Silver Screen and Roll: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

Lakers 103, Nuggets 94: Game 5 Recap

This is why I have yet to hit the panic button in these playoffs.

Did someone mention that these Lakers are who we thought they were? Perhaps that is why there was little surprise when a flat, tired, unmotivated Lakers team lost a non-critical Game 4. It's also why Lakers fans across the board expected a strong showing and a solid win tonight. That is exactly what they got.

It has never been a question of ability; the Lakers can do it all, and they can do it better than anyone else. As it has been from the beginning, it is a question of motivation. As J.A. Adande put it, this team "seems to require danger to be at its best." That's what they faced in Game 5, where for much of the game they were in danger of being behind in a series after the second game, for the first time in these playoffs – not to mention being on the brink of elimination. But as they have throughout the postseason, they rose to the occasion forced their opponents into that precarious position, instead.

This was a championship level effort in so many ways, but at its most basic, this was simply the Lakers doing what they and everyone else knew they needed to do. The keys to the game were rebounding and defense; they were active in both areas, dominant in the fourth quarter. Simply put, this was a matter of execution and will, and in this game, the Lakers imposed their will and did what they needed to win.

Star-divide

In Game 4, the lethargic Lakers secured 18 fewer rebounds than their opponents, including 11 fewer on offense. Last night, the rebounding game was virtually equal; the Nuggets pulled down one more rebound than the Lakers, including four more on offense.

What was most impressive, however, was L.A.'s rebounding effort in the fourth quarter. During the final period, the Lakers gave up only seven rebounds to the Nuggets, and not a single offensive one. Meanwhile, the Lakers grabbed 14 rebounds, including one offensive board. To say that this fourth quarter rebounding dominance was instrumental in the Lakers' late push to take control of the game is an understatement. The defensive stops fueled their run, but their ability to eliminate Denver's second chance points was key to their ability to take Denver out of the game while turning a late third quarter deficit into an early fourth quarter lead.

At the same time, the Lakers clamped down defensively. They were fairly good on defense throughout the game, holding Denver to 94 points on 38.6% shooting for the game. They had 12 blocked shots (Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom combined for nine of them), and they altered countless others, giving up only 36 points in the paint.

Most impressive, however, was the stretch to end the third quarter and start the fourth, where they literally shut the Nuggets down offensively. John Hollinger describes the turning point:

From the 7:37 mark of the third until the 7:52 mark of the fourth -- a span of nearly a full quarter -- Denver mustered only five points. That was a span of 19 trips in which they a seven-point lead became an 11-point deficit, and the Nuggets never recovered.

During that "span of nearly a full quarter" was a stretch of 11 straight Denver possessions in which the Nuggets failed to score a single point. That 11-possession stretch included four straight turnovers, two of them steals by Gasol. This was the Lakers letting the world know that they're very aware that defense wins championships – and that they are fully capable of living up to that standard.

Offensively, the Lakers weren't too shabby, either. The most impressive offensive statistic was the 25 assists the Lakers tallied on 37 field goals. After several games of ineffective dribble penetration, screen and rolls, and one-on-one isolation play, the Lakers finally got back to their vaunted triangle offense. They swung the ball from one side of the floor to the other, and back again, inside and out.

They also shared the load offensively, putting together an offensive performance that was about as balanced as it could be. As ESPN's Kevin Arnovitz points out, "eight different Lakers attempted between five and 15 shots." Five different Lakers scored in double figures – Kobe Bryant, Gasol, Odom, Derek Fisher, and Trevor Ariza – and Bynum just missed the cut with nine points.

The result was that for the first time in several games, Kobe Bryant was not forced to carry the team offensively, scoring only 22 points in the game while collecting eight assists as he played the role of decoy and facilitator.

But don't let that fool you into thinking Bryant had a subpar game. He was absolutely masterful. Recognizing that Denver's defensive game plan centered on stopping him individually, he accepted the challenge of drawing the double- and triple-team, and when it came, he willingly passed out to teammates, who were able to find high percentage shots. After the game, he explained his approach (via ESPN):

"It was a big gamble for me coming in, but I wanted to change my approach this game and be more of a decoy," Bryant said after adding eight assists, several out of double-teams in the fourth quarter. "The past couple games they really were loading to my side and I figured I could be a decoy and try to give chances to my teammates."

He did so exceedingly well. Over at Forum Blue and Gold, reader Reed added these thoughts on how Kobe beat Denver's defense:

Kobe continues to prove that he is the preeminent closer in the game. Every time down he knew the double was coming, but brilliantly let the full trap come as far out as possible - all to give the other 4 as long as possible to beat 3. A lesser player would have skipped the ball out as soon as the double started. But he is a Man, directing and inspiring his teammates as a true leader - telling Pau and Odom to make plays and putting them in a position to do so.

Bryant's ability to make the pass out of the trap should not be underrated, either. Often times, Denver trapped him so successfully that most players would be completely stuck, forced to either call timeout or turn the ball over. Not Kobe. He always found the pass, and often it was an incredibly difficult one to make, but Bryant executed it to perfection.

Meanwhile, Kobe's effect on Game 5 extended far beyond his play on the court. Just hours after he was criticized by a friend of Henry Abbott's and a supposed Lakers fan for not inspiring his teammates to better play, there was Kobe – drawing on white boards, providing instruction, giving encouragement, and firmly pushing his teammates to rise to the occasion. Where LeBron James allows his teammates to look to him to take over and bail them out in tough situations, Kobe pushed his teammates to step up, and they did.

On one fourth quarter possession, with the clock winding down, Gasol received the ball near the free throw line and immediately looked to Kobe. Instead of taking the ball and forcing a tough three-pointer to beat the buzzer, Kobe told Gasol not to look at him, but to turn around and make a play with the ball himself. Gasol backed down his defender, spun, and hit a fadeaway floater.

Not much later, on the left wing, Gasol and Kobe tried to work a give-and-go play, which resulted in a Denver steal. The next time down the floor, Kobe let Gasol know he wasn't interested in trying that again, but that instead, he should go to work on the block. He drew the trap on the left wing and passed out to Gasol, who again beat his defender for the basket.

Still later, on the play that sealed the victory, Kobe Bryant received the ball on the right wing. He felt out his possibilities to the right and left, and finding no place to go, he dialed in on the basket and elevated. Everyone in the world expected him to take the shot; it was a classic Kobe Bryant shot. Instead, he saw a wide open Lamar Odom standing under the basket, and he fired a bullet pass to Odom for an easy layup.

This was Kobe Bryant at his best – not necessarily scoring, but controlling every aspect of the game, forcing the Nuggets to trap him and then punishing them by finding his teammates, who then exploited the opportunity to play 3-on-4 basketball.

Predictably, Jon Barry and Michael Wilbon spent much of the post-game rehashing their absurd theory that the less Kobe shoots, the more successful the Lakers are. Like many that contribute to the discssion here at SS&R, I am utterly dumbfounded that they continue to interpret a causational relationship between the two. In fact, it is the other way around; Kobe shoots more when the Lakers are behind with time running out, and he feels the need to get them back into it. While JB and Wilbon incorrectly insist that it was because Kobe took fewer shots that his teammates were able to get involved in the game, the opposite was actually true. It was because his teammates played so well, removing any need for Kobe to carry them, that he took only 13 shots.

That brings us to the rest of the Lakers. First among them, Lamar Odom was sublime. He was aggressive on offense, aggressive on the boards, and played like someone who wasn't battling a back injury. He was often the beneficiary of Kobe Bryant passes, and he dominated the paint. His final line of 19 points, 14 rebounds, 4 blocks, and 3 assists was excellent, but his game was even better than that. Suffice it to say that if he could play like this on a regular basis, the Lakers would feel nearly invulnerable.

Pau Gasol was also excellent. While he got few touches, taking only eight total shots, he left his mark on the game in no small way. On both ends of the court, he was aggressive. On offense, his passing contributed to the success of Bynum and Odom. On defense, he was insanely active. He blocked five shots, and probably changed at least ten to fifteen more. He protected the basket, kept the Nuggets from getting second chance opportunities, and even ran the break like a point guard.

Andrew Bynum, though still limited in minutes, was also very effective in the early going. It is because he was so aggressive, and so successful offensively, that Gasol's lack of touches (especially early in the game) are of little concern. Had he shot better from the free throw line, he'd have been the sixth Laker in double digits.

Derek Fisher's shot showed up for a game. He, too, was aggressive early on, and he hit some big shots to get the Lakers going. Shannon Brown, however, was simply awesome as Fisher's replacement. He gave the Lakers a huge burst of energy, and his thunderous breakaway dunk off of Gasol's feed, Birdman be damned, ignited the Laker run that blew the game open. He moved constantly without the ball, makingh him an easy target for Kobe's passes out of the traps, and he played very good defense on Chauncey Billups.

Luke Walton played limited minutes, but while he was in he was very effective. Defensively, he continued to make life difficult for Carmelo Anthony, and on offense he brought the passing and triangle IQ that helped make the Lakers' offense so effective in the fourth quarter.

Trevor Ariza was quietly effective, working the baseline give-and-go with Pau Gasol all night long. As always, he made some clutch plays, including one such give and go for a huge basket near the end of the fourth quarter. He scored 12 points on seven shots, and his four assists, two blocks, and one steal weren't too shabby, either, especially considering he didn't commit a single turnover.

As an entire team, the Lakers came to play in Game 5. They played with tremendous energy, and the defensive lockdown in the fourth quarter, combined with the mamoth rebounding effort, was truly a thing to behold. Because the rest of the team showed up, Kobe was able to share the offensive load, exploiting the Nuggets' defense with his passing far more effectively than he could have by going 1-on-3. They played with energy and intensity, but they also played with poise and composure where they could have fallen apart at the seams (much like the Nuggets did, proving that some things never change).

This was the effort Lakers fans have been waiting for. It was the complete opposite of Game 4, and once again, those watching got a look at a team truly capable of winning a championship. Will they show up for Game 6, or allow the Nuggets to force a Game 7? None can say. But for now, Lakers fans can revel in the fact that their team's championship aspirations remain alive and well.

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Silver Screen and Roll

The Credits: "Variety"

Sep 2010 by wondahbap - 48 comments

The Credits: "Deep Impact"

Sep 2010 by theshmoes - 138 comments

USA-Iran Open Thread

Sep 2010 by DexterFishmore - 66 comments

The Credits: "The Fisher King"

Aug 2010 by wondahbap - 72 comments

The Credits: "Anchorman"

Aug 2010 by theshmoes - 175 comments

Comments

Display:

1st!!

0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.

by gee-roj on May 28, 2009 5:43 AM PDT reply actions  

The up and down nature of the Lakers…

…still concerns me a bit.

I’d really like to see them close this thing out on Friday night. If they advance to the finals they’ll be playing against a team from the east that will be on a roll; either an Orlando team that will have disposed of the number 1 seed in these playoffs in 5 or 6 games or they’ll be playing a Cleveland team that will have just come back from being down 3-1, rolling into the finals on a 3-game winning streak with huge momentum (not to mention the Cavs would have the home court edge).

In 2009’s post-season, the Lakers have not won back to back games in a playoff series since winning games 2 and 3 of the Houston series and it’s time for that to change. Another tough win in Denver would position them very nicely for the next round; giving them some extra rest while also proving that they are capable of putting together back to back wins in a series (their eventual opponents from the east, regardless of who they are will have already proven that). Loose this Friday night and the Lakers face the very real possibility of not making the finals at all.

Last night’s game was tied at the end of each quarter and as impressive as the Lakers’ effort was, it’s no guarantee that they would reproduce that on Sunday night, if necessary. Denver has played well at the Staples Center and giving them another chance at it, in a winner_takes_all situation, is not something I’m comfortable with. A lot of the great championship teams of the past could smell blood in moments like this and would not even allow the series to go 7. Friday night could be the difference between a hungry Lakers team that can smell that championship they fell short of last year; or Lakers team going through the motions, relying on the comforts of home to give them their edge.

0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.

by gee-roj on May 28, 2009 6:42 AM PDT reply actions  

Not really

Anything is possible, but is it probable that the Lakers will be eliminated in game 7, highly unlikely. To use a popular term here at SSR: Lakers just have to "hold serve" and steal one away game if it’s the Cavs, and that steal is more likely to occur than getting eliminated in game 7 with the Denver.

by Jello Is Jiggling on May 28, 2009 7:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pau

Pau blocked 5 shots which could of easily been a 10 point swing in the Nuggets favor. Considering that the Lakerw won by 9 that is a huge defensive effort by Pau. I don’t remember this team playing this good defensively in this entire post-season. It is amazing and scary (for the rest of the league) how good this team and how tough they actually can be when they make the effort to do so.

By the way, I would like to officially welcome Bynum to the playoffs.

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on May 28, 2009 6:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Excellent recap Josh

LO performance picked up after that get even, in your face bird dude slaaaam dunk. I think he was a big diff in this game. Yeah, Barry, I think I’ll keep my comments clean here by simply paraphrasing another poster in one of the second half threads, don’t remember who it was, but that poster asked, Why is Barry even employed.

by Jello Is Jiggling on May 28, 2009 6:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Great write up

I’m glad you touched on the rebounding. The 14 to 10 edge really only closed up in the 4th quarter. The early dominance by the nugs on the boards was a real issue over the first couple of quarters.

I like the look of our team, I bet Kobe has a sit down with his teammates, and gets them set to take this one in Denver.

Loved the hustle, loved the leadership from Kobe, and Brown continues to be my favorite Laker off the bench!

by 99bc99 on May 28, 2009 7:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Well, your preview was spot-on.

Phil Jackson’s $25,000 was well spent and the Lakers definitely got the “friendly” whistles. Congrats on the win.

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 8:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Nugg

1) The Lakers got bumped every time they drove the baseline in the 4th with no fouls called.

2)The Lakers wanted it more than the Nuggets and the Nuggets settled for jump shots in the late 3rd and early 4th.

Man up, quit complaining.

by 81 Witness on May 28, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

There was no complaint there.

1. We already hashed out the productivity of the fine before game 5.

2. I never said that the Refs gave the game to the Lakers. The Lakers earned it. The Nuggets went stupid (and not the good stupid) at the end of the third, beginning of the 4th.

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

It went both ways.

The way your team, and fans want to think you are the more “physical” team, the way it was called yesterday should work in your favor. Right? Complaining about that is lame.

Phil complained about the uneven way the games were called, not the calls themselves.

BUT, I don’t think there was any thing “friendly” last night. The same thing that went for us, went for you.

it was a bad call on Nene’s 6th, but it wasn’t a game decider. Maybe the fact he only took 3 shots was.

The Lakers are 13-3 against the Nuggets in the past 2 years.

by wondahbap on May 28, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

It went both ways.

See, and that’s what I thought happened in game 4 — but Laker fans were up in arms.

it was a bad call on Nene’s 6th, but it wasn’t a game decider. Maybe the fact he only took 3 shots was.

That was the 3rd bad call against Nene. His 3rd foul was a loose-ball foul. In game 4, Melo ran into Ariza when Ariza touched the ball first, the call went against Melo. In game 5, Nene had reached the ball first and the call still went against Nene. His 4th foul was a phantom offensive foul. Sure, you can call a guy for a foul when he forces his way into his spot — but calling it for the first time in the 4th quarter after it hadn’t been called all game (on either side) is not consistent. The 6th should have been a no-call. The tech was completely deserved and completely moronic.

And yes, there were calls that were called both ways and some non-calls both ways. But I just don’t believe that Pau Gasol has such amazing body control that he can jump to contest 20+ shots, block 5 of them, and only get called for 1 foul in 45 minutes of play. That’s just ridiculous. Even more ridiculous since I watched the whole game.

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

What didn't go both ways in game 4 was the body contact calls Melo got

When no Laker got the same kind of call (including Kobe). That was the major source of frustration for me. Please see below for my thoughts on both Pau and Nene

by C.A. Clark on May 28, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Lakers fans were "up in arms"

because of Dahntay Jones. That was the 3rd “non-basketball related” foul of his in the series. Which then magnified the techs, and then magnified the tick tack calls. Which were confusing sue to the non-calls. I don’t think Phil or even most Lakers fans cared as much as the calls themselves, as much as the inconsistency of the calls.

Nuggets fans might not like how the game turned out (obviously), but you can’t say the rules didn’t apply for both teams. You think Nene was called for cheap fouls? We think Bynum is called for cheap fouls.

I saw Pau trying to jump away from contact while making the block. So is it fair to call the foul when Melo is looking for contact just as much as making the shot?

All PJ wanted was reciprocity.

The Lakers are 13-3 against the Nuggets in the past 2 years.

by wondahbap on May 28, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well said

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

NuggBuckets

Did you see the points in the paint? Did you see the three point shot attempts?

The Nuggets had 18 fewer points in the paint than the Lakers, and they took 8 more threes than the Lakers. And they still ended up with only 5 fewer free throw attempts, of which at least 2 the result of garbage time, intentional foul(s).

Given all of that, I think you guys should be happy with how many free throws you got.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

By contrast

In Game 4, the Lakers also scored 18 fewer points in the paint than the Nuggets. A direct reversal.

They also took 7 more three-pointers than the Nuggets. Again, almost an identical reversal.

The Nuggets took 14 more free throws.

Like I said, the Nuggets only being -5 in FTAs in Game 5 actually shows they got a pretty friendly whistle.

You really want to keep comparing Games 4 and 5?

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

And points in the paint are just that:

“points in the paint.” If a player is fouled and misses the shot but the foul is not called, the player does not receive points in the paint. So to say that one team has more points in the paint and therefore deserves more foul calls is incongrous. Now, if we were to compare attempts in the paint, that might be a better breakdown. And perhaps the Lakers had more of those as well.
Again, I am not saying that the refs lost the game for the Nuggets, I was continuing my point that bringing up the “friendly whistle” in a pre-game analysis is bad mojo. But everyone wants to put words in my mouth saying that I’m complaining.

The Nuggets lost that game by shooting too many “dagger 3s” on the road. 1-10 JR? Gimme a break.

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Points in the paint

don’t necessarily correlate EXACTLY to attempts in the paint, but they do corrolate GENERALLY. And when there’s such a large disparity, as there was in both Games 4 and 5, it’s pretty clear who spent more time in the paint.

Tally it up if you want. It’ll only prove my point.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pregame Mention of Officiating

You’ve been there, you’ve made your case. You’re wrong. Here’s why: Officiating is a real factor in the game; as such, it is a valid point to preview.

Your beef isn’t that I brought it up. Your beef is that you interpreted it as complaining or claiming we “deserved” more free throws, which was unequivocally false. That one was on you.

You’ve made your point about bringing up officiating in a preview. Guess what? This is our blog, and we’ll preview a game as we see fit. If you want to keep talking about it, go somewhere else.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Easy there tiger.

All I’m saying is that to write before the game that the whistle should be friendlier — and then go off on a guy for writing after the game that it indeed was, is your onus, not mine.

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why can't you get this through your head?

I NEVER said the whistle should be friendlier!

I said the Lakers likely will get more free throws. VERY different.

There are two key differences in these statements:

  1. “Friendlier” implies unfair, that the Lakers got the “benefit” of an uneven whistle. I was NOT saying that. I just said they’d get MORE. Like I said, that is just as likely because of how the Lakers played, legitimately earning their FTAs, as it was because of “friendly” whistles. I did NOT say they would get friendlier whistles.
  2. “Should” implies I’m asking for some sort of cosmic balancing out. I was not. I simply expected that the Lakers would get a few more free throws.

YOU are the one that is adding those additional aspects, which make it seem unfair and biased. Not me.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Phil Jackson has made his protests clear and driven home his point regarding the officiating, both in the middle of Game 4 and after it, and I expect that he will get his way in Game 5. In Staples Center, after the Nuggets shot 49 free throws in the previous game, and in light of the numerous less-than-sportsmanlike displays by various Nuggets throughout the game, expect the whistle to be less of a hindrance to the Lakers in tonight’s game.

So let me rephrase my response:

Well, your preview was spot on. Phil spent $25,000 and the whistles were less of a hinderance to the Lakers in game 5. Congrats on the win.

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's how the Nuggets play.

It’s the same thing they’ve been doing. They hit them in the 2 wins, miss them in the losses.

Nothing has changed with this team as far as shot selection. Chauncey’s play encourages J.R. to take those shots. But I will say, that J.R. has shown a little more to his game. At least he’s also driving and finding open guys on the baseline (the left every time,and we fall for it) and doing a decent job of swiping the ball out of Kobe’s hands (something Kobe must adjust to, because it’s J.R.’s only defense).

The Lakers are 13-3 against the Nuggets in the past 2 years.

by wondahbap on May 28, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure...

Free throws count as points in the paint.

Not 100% sure on that, but I believe I’ve read it somewhere before.

by tandur on May 28, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I did my homework in preparation for this

After reading the Nuggets post-game thread, I re-watched the 4th quarter of the game to review the officiating, and also watched every single foul called on Nene. Keep in mind, I was literally focusing on whether the Lakers were “getting the calls”. Some calls I watched multiple times until I felt I had a fair assessment of it. I don’t have my notes with me (yes, I was that detailed) and I don’t have the time for a full breakdown, but here is what I remember

The only really legitimate gripe I could see from the Nuggs perspective was Nene. He had a rough game. His first foul would definitely fit into the ticky-tack category. His 2nd was unlucky, a loose ball foul, and I would have prefered that be a no call ball out of bounds to LA instead of a needless foul. His 3rd was clear cut. I can’t remember his 4th off the top of my head. His 5th was an absolutely terrible call, no questions asked. And then there’s his 6th.

I saw a ton of pissing and moaning from Nuggs fans about that call. Sorry, guys, but KD at BDL (a probably impartial third party) nailed it in his Behind the Box Score. Yes, Nene beat Pau to the spot. But Nene was trying to get the foul call. That’s just a terrible decision in that situation. Its the type of thing you should try to do when you have 1 foul and the other guy has 5, instead of the other way around. It shouldn’t have been a foul on either player (because Pau was not out of control, which is how you get a charge call), but Nene falling down (causing Pau to fall down) trying to draw the foul forced the ref’s hand, and the ref decided not to reward Nene for trying to draw the offensive foul. If Nene mans up, there’s no way any foul is called and he is still in the game. It was a gamble that he took, and he lost.

And even accepting the fact that his game wasn’t officiated cleanly, that’s hardly a major indictment of the refs. Big men are a tricky bunch to call, and every once in a while, a big is going to run afoul (sorry, I couldn’t resist) of the refs. How many times has Bynum been called for “phantom” fouls in these playoffs. How about Dwight Howard? Yao Ming had a game where he got some bad calls.

As for the rest of the 4th, I could definitely see individual situations where Nuggets fans would scream “That’s a foul” and be angry. But the consistency of the officiating in the 4th quarter was really pretty amazing. Almost every single no-call in the Lakers favor was followed by a no-call in the Nuggets favor in very similar circumstances. The refs made it clear from the beginning that they were going to respect the bigs right to verticality while challenging shots. This is something Pau does EVERY SINGLE TIME someone comes to the lane. It can drive us crazy because a lot of times, players will just go around him. But in this game, the Nuggets had the mind set of trying to draw foul calls by driving straight in against his body. He responded the same way every time. Arms straight up in the air. The refs made it clear in the beginning of the game they wouldn’t call that a foul, and it stayed that way the whole game. The Nuggets didn’t adjust to that strategy, and the result is 5 blocks for Gasol.

Outside of the Nene situation I already addressed, there were definitely a couple of missed calls in the 4th. Ariza’s “strip” on Melo was hardly clean, but it came right after a “strip” on Kobe that didn’t seem clean either. A couple of Melo’s drives seemed to result in a lot of contact, and there were a couple of la drives (Walton had one in particular) that resulted in a lo of contact. The tit-for-tat aspect of stuff being called or let go was almost comical, simply because it was so bizarre that both offenses were getting the exact same offensive scenarios back to back so many times.

The discrepency in fouls was 11-4. Two of the fouls were intentional at the end of the game, and two belonged to Nene and have already been addressed. I don’t remember my notes exactly, but the only of the other 7 fouls that stick out in my mind was Billups foul on Odom, because it wasn’t born of an aggresive move of any kind. I’ll be honest, the camera angle on that one wasn’t good enough for me to determine whether Billups actually held Odom, so I can’t offer any true insight on it. I will say that Odom’s reaction to the pass certainly seemed like his mind was working faster than his body, which is what happens if your body is being held. Take that for what it’s worth.

As many have mentioned, the Lakers were more aggresive in the 4th than the Nuggets were. JR Smith (not surprising) and Chauncey Billups (pretty surprising) both launched some tough, tough three pointers, and they just weren’t falling.

by C.A. Clark on May 28, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very impressive

Thank you for that

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

You don't write a piece about officiating being poor without being ready

to back it up if you think (contentiously) that it was considerably improved the following game.

by C.A. Clark on May 28, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good point

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

In fact

If you want, I can actually do a full version of this when I get home tonight and have the actual backup from my notes. We can run it as its own post.

Or not. I don’t know how much we want to stoke the fire.

by C.A. Clark on May 28, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do a FanPost

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't think it was officiated as inconsistently as some other games

But it was consistently bad, which was worse for the Nuggets than it was for the Lakers. They didn’t consistently call fouls when a guy drove to the basket (for either team) or when a guy was already under the basket and trying to go up. Those are things that the Nuggets excel at. They did call fouls when a guy was posting up and would spin to shoot. That’s Gasol and Odom to a T. For some reason, they were also calling a number of fouls on jump shots — one where I thought AC had a great block on Bynum and another called on Chauncey (which I didn’t get a replay of) while Kobe was falling away. My gripe with the officials was the inconsistency away from the hoop. As we’ve stated, Nene’s loose-ball foul, Nene and Chauncey’s offensive fouls, the moving screen call against Melo as he was trying to receive a pass and an obvious shoulder that Bynum gave to JR (right in front of the official that sent JR skipping 3 feet towards the official). The last one I only add because it was in the volatile 4th quarter and I was looking for anything to stop the run. A timeout, maybe?
Again, none of those led to Denver’s downfall — it was their own stupid shot selection. You can sum it all up when you look at JR’s steal. The ball went to Chauncey and he led a three on two fast break. The Nuggets could have gotten it to within 2 with a lay-up, but Chauncey passes it out to JR who bricks a 3-ball. Why shoot a three when you have numbers? Assclowns.

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tendencies mean nothing

Saying, “Those are things that the Nuggets excel at” is an appeal to what they usually do. But they didn’t do that in this game. They took way too many 3s and jumpshots, they didn’t get in the paint as much. You talk about not calling things on guys driving to the basket or trying to go up – funny, because the Lakers did that more, too. Calling fouls on jumpshots? Yeah, you guys did that more, too.

And all the things you pointed to can be offset easily on the other end. Carmelo got several touch fouls in the 4th quarter, resulting in undeserved free throws. Then, on the other end, Kobe would get mugged by 3 or 4 Nuggets in the paint, and the refs wouldn’t call a thing.

And Nene? More than one of Bynum’s fouls were ticky tack, too. If Jackson had played him more than 19 minutes, he would undoubtedly have fouled out. Seems pretty even.

Melo took more free throws than Kobe, despite taking more jumpshots. Seems pretty even.

Why don’t you just recognize that in general, they called things pretty evenly?

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

only if you recognize that in game 4, taking into account the play of the Nuggets and Lakers, they called things pretty evenly as well. :)

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I recognize that the same tendencies prevailed

But +5 under virtually identical, reversed circumstances, where the Nuggets got +14, does not make it even. Either Game 4 was even, and the Lakers’ 14-FTA deficit was simply because they took too many jumpshots and didn’t get into the paint enough… or Game 5 was generous to the Nuggets, who were fortunate to suffer only a 5-FTA deficit despite the exact same deficiencies.

The general trend prevailed. The severity of it was something else entirely.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ahh, but +14 free throws in a 19 point win still puts the Nuggets up by 5. +5 in a 9 point win puts the Nuggs down by 4.

Either way they still lose and either way the series is still 3-2. So what does it matter?

by NuggBuckets on May 28, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Never said it was why the Nuggets win

I thought we were just talking about free throw disparity and the quality of the officiating.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nene obviously fouled Kobe on his alley-oop dunk as well - not called

Don’t remember if that was the beginning of the 4th or 3rd quarter

Nick Adenhart - 1986 - 2009 R.I.P.

by swiss mcgee on May 28, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Must have been in the third

Because I would have noted it in my recap otherwise =).

by C.A. Clark on May 28, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

4th quarter, I belive

I believe it was the first play out of the gate for the Lakers. They run that play alot at the beginning of quarters. 2nd quarter examples usually involves some form of Walton, Ariza, and Farmar.

by tandur on May 28, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Perfect sum-up on Gasol's play by Dwyer

LINK

Pau had fewer points, just as many assists, just as many rebounds, and more turnovers than in the Game 4 loss. He didn’t even shoot the ball from the post until the 4:43 mark in the second quarter, and he missed. But he was heaps, heaps better. Those five blocks and two steals help, no doubt, but he was mainly better because he had the ball, and two or three passes later, the Lakers had a score. He was better because he was allowed to be better, in ways that didn’t show up on the stat sheet.

It’s not about the shots. It was never about the shots. It’s about running the offense, and people don’t seem to get that about the Triangle. Not running the Triangle through the post is like the Nuggets running everything through Kenyon Martin, with Chauncey Billups not even bringing the ball up court, or making the entry pass. It’s that backwards, no hyperbole. It’s not about the shots. Tell your local columnist.

Bork bork bork!

by Avinash on May 28, 2009 8:36 AM PDT reply actions  

That said, I still think he's taking too long to make decisions.

We can be much better if he is more decisive.

The Lakers are 13-3 against the Nuggets in the past 2 years.

by wondahbap on May 28, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

“JB and Wilbon incorrectly insist that it was because Kobe took fewer shots that his teammates were able to get involved in the game, the opposite was actually true. It was because his teammates played so well, removing any need for Kobe to carry them, that he took only 13 shots.”

Anybody notice that LeBron tried to take over game 5 by himself down the stretch and lost. Kobe trusted his teammates and he won. Fairly ironic since LBJ won the MVP for being able to trust his teammates while Kobe lost the race because he still tried to put too much weight on his shoulders.

by 81 Witness on May 28, 2009 9:19 AM PDT reply actions  

Nice write-up JT

I was glad to see Odom finally be aggressive and show the kind of player he is.This win was a comeplete one with everybody doing their part.

On the JB and Wilbon comments on Kobe’s shots, it surprises me that these guys don’t realize that his teammates are making their shots. I also wasn’t surprised that at halftime the crew couldn’t say one good thing about the Lakers and then couldn’t stop complimenting them after the game

GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!

Lakers lead Nuggets 3-2

by weazel on May 28, 2009 9:28 AM PDT reply actions  

I wish this series was on TNT...

…instead of BSPN.

0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.

by gee-roj on May 28, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

You aren't the only one.

GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!

Lakers lead Nuggets 3-2

by weazel on May 28, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah. With Hubie and Mike Tirico.

The Lakers are 13-3 against the Nuggets in the past 2 years.

by wondahbap on May 28, 2009 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Luke Walton for MVP!

First Ron Artest, now Carmelo Anthony… now if he can only contain Hedo or Lebron! :)

by tandur on May 28, 2009 10:42 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Nice recap and right on the money

Not that I need to add anything because I totally agree with everything writen so I just want Lakers to win game 6 and put forth the same effort.

by BrittneyM on May 28, 2009 11:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Actually, no... They are more or less right on this...
Predictably, Jon Barry and Michael Wilbon spent much of the post-game rehashing their absurd theory that the less Kobe shoots, the more successful the Lakers are. Like many that contribute to the discssion here at SS&R, I am utterly dumbfounded that they continue to interpret a causational relationship between the two. In fact, it is the other way around; Kobe shoots more when the Lakers are behind with time running out, and he feels the need to get them back into it. While JB and Wilbon incorrectly insist that it was because Kobe took fewer shots that his teammates were able to get involved in the game, the opposite was actually true. It was because his teammates played so well, removing any need for Kobe to carry them, that he took only 13 shots.

It is the PASSING and the USE OF ALL TOOLS that makes the Lakers great… Kobe going off for 40 with everyone else standing around looking at each other or so cold that they can’t find the rim is what makes them terrible…

You want to beat the Lakers? Get Kobe chucking…

When Kobe is passing out of double-teams, as he was in Game 5 — say your prayers!

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on May 28, 2009 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Outstanding recap, by the way, Josh!

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on May 28, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Again

Point to just ONE game where Kobe started “chucking” BEFORE the Lakers got into a serious hole, and I’ll give it to you. Because since we started this blog, not ONCE has that happened. WITHOUT EXCEPTION, the Lakers lose the lead with Kobe playing good team basketball, they fail to get back into the game with Kobe playing good team basketball, and only once all that has failed and time is running out does he start gunning.

You can’t cite a causal relationship when the effect happens before the cause.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

You might be able to make the case

in Game 4 i think it was of the Houston series. Kobe wanted to set the tone and missed a binch of shots to start the first. But that only lasted a quarter and was not the reason the Lakers lost-defense was the culprit

by Sideout11 on May 28, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not so

Check out the play-by-play

The quarter started on a 19-4 run by Houston. Here is how that went on the Lakers’ side:

Ariza Turnover : Bad Pass (1 TO) Steal:Artest (1 ST)
Bryant 3pt Shot: Missed
Ariza Jump Shot: Missed Block: Battier (1 BLK)
Gasol Jump Shot: Missed
Gasol Turnaround Jump Shot: Missed
Ariza Turnover : Bad Pass (2 TO) Steal:Hayes (1 ST)
Bryant Step Back Jump shot: Made (2 PTS)
Odom Running Bank shot: Missed
Bryant Pullup Jump shot: Made (4 PTS)
Odom Jump Shot: Missed
Bryant Jump Shot: Missed
Fisher Jump Shot: Missed
Odom Turnover : Bad Pass (1 TO) Steal:Hayes (2 ST)
Gasol Hook Shot: Missed
Ariza Turnover : Foul (3 TO)

The first 15 possessions resulted in 9 misses, 2 makes, and 4 turnovers. Both of the makes belonged to Kobe. None of the turnovers belonged to Kobe.

Kobe took 4 shots, but he hit 2. Gasol took 3 shots, and missed all of them.

4 shots out of 15 offensive possessions? I wouldn’t call that chucking. Especially when you’re shooting 50%.

Strength & Honor

16...15...14...13...12...
11...10...9...8...
7...6...5...

by Josh Tucker on May 28, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

maybe I’m thinking of a different game. But it’s entirely possible that the Rockets had already jumped out to a huge lead in the game I am thinking of anyways given the way we were playing, in which case you would be right

by Sideout11 on May 28, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Another thing to remember Timbo.

The Nuggets doubled and trapped Kobe more times last night than any other game in the series, and the rest of the Lakers made them pay by converting.

The previous games saw the the Nuggets allow Kobe to go to work in the post. He roasted them. But while that was going on, they were intent on paying Derek Fisher no mind. Or whoever was at SF (Trevor and Luke) was conceded the shot in an effort to prevent post entry passes down low.

Once they decided to double and trap Kobe, he drew them out and we swung the ball around. Easy shots converted.

The Lakers are 13-3 against the Nuggets in the past 2 years.

by wondahbap on May 28, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, but the big difference is

other guys stepped up tonight.

Kobe has been passing the same amount. Only it looks different because LO showed up?

The Lakers are 13-3 against the Nuggets in the past 2 years.

by wondahbap on May 28, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Timbo you're pretty sensible...

how can you agree with BS like that?

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

by Justin N. on May 28, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood
Start posting about the Lakers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rodman6_small
Hey, You. Create Humor. Now! 8/31
Rodman6_small
Larry Bird Could Have Been A Laker?
Rodman6_small
Greatest Transactions in Laker History
R8_small
Rough Cut: Getting to know your fellow SSR-ers
Owlmuse_small
Shout Out to Lewis Monroe

Recent FanPosts

Small
Predicted Lakers Stats for Next Season
Facebook_avatar_kobe_small
Heat Will Make the Finals - Only If the Celtics Let Them
Small
How I felt when the Lakers repeated...
Small
Sparks Vs. Storm 11P.M. Eatern Time. I see u Wave Storm going down
La_g_kobe11_668_small
2010-2011 Los Angeles Lakers Stats
Facebook_avatar_kobe_small
Cry Me a Doc Rivers
Jelly_bean_p_small
Will Dampier Be A Good Fit For LA?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Was signing Ron Artest the right move for the Lakers?
Yes, Artest was the best wing available and the Lakers got him cheap
3801 votes
Yes, paying Artest the same money Ariza would have gotten is a wise investment
2027 votes
No, Ariza fit better into what the Lakers needed from the wing
645 votes
No, Artest will ruin the team chemistry
281 votes

6754 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

nice highlight reel
:D

http://i36.tinypic.com/21azscn.jpg
for larger image

Recent FanShots

The Lakers top 10 plays of the year, according to nba.com
NBA 2K11 looks sick.

Good preview from IGN here.
nice mix, except the part after 2:23 sucks
Biting the Hand that Feeds You: Gary Payton
I had some time on my hands and thought about doing something productive. Instead, I made this!
Lakers vs. Celtics: All-Time Teams Match-up
Good News for Filipinos!
For entertainment purposes only, do not try this at home

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

NEW YORK CITY NY - AUGUST 12:  Kevin Durant #5 looks on during the World Basketball Festival USAB Showcase at Radio City Music Hall on August 12 2010 in New York City. (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images for Nike) +4 updates

FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Routs Iran 88-51, Clinches Top Spot In Group B

Cleveland Cavaliers' Delonte West, right, shoot over Indiana Pacers' Jeff Foster in the first half of a NBA basketball game in Indianapolis, Monday, April 13, 2009.  (AP Photo/Michael Conroy) link

Celtics Sign Free Agent Delonte West

Rose +2 updates

FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Ekes Out 70-68 Win Over Brazil

More from SBNation.com >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Df_logo_-_lakers_small DexterFishmore

Editors

Josh_small Josh Tucker

Ohkproof_1__small wondahbap

Beat Writers

Lakers_small vikas_s24

09_finals_wallpaper_mvp_1920_small Saurav A. Das

Kobelogo_small Gil Meriken

Umad_small theshmoes