Silver Screen and Roll: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Magic 108, Lakers 104: Game 3 Recap

This one is on Kobe.

It's hard to blame him too much when he was the primary reason the Lakers were in the game at halftime. The Magic shot 75% from the field in the first half, including 44% from three-point range, and yet took only a five-point lead into the half, and Kobe was a large part of that. He was 7-10 in the first quarter for 17 points, along with three rebounds. He scored 21 points on his first 11 shots – efficiency that would have Doug Collions raving, a rate of 1.9 points per shot. At the same time, he also dished out eight assists for the game – half of the entire team's 16 total – in a formidable effort to create good shots for his teammates.

Unfortunately, this was a four-point loss, and in such a close game, one or two mistakes can make the difference. Kobe came up short in several key ways that caused this loss.


Click on through for more...

Star-divide

As brilliant as Kobe Bryant was in the first half, he struggled in the second. Had he played at even a decent level, by his own standards, the Lakers likely would have won this game. Instead, he failed in several crucial ways that resulted in the loss:

  • After hitting eight of his first 11 shots, he hit only two of his next 13. (He did make his final shot attempt, but by that time it was too late to matter.)
  • He missed five of his 10 free throws. Had he made them at his usual rate, the game likely would have been tied. Had he made all of them, the way he usually does in games like these, the Lakers would likely have won. I've held LeBron James accountable for his missed free throws in the Eastern Conference Finals; while Kobe's five missed free throws didn't all come in the fourth quarter, those five points were nonetheless critical in such a close game. They were misses the Lakers couldn't afford.
  • With 2:02 remaining, he forced up a contested three-pointer from the left wing that was simply a bad shot. It was a rushed possession, and there was time left in the shot clock to find a better shot. Had he done that, the Lakers might have been able to tie the game with less than two minutes remaining. Instead, Kobe took and missed that ill-advised three-pointer, and the Lakers trailed the rest of the game.
  • With under 30 seconds remaining, Bryant attempted to split a double team on the perimeter and had the ball swatted away. Gasol dove for it, retrieved it, and then passed it to Kobe, who again couldn't control it. While it is correct to point out that Gasol should have called time out instead of trying to get the ball to Kobe with two defenders hovering above, it was Kobe's initial mistake that caused the turnover. Additionally, when Gasol attempted the pass, Kobe had a great chance to grab the ball, and he bobbled it, leading to a turnover and free throws for Mickael Pietrus.
  • The final possession of the game was a three-pointer for Kobe with 24 seconds left. Had he made it, it would have been a one possession game and given the Lakers a chance to tie it. But he missed, and a series of offensive rebounds and additional misses ensued.

So Game 3 is on Kobe – and honestly, he's okay with that. That is how he wants it. All he has asked for is the opportunity to be in this position, with a chance to lead his team to a championship as The Man. He fervently longs for the glory of success, but don't think for a minute that he's unaware of, or unwilling to accept, the responsibility. He wants that responsibility. On most nights, he is Reason Number One for a Lakers victory; tonight, his late failures outweighed his early success and resulted in a loss. That is a responsibility that he is okay with. It is also not something I expect to continue.

Aside from Kobe Bryant's second half and, of course, the end result, this was a fantastic game. For most of it, the Lakers played well. In the final minutes of a very close game, as they methodically cut into Orlando's lead, it appeared that they would be able to coolly make all of the right plays and decisions and pull out a tough win that would likely have broken Orlando's spirits. In the end, however, all it took was a couple of mistakes, while the Magic made all the right plays – and most of their free throws, down the stretch.

Give credit to the Magic; they deserve it. They shot the lights out, setting an NBA Finals record for shooting percentage in a game at 62.5% from the field. Quite frankly, they won the game because they simply couldn't miss. The Lakers played subpar defense at times, excellent defense at others, and in the end it simply didn't seem to matter. The Magic just hit their shots, either way. Many of them were quite difficult shots – quite a few of them were shots that, if missed, could get a player benched. But the Magic were on fire – not just from distance (in fact, they only shot 35.7% from three-pointe range), but from everywhere.

On the other hand, it's not as though the Lakers played poorly. They shot 51.3% from the field, while taking 14 more shots than the Magic (usually, those two numbers by themselves are enough to almost guarantee a win). The rebounding game was essentially even, and they collected 11 offensive rebounds to the Magic's 5. They scored 40 points in the paint to Orlando's 36. Both teams had 10 fast break points and 13 turnovers. Both teams attempted essentially equal amounts of free throws – with the single most glaring failure by the Lakers being that they made only 16 of their 26 attempts from the line.

In all, it's hard to be disappointed with the game the Lakers played, aside from the final few minutes, which fall mainly on Kobe's shoulders. They shot very well, rebounded well, outscored their opponents in the paint, got more shots, and played even with the Magic in both turnovers and fast break points. All of this, they did on the road against a very inspired, very tough opponent that was playing for its life. Meanwhile, the Magic's offensive success was as much because they were simply playing out of their minds as it was the result of any Lakers breakdowns.

The story of the game, aside from the late failures, was simply the Magic's inability to hit shots. Time and time again, I turned to those I was watching the game with and said, "They just can't miss!" Try as the Lakers may, they weren't going to get back in the game if the Magic didn't miss a shot or two, from time to time.

Often times, a loss feels almost like a waste of my time. That sounds bad, I'm sure, but think of it this way: If you knew before the game that they Lakers would lose, would you watch it? I might if I had a specific reason to – for example, if there was something specific I wanted to see or learn from the game. But in general, I'd just as soon forego the disappointment and letdown of three hours of high hopes that coming crashing down in a loss. Last night, however, did not feel that way. Despite the end result, the game didn't feel like a waste, and I wasn't overly disappointed.

The Magic simply refused to lose this game; they wouldn't be denied. They deserve a lot of respect for how they played, for the heart they displayed and the discipline and composure they showed down the stretch. The Lakers made mistakes, but the fact of the matter is that mistakes do happen; perfect games don't exist. All things considered, I think the Lakers' did a fairly good job of minimizing those mistakes. They did not give this game away; the Magic took it. The Lakers did not lose it; the Magic won it.

Congratulations to the Magic for a fantastic game and a historic shooting night. However, given what it took for the Magic to win, and the likelihood of them shooting that well again (not that they won't shot well, just not that well), I think the Lakers have plenty to feel good about.

0 recs  |  Comment 34 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Silver Screen and Roll

The Credits: "Variety"

Sep 2010 by wondahbap - 21 comments

The Credits: "The Fisher King"

Aug 2010 by wondahbap - 72 comments

The Credits: "The Rundown"

Aug 2010 by vikas_s24 - 169 comments

The Credits: "The Good Doctor"

Aug 2010 by wondahbap - 98 comments

Player Report Card: Kobe Bryant

Aug 2010 by C.A. Clark - 300 comments

Comments

Display:

Everyone is talking about Magic’s shooting percentage. So what did the Lakers shoot? The whole game it felt like nobody missed much. Especially the first half, I didn’t see the Lakers miss many either.

by LionZion on Jun 10, 2009 8:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Think of it this way: the Magic shot at an NBA FINALS RECORD CLIP for that game — and it came down to a coin-toss finish.

THAT’S a “good loss.”

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 10, 2009 8:42 AM PDT reply actions  

No doubt

He’s our best player, and has won many games for us. But that does not excuse Kobe Bryant from any blame. He lost the Lakers the game with his over obsession with being “The Man” and refusal to trust his teammates not named Derek Fisher.

If Kobe hadn’t been hot and hadn’t made a number of the shots he took in the 1st Half, this is a 20 point blowout. I spent much of the game, from about the 2nd Quarter on, screaming at the TV for Kobe to pass the fucking ball to one of his many open teammates.

His obsession with being a road assassin kills our team on too many occassions, and too often he escapes blame simply because he is Kobe Bryant. It’s time, Kobe. It’s time to realize there’s more to the game of basketball than shooting the ball. It’s time to trust your teammates. It’s time to PASS THE BALL.

I love Kobe Bryant, but this one is most DEFINATELY on you. Sonofabitch!!!!!!!!!!!

by tandur on Jun 10, 2009 8:56 AM PDT reply actions  

The Lakers lost the game on the defensive end

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gils_Keloids on Jun 10, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

And the poor free throw shooting too.

Very uncharacteristic of the team so don’t expect to see that again.

by BallerBabe on Jun 10, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

umm

We do this alot. Don’t have the numbers in front of me, but just from watching, I’m willing to bet the Lakers have been one of the worse FT shooting teams this postseason. They constantly have games where NOBODY can seemingly hit two straight free throws.

by tandur on Jun 10, 2009 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

here's the numbers

Regular Season: 14th in the NBA with 77.0% FT shooting
Postseason: 10th out of 16 teams with 74.7% FT shooting

The funny part is, I’m willing to bet money that the Lakers, as a team, shot better FTs when Shaq was on the team. It seems, when it comes to freebies, we’ve been slapped with the Shaqino Curse. :P

by tandur on Jun 10, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's one game, man

This is the kind of thing the haters do. I wrote the recap, and I pinned this game on Kobe, because in this game he tried to do too much, and also made several crucial errors.

But we’ve seen him trust Ariza, Gasol, Fisher, even Odom in crunch time. Hell, even Sasha (yes, even this year). He’s one of the best passers in the game, and last night was the exception, not the other way around. (By the way, he took 25 shots, three of which came in the final few seconds – I don’t think 22 shots is that much for him, especially when he’s got 8 assists.)

He made some mistakes this game… let’s not overreact and blow this out of proportion, acting like he’s a selfish player that does this to this team all the time. The haters will do plenty of that for us.

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tired

Tired.

Kobe was tired and fatigued. I was wondering why PJ held him out that long in the fourth. And I got my answer

But when you get a steal and miss a lay up, a few free throws, rush a 3 point shot and fumble your dribble between two players; that shows you are a tired greatest player of the universe.

Orlando shot lights out could have lost. Props to the “O.” I initially I guessed 6 games, but let’s see it the Lakers can prove me wrong and kill it in 5.

Best,

by Charles Y on Jun 10, 2009 9:09 AM PDT reply actions  

That missed layup was very very surprising to me

You don’t see that very often

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gils_Keloids on Jun 10, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right

It was really shocking to see Kobe play like that

by Charles Y on Jun 10, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Josh!

It was nice meeting you btw at the ESPN Zone aside from PsLakerFAn, I forgot the other kat’s real name and handle.

by Charles Y on Jun 10, 2009 9:52 AM PDT reply actions  

That was Sideout11

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good to meet all three of you guys

And Sideout, that was one bitchin’ homemade Ariza jersey.

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Whowins.com
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Up WWL @ HHV:
Considering win order; considering site order: The team winning Games 1-2 and losing Game 3 with Games 1-2 at home and Game 3 on the road (Los Angeles) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2009 NBA and NHL Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 211-41 (.837)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 43-11 (.796)
series record, NBA only, all rounds: 108-11 (.908)
series record, NBA only, Finals round: 14-3 (.824)
Game 4 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 119-133 (.472)
Game 4 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 25-29 (.463)
Game 4 record, NBA only, all rounds: 63-56 (.529)
Game 4 record, NBA only, Finals round: 10-7 (.588)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1083 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and MLB series played through the 2009 NBA and NHL Semifinals. Note in general that the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning fraction: For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is 400-100 rather than 4-1.

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gils_Keloids on Jun 10, 2009 10:09 AM PDT reply actions  

My thoughts pretty much echo Josh's

Good game for the Lakers, Great, outside the realm of normal possibility, game for the Magic. If that’s what it takes to beat the Lakers in the Finals, we should definitely be able to celebrate a championship.

One thing I’d like help figuring out. The Lakers were able to stay in the game because they took 14 more shots than Orlando. WHERE DID THOSE EXTRA SHOTS COME FROM? They didn’t come from turnovers (split 13-13). Offensive rebounds (11-5) can explain 6 extra shots. And free throws for the Magic can explain another 2-3. That still leaves at least 5 more shots the Lakers got over the Magic with no logical statisitcal explanation that I can think of.

For my money, I wasn’t particularly disappointed with the defense. A lot of times, I think people equate defensive performance with defensive success, and that’s not always the case in basketball. It’s the same defense we’ve been playing the last two games, but the Magic just dealt with it much much better than previously. Yes, there were wide open shots, but ball movement and penetration can create that. The Magic did a great job of attacking the rim when we did close out on shooters, and, as mentioned, they also hit some ridiculous shots, as well as some tough shots that are low percentage on top of the ridiculous. I’ll take those Rafer Alston double clutch hook shot layups and awkward floaters all night long.
 
The Magic are too good offensively for you to take everything away. The Lakers are doing a great job reducing Howard’s role in the offense, and spending the rest of their effort on Hedo and Rashard. This allows the Rafer Alstons and Mikael Pietruses to get open shots (and 20 foot fallaway jumpers too!). And if they go 8-12, or 7-11, you live with it because that’s the risk of the defensive game plan. But that’s not going to happen every game (even at home) for either player. And it took both of them having that kind of game for the Magic to pull out a close game, even with good to very good efforts from Hedo and Rashard.

The point is: What exactly would you have the Lakers change about their defense? Outside of maybe making Dwight earn the double a little bit more, and using Clockwork Orange style therapy on LO so that he knows to NEVER LEAVE RASHARD LEWIS FOR ANY REASON, I wouldn’t change anything about the defense. They’ve done a great job of creating situations in which the role players need to be the ones who make big plays, and those role players are 1-3 so far.

If the Magic can play 4 games like last night, they deserve to win a championship. But I’ll believe it when I see it.

by C.A. Clark on Jun 10, 2009 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

not sure

even using the possessions formula, the Lakers came out with 87.8 possessions, and the Magic with 81.8 possessions. At the very least, this shows that APBRmetrics is not foolproof, and does’t take into account things like free throws from fouls on the 3 point shot.

Basketball is like all other sports. Possessions must be equal, or have a difference of only 1, as one team cannot have two possessions to the opponents zero.

by tandur on Jun 10, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Actually, it can be plus 2

Since every quarter is a separate entity, you can have +1 posession for every quarter that you start and end with the ball. You only start with the ball in 2 quarters though.

by C.A. Clark on Jun 10, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

So, assuming that’s what happened, we’re still missing 3 possessions?

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't even think we can assume this happened

It requires one team to have the final shot at the end of every single quarter. I can’t get a hold of a play by play, but I didn’t think the Lakers got a shot off at the end of the game, which would already eliminate one of those bonus possessions. I don’t remember exactly how the other three quarters ended.

by C.A. Clark on Jun 10, 2009 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do rebounds count as possessions?

If Kobe takes a 3, and Dwight collects the rebound as time expires, is that a possession? If it is, then the Magic had 3 of the 4 quarter-ending possessions. If it is not, then the Lakers had 3 of the 4 quarter-ending possessions.

So, how many missing possessions does that account for?

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think for the purposes of a "posession" it counts for the Magic

But what we should be concerned with is who took the last shot/shot related activity (free throws) in a quarter, which would count for the Lakers.

So I’d say the end of quarter numbers count for a +1, still 4-5 extra shots to account for. I’ve brought the resident expert, Dex, in on the search on his Tempo Free breakdown.

by C.A. Clark on Jun 10, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

The final word

Had the Lakers taken the final shooting possession of all 4 quarters, they would have had a +2 margin in shooting possessions. Because the only took the last shot of 3 out of 4 quarters, that gives them a baseline +1 in shooting possessions, accounting for one of the missing 5 possessions.

Then, as Dex pointed out, the ESPN box score does not show team offensive rebounds. It simply adds up individual offensive rebounds. The Lakers had 5 team offensive rebounds to the Magic’s 1, putting them at +4 in team offensive rebounds and +10 in total offensive rebounds. That +4 margin in team offensive rebounds accounts for our 4 missing shooting possessions.

Thanks to Dex, loose ends taken care of.

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

EXACTLY!!

I notice this all the time. More shots. But there is always an explanation! Rebound differential, turnovers, free throws. Those are the typical factors that account for more or less shots. But those things don’t account for everything.

Where did the extra shots come from??

Personally, I’ll be shocked if the Magic can play even one more game like this.

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Coaching...and blog party

Is it just me or does it seem like a great coaching matchup? I think Phil as an awesome coach as far as pregame preparation and adjustments between games. He’s also relatively good in-game. Conversely, SVG’s forte seems to be in-game adjustments and plays. I think he has handled games very well from the sidelines.

He’s willing to try things that, while they seem common sense, most coaches wouldn’t try (playing lineups without a PG, Hedo on Kobe, the alley-oop to Lee at the end of reg in game 2). I have been very impressed with his flexibility during games.

On another note, will people be watching at the ESPN zone again for game 4?

Josh, I always anjoyed reading your articles @ respectkobe.com and am glad you have time for this again.

by Happydaze on Jun 10, 2009 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Haha

“have time” is such a relative term…

Strength & Honor
16...15...14...13...12...11...10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...

by Josh Tucker on Jun 10, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not entirley dissapointed.

This is the NBA Finals and while I should be pissed like normal when we lose, I wasn’t last night. Give props to the Magic for the incredible shooting, yet with all that we still had a chance to win and this one was on Kobe. He is the best closer in the NBA and unfortunatly had an off-night. I am confident that this was a once in a blue moon kind of things and will be a different story tomorrow. This was the game I figured the Magic were going to win after we went up 2-0, so now it is our time to respond and put the Magic on the brink.

GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!

Lakers lead NBA Finals 2-1

by weazel on Jun 10, 2009 3:19 PM PDT reply actions  

"He’s human man," Odom said. "And look at the first quarter, he was inhuman. A superhero. We win together, we lose together.

"Kobe is the ultimate competitor. He’s tough on himself. That’s why he is so good. I’ve seen Kobe hit shots when he’s winded, sick, with the flu. It didn’t come down to one play.

"There’s one guy I want to be in the foxhole with every time, win, lose or draw. That’s who I want to be with."

by intuitive on Jun 10, 2009 3:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood
Start posting about the Lakers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rodman6_small
Hey, You. Create Humor. Now! 8/31
Rodman6_small
Larry Bird Could Have Been A Laker?
Rodman6_small
Greatest Transactions in Laker History
R8_small
Rough Cut: Getting to know your fellow SSR-ers
Owlmuse_small
Shout Out to Lewis Monroe

Recent FanPosts

Small
Predicted Lakers Stats for Next Season
Facebook_avatar_kobe_small
Heat Will Make the Finals - Only If the Celtics Let Them
Small
How I felt when the Lakers repeated...
Small
Sparks Vs. Storm 11P.M. Eatern Time. I see u Wave Storm going down
La_g_kobe11_668_small
2010-2011 Los Angeles Lakers Stats
Facebook_avatar_kobe_small
Cry Me a Doc Rivers
Jelly_bean_p_small
Will Dampier Be A Good Fit For LA?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Was signing Ron Artest the right move for the Lakers?
Yes, Artest was the best wing available and the Lakers got him cheap
3801 votes
Yes, paying Artest the same money Ariza would have gotten is a wise investment
2027 votes
No, Ariza fit better into what the Lakers needed from the wing
645 votes
No, Artest will ruin the team chemistry
281 votes

6754 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

nice highlight reel
:D

http://i36.tinypic.com/21azscn.jpg
for larger image

Recent FanShots

The Lakers top 10 plays of the year, according to nba.com
NBA 2K11 looks sick.

Good preview from IGN here.
nice mix, except the part after 2:23 sucks
Biting the Hand that Feeds You: Gary Payton
I had some time on my hands and thought about doing something productive. Instead, I made this!
Lakers vs. Celtics: All-Time Teams Match-up
Good News for Filipinos!
For entertainment purposes only, do not try this at home

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

NEW YORK CITY NY - AUGUST 12:  Kevin Durant #5 looks on during the World Basketball Festival USAB Showcase at Radio City Music Hall on August 12 2010 in New York City. (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images for Nike) +4 updates

FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Routs Iran 88-51, Clinches Top Spot In Group B

Cleveland Cavaliers' Delonte West, right, shoot over Indiana Pacers' Jeff Foster in the first half of a NBA basketball game in Indianapolis, Monday, April 13, 2009.  (AP Photo/Michael Conroy) link

Celtics Sign Free Agent Delonte West

Rose +2 updates

FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Ekes Out 70-68 Win Over Brazil

More from SBNation.com >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Df_logo_-_lakers_small DexterFishmore

Editors

Josh_small Josh Tucker

Ohkproof_1__small wondahbap

Beat Writers

Lakers_small vikas_s24

09_finals_wallpaper_mvp_1920_small Saurav A. Das

Kobelogo_small Gil Meriken

Umad_small theshmoes