Lakers vs. Rockets Game 1: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
That certainly wasn't the start the Lakers were looking for. They came out flat, rusty, whatever you'd like to call it and the Rockets played great, especially on the defensive end. When the Lakers needed a basket, the Rockets came up with a stop en route to a Game 1 victory that few expected, but certainly ratchets up the series as we head to Game 2.
The Good
We Can Chalk Some Of It Up To Rust- While it's definitely not THE reason the Lakers lost, they certainly were a little bit off, especially early on and that can be chalked off to not having playing a game in seven days. You can practice all you want and do so at a very high level, but even the highest practice level isn't up to level of a game, let alone a playoff game. Yeah, the Lakers struggled, but at least a portion of it (you judge how much) is due to something that won't be a factor for the rest of the series.
Rebounding- The Rockets are a good rebounding team, but the Lakers outrebounded Houston despite missing far more shots. LA was able to grab a dozen offensive boards, two times as many as the Rockets. The Lakers didn't do a very good job stopping the Rockets from scoring, but at least they held Houston to one shot on the occasion the Lakers did get a stop.
Jordan Farmar- Sure, it was only three minutes, but that's three more minutes than he's played since Game 2 versus Utah and guess what...he looked good. Farmar knocked down a three, his only shot, and played good defense. He was also the only Laker to finish in the positive column of the plus/minus. Because it was three minutes, we can't count on this going forward, but it gives us a glimmer of hope in a player many had written off this postseason.
Andrew Bynum- It only took all of what, 150 seconds before he picked up his second foul and found the bench? So yeah, that was less than stellar, but he did play 15 minutes, showed confidence on the offensive end while scoring 10 points and when not picking up fouls, made Yao work for his points. It wasn't the greatest performance we've ever seen, but fouls aside, it was a good performance and showed that he could make some form of an impact in the series.
The Bad
When The Other Team Is Making A Run, Get The Ball To Kobe- So Kobe wasn't at his best tonight, but how many Lakers were in Game 1? At the end of the day, Kobe is still the Lakers best player and the guy whose hands you want the ball in. So, when the Rockets were in the midst of a 7-0 run that turned a one point lead into a six point deficit that changed the game, why couldn't Kobe get a touch, let alone a shot?
Can Someone Take Advantage Of A Six Inch Height Advantage?- With Mutombo out, the Rockets' backup center is Chuck Hayes. That's 6'6'' Chuck Hayes. He was guarding 7' Pau Gasol and the Lakers didn't recognize this mismatch at first, then when they did, Pau couldn't take advantage of it. He was muscled out from his position and couldn't even draw a double team, let alone score. Andrew Bynum didn't fare much better, tossing up an awful looking jump hook. If Chuck Hayes is going to be able to shut down Pau and Bynum then the Lakers might as well just give up now.
The Ugly
Free Throw Shooting- 12-19 (63.2%) from the free throw line is very poor and even worse when you consider the Rockets' 86.2% and who missed the Lakers' free throws. Kobe was 3-5 and the biggest culprit, Lamar Odom, was 1-6. The Rockets are an excellent defensive team and will make you work for everything you get. The worst thing you can do is put in all that work, then get to the line and come up empty.
Three Point Shooting- The Lakers shot 2-18 from three. That's 11.1% Farmar knocked down his only three point attempt and Kobe made one (while missing six). Ariza and Fisher were each 0-4 and Sasha was 0-2. The Lakers should be able to control the paint with multiple big men who can score inside as opposed to the Rockets' one, but they will still have to knock down a shot from the perimeter.
Derek Fisher- Fish is 35 and his legs show it. He doesn't have the foot speed he once did and as a result, is beat consistently on defense, but that's nothing new. His leadership skills, command of the offense and perimeter shooting usually make up for it though. In Game 1 he couldn't knock down a shot and wasn't active enough to create space for others. If that's the case, why is he still out on the floor? I'm not going to harp on Fish's inability to stay in front of Brooks because he just can't. Psychically, he can't do it and theres nothing he can do about it. So if Fish isn't going to make a contribution on the offensive end, why not go with a guy like Brown or Farmar who can at least bother Brooks a bit?
Lamar Odom- Odom's numbers and output weren't awful. He did have nine points and five rebounds, which isn't too bad, but most concerning was Odom's inability to find his niche. Where exactly is Odom going to make an impact versus the Rockets? He got to the offensive glass a couple times, but not with any consistency. He couldn't get any easy buckets in transition or on cuts and he didn't do much off the bounce. So Odom didn't have a major impact in Game 1 of the series, but what we still don't know is how exactly Odom is going to make an impact.
1 recs |
64 comments
|
Comments
Chuck Hayes
I would have kept silent for just about anything else you could have said, but I have to stick up for Chuck.
You rip Gasol and Bynum and the rest of the Lakers for not taking advantage of Hayes’ defense. Hayes, however, is a tremendous post defender. If it weren’t for his utter lack of an offensive game (seriously- the guy misses wide open layups regularly, he has the ugliest free throw in the NBA, and he flat doesn’t have a jump sot) he’d be a starter level power forward. The two plays you described (ie. Bynum and Gasol getting out muscled and taking awkward shots from out of comfortable range) are duplicates of 80% of the shots that get taken against him.
I don’t mean to be argumentative; It’s just Chuck doesn’t get much respect in the best of times, so I feel like I ought to defend him.
Time to galvanize
I couldn't agree with this more.
He reminds me of what everyone’s taught in basic football. If you get lower than the opposing player and drive your legs, you’re going to be dominate the opposing offensive/defensive line. Chuck takes the same principles to basketball in the post defense.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
That
was Landry.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
hayes is the short round one
landry is the taller a little less round one.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
Sorry, but Pau blowing shotshe normally hits
wasn’t because of Chuck Hayes’ tremendous post defense. Pau blew it tonight.
I’ll give him credit for Bynum giving up on getting better position.
Scola also missed a couple wide open looks though... Remember that the "rims made us lose" theory can break both ways...
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
I'm sure he did,
but he’s not a focal point of the Rockets offense like Pau is in our offense. We need Pau to be better more than the Rockets need Scola to.
Pau has to score for us, but that wasn’t my point. It wasn’t Hayes defense on Pau, it was Pau just missing his shots. So, if Scola missed some wide open look, don’t expect me to credit the Lakers D, if it wasn’t responsible for it.
Scola is the focal point
when the lakers take Yao out the game. Scola is very underrated because he is dwarfed by Yao.
Pau struggle a little bit more than Scola, but Scola did still struggle
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
Scola is great, but a couple of those wide open looks were at the edge of his range, maybe even a bit beyond.
Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Scola is a good shooter out to about 15-17 feet
I don’t recall him taking any shots from beyond 15ish
"Tree stumps are short, too, but have you ever tried to move one?"
J. A. Adande on Chuck Hayes
When Hayes is out of the game, sure
Hayes only played 6 minutes. I was just saying that it’s not fair to knock Gasol for not taking advantage of the height differential. I wasn’t blaming Gasol’s entire night on the Chuckwagon.
"Tree stumps are short, too, but have you ever tried to move one?"
J. A. Adande on Chuck Hayes
Exactly. Why wasn’t Pau in “the ugly”? (Oddly fitting for Pau, for obvious reasons.)
Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Too Much Credit..
..is being given to the Rockets. The Lakers were uncharachteriscally bad. The things that lost them the game are things that would only happen after being off for several days and not playing. That can be seen in their poor free throw and three point shooting. Don’t get me wrong the Rockets won because they played better last night. But this loss had more to do with the Lakers rustiness and less to do with the Rockets defense. Besides, the Lakers ONLY lost by eight points and to me I think that if Sasha, Fisher and Ariza each shot at least fifty percent from the three point line the Lakers would have won and we would not be here talking about the Rocket’s defense. Maybe this loss will wake up the Lakers and bring up their intensity.
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on May 5, 2009 7:19 AM PDT reply actions
You can't expect
3 role players on your team to shoot 50% from the field much less from deep. I fail to see your argument here. Of course you would have won with a higher field goal percentage, just as it would have been a blowout of the Rockets had shot 50% from 3 with 3 role players.
You’re also forgetting that the Rockets didn’t play particularly well either. Far too many turnovers, were outrebounded, less steals and blocks, etc. What won this game was the Rockets defense. Everyone knows that defense wins championships. It’s been that way for a long time. Just ask Boston if you don’t believe me.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
That was the best you played against us all year.
Yao, Ron and Brooks were all great. Their best games against us.
Did I say it was?
I just said they understand that defense wins championships.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
the ugly
Pau Gasol.
but get him the ball and the lakers win, simple as that…hes the real MVP of the lakers, sorry mamba lovers
It was exactly as I feared it would be…
The Lakers came out last night clunking everything. Wide open jumpers were missed routinely and no one got into a zone shooting the ball for LA last night. Unfortunately the Lakers are not the type of team that can rely on their defense in these sorts of situations either.
The Lakers defense really feeds off of their offense. When they get on a scoring roll they start shutting things down on the other end. Their transition defense is usually poor and so the opponent is usually off and running off of any miss or turnover. The Lakers really do feed off of their offense.
I’m more concerned about the toughness of this team. These are not the same Lakers that started out this decade winning 3 –straight titles; those guys were mentally tough enough to come back in a series like this. But these guys, IMHO, start to press and don’t play as smart when the pressure is on (last year’s finals is a great example of that).
There is enormous pressure on the Lakers now to win 2 of the next 3 games. They have the talent to do it but do they have the mental toughness. Stay tuned for Wednesday night…
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
Talent, Mental Toughness, Heart
Are all peripheral to Execution.
The Lakers need to execute their game plan better than the Rockets.
So many
Doubters out there. Because of one loss.. I guess that’s a testament to how good the Lakers are. One loss and everybody feels like the sky is falling. A couple of things:
Kobe was sick with flu like symptoms.
The team was off for more than a week, while Houston was fresh off the first round.
No surprise the Lakers couldn’t find their rhythm. By Wednesday, they’ll have their legs back, and Kobe will be feeling better.
There is a HUGE difference between "one loss" coming at home and "one loss" coming on the road...
Let there be no mistake, it is the Lakers who are in the hole now, not the Rockets.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
Sounds Ominous
But it really isn’t.
Yes, the Lakers are in the hole by exactly one game.
Not insurmountable odds. The Lakers are going to have to execute, for the first time in a long time. I’ll get a better idea of what will happen once game 2 is done. Still won’t know what will happen, I’ll just have a better idea.
They lost
home court advantage. The Rockets have been a much better home team than road team all year.
I’d say it was a pretty big deal.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
How big is deal
Is the real issue.
Not enough to say that the Lakers will lose the series definitely, and not enough to say the Rockets will win the series definitely.
Obviously
you can’t make a series prediction on Game 1 alone, but it made surely made a statement.
Phil Jackson has never lost a playoff series that he won the first game in. (Like 40-something and 0) Never.
He’s 6-8 in Playoff series that he lost the first game in. Thus if history tells us anything; Houston has become the favorite to win from here on out.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
So you believe that Houston is the favorite to win the series
Is that what you are telling me?
Or do you mean just by looking at past performances in a statistical sense? Because I can’t really argue with that. The stats are what they are.
But I can disagree that in this series, Houston is now the favorite.
I'm not necessarily saying that the Rockets are the clear favorite now
but a case can certainly be made.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
Well the Rockets did take Game 1
So they’re ahead.
I was going to say, if you think that Houston is the favorite, give me underdog odds for the Lakers and I would take it (you’d have a lot of takers regardless of their team bias) … if I were a betting man, which I’m not.
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions
The Rockets are
21-2 in their last 23 at home. One loss to LA, one loss to SA. Both without our full roster.
The rockets are also 27-10 since T-mac quit for good. That translates to 60 win team for a full season.
Im not saying the rockets are the clear cut favorites, but the lakers definately have their work cut out for them.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
If I hold anything against the Rockets, it is that &*^&*(*#@ loss to the Spurs...
That screwed up EVERYTHING.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
Which loss to the Spurs??
Do you mean the last game of the season, because that was against the Mavs.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
I expect LA to respond...
in game 2. Maybe even with a big win. I can see not only LA playing much better but Houston playing a lot worse (perhaps a little too satisfied with already having taken one of the first two in LA).
Its Friday night game 3 and Sunday game 4 from Houston that has me worried.
The pressure is totally on the Lakers now to win two of the next 3 games in order to get home court back.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
I've just seen this movie and now it's starting to look like the sequel...
Rockets come out hitting on all cylinders and steal the first game on the road, utterly erradicating home court advantage for the series.
Home team responds in game 2.
Good luck with games 3 and 4 in Houston. Rockets hang on to win in front of their home crowd — who will be NUTS.
Game 5 is a must win at home, and the home team will.
If only, Game 6 can be pulled out on the road………….. Game 7 will show ‘em who’s boss!!!
But it can’t.
And the bottom line is that the series was won in Game 1.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
"seen this movie"
not sure what type of analogy this is. especially if you consider how the Rockets have not gotten past the 1st round in any recent years. I understand it’s a different team without T-Mac, but that would further go against your point. I would not stick a fork in the Lakers quite yet…
by Frankie_JHawk on May 5, 2009 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions
This is how the Blazers vs Rockets series started
"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''
Do you have a crystal ball?
Also game 1 Houston at Portland, Houston shoots 58%, gives up 41% to Portland, Houston wins by 27
Game 1 Houston at LA, Houston shoots 48%, gives up 44% to LA, Houston wins by 8
Doesn’t look like the same movie to me. The first one you could figure out the ending halfway through. The second one kept you in suspense until near the end.
Not. The. Same.
The Lakers are not the Blazers. This is a simple fact. You may find similarities, but they are not the same.
No -- but I do believe in probabilities and the reality of massive home court advantage in the NBA.
Do you have a crystal ball?
The Blazers match up with the Lakers better than you are willing to admit. Frankly, I think the Blazers had a good-to-excellent (40%) shot of beating the Lakers if they had escaped the first round Matchup from Hell™®, which they could not…
At this point, with a road win under their belts and potentially 3 more grabs for the ring in LA, the Rockets have a statistically better chance of beating the Lakers than 40%…
Doesn’t look like the same movie to me. The first one you could figure out the ending halfway through. The second one kept you in suspense until near the end.
We’ll see. I think we can agree that there is a universal expectation that the Lakers will come out fast and frenzied in Game 2… Then we see about the situation in Houston…
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
..... and by "match up" with the Lakers, I mean correlate, correspond, equate...
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
I'm just impressed with the way you mapped out the entire series
Based on Game 1
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Wait
I just stumbled across your prediction for this series two days ago : “Lakers in 6”.
The Lakers losing Game 1 completely changed your mind?
I'm confident
That rust played a huge factor in the outcome of this game. Lakers destroyed Utah at home last series, and they didn’t play that way last night. Once they get back to their regular style of play they should be fine. Remember, they went 4-0 against Houston in the regular season, winning both of the games in Houston. That was when they DIDN’T have a week off.
It’s like Dwight Howard said, even though he was only off for a couple of days it felt like he had been off for weeks. That’s what extensive rest will do to your rhythm and timing, and it takes at least a game to get it back.
But Utah threw in the towel before the postseason
Oh sure Utah may have been able to get back some of the 22 point lead that L.A. had against them but Utah was obscenely bad on the road where I believe they only won 1 game against teams above .500 in the Western Conference.
While Houston’s road record this season was not pretty, a large portion of our road losses came early on in the season while Tracy McGrady was still with the team and playing piss-poorly in nearly every road game.
Houston’s a much better team now, but with that said:
I expect L.A. to bring nothing less than 100% on Wednesday
I expect L.A. will probably win on Wednesday.
I also expect Houston to do everything in its power to stop that from happening
Rockets in 6/Lakers in 7
Crap, Houston
Is now the team everyone is rooting for, because they play together and they play hard.
Still waiting for Game 2 to start. Only 32 more hours …
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Game 2 is now completely "must win" for the Lakers...
I’ll be shocked if they don’t… But there needs to be something going on other than Kobe jacking the ball up 50 times in the next game… He took, what, 31 shots in Game 1? That is indicative that there was something SERIOUSLY wrong with the Lakers offensively (likely due to the matchup with the defense-first Rockets).
I’ve said before and will say again that Phil has got to get Mbenga off the end of the bench and let him come in and bang bodies with Yao for 20 minutes. Bynum you can only count on to say on the floor 20 minutes max, with an expectation of 15… If you have Pau on Yao defensively, you grind Pau down and reduce his offensive effectiveness dramatically. And the Lakers MUST have a big performance from Pau (and Lamar) to compete with the Rockets. If Kobe shoots 50 times and scores 50 points, the Lakers will lose.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
Can we save all the Rust Talk till after the Cavs play??
Lakers had 6 days off
Cleveland will have 8 days off before they play tonight.
Maybe it is rust, we will see how the Cavs come out tonight. If they come out hot, the rust excuse goes out the window.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
Anybody else
Having flashbacks to The Finals last year?
This Houston team plays in the same manner that Boston did last year, and seems to employ a lot of similar defensive schemes. Pau got PUNKED by Hayes, just like he did by KG last year. Bynum couldn’t stay on the freakin’ court, so it was just like not having him. Odom couldn’t produce any easy baskets inside against Yao or Scola, and Brooks was torching Fisher just like Rondo did a year ago.
That left us with Kobe trying to generate offense by himself, with an elite defensive team locked in on him. Sorry, but that won’t win the series.
I agree, Houston in 6 or Lakers in 7.
Maybe just the brand new fans who watch the Lakers come May.
Who might not know enough about the Lakers to know that last night shouldn’t repeat itself. Who saw the Lakers own the Rockets this year, and know last night’s gave wasn;t too much different, save for the rockets actually showing up in the 4th quarter, and the Lakers missing too many shots they normally hit.
Calm down. Picking the Rockets in 6 sounds awfully fairweather to me.
The Lakers did own the Rockets in the regular season.
Kind of. All of the games except the first were won in the 4th, so thats not really ownage. Also, not ONE single regular season game was played with the roster both teams have now. Whether it was T-mac playing, battier out, artest out, rafer playing, landry out, odom out, or bynum out, these two TEAMS havent played each other besides last night.
I dont know what your definition of fairweather is, but someone can be a real fan and still not believe their team will win. I’m not a fairweather rockets fan but i didnt think we could win this series until last night, and even now i still dont know if we can. Theres a difference between fairweather and realistic.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
Just saying
During last year’s Eastern Conference semis between Boston and Cleveland, LeBron opened with a 2-18 outing. Then everybody’s like, “watch out, he’s gonna explode in Game 2, no way he’s having another bad shooting night like that”, and then he has a 6-24 game. So obviously, it wasn’t just a case of LeBron being “off”, it was a case of the Celtics making LeBron “off”.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Houston was the big reason the Lakers were off last night. And Houston’s not going to go away, so if they can throw the Lakers off their game again..
Good Analysis
Im not saying it was all the Rockets defense, but it wasnt all the lakers being off. We will learn more tomorrow though.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0

by 






























