Silver Screen and Roll: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

Lakers vs. Rockets Game 5: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly

After the Rockets laid waste to the Lakers in Game 4, I can't imagine many Laker fans felt bad for the Rockets during Game 5. This is a piece on the good, the bad and the ugly, but it could very well be about the good, the better and the best after the Lakers' performance.

The Lakers came out with a fire, got contributions from all over the place (including a stunningly active Andrew Bynum) and for the first time in a while, played a full 48 minutes. Read on after the jump...

 

Star-divide

The Good

Defense, Defense, Defense- It's cliche and you hear it all the time...defense wins championships. Whether you agree with that statement or not, I think just about everyone would agree that's the case for this specific Lakers team. If the Lakers commit to playing defense for 48 minutes, there aren't many team that will beat them. In Game 5, the Lakers played awful defense for 5+ minutes, then locked down unlike they have all postseason until the final buzzer sounded.

Houston had 18 points just 5:42 into the game and it looked like the Lakers could be in for a rough night. All of a sudden, the purple and gold locked down all over the court. The strong-side zone took shape, they didn't get caught going for steals, they hedged harder on screens and their rotations were sharper. Most notably though, they committed to making someone not named Aaron Brooks beat them. The Lakers started bringing an early double on Brooks all the way out to the three point line and made him get rid of the ball early. Phil usually doesn't like doubling on the perimeter, almost to a fault, but in Game 5 it was clear that stopping Brooks was Phil's primary objective. While Brooks did have 14 points, he did so on only 4-11 shooting and wasn't allowed entry to the paint where he could kick it out for open jumpers so Brooks tallied only two assists.

In the final 18:18 of the first half, the Lakers held the Rockets to only 21 points and not only were they keeper Houston off the board, the defense ignited the offense. From the 6:18 mark of the first quarter through halftime, the Lakers outscored the Rockets 54-21. The Lakers forced 18 turnovers and held the Rockets to 32.6% shooting. When the Lakers play defense, they're darn tough to beat and the Rockets found that out in Game 5.

Andrew Bynum- A new brace and we see a new Drew. He's out of his big, bulky brace and into something that's a little smaller and looks much more flexible. Now, I don't know if that new brace's extra flexibility actually made the difference in Drew tonight or if it was more of a mental thing with the new brace, but we saw an active, determind #17 on the floor tonight. The big man was 5-6 from the field, he knocked dow all four of his free throws and reeled in six boards in 20 minutes of action.

Drew didn't record a block, but he was excellent defensively. Twice he altered shots in the paint and his presence on the strong side seemed to deter the Rockets' ball handlers from even attempting to go to the rim. Most notably though was when Bynum doubled early on Brooks above the three point line, forcing Brooks to get rid of the ball and then showing enough speed, quickness and awareness to get back to his man or clog up the paint.

If Drew can give the Lakers 20 minutes like he did tonight then opposing teams will be in trouble. Rick Adelman said in his postgame news conference that there's not much he can do against our frontline of Bynum and Gasol besides trying to stretch out his guys another six inches. Well, there isn't much other teams can do either if Drew is playing like he did tonight.

Backup Point Guards- Jordan Farmar is officially back from hibernation and Shannon Brown is still one of the more athletic point guards in the league. While Fisher continued to struggle on the defensive end (although he was better), Farmar and Brown were quick, active and got their hands in passing lane repeatedly.

Farmar was a +20 in his 22 minutes as he scored 12 points, none more exciting than his buzzer beater to cap the first quarter. Farmar spent a lot of time on the ball in Game 5, but it was sure good that he did because he was in complete control. The triangle offense doesn't really use a true point guard, but Farmar played as much of a true point as you'll see in the offense and he did it to perfection, picking up six assists.

Every game Brown has two or three moments where you just go "wow." There were a few of those tonight (such as skying 36 feet for a rebound, slight exaggeration), but was so impressive was his ability to harness that athleticism. He was splendid defensively and did so within the system. There have been times where Brown gets so excited looking for turnovers that he takes himself out of position chasing the ball, but tonight he was in complete control and picked all the right times to make a play on the ball. He brings an explosiveness to the game that few others do and creates havoc, but a good havoc.

Lamar Odom- He only played 19 minutes, but he played. If you took a look at all of the attention he was getting from the medical staff during the game, the way he gingerly moved around the court before the game and the fact that he took a golf cart through the arena to the locker room so as not to risk further injury to his back, getting 19 minutes and some pretty good ones is quite an accomplishment. Lamar picked up six board and 10 points, but maybe the most encouraging was his 5-6 shooting from the line after some abysmal shooting from the stripe earlier in the series.

Lamar was an astonishing +31 on the evening, the second best on the team. Think about that for a second. +31 in 19 minutes. That's a +1.6 per minute or +76.8 for 48 minutes. Bad back, limited minutes, unspectacular stat line, whatever. Lamar brought it tonight.

Pau Gasol- Odom's +31 was second on the team because Gasol was a +32. Pau led the team in minutes and set the tone in the first quarter as he dominated the paint. Pau's teammates picked up on the ridiculous size advantage that he holds over any healthy Rocket and gave him the ball early to set the tone. Through the first three quarters the Lakers outscored the Rockets 42-28 in the paint.

Pau defended the paint in picking up three blocks, spent enough time taking it to the rack to earn eight free throws and has 13 rebounds. The Rockets' top post defender Chuck Hayes played only 16 minutes because of foul trouble trying to man-up Pau. In both the first and third quarters, the Lakers were in the bonus within the first four or five minutes and a good number of the fouls that put the Lakers in the bonus so while he has only 16 points, he contributed to a whole lot more.

Kobe Bryant- Pau dominated the inside early on and Kobe came out dominating the perimeter, while still getting the paint a little more than we've seen from him lately. Kobe had 12 points on 5-7 shooting in the first quarter as he continued his trend of being aggressive and dominating early in games following a playoff loss. Kobe finished with 26 points and was a +30 in only three quarters of play and while those numbers seem pedestrian for arguably the game's top scorer, you had the feeling all game long that whenever Kobe wanted two points, they were his.

The Crowd- The Staples Center crowd this postseason has been awful. No game has had that buzz that usually accompanies postseason basketball and it took a lot to get the crowd going. That wasn't the case tonight.

As we were walking into the arena, my brother asked whether the crowd would be somber and ready to boo at the first sign of vulnerability following Sunday's massacre or energized by the importance of the game. I told him I had no idea, but what we got was outstanding. Yeah, good play makes it easy to cheer and tonight's play was phenomenal, but prior to tip and in those first six minutes where we were behind, the crowd was roaring.

The Bad

Derek Fisher- I really don't want to continue hammering the guy's defense because there isn't much he can do about it. He'd older and his feet have slowed down, but we still need more from him. Brooks had four field goals in the game, each one with Fish on the floor. With Farmar and Brown playing well behind him and Fish playing less minutes than we're accustomed to tonight, you have to wonder how much playing time the veteran will get in Game 6.

Sasha Vujacic- He's still playing defense and working his tail off, but he's a shooter and he's not shooting well. I don't think I need to say much here because anyone that's watched the Lakers at just about any point this season knows what I'm talking about. If Sasha can find his shot again (that's a big if right now), the Lakers can go to a whole new level, but not only is he missing right now, but his shots aren't even in the same area code as the net.

The Ugly

We won by 40 points, played hard for 48 minutes and better defense than we have at any time this postseason. I don't think it's possible to describe anything the Lakers did as ugly tonight. Things can be improved, just like they always can, but there's no such thing as ugly in a 40 point win unless you want to hear about the stain I got on my jersey.

0 recs  |  Comment 34 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Silver Screen and Roll

The Credits: "Balance of Power"

Mar 2010 by wondahbap - 0 comments

The Credits:  "Confidence"

Mar 2010 by wondahbap - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

In regards to "The Ugly" section of the post...

I’m glad they won and brought everyone in Houston back down to Earth by showing who the better team really is. I do, however, hate how they turn it on and off when they feel like it. I wish that the Lakers would put this effort into all of their games. Like Kenny said on the post game show, it almost a sign of arrogance. This series should have been over with already. Quit screwing around Lakers.

by Magic's_Johnson on May 13, 2009 5:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Dude.

I can tell you as a Houstonian… that no one expects the Rockets to win anything anymore. As a matter of fact, I was expecting a loss somewhere in the 20-25 range last night. I wasn’t expecting 40 but still, it had the makings of a blowout.

There’s no reason to get all cocky talking about “bringing everyone in Houston back down to Earth” when our 2 best players are on the bench injured and our backup center as well. I mean, do you honestly think anyone thought a team whose tallest (uninjured) player is 6’ 9’’ can compete consecutively with a team with 3 seven footers?

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 6:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not pointing at you specifically,

but the “everyone in Houston back down to Earth” statement is completely legitimate considering the amount of comments referring to how the Rockets are a mentally, and physically tougher “team”; How they would always come out and play hard, blah, blah, blah.

No, we do not expect you to compete with us, because we’re better (whether you’re healthy or not), and that was the cause of our frustration. But getting waxed by 40 is no different than us getting beat down by 13 29. the point is your team lost focus, played bad, then quit. Same thing we did the game before. Except, I doubt any Houston fan is blaming it on anything other the Lakers superiority. The Rockets played some terrible basketball last night, mentally.

The Lakers are now 7-2 against the Rockets this season.

by wondahbap on May 13, 2009 6:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can agree with you on everything you said

except the extremely biased “fact” that LA is better than Houston healthy or not. If Yao wasn’t hurt this series could have gone a very different way much less with a healthy T-Mac. I know the popular opinion in Houston (and around the league) is that we’re better without McGrady, but it’s just no true.

Now I’m not going to go as far as to say that Houston is the clear cut better team, but a healthy Houston team can go toe-to-toe with the “Hot and Cold” Lakers anyday.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 6:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree with most of what you said

except what artest4prez spoke of, and the difference between game 4 and game 5.

Game 4 was a wacking by a team minus its two best players, no one over 6’9, and the 2nd leading shot blocker of all time, of a team with the reigning MVP, three 7 footers, and one of the greatest coaches of all time. The fact that most houston fans expected a big loss last night only confirms my opinion more. lakers fans didnt expect to be down 29 in game 4, but houston fans expected something like last night.

Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Game 2 111-98 lakers
Game 3 108-94 lakers
Game 4 99-87 Rockets
Game 5 lakers

lakers lead series 3-2

by TexasHoosier on May 13, 2009 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have to disagree with you both

Perhaps I can shed some light on the Laker fan’s mindset, for you. To put it simply, we believe (for very good reason) that when this team brings its A-game, there is no team in the league that can handle us.

Period.

You saw that against Boston and Cleveland during the regular season. In half of those games, Kobe was a monster – in the other half, he wasn’t (struggled with his shot in Boston, was so sick he could barely do anything in Cleveland… though he still outperformed LeBron). In half those games, we had Bynum – in the other half, we didn’t. Half were at home, half on the road. And those road games… they came at the end of a long, 6-game road trip, at a time when it would have been acceptable to lose one or two of them.

But when LA is motivated and dialed in, they’re so good that they’re nearly unbeatable. Sure, you could point to the fact that LA isn’t always dialed in and motivated… and that has been good for a couple losses. But that would have been the case with or without Yao, and even McGrady. In fact, I’d argue that they would have been less likely to come out flat in Game 4 had Yao not been injured – it was his absence that caused them to play as though a win was automatic. The bottom line is that with or without Yao, when this team feels the pressure, when they get their backs up against the wall a little, they play like they did tonight, or even better. And their talent level is so unparalleled that when they play with that kind of effort, motivation, and drive, there’s simply no stopping them.

All of which is why Laker fans feel that even with Yao, Mutombo, and McGrady, the Lakers still would have been the clear favorites. If anything, it would have motivated them to play better all around, including in the games they lost.

16...15...14...13...12...11...10...10...
Strength & Honor

by Josh Tucker on May 13, 2009 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess all that applies..

except last year in the Finals.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure

we can use that logic, but it wasn’t the same team — in terms of personnel or experience.

by whorge on May 13, 2009 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

Now they are pissed off after being so close to the championship and losing.

5 wins down.... 11 more to go

by black mamba on May 13, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's just it.

They don’t look like they’re pissed off. Allowing Utah many comebacks for finally putting them away, allowing Houston to win at home and then again in Houston against a team without Yao.

If LA is pissed off about losing in the Finals they sure have a funny way of showing it.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t believe I was being cocky, just accurate. Remember, the Lakers swept these guys during the regular season, so out of 11 potential games throughout the regular and post season combined (10 we now know will happen for sure), the Lakers were bound to lose a couple of those games, with or without Houstons top 2 in the line up.

I say the Lakers wrap it up in Houston next game.

by Magic's_Johnson on May 13, 2009 6:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm cocky about the Lakers....get over it!

I come on this LAKERS blog to boast and be proud and to get cocky about the Lakers. What else are we supposed to do? I don’t understand how a fan from an opposing team can come on here and judge why we are being cocky and even sound offended. We are on a Lakers blog. Why wouldn’t be proud of what our team accomplishes. If anyone does not agree with that then why not go back to your own team’s blog and post away. On top of what MAGIC’S JOHNSON said I completely agree with the comment of “bringing everone in Houston back down to eart”. Especially with the confidence that they (Houston Fans) were speaking with after game 1. So Yeah! i’m cocky about my beloved Lakers and I will never make any apologies for it.

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on May 13, 2009 8:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's one thing to be proud (or cocky) about your team

when you’re playing a team to full or even close to full potential, but blowing out a depleted Rockets team and being cocky about it just in bad taste. As for Rockets fans to be excited about winning Game 1; they (we) had every right to be. The Rockets went into LA and beat a good team fair and square. Now that Yao’s out no one realistically thinks the Rockets can win this series. As a matter of fact you guys should probably still be talking about how in the hell you lost Game 4.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is your point of view..

But again none of us come here for a sermon about what is in good or bad taste. We are on a Lakers blog and will express ourselves as we wish. Regardless of what break down you point out about who is healthy or who isn’t. You can come on here and post your point of view but for someone to dictate on this site about when and why we can’t be cocky is too much. This a Lakers blog.

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on May 13, 2009 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's just inconsistency

First, that’s crap – you use the word “cocky” to describe us after a win, but when it’s Rockets fans, you’re just being “excited about winning.” Sorry, no. The reactions have been essentially the same, depending on who won the most recent game.

Second, when your depleted team blew out the Lakers by 27 points in Game 4, the whole, “blowing out a depleted Rockets team and being cocky about it just in bad taste” argument lost any validity. At the end of the day, this is a team that can beat the Lakers (in a game, though I still don’t see it in a series). And it’s a team that did beat the Lakers. Because of that, Lakers fans have every right to be cocky, or get excited about winning, however you want to put it.

And we have talked plenty about the Game 4 loss. But in Game 5, we saw the Lakers we’ve wanted to see all along. You going to try and tell us we can’t talk about that?

16...15...14...13...12...11...10...10...
Strength & Honor

by Josh Tucker on May 13, 2009 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

to add

being cocky would be posting the “bringing the Rockets back down to earth” comment in the dream shake blog. i think by posting it here we’re just discussing and celebrating. review your own game 4 postgame thread for details.

by whorge on May 13, 2009 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

I discussed this below. You guys can say whatever you want on SS&R.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry

just made it down there, reading through the posts with my morning coffee.

by whorge on May 13, 2009 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's cool.

But response to your post above about this team being different from last years I have to disagree. This Lakers team looks very similar to last years in terms of effort. I’d like to hear some differences if you have any but from my perspective it looks like deja vu.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK

The Rockets 2 championships were won when Jordan was playing minor league baseball. Do you guys care about that? Hell, no. And you shouldn’t. In the 1989 Finals when the Lakers lost Magic and Byron Scott, do the Pistons want to hear us cry about being way shorthanded? No and they shouldn’t care about who was on the floor for the Lakers.
My point is that you have to win with who ya got. It’s unfortunate that Yao and McGrady are out. But if the Lakers win this series, it not like there should be an asterisk. And we as Laker fans will be happy and rooting for our team the whole way.

by illcowboy on May 13, 2009 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Biased? I don't expect you to agree.

As a Rockets fan, why should you? I could claim your disagreement is “biased.”

As a Lakers fan, I still can’t admit the Celtics were a better team than us last year.

Also, T-Mac has been out so long, and played so bad, and the team and the dynamic has changed so much, his presence is a non factor. Arguing that point is akin to saying the Lakers would have won last year if they had Bynum.

The Lakers are now 7-2 against the Rockets this season.

by wondahbap on May 13, 2009 6:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Yeah because Bynum = McGrady.

I agree that the team chemistry has changed, but there’s no reason to believe that Adelman couldn’t work something out if injuries hadn’t kept the lineup changing from game to game all season. Anyway, it is a moot point because neither Yao or T-Mac are available to play Game 6.

My point in general is that Magic’s_Johnson was trying to to act like the Lakers are the clear cut better team and that’s just not true. Hell, we’ve managed to make a series out of this with this shell of Houston team. I’d hate to have any East team with the championship again after years of talk about how the West is so much better and competitive but it looks like the Cav’s (the LeBron’s I mean) are way too hungry to lose.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 7:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If T-mac were playing

Yes because if T-mac was playing we wouldn’t be having this conversation because Houston would not of been out of the first round so that’s reason enough to LOL!

Before the Playoffs the Lakers were the clear cut favorite but they still are the better team with any player on the injured list. But you are correct they have proven to be a competitive team. But defenitely not a team that was going to get swept.

by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on May 13, 2009 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude

If we were the Pistons, acting like we were the clear cut better team than the Cavs, that would be one thing. But this is the Lakers, and this year, we ARE the clear cut better team than the Rockets. This isn’t some Laker delusion. This is something that everyone except a handful of Rockets fans recognize.

As for making a game of it – I’d say it was the Lakers, by underestimating the Rockets, that made a series of it. If they had taken you guys seriously, and come out hard from the start of Games 1 and 4, this wouldn’t be anything close to a series. (Understand what I’m saying here – the Rockets are good enough that the Lakers should have taken them more seriously, but not good enough to have had much chance at all if the Lakers had done just that, and taken them seriously from the start, and throughout.)

16...15...14...13...12...11...10...10...
Strength & Honor

by Josh Tucker on May 13, 2009 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're last paragraph is exactly my point.

The Lakers team and fanbase are already scheduling appointments for ring fittings. The Lakers can’t afford to be “giving away” games such as Game 1 and 4 of this series. You play how you practice and if you look at the road to the Finals as practice then I think the Lakers are in trouble.

The Cavs have played every game of the post season so far as it’s the last game of the season, something I can’t even say about my Rockets. That’s the kind of mentality that Championship teams are made of.

Overall though, you guys are right and you’re well within your rights as a Lakers fan and a member of this board to be excited about winning Game 5 last night. So I’d like to squash this now before it gets out of hand.

If (when) the Lakers move on they will be my team. That’s all.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

disagree

about the cavs playing every game like it’s the last of the postseason. they play with much more intensity on defense than on offense — and the fact is that their offense gets stagnant sometimes. granted, they’ve been able to dispatch the teams they’ve played pretty handily - but these are teams that are already handicapped on offense are skewing the public perception of the cavs- they’ve played directly into their defensive intensity. on offense though, they’ve relied on the fact that no one in the past two series had the footspeed on the perimeter and the length in the post to disrupt lebron’s drives, and his outside shot is falling at a rate unheard of in his career so far. i have not seen all the elements of the cavs offense executing like they need it to (because they haven’t).

i still think that the cavs have something to show on offense, just like i think the lakers have something to show in terms of consistency and defensive intensity. if/when the teams meet in the finals and if they both bring what we know they can bring, it will be a sight to behold.

by whorge on May 13, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

damnit sbnation

stop crossing out portions of my post due to formatting! i’m working on it.

by whorge on May 13, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to admit.

It would be quite a slight to see in LA vs. Cleveland. However, the reason I think the Cav’s are favored as of now if that defensive tenacity. That never say die mentality. It’s been said 100 times before but defensive wins championships.

On top of that LeBron is really putting on a clinic. He’s getting to line at an outlandish rate which tells me he’s being even more aggresive than usual. Scary things for whoever has the unfortunate fate of playing them in any round this postseason.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Defense wins Championhips.

When focused, I’d argue the Lakers defenses as good as there is in the NBA. You saw that last night. Cleveland saw that in the regular season.

Read any article from any writer or expert, or read what opposing teams have said about our defense when played properly. You will see that they all find it tough. The problem is sometimes it’s lax.

The Lakers are now 7-2 against the Rockets this season.

by wondahbap on May 13, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i would say

that while the cavs have a greater ability to bring defensive intensity, the lakers gameplan their defense at a higher level. the cavs look for a “swarm and smother” approach, while we make it a point to disrupt what other teams look to run and throw their offense out of sync. i don’t think we’ve been a “shutdown” type defense all year, but our defense (when we execute it) really forces teams outside of their comfort zone.

case in point, last night: we gave the rockets the shots we wanted to give them – scola at the midrange (which he can hit, but has shown no confidence in this series), out of rhythm 3-pointers (much different than the open 3 looks we gave in game 4), and pretty much daring their non-shooters to take jumpers outside of the confines of their offense (ron artest when his shot isn’t falling will continue to jack up shots, and we all know what giving extended minutes to brian cook will bring a team).

that being said, we only seem to commit to our defensive schema when we feel like it, and that’s not a good sign.

by whorge on May 13, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That last sentence sums it up.

It seems like in the event of a Cavs/Lakers final you KNOW Cleveland is going to show up and play defense and maybe have a shaky offense. You never know which LA team is going to show up. When you’re talking about a team that has home court throughout the playoffs and has only lost 2 games at home all season (one without LeBron) it looks bleak for anyone facing them.

P.S. I know, LA dealt them the only real home loss they incurred all year.

"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018

by Artest4Prez on May 13, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes but whenever they know they are up against a really good team

they show up, evidenced by the boston and cleveland away games.

5 wins down.... 11 more to go

by black mamba on May 13, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Cleveland ALWAYS shows up...

and if you want to talk about being pissed off, think of how pissed off Cleveland is because LA won in Quicken Loans. Thats some reason for revenge. .

Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Game 2 111-98 lakers
Game 3 108-94 lakers
Game 4 99-87 Rockets
Game 5 lakers

lakers lead series 3-2

by TexasHoosier on May 13, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quicken Loans

worst. arena. name. ever.

by whorge on May 14, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood
Start posting about the Lakers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Marshall_small
I'll give you Ten Reasons (non Resume) Why Kobe is Better Than LeBron.
Hotterthan_summer2_small
Adam Morrison demands playing time
Kobe_wallpaper_1_small
LeBron Has Surpassed Kobe Bryant (On One Condition)
Small
Are the Lakers fit for a second championship?
Silver-lg_small
Weekend homework assignment: Show SS&R some Facebook love.

Recent FanPosts

Kobe_dunk_small
We Need Help At Guard. Could Any Of These Guys Contribute?
Maui_sunset_small
Will the real MVP please stand up?
Small
How we'll finish the reg. season
Small
Cook questions
Small
Where's Wally? Or am I being stupid.
Kobe_wallpaper_1_small
Poll: In Your Opinion, which was Kobe Bryant's Best Season?
Small
Triangle is history — and so are we???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Was signing Ron Artest the right move for the Lakers?
Yes, Artest was the best wing available and the Lakers got him cheap
3801 votes
Yes, paying Artest the same money Ariza would have gotten is a wise investment
2027 votes
No, Ariza fit better into what the Lakers needed from the wing
645 votes
No, Artest will ruin the team chemistry
281 votes

6754 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Kobe Game Winner vs Raptors - Whoa, I watched this and then I read the comments on Youtube claiming Kobe travelled, which I had not heard of. Then, after watching a few times, I have to say, I agree, Kobe changes his pivot foot before putting the ball down on the floor. I also think there's no way a ref catches that in real time, and even if they do, they can't be sure enough to call it then, either.
Kobe Gamewinner vs Raptors
Don't Trust Bleacher Report
What's Wrong with the Los Angeles Lakers?
Dave McMenamin: Los Angeles Lakers' losses expose conflict with Kobe Bryant - ESPN Los Angeles
No such thing as a (Kobe stopper) he's the badest man n the league. He had...
Ron's inspiration for his weird haircut...
Matt Barnes Pump Fakes Kobe During Inbounds Pass
Mass cult gathering at Quicken Loans Arena...
Orlando Magic BasketBlog – Stan Van Gundy thinks Lamar Odom is one of the most underrated players in the NBA

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Blog Managers

Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

Df_logo_-_lakers_small DexterFishmore

Founder Emeritus

Silver-xl_small Josh Tucker

Beat Writers

Ohkproof_1__small wondahbap

09_finals_wallpaper_mvp_1920_small Saurav A. Das

Slava_small Gil Meriken