Game 4 Recap: Lakers vs Magic
I have a confession to make: I was wrong. I was wrong about Fisher, and I was definitely wrong about Phil Jackson. I know, it's shocking right? Me not knowing what's best for the Lakers, who would have thought. Now I know that I was not the only one screaming for more Farmar and UPS, so if anyone else would like to out themselves and publicly apologize, now is the time to do so because come next year, you and I will be criticizing every wrong move yet again. It's inevitable, but it's fine because it means we're fans (it also means that championships are now officially more addictive than crack, unless of course you a Cubs fan).
Speaking of championships, congratulations to the Los Angeles Lakers, 2009 NBA Champions!!! I know it's one game premature, but c'mon, this thing is O-V-E-R. The proof is in the pudding. If you're a stat junkie consider this: the Lakers have 3 chances to win just one game, 2 of which are at home. Now, considering that we have the second best home record in the league, have yet to lose two games in a row in these playoffs, and have yet to lose 3 games in a row since Pau joined us last year (did I mention that he is underrated?). I'd say that those are pretty good odds. For those of you who ascribe to more of a Zen Master mind-game philosophy, last night's win was like telling Orlando that not even their own mamas love them. It was the soul-crusher, the dagger to the heart, the realization that despite 5+ chances to be up 3-1 instead of down, they just can't close the Lakers out. As far as Orlando winning 3 straight games, have crazier things happened? Yes, but if you look closely none of them happened with KB24 on the floor.
And for those Orlando fans and MSMers (I'm looking at you Wilbon) who want to say that the Lakers are lucky or that Orlando should be up 3-1 right now, that's a bunch of bull. I'm a firm believer that luck is when preparation meets opportunity, and the Lakers are just more prepared than the Magic. Not only that, but when the Lakers have won they have played better. I don't care what the game felt like, when you turn the ball over and miss your free throws, you're asking for a world of trouble. Orlando did neither of these in Game 3, and surprise surprise, they won. A win is a win, and even if it means that the only 2 threes you make all night happen to be the 2 biggest shots of the game, that is earning it in every sense of the word. After all, there's a lot to be said for being your best when your best is needed.
Wait, there was a game last night? Why didn't somebody tell me? And here I've been just been rambling about Zen something and planning where along the parade route I am going to stand. Click on the jump, and I promise that there will be at least 2 sentences about the play in Game 4.
Game 4 started off looking like a hybrid of Games 2 & 3. It began with yet another hideous 1st quarter on both teams parts, followed by the Magic mopping the floor in the 2nd with their drives and our bricks. The front court carosel the Lakers rode in the first half was not as fun as it sounds, but admit it, it was nice to see DJ get some minutes in the finals. One more victory and he is officially better then Charles Barkley, Patrick Ewing, and Reggie Miller, technically speaking. As the Magic found out, defending Kobe becomes much easier without a low post presence, so when you see that he missed 20 shots, don't think much of it. I'm not going to lie, at this point I was getting very worried because almost all of the Magic's offense was coming on drives to the hoop, and if the Lakers could not stop that then they would not be able to stop the 3 ball later.
Then came the third quarter, where the Lakers have been money in these playoffs. Last night, it was TAT (Trevor Ariza Time). Get used to that acronym, because we will be using it a lot more provided that he resigns with us. I don't know whether it is Kobe's presence, PJ's influence, or some inner strength he summons, but Ariza has shown the ability to focus himself and play with a level head on the world's biggest stage. There are Lamar Odoms veterans that cannot do this, but whenever Ariza is playing poorly he just shakes it off and by the end of the game he is performing like nothing was ever wrong. The previous shot or defensive sequence never affects his next one, and I am just in awe that someone so young has already mastered this, the holy grail of consistency. Anyways, after a very poor first half on both ends of the floor, he came out in the third and put up Kobe like numbers, scoring 13 (9 straight) while going back to his bread and butter and shutting down Turkoglu. This got the whole team going and the Lakers turned a 12 point deficit into a 4 point lead going into the 4th.
To be honest, while I was watching the game I never noticed the incredibly large free throw disparity between the two teams. Looking back it seems painfully obvious as I remember the parade of foul shots, but at the time I was so focused on how the Lakers were performing that I just shrugged off each foul, even the bad ones, and just prayed for a response by the Purple and Gold on the other end. I'm not going to say anything more on that subject because the Lakers won so it's a mute point (and in my mind totally different than, say, the way the league has been calling flagrants), and I will leave it to my colleagues to discuss if they so choose, because frankly, they are better at controversial stuff like that. Now on to the Fisher shots. They were huge, they were clutch, and they were classic DFish. 0.4 was nice, but it was ultimately meaningless, so I'm glad that this can be Derek's standout moment in his Lakers career. He proved why he's the starter, he proved why he's the leader along with Kobe, and he proved me dead wrong. I will shut up now.
Just a few random thoughts from the game:
- Phil Jackson is still as crafty as ever. That was a game-saving decision in my book to take the ball out from three quarters court at the end of regulation, and just as important as Fisher's shot. The Magic clearly were not expecting it, and the Lakers executed perfectly by pushing the ball, spreading the court, and creating all the space in the world
- I give the Magic credit for not fouling at the end of regulation. I hate that something like that is even a strategy, just like I hated hack-a-shaq before they changed the rules. It goes against the spirit of the game and takes the decision out of the players hands. I say have some confidence in your players, and just get the stop. To the best of my knowledge the Lakers have never purposely fouled when up by three under PJ, and I hope they never do. If they get burned by a big shot, a la Andre Iguodala, then so be it. I can live with that, because that's someone going out there and just making a great play, as we have seen Kobe do so many times.
- Pau Gasol finally got his tough guy moment. While I'm not happy that Pietrus made such a dirty play, given the fact that Gasol was okay, i'm glad that it happened. Pau has never really gotten angry before. When something happens that he doesn't like, he might stare the person down, but most of the time he goes and complains about it to the refs. However, after Pietrus shoved him, he got up in his face in a hurry and did not back down. Does anybody know how to say F@#k You in Spanish? Maybe Kobe could have translated from Spanish to French, just to make the massage a bit clearer for Mickael. Also, after that play, Kobe broke his Monk-like vow of seriousness and gave Gasol a huge smile on the court. I guess he liked what happened too.
- It was a wonderful sight seeing the entire Lakers bench giving Fish hugs at halfcourt after the game ended. He means so much to this team, and it was nice to see the younger guys appreciate everything that he has done for this organization.
That's it from me. I'll see you all on Figueroa in about a week for one long-overdue parade!
Go Purple & Gold!
0 recs |
46 comments
Comments
It was good to see Pau show that much emotion
but I hope he ever makes a fist again. He balled it up like a girl. Haha.
Fish and Ariza have big marbles.
by wondahbap on Jun 12, 2009 6:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Like they say
Every dog(fish) has its day. If you didn’t believe Fish would redeem himself for showing his age then you don’t know fish. .4 was no fluke. I’m very happy for him. And it was really good to see, as Sideout pointed out, the young-uns flocking to papa fish at the end of the game.
Man how did you feel after the 1st half. I was pissed and frustrated and I have to admit I was already resigned to loose, even considering the scary notion of being down 3-2. It was in the heat of the moment-but Ariza, the Man, changed it all!!
That foul on Pau, that was no push, that was two vicious slugs to the back. Pietrus should be suspended for the next game.
by Jello Is Jiggling on Jun 12, 2009 6:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah it was probably flagrant
but it’s the finals and the lakers are going to win, and pietrus should be in the final game.. i guarantee you kobe would say the same. you want to beat the whole team.
by dach on Jun 12, 2009 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was also on the verge of packing it in a halftime
that was one horrible first half by the Lakers
by Sideout11 on Jun 12, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lake Show fans.
Congrats on a hard fought win last night. I’m a Magic fan, and I, like every other Magic fan, have just about cried out all my tears. My guys choked last night, plain and simple, and you guys responded like champions are supposed to. I’m still keeping faith in my boys, but you guys are sittin pretty right now. Just ask Kobe not to clinch on our floor. Good luck on Sun.
P.S. You guys have some d-bag named Bento Box who spends his time trolling our site and telling us how much we suck. Please keep your dog on his leash.
by pjlawrence81 on Jun 12, 2009 7:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you and very classy of you to post..
Never heard of Bento-Box….
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jun 12, 2009 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
For what I have read from Magic fans popping in our blog, you guys have shown nothing but class.
by Jello Is Jiggling on Jun 12, 2009 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aint my dog
He’s a stray
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Jun 12, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
First of all DJ Bento Bag has never commented here.
Do you know how many Lakers fans there are. We don;t all belong to one site.
Secondly, I am familiar with him form Celtics Blog, and I don’t find him to be a troll at all. Maybe he’s changed, but it wasn’t his M.O. before.
by wondahbap on Jun 12, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Bento is allowed to post at Celtics Blog?
I was banned by Clark after one post after claiming the Celtics were finished if KG could not return from his injury (and I was correct).
It’s a minor troll post, but considering what Bento Box posts, we’re comparing softcore porn to hardcore here.
by tandur on Jun 12, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Redemption for......
Fisher – For people doubting him because of his age and yes that includes Laker fans
Kobe – For being hated just because he is Kobe
Odom – For being doubted and for his struggles in his personal life
Gasol – For being called soft (not anymore)
Phil- For being doubted as a coach but yet managed to tell Kobe to pass the dam ball
Ariza- For being on the end of the bench in Orlando
Bynum – For being told that he is too young to be drafted 10th
Laker fans – for taking so much crap from haters. Especially when the Lakers loo
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Jun 12, 2009 7:51 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Yes, Congrats Lakers
Although it took me a minute to figure out this post. You see, all I’d heard about was the Kobe Bryant was winning the finals. I guess there were a few other guys around him. Huh. Guess that was the Lakers.
Next year, are the finals just going to be a one-on-one game between Kobe and LeBron?
by RangersKoolAid on Jun 12, 2009 8:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My $.02
While I was as happy as anyone after Fisher hit those shots last night, I am still on edge and a little nervous about last night. My reasons:
1) Let’s get it out of the way…the officiating was atrocious . I’ve never seen so many bad calls and non-calls go against a Laker team. Maybe it’s karma for the breaks Kobe gets most of the time, but that really, really pissed me off last night.
2) Let’s let Fisher have his day, he deserves it. He saved this team last night and came through in the clutch. However, that being said, he’s been playing terrible overall, and I don’t think it’s something we should ignore. He can’t keep up with Alston when he’s in the game, and he tries to create shots WAY too much. At this point in his career, he should realize he’s a spot-up shooter, a la Jason Kidd. He needs to focus on moving the ball around on offense and taking the open jumper when it’s there. I don’t really have much of a conclusion to this, since Farmar’s defense is even worse, and Brown can’t keep up with Alston either, but it’s the selfishness on offense that irritates me most with Fisher
3) Kobe bothered me most last night. In the second half, he reverted to Old Kobe. You remember him, right? The guy that decides he’s going to take every shot, no matter who’s in his face, and no matter how many shots he’s missed? If he’s going to pull that crap, this team is not going to be a championship team on most nights. I think this is also a reason Odom struggled last night. You can say he “disappears” or “shrinks” in the big moments, but it’s probably because he’s not being involved in the crunch-time offense at all. The Lakers are at their best when there’s ball movement, and there was very little of that in the 4th quarter last night.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on Jun 12, 2009 8:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
not a Kobe hater, per se
but the worst non-call of the game was the elbow to jameer nelson’s face, directly preceding Fish’s awesome, huge three-pointer.
"So, then, I was like, it'd be really dirty if I put up 42. So I did!" -Brandon Roy, post-game comments after game 2 of the first round of the 2009 NBA Playoffs
by 5212872 on Jun 13, 2009 4:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nelson had it coming
for always running around with his nasty mouthpiece hanging out of his mouth. If I were Kobe, I would have elbowed him in the grill too, just for being gross.
by Darkemans on Jun 13, 2009 7:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it wasn't about Kobe last night
Kobe struggled again in the second half. I don’t know if it is Orlando’s defense ,his age or just a long season that included the Olympics, but kobe is looking tired. But Trevor came through in the 3rd quarter, Fish made the game winning shot and Gasol clinched it with his hustle and aggressiveness in the OT. the LAKERS won and Kobe was the best player, but he didn’t have to do it by himself. I wonder if the haters are going to start saying " Kobe can’t win a championship without Fisher " ?
by keefer on Jun 12, 2009 8:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nobody does it by himself
But Kobe did a lot of good too last night. Hustle plays, good passes all came with some of the bad shots
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Jun 12, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Retarded Logic
ALWAYS foul when up 3. Allowing for someone to make a “great play” is just stupid. Nix it before it can even happen. It’s within the rules, it’s a widely used strategy, and it is, statistically speaking, the right move. Just ask people in Dallas. It is NOT “bush” or “cheap” or “against the spirit” of the game. Hack-a-Shaq was smart too. Exploit whatever advantages the rules provide you.
Also, greeeeeeeeeeeeeeat… Pau got his “tough guy” moment against a French dude. Did anyone else see Pietrus throw his hands up and surrender immediately? I think ABC cut away too early. Way to go Pau, you stood up to a dude from France— just like the rest of the world has done since Napoleon was exiled. Merci. Let’s just not get ahead of ourselves here and start thinking that Pau was channeling his inner KG, because he was not.
Pau is not, and never was, soft. He’s mentally tough, and physically strong. His style is just not suited to bang away in the post but he does so whenever it is asked of him and his defense against a physical freak, Dwight Howard (HGH? Anyone?), has been stellar. Good for you Pau, LA loves you.
Great game Lakes. ONE MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by billyknight on Jun 12, 2009 9:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Easy there cowboy
Sideout wasn’t making an argument against the strategic benefits of fouling to prevent the three. His “logic” can’t be called retarded, because it really wasn’t an argument based in logic, it was an argument based on philosophy. He’d rather see teams play each other straight up, and if someone beats you with an amazing shot so be it. You’d rather exploit the rules as much as possible to secure victory. I tend to side with him on this one, though I do understand that it is a view based on a certain amount of idealism and naivete that can’t be expected from all, or even most, people.
For that matter, try to stay away from calling anything retarded. We try to keep it pretty classy here.
And Pau physically strong? I’m with you on the mentally tough, I’m with you on the style not conducive to banging. But physically strong is a stretch. You can see a lot about strength in the form of muscles (see Dwight Howard) and Pau isn’t strong. I’m not saying he’s weak, but dude’s arms are like string beans. Just saying …
by C.A. Clark on Jun 12, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sideout is wrong about the Lakers never doing that
Game 1 vs. Denver, Lakers were up by three and Phil Jackson told his team to foul, which they did and they ended up winning the game. So billy is right in that it’s the better strategy, Sideout is wrong in that the Lakers under Phil DO do it, and though some may call it cheap, well if everyone else is doin’ it, then u should probably too.
by laker on Jun 12, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not over
Remember 2006? Up 3-1, on the Phoenix Suns?
Don’t jinx us… because honestly, if there’s ANY Finals team that’s capable of blowing a historic 3-1 lead… it’s these Lakers.
by tandur on Jun 12, 2009 9:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A little bit different as that was a 7th seeded Lakers team vs a 2 seed Phx team
And Phx still had home court.
But you’re right, it’s not over. Your example was just not very representative of the current situation.
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Jun 12, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is more representative of the Lakers' chances
From whowins.com
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Up WWLW @ HHVV:
Considering win order; considering site order: The team winning Games 1-2, losing Game 3, and winning Game 4 with Games 1-2 at home and Games 3-4 on the road (Los Angeles) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2009 NBA and NHL Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 114-5 (.958)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 24-1 (.960)
series record, NBA only, all rounds: 62-1 (.984)
series record, NBA only, Finals round: 10-0 (1.000)
Game 5 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 81-38 (.681)
Game 5 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 12-13 (.480)
Game 5 record, NBA only, all rounds: 44-19 (.698)
Game 5 record, NBA only, Finals round: 4-6 (.400)
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Jun 12, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely no parallels between the two scenarios
Except, of course, the score in the series.
That Lakers team was inferior to this one at almost every single position, besides Kobe.
At point guard, we have three point guards who are all better than anybody the Lakers had on the team that year. Farmar was only a rookie, and Smush was the starter.
Ariza is certainly an upgrade over Walton at the 3.
And our bigs rotation in that series was Kwame, LO, Chris Mihm and rookie Drew. Compared to Pau, LO, and 4 years experience Drew.
The point is, that Lakers squad had no business being up 3-1 against a very talented Suns team that, for some reason or another, forgot who they were for a couple games. Even up 3-1 in that series, I was deathly afraid that Shawn Marion would wake up, which is exactly what happened. The better team wins in a 7 game series for a reason, and there’s no way the Lakers were better than the Suns that year.
This team IS better than Orlando. They also have two games (if neccesary) at home to close it out, vs 1 for the PHX series. I get your point, chickens before their hatched and all, but have you watched this team in the last 3 weeks since the Houston series ended? They’ve had, maybe, one game that wasn’t 110% effort, game 4 against Denver, and even in that game, I think they played hard for most of the game before Denver got hot and ran up the score in the 4th.
by C.A. Clark on Jun 12, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see Smush Parker on the floor nor Luke Walton and Devean George.
But yeah … we had to play @PHX, then home, then game 7 @PHX. Game 6 was a close one, we could have gotten it. Now we have @ORL, then last 2 at home. Much more experienced team. Have some faith. It ain’t over ‘til it’s over, but I know the guys will get it done.
by ATLakers on Jun 12, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree, except that the lakers have matured up until and into these finals
of course these are also totally different teams but i say proceed with caution. exercise humility balanced with excitement. i’m sure that’s what coach phil and the lakers are still practicing until the job is done. statistically and historically, it is there for the lakers to take. but to assume an extremely dangerous team like orlando can’t pull a massive upset would be a tragic mistake. this is a team that proved itself tremendously through adversity in the playoffs up until now. 3 games were played that could have went either way. it could easily have been tied 2-2 or up 3-1 but lost due to some critical errors that they will probably correct. so unless a very dejected magic team come out the rest of the way, i would still respect them, especially if they manage to pull out a gm5 win. 3 wins in a row and 2 on the road is nigh near impossible, but if any team is capable, it’s this magic team. as long as the lakers play like every game is a must win, then the championship is there for the taking, and i think it will happen in 5 in another close match, updating my prediction from a sweep, lol – which, could have happened too. but again, it ain’t over till it’s over. GO LAKERS!
by kumquatsrus on Jun 12, 2009 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was a risk saying that for sure
but I will eat my hat big time and a few other things if we do not win this championship
by Sideout11 on Jun 12, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
nah no worries i expect a laker championship too of course,just trying to be prudent about the matter
by kumquatsrus on Jun 12, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm big on jinxing and luck
I don’t believe in god, but considering the stretches of both good and bad luck I have experienced in my own life, plus premonitions… I’m strongly on the other side of the fence on calling anything “over” till it really is.
Also, this is my own feelings on this, but calling a series “over” when up 3-1 usually will be said the same way by some when down 1-3, and is the sign of a poor sport. Both people, those who boast that they already have it won, and those who have already lost it, are people infected with poor sportsmanship and bad habits.
by tandur on Jun 12, 2009 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To the best of my knowledge the Lakers have never purposely fouled when up by three under PJ, and I hope they never do.
Did you not watch Game 1 of this year’s WCF? We fouled JR Smith when up by 3 …
Anyway … ORL was atrocious from the line, I can see why they were hesistant to do that.
by ATLakers on Jun 12, 2009 10:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That shouldn't matter.
You play the odds. As you can see, the strategy they went with lost.
SVG simply used that as an excuse because he blew it.
by wondahbap on Jun 12, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, but that's a load of crap.......
Hindsight is 20/20. SVG didn’t get his team into this predicament. He can’t control 15 missed free throws and he can’t control 19 turnovers. Despite all of this his team was still in position to win easily.
Math alert: Using the “no foul” strategy, let’s say the Lakers have a 50/50 chance of making a contested 3 pointer. Then let’s say the Magic have a 50/50 chance of winning in regulation even if the Lakers make the 3 pointer. Then let’s say the Magic have a 50/50 chance of winning in overtime (really more like 60/40). Then that means the Magic had a roughly 88% chance of winning the game at that point using SVG’s strategy. When your team fails to execute in an 88% favorable situation, that is on them, not the coach. Would the other strategy have worked, who knows? Would it have had a higher chance of success? Too many variables for me to figure (I ain’t Charlie Epps). Regardless, you can’t blame the coach for horrific execution. Period.
Well, sir, you are a cowardly son of a bitch! You just shot an unarmed man!.......Well, he should have armed himself if he's going to decorate his saloon with my friend. – Will Munny
by pslakerfan on Jun 12, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. The Magic should have fouled.
The result of the Lakers making the 3 pt is definitely worse than taking your chances at the line.
As SVG said in his presser, Nelson should have been closer to Fish, seeing that a 2 pt basket doesn’t hurt. Given that, it’s safe to assume that they were willing to give up the 2 pt basket, meaning that if the Lakers did get an easy 2 instead, they would foul anyway, thus putting the Magic at the line.
So, all the Magic really did is concede the only play that could hurt. This loss was on him. I also blame Turk (as I commented in the Credits comments).
by wondahbap on Jun 12, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the conceded 2 would have taken 4-5 seconds off the clock, vs the free throws take up no time.
I think that is the difference. The truth is that Jameer Nelson blew it, not SVG.
Well, sir, you are a cowardly son of a bitch! You just shot an unarmed man!.......Well, he should have armed himself if he's going to decorate his saloon with my friend. – Will Munny
by pslakerfan on Jun 12, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They both blew it.
I’m sure SVG would not have allowed the Lakers to shoot a three if he had known Mr. Nelson would give him 2 feet to shoot. It doesn’t matter though you foul when up by three. SVG is the master of panic for a reason and the fact that he went with Nelson in the first place when Mr. Alston had a good game 3 just demonstrates he’s out of his mind.
by laker on Jun 12, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did we?
I couldn’t remember. Thanks for clearing that up
by Sideout11 on Jun 12, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The intentionality of it could be questioned.
Fish did not specifically grab him to get a foul called, but he gave him a very solid bump. I’m not convinced Phil told him to do that or if he just wanted to make sure JR didn’t get a clean look, and if they call the foul, no big deal.
by C.A. Clark on Jun 12, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember Breen mentioning that PJ went up to Fish and talked to him and pointed to midcourt, suggesting that the Lakers should foul once the Nuggets got past midcourt (which Fish did). I doubt Fish would have done a bonehead move like that.
by ATLakers on Jun 12, 2009 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Game. Blouses.
Wrap this up next game guys. This should be a wrap for the West!
13 points in 39 seconds. Enough said.
by Duhoh on Jun 12, 2009 5:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Done!!!
Superman failed. The Bill Buckner of Orlando. The biggest choke job in the history of NBA finals. The Lakers showed the heart of a champion and the Magic showed the world that the aren’t ready for this stage.
by Lakertime on Jun 12, 2009 6:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Kobe Bryant has always preferred Batman to Superman, for one good reason: "Batman’s self-made."
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/bryant-fisher-game-2461629-lakers-finals
by intuitive on Jun 12, 2009 9:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















