’d argue that he guards Kobe better than Bowen can now because Bowen is a shadow of his All-Defense self. San Antonio’s offense definitely becomes a thorn now because Parker and Duncan are not only spaced by three shooters (Mason, Jefferson, Bonner), but Jefferson can take it to the hole or shoot the midrange jumper as well. That all said, San Antonio never beat teams by outscoring them, and they definitely can’t outscore the Lakers’ offense. Definitely makes them better overall though.

by Ben R on Jun 25, 2009 3:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dun know how many times you guys(laker fans) need to watch Spurs/Lakers games, but Kobe is not the problem. Kobe does what he does. And he will win the game a lot of times if its close with 2 mins to go.

The problem really is Gasol and the rest of the crew. Make Gasol have a bad game, and don’t allow rebounds and second chance points, seriously, Spurs win more times than not. Even a team oriented Kobe isn’t making everyone that much better. This is assuming Spurs defense gets back to respectability. We will see how rosters stand on opening day.

Currently constituted, we dun have anyone to cutoff rebounds and make life difficult for Gasol. And then there is Odom. But I will reserve judgement on Odom, since it remains to be seen how he plays after a new contract

by LionZion on Jun 25, 2009 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lionzion, u forgot about bynums coming of age.

bynum really gave us (laker fans/ the WORLD) a glimpse of why he is getting paid so much. Last year against TD, a future hall of famer, bynum brought TD back to earth, and sometimes made him look like a boy among men. im sorry but (im assuming your spurs) just arent deep enough, you guys better pray you get oberto back

by robi s on Jun 25, 2009 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed.

I definately agree with you saying RJ is a definate improvement. But the point im trying to get across that RJ is simply not enough. we all know how kobe reacts the instant anyone in the media even suggests he can be guarded (see Patterson, Artest, Jones, Battier) : he TORCHES them.

RJ, no one for that matter is ever going to be able to take away both kobes drive and his outside shot, kobes just too good, and i feel way stronger then RJ.

As for Rj’s offensive capabilites those have yet to be seen. I like many others doubt his efficiency when his shot totals go from 20 to 8. He got 20ppg on lets be honest terrible teams. he’s not gonnaa be taking it to the hole with our twin towers there. Aside from Roy, i havent seen anyone do it effectively. I’ll give u his midrange game is solid, but thats not gonna play into the lakers favor since its alot easier for ariza/kobe to recover from doubling TD to the 15 feet rather than 30. The only reason we lost to the spurs last year was cuz mason was hot from 3 that day. Jefferson is no Ray or Kapono from 3.

Thats scenario is even being kind, last year we saw a healthy bynum handling his own against an aging TD one on one. next year bynum will have more practice/moves, while td is going to be another step slower. Lets not forget the bench….

Im sorry, but you cant seriously tell me you think this trade scares the lakers, if anything Kobe is just thinking alright new meat for me to show off my greaness.

by robi s on Jun 25, 2009 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well they just got Dejuan Blair.

by intuitive on Jun 25, 2009 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lakers/Spurs

Though a very good trade for SA, this does not put them over the top. The Lakers should be better next year…gelling more, Bynum healthy, Kobe more rest. The Spurs will be more viable on the perimeter, but cannot handle the Lakers inside. And Kobe will still dominate them.

by gunslinger91 on Jun 26, 2009 1:01 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Bad Trade for the Spurs

Look who Jefferson played for last year. He was on a Bucks team that had Michael Redd with knee problems who played only 33 games. He averaged 19.6 points which dipped from 22.6 points. The guy is small and can’t grab rebounds. HIs three point shooting was up but, the Spurs never had problems with that. In short this was a desperation trade for one last chance by San Antonio.

by SquallCloud on Jun 30, 2009 1:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood
Start posting about the Lakers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Marshall_small
I'll give you Ten Reasons (non Resume) Why Kobe is Better Than LeBron.
Hotterthan_summer2_small
Adam Morrison demands playing time
Kobe_wallpaper_1_small
LeBron Has Surpassed Kobe Bryant (On One Condition)
Small
Are the Lakers fit for a second championship?
Silver-lg_small
Weekend homework assignment: Show SS&R some Facebook love.

Recent FanPosts

Kobe_dunk_small
We Need Help At Guard. Could Any Of These Guys Contribute?
Maui_sunset_small
Will the real MVP please stand up?
Small
How we'll finish the reg. season
Small
Cook questions
Small
Where's Wally? Or am I being stupid.
Kobe_wallpaper_1_small
Poll: In Your Opinion, which was Kobe Bryant's Best Season?
Small
Triangle is history — and so are we???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Was signing Ron Artest the right move for the Lakers?
Yes, Artest was the best wing available and the Lakers got him cheap
3801 votes
Yes, paying Artest the same money Ariza would have gotten is a wise investment
2027 votes
No, Ariza fit better into what the Lakers needed from the wing
645 votes
No, Artest will ruin the team chemistry
281 votes

6754 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Chinese Basketball League
Heres a new mix I made.

Kobe hasnt always been known as a clutch player. In game 5 of the 1997 Eastern Conference Semifinals, he missed a shot to win the game in the 4th quarter and 2 three-pointers to tie the game in the last minute of overtime, all of the shots being airballs. With that the Utah Jazz ended the playoffs for the Lakers in the 2nd round. Shaquille O'Neal commented years later that "Kobe was the only guy who had the guts at the time to take shots like that."

Ever since that horrible experience in his rookie year, Kobe has worked harder and has learned how to make those shots with the game on the line. This vid features some lines from Carmelo Anthony's Become Legendary commercial as well as some of Kobe's recent gamewinners.

Enjoy!
Kobe Game Winner vs Raptors - Whoa, I watched this and then I read the comments on Youtube claiming Kobe travelled, which I had not heard of. Then, after watching a few times, I have to say, I agree, Kobe changes his pivot foot before putting the ball down on the floor. I also think there's no way a ref catches that in real time, and even if they do, they can't be sure enough to call it then, either.
Kobe Gamewinner vs Raptors
Don't Trust Bleacher Report
What's Wrong with the Los Angeles Lakers?
Dave McMenamin: Los Angeles Lakers' losses expose conflict with Kobe Bryant - ESPN Los Angeles
No such thing as a (Kobe stopper) he's the badest man n the league. He had...
Ron's inspiration for his weird haircut...
Matt Barnes Pump Fakes Kobe During Inbounds Pass

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Boston Celtics' Paul Pierce (34) and Kendrick Perkins, left, harass Cleveland Cavaliers' LeBron James (23) in the first quarter of an NBA basketball game Sunday, March 14, 2010, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Mark Duncan)

Cavaliers Hand Struggling Celtics Their Third Loss In Past Four Games

Los Angeles Lakers' Kobe Bryant passes against the Phoenix Suns during the second half of an NBA basketball game Friday, March 12, 2010, in Phoenix. The Lakers won 102-96. (AP Photo/Matt York)

Kobe's Near Triple Double Helps Lakers Eclipse Suns

Oklahoma City rookie guard James Harden dunks the ball over San Antonio guard Manu Ginobili of Argentina during the third quarter of an NBA basketball game at the AT&T Center in San Antonio, Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009. (AP Photo/ Bahram Mark Sobhani)

James Harden Out 2-4 Weeks With Hamstring Injury

More from SBNation.com >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Df_logo_-_lakers_small DexterFishmore

Founder Emeritus

Silver-xl_small Josh Tucker

Beat Writers

Ohkproof_1__small wondahbap

09_finals_wallpaper_mvp_1920_small Saurav A. Das

Slava_small Gil Meriken