Should the Lakers Retire No. 34?
After reading the article Josh made about a week ago, I thought about this interesting dilemma the Lakers management might have to face when Shaq does eventually hang up those shoes for good. I know the dude feuded Kobe and the team in the final years, but we should not forget what he did do for the team in those eight years. Anyway thats my opinion. As you can probably tell by my user name, I might have a bias on this issue (cough-cough).
So what do you guys think?
( Vote in the poll and comment below)
Everyone has seen the Kobe to Shaq lob in game 7 of the 2000 western conference finals, so heres a different one some of you might be familiar with.
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As immature as I think shaq is, there is no denying that without him the lakers don’t win 3 in a row.
Most people would say he is a 1st ballot hall of famer. Most people would also agree he played the best years of his career in LA. Putting together the pieces, I think he definately deserves a spot up there with the other laker greats. Sure we may not like him as much as we liked magic, kareem etc. When you think lakers, Shaq is still very much apart of our history and image.
In Kobe we trust!
Definitely
And he will go into the Hall of Fame as a Laker too.
Bigger question, do the Lakers retire #8 one day, or #24?
if they pick one, itll be 24
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
lol if the Lakers win another championship or two in the next three years
One could make a strong case to retire both.
really though
Shaq was the mvp of those teams, Kobe is the mvp of the Lakers now. I highly doubt they’ll retire both number 8 and 24…it’s just going to be 24.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
Yes
for sure
shaq was really the main reason we won 3 in a row..
Finals MVP all 3 years.. man was a BEAST
and the 24 and 8 question… i really think it will be 24.. cause when kobe was 8 shq won all his championships and kobe is a much better player wearing 24
true true.
I want the Lakers to resign shaq to come off the bench for a year. Kind of like walking into the sunset sort of idea
Yeah, the big fella deserves it
Several great seasons and 3 dominant chamionships should outweigh anything else. Shaq was amazing for the Lakers early this decade and should be rewarded. The 2000-2001 team should rank up there with the greatest teams of all time (certainly among the top playoff teams) and Shaq led the team.
With Shaq’s jersey retired it will confirm the continued greatness of the Lakers’ center position. There may not be another line of greatness for one team in any other sport like it.
"If you don't take out his battery, he's going to keep going all day."
Compromise?
So that the awkward situation of having Shaq’s jersey hanging around in the rafters during the impending Kobe-Gasol dynasty may be avoided, I propose that we wait until Kobe retires and put 34 and 8 up there together. This is how people choose to remember that era, anyways: as the Shaq AND Kobe years.
Then, we retire 24 and 16 (Gasol) together. That is, if we get at least two more rings :)
34 who is # 34, oh that fat guy NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
.
by so.cal.native1952 on Dec 16, 2009 5:08 PM PST reply actions
who won 3 titles
yeah kind of a big deal
Aybar is a nowhere man, Sitting in his Nowhere Land, Making all his nowhere plans for nobody.
by princeton11loveshalos on Dec 18, 2009 8:23 AM PST up reply actions
YES!
Without a doubt. When Shaq was a Laker I loved him as much as Kobe. No matter what happened between and Kobe or him or anyone else in the Lakers organization without Shaq there would not have been any titles. He said that his dream was to see his jersey retired in the Staples Center so yes we should. Although Kobe was not a sidekick Shaq was the most instrumental in that three peat. And for that I respect him. The fued was not just one player’s fault. They should both be blamed. But when it comes down it we cannot ignore what he meant to all of us when he was hear. At least I can’t.
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 16, 2009 5:16 PM PST reply actions
NO
and Yes
Well you see I’m torned, I guess its up to Jerry but if I was Jerry, I wouldn’t but based on facts Shaq was important for 3 rings and that does count but I still wouldn’t do it, Shaq has issues.
There are basic Fundamentals that are needed to move forward in this game. Always keep your guard up at all times to avoid being caught in a trap. Overcome the fouls that will be commited against you REBOUND AND PRESS ON. ADJUST to the LimeLight: ALL-STAR PLAYERS ARE ALWAYS THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. Know what your role is and play your position. Find a game plan and execute it. REMEMBER YOU ONLY GET OUT OF THE GAME WHAT YOU PUT INTO IT.
NO
Shaq was a great player for the Lakers but with that said, he was not the hardest working cat in the building, which may or may not have contributed to more championships, the effort was just not there. Kobe caught flack for how things turned out immediately after the trade but Shaq showed his true self more than once after yet, another trade. If he was really what he wanted to viewed as, the greatest center of our time, then why does team after team trade him?
Well here is my argument.
Shaq 8 seasons 3 championships.
Wilt 5 seasons 1 championship.
Wilt’s number is retired. Shaq is a no brainer.
BTW, here is Wilt’s “best” season (meaning his best ever season for each statistic)
Pts……..50.4
Reb……27.2
FG%…..72.7 (played all 82 games, 43mpg)
Ast……..8.6 (really)
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
The one think he couldn't do was hit FTs...
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
Of course
If Shaq was Shaq in those days, he’d probably average BETTER numbers than Wilt. Easy.
by Julio Nievas on Dec 17, 2009 2:11 AM PST up reply actions
on the court numbers.....
or off the court numbers… =)
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
I actually shed a single tear watching that. Chick announcing the game, Fox and Salley on the sidelines. Staples Center actually loud for a regular season game.
Without a doubt Shaq’s jersey should be retired, he led the team to three championships and for most of his stay here it was unthinkable that he would ever leave.
I loved Shaq since I became a fan of the Lakers, Kobe was always my favorite player but Shaq was my second favorite by far, and I think that Kobe and Shaq was the best duo in the history of the NBA no matter what, I think it should be retired
The Spanish Kid
by Kobe:The Legend on Dec 17, 2009 8:54 AM PST reply actions
Well it doesn't get talked about much, but the best duo in NBA history is almost certainly.....
West and Baylor. If not them probably Kareem and Oscar Robertson. However since 5 of those 6 players are Laker legends I think the point is that the Lakers have had some pretty awesome players.
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
Well they are certainly in the discussion.
Very similar to West and Baylor actually. One is top 3 shooting guards of all time with top 5 forwards of all time and the other is top 3 forward with top 5 point guards of all time. Basically equal. Neither group won a championship, but the Laker duo went to the Finals almost every year so I would give them a slight edge.
Kobe and Shaq are arguably top 2 shooting guards and top 3 center of all time and they won 3 championships together.
You could argue Oscar is best PG of all time and Kareem is best C of all time, but they didn’t play together for very many years. Tough choice really.
Of course Magic and Kareem is a good argument with arguably Top 1 PG and Top 1 Center of all time and 5 championships together.
However Kobe and Shaq were both in their primes but Kareem was probably slightly past his prime for most of his Championships with the Lakers.
Again, tough choices, really no wrong answer……..(unless some idiot says Jordan and Pippen)
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
If you want I'll do a poll and post on the best duo
Just give me a list of who should be included
Shaquille O'Neal: "Tell him Shaq doesn’t respond to juvenile delinquents without a college degree. Tell him to get his degree, and we can talk. In the meantime, he should call me Dr. Shaq because I’m working on my PhD." (Referring to 17-year-old rookie Andrew Bynum, who compared himself to Shaq…except that he can make free throws.)
(courtesy of www.shaqquotes.com)
On the fence
Personally, I don’t like Shaq, so I wouldn’t fault the organization for not retiring his number, especially given the unhappy parting between the two … however, the retiring of #s is not done by my dislikes and likes and thus, championship-wise, Shaq’s number should be retired by the Lakers, but only and I mean ONLY when Kobe’s retired and it should be either after Kobe’s number/numbers get retired or before it.
Then there’s the subject of whether or not Kobe’s #8 or #24 should be retired and I’m pretty adamant both should be retired.
- is already a shoe-in, but I think Kobe’s career in #8 wasn’t too shabby either. Sure he wasn’t THE leading man in the 3-peat years, but hell, he wasn’t chump change either and his numbers were still amazing!
- kobe still came through in the clutch in so many of those championship runs. I mean, if his achievements in #8 pretty much solidified him a HOF status, shouldn’t it equally be enough to merit a retiring of the jersey?
Not to mention, #8 Kobe was the Kobe that made 81 freaking points. The string of 50+ games. The only player to outscore an entire team 62 points through 3 quarters. #8 Kobe was still keep the Laker “relevant” after Shaq left.
Of courses all those accomplishments I listed were more “personal” achievements rather than achievements he accomplished for the organization … but man, #8 Kobe still achieved a lot in a Lakers uniform. It’d be really cool if the Lakers organization recognized that without #8 Kobe, there wouldn’t be a 3-peat either.
Lakers 2009 Road to Redemption: TREVOR, DEREK, LAMAR, PAU & KOBE.
Play the game of which Lakers reminds you of: TA - TI, Shannon Brown - Chris Brown, Pau Gasol - Jesus, Machine - Luis Scola/Russell Brand, PJ with mustache and beard - Colonel Sanders.
by PeanutButterSpread on Dec 17, 2009 11:32 AM PST reply actions
okay that should say:
“The retiring of #24 is already a shoe-in, but I think Kobe’s career in #8 wasn’t too shabby either. Sure he wasn’t THE leading man in the 3-peat years, but hell, he wasn’t chump change either and his numbers were still amazing!”
and
“Also #8 kobe still came through in the clutch in so many of those championship runs. I mean, if his achievements in #8 pretty much solidified him a HOF status, shouldn’t it equally be enough to merit a retiring of the jersey?”
Lakers 2009 Road to Redemption: TREVOR, DEREK, LAMAR, PAU & KOBE.
Play the game of which Lakers reminds you of: TA - TI, Shannon Brown - Chris Brown, Pau Gasol - Jesus, Machine - Luis Scola/Russell Brand, PJ with mustache and beard - Colonel Sanders.
by PeanutButterSpread on Dec 17, 2009 11:34 AM PST up reply actions
“and I mean ONLY when Kobe’s retired and it should be either after Kobe’s number/numbers get retired or before it.”
LOL. So Shaq’s number should ONLY be retired before or after Kobe’s. Doesn’t leave much else does it?
j/k =)
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
ok, I phrased that sentence awkwardly :P
Shaq can get his # retired when, Kobe is retired and not playing in the league anymore.
But then after when Kobe retires, does Shaq’s # get retired first or Kobe’s?
I wavered on when Shaq should get his # retired because I don’t know if retiring Shaq’s # before Kobe’s # gets retired is a disrespect to Kobe or is it a bigger respect to retire Shaq’s # after Kobe’s # gets retired. I don’t feel their #s should be retired at the same day either. It’s a dilemna.
Lakers 2009 Road to Redemption: TREVOR, DEREK, LAMAR, PAU & KOBE.
Play the game of which Lakers reminds you of: TA - TI, Shannon Brown - Chris Brown, Pau Gasol - Jesus, Machine - Luis Scola/Russell Brand, PJ with mustache and beard - Colonel Sanders.
by PeanutButterSpread on Dec 17, 2009 2:39 PM PST up reply actions
sounds so complicated, lol
But I say retire Shaqs number, You can’t be a fan of the Lakers and not think of Shaq. I am a big Kobe fan but i also appreciate how Shaq HELPED the Lakers win 3 in a row. To win that many in a row deserves recognition no matter what.
And i think Kobe would want #24 retired, only because it was due to him needing a change in parts of his life. But i wouldnt be against #8 and #24 being retired. His jersey could look have both 8/24 when they do it. That would be pretty cool.
" I'm a human, not a sandwich"
by true_lakerfan on Dec 17, 2009 3:08 PM PST up reply actions
can't help but feel
that you can’t keep a straight head when you talk about
Kobe. Your thread is actually funny! Amore….
OK, here's the deal
I really hated the all the damn squabbling during the Shaq/Kobe run. In fact it makes me remember those championships less fondly than the Showtime ones. Who knows what really went on but I hold Shaq & Kobe equally responsible for it.
The way Shaq left and his behavior since has convinced me what a d-bag he is. All that made it clear to me how self-centered Shaq is and that he never gave a shit about the fans. (But it is nothing personal, he don’t care about the Orlando, Miami, Phx fans either.)
I remember when KG first got to Boston a reporter asked him about comments the T-Wolves owner made that KG didn’t try too hard his last year there. KG had the sense to just say “That’s in the past, I’m in Boston now and just focused on winning with my new team.” I never heard Shaq say that kind of thing.
So I think that while the Lakers should retire Shaq’s number they should not do so until a year or two after Kobe’s number is retired.
The Lakers "Too big, too strong, too long, too good."
amen on this:
I really hated the all the damn squabbling during the Shaq/Kobe run. In fact it makes me remember those championships less fondly than the Showtime ones. Who knows what really went on but I hold Shaq & Kobe equally responsible for it.
Ok Shaq did a great job for the lakers, but when he turned on Mr. Buss I lost all respect for him.
Also he has always been about Shaq and not the Lakers so I can’t see disrespecting all those great players with putting his jersey there, maybe the Womens head would be better.
.
by so.cal.native1952 on Dec 17, 2009 1:59 PM PST reply actions
here comes the hate mail...
why does everyone just ignore the fact that kobe wanted to shoot more and get a check like shaq and shaq wanted to keep shooting the most and keep getting the biggest check? to watch kobe against the bucks with those two final shots last night said a lot. after the regulation miss, ronron is complaining to kobe about kobe not passing him the ball as they are sitting side by side on the bench. kobe is adamant that he should have took the shot and he backed it up in OT. ronrons digust is shown in his face as he and kobe speak on the bench after the missed shot.
i’m just saying, kobe refuses to let the others get going. pau said it all when he was complaining about not getting touches a couple nights ago. he was asked about how he was getting so many rebounds and he said it was the only way he was going to get offensive looks. telling… i’m just saying…
34 should be retired because that was the player LA paid to play for them. what happened on the court during the games is what we should care about. from tip off to the final buzzer, not the locker room and FO circus. he did what he was paid to do and he did it well.
any of you that feels like his number shouldn’t be retired ought to ask themselves could we have done the 3peat without shaq as a Laker. yeah, kobe and kwame for the 3 rings. show some humility, be grateful that we got 3 while he was here and pay the man homage, its simple for those of us aware of bostons ring count. ingrates…
Lakers, Hurricanes, Dolphins
Imagine my sports world in the 80's. They're almost back, 'ceptin the Dolphins
by LAKESHOWrydamee on Dec 17, 2009 5:19 PM PST reply actions
I gotta say I like your no nonsense attitude...similar to PSlakerfan
awesome!
ingrates…
Ultimately, Shaq did get the Lakers organization 3 titles. I can’t deny that and putting all the bullshit aside I think that there are less than three Lakers who I can think off the top of my head who have been as instrumental in getting this organization banners. What other player not named Magic has been the main one responsible for us getting titles? Horry doesn’t count either. I’m talking about the leaders for each of the teams that won titles.
Magic
Kobe
Shaq
Kareem
These players have been part of dynasties and the main ones to lead us to more than one title. If you leave Shaq off that list then I don’t know what to tell you.
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 17, 2009 6:31 PM PST up reply actions
Although he only won 1 title, you can add Jerry West to the list. He was epic throughout the Laker Celtic wars of the 60s. I would say you could add Wilt as well. And I would also add James Worthy although it was ultimately Magic’s team.
None of the guys on that list are perfect but to me Shaq was the only douche-bag on the list. Kobe and some of the others were arrogant but not a douchey as Shaq – hence the reason Shaq the “most dominant ever” is playing for his fifth team.
The Lakers "Too big, too strong, too long, too good."
You are right about adding the other players
And I think that in my mind i’m just thinking of “leaders” meaning when you think of past Laker teams which players stand out as the “leaders” or players that if the team lost he would get the blame. In other words the players that led the team to dynasties. Btw..i made a huge mistake in forgetting
Mikan. he defenitely belongs there. He is knowns as the originator of the first dynasty in the NBA.
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 18, 2009 6:48 AM PST up reply actions
spank yourself PGFL...
Mikan is the the Gatekeeper for defending the ring. Our 1st back-2-back AND 3peat came with Mikan attached. Hallowed ground brethren, hallowed ground…
Lakers, Hurricanes, Dolphins
Imagine my sports world in the 80's. They're almost back, 'ceptin the Dolphins
by LAKESHOWrydamee on Dec 18, 2009 11:09 AM PST up reply actions
sorry you lost me on what you are trying to say
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 18, 2009 11:57 AM PST up reply actions
lol
Yeah me too.
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
dang you 2
Lakeshow is chastising PG4L for forgetting Mikan. It’s like his “blasphemy” comment when we considered having a 2nd fave team.. Shows you how serious Uncle Lakeshow is about anything lakers… ;-)
OK, I read the whole thing again and it makes more sense.
It seemed like he was chastising him for forgetting Mikan in his last post which makes no sense, but I guess he was chastising him for forgetting Mikan in his first post which makes a lot more sense.
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
eh
I corrected myself but some people love the sound of their own voice. even if they are typing it they still love the sound of correcting someone.
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 19, 2009 11:16 PM PST up reply actions
uuuhhhhh...
imagine Mr. Mikan saying this. “Wait a minute!!!! I started this Back 2 Back shit, is this the motherfuckin’ thanks I get?!?!?!?” i hope that dumbs it down for you people.
ahh, internet conversations…
Lakers, Hurricanes, Dolphins
Imagine my sports world in the 80's. They're almost back, 'ceptin the Dolphins
by LAKESHOWrydamee on Dec 26, 2009 12:47 PM PST up reply actions
WORTHY!!!!!!!
how could i have forgotten. this guy was EVERY BIT as important to Magic as pippen was to jordan.
Lakers, Hurricanes, Dolphins
Imagine my sports world in the 80's. They're almost back, 'ceptin the Dolphins
by LAKESHOWrydamee on Dec 18, 2009 11:03 AM PST up reply actions
On worthy
yes he was but that is not the point i was trying to make. If the Lakers lost in the 80’s the blame would have gone on the capt which would have been Magic or Kareem. Also when thinking of “who lead the Lakers” you never think of Worthy. He was part of it but he never Lead the Lakers it was Magic and Kareem.
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 18, 2009 11:48 AM PST up reply actions
i hate to respond to this buddy...
so i will just say maybe if you watched Worthys’ carreer, you wouldn’t say that. he played from ‘82-’90 with Magic. Magic scored more in the season than Worthy four times. Kareem scored more than Worthy four times from ‘82-’88. I’m not trying to go away from your point but to say The Number One Draft Pick In 1982 wasn’t as important as Kareem or Magic (another #1 draft pick, ironic) is just flat out wrong.
When we lost to Detroit in the summer of ‘89, it was blamed on Magic AND B. Scott injuries. Worthy played 600 minutes while Magic(500) and Scott(400) had hamstring injuries. We DID NOT blame Magic.
From ’86-’88, when we tried to 3peat but only got a back2back, Worthy OWNED those playoff years with more PPG, MPG and rebounds than Magic or Kareem. You should apologize for that statement sir…
Lakers, Hurricanes, Dolphins
Imagine my sports world in the 80's. They're almost back, 'ceptin the Dolphins
by LAKESHOWrydamee on Dec 26, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions
if he weren’t such an idiot, i’d say, in a heartbeat, retire number 34. maybe even if he retired as a laker years ago. but he’s been on so many teams since then, that i’d say no. i don’t think he’s earned the privilege to retire as a laker. he only played with us for 7 or 8 years. in my opininon, one of the criteria for a player’s number to be retired with an organization, that player should not play with so many other organizations. one’s loyalty to a team, should be part of the requirements.
If they had to do one I'd choose #24
but why not both?
Yeah , #34 should be retired and here’s a question:His career isn’t over but he should stay as a Laker, How about #16???
Shaquille O'Neal: "Tell him Shaq doesn’t respond to juvenile delinquents without a college degree. Tell him to get his degree, and we can talk. In the meantime, he should call me Dr. Shaq because I’m working on my PhD." (Referring to 17-year-old rookie Andrew Bynum, who compared himself to Shaq…except that he can make free throws.)
(courtesy of www.shaqquotes.com)
The subject of Pau's number being retired
was discussed before.
I remember the general consensus was that Pau had to at least play a couple more years and win at least one more ring here before his # was retired.
Judging by the rumors, if he is being offered a contract extension by the FO, he will be playing with the Lakers for at least 6 years or so and if he can keep up the level of playing he’s been at, then I can see a really good argument for Pau’s # being retired here.
But it really all depends on how well the Lakers are playing with him here for the next couple of years. There’s no denying he makes our team soooo much better, so hopefully, with some more rings and the same consistent amazing play, Pau will be recognized by the organization.
Lakers 2009 Road to Redemption: TREVOR, DEREK, LAMAR, PAU & KOBE.
Play the game of which Lakers reminds you of: TA - TI, Shannon Brown - Chris Brown, Pau Gasol - Jesus, Machine - Luis Scola/Russell Brand, PJ with mustache and beard - Colonel Sanders.
by PeanutButterSpread on Dec 18, 2009 12:43 AM PST up reply actions
gasol is the best big man in the nba today. he keeps proving me wrong. i, too, called him soft, weak, etc. even last year i said howard was the best. i ate my words. the guy has a complet game, save for a deadly mid range jumper. however, he doesn’t really need it. he is deadly in the post with either hand. he scores, rebounds, blocks, passes, and defends effectively. he has the best all around game among big men. more importantly, without him the lakers aren’t the elite team in the league. without him, they don’t win the title. he is as crucial as kobe is to the team. he is the perfect complement to kobe. but he is more than a complimentary player. in my opinion, he is the key to our success. big men dominate the game more than any other position. gasol may not be a dominant force, but he is a silent assasin.
that said, i sometimes wonder how much he may slow down bynum’s development. i understand gasol is more vital to the team’s success than bynum, but i still want the latter to be able to establish himself as the best center in the league. and from a fantasy perspective, i have bynum on my team, so i want him to put up monster stats…lol
Is anyone else curious as to what is up with Pau's rebounding lately.
You go from never getting 20 rebounds in a game to averaging 20 for 4 games? There is just no way that this is an anomaly. It reminds me of when Magic asked Kobe why he never gets a triple-double. Next game Kobe gets a triple-double. My point is I think Pau is sending some sort of message to someone.
If I had to guess what that message was and whom it is directed toward I would bet it is something like this…..
Hey Andrew, if a 30ish, skinny, “soft”, euro-white boy can get 20 rebounds a game do you think maybe you can grab more than 3?
Just a guess.
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
yes hes been all over the boards lately
like hes broken his career record for rebounds two or three times last couple of days…crazy
and like this:
Hey Andrew, if a 30ish, skinny, "soft", euro-white boy can get 20 rebounds a game do you think maybe you can grab more than 3?
Leave Chad Billingsley alone!!!
oh no he didnt!!!...
I would hope bynum gets the message.
i know it doesnt really compare but if in my b-ball league i can get more than 4 rebounds a game being the shortest guy out there, bynum has no excuse.
" I'm a human, not a sandwich"
by true_lakerfan on Dec 18, 2009 1:46 PM PST up reply actions
that's why I think we should get Tyrus Thomas
juuuuust kidding! don’t want to start that again.
Bynum will make it. I guess I have to cut him some slack since he has been injured so much. But no one has ever driven me so nuts watching a game as much as Kwame though.
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 18, 2009 2:26 PM PST up reply actions
19 people want a Kazaam sequel
i dont blame them.
after all it is the greatest movie ever made.
Leave Chad Billingsley alone!!!
here's my 2 cents
Shaq’s jersey will be retires while kobe is still playing. shaq doesnt have much longer in the laegue. I dont understand how you cannot retire the jersey of a player that helped you get 3 rings. Especially the most dominant big man of modern basketball. He is a for sure hall of famer and will be in the staples center rafters. Kobe will have his jersey retired long after shaq’s jersey has been retired. and his banner will have #8 & #24 on it. Why the hell would you have 2 banners in the building for 1 person. both numbers will be on his jersey.
Just another thought. With all the talent and the players the Lakers have still to come (shaq, kobe, gasol, bynum, fisher…) do you think we will ever get low on numbers. lol. I dont really think so, but you never know – the lakers will always be in the hunt for another championship. there is too much pride and tradition. we dont take 22 year lapses liek some other team… cough… cough…….
Another tangent – what do you think the possibility is of the lakers retiring fishers number. I mean the guy has been on every championship winning team that kobe has, and has hit MANY clutch shots. do i even mention .4?

by 




















