Back-to-Back Preview: Bulls and Bucks
The United States has an unemployment rate of 10%, yet Vinny Del Negro still receives a paycheck for coaching the Chicago Bulls. This is called market failure. Anyone outraged over Goldman Sachs bonuses should reroute a little populist anger toward Coach Vinny, as no one in America gets paid more for so little achievement. He's turned Derrick Rose and a bunch of other guys you've actually heard of into one of the suckiest teams in the league.
He'll be fired soon if there's even a tincture of sanity in this world, but luckily for Lakers fans it won't be until after tonight's game. The Lake Show kicks off a back-to-back at the United Center against the woeful Bulls, followed tomorrow by a visit to the Milwaukee Bucks. With their loss on Sunday to Utah, the Lakers ceded the league's best record to the Boston Celtics, who've been masterful at taking care of business on the road. There's a little urgency here for the Lakers to keep up, lest they start falling behind in the race for playoff home-court advantage.
These games really do matter.
Tonight: Chicago
Let's start with a basic truth about the Bulls: they're awful. Their record of 8-14 belies the true depths of their badness. They're 28th in the league in net points per game, ahead of only New Jersey and Minnesota. Over their last five games they've been outscored by an incredible 0.18 points per possession. This stretch includes two separate home losses by more than 25 points, a 35-point road loss to Atlanta and a home loss to the Nets. The only win in the last five was an overtime home victory over Golden State.
Girlfriend, please.
Word around the league is the team has quit on Del Negro, and the numbers won't tell you otherwise. Despite having the prodigiously talented Rose at the controls, the offense ranks 28th. They run hardly anything resembling a planned system. Most of their "plays" are either half-assed pick-and-rolls, or flattened 1-4 sets that ask Rose to improvise off the dribble. They don't get to the line and they're some of the worst shooters in the league. Other than that they're awesome.
Rose, in his second season, is regressing under Del Negro's non-guidance. His turnovers are up over his rookie year, and every other of his offensive metrics are down. He's made only one three-pointer in eight attempts. As a defender he's just terrible, lacking the ability to stay in front of any half-decent point guard. Derek Fisher isn't going to blow by him, of course, but Jordan Farmar certainly could.
Rose, in his defense, is getting less than zero help from his teammates. Starting shooting guard John Salmons has a True Shooting Percentage of 48%; keep that up over the long haul, son, and you're out of the league. He's made 33% of his threes this year, which isn't at all good but actually makes him the Bulls' best perimeter threat. That role you'd think would fall to Kirk Hinrich, but he's having a nightmarish campaign in terms of both injuries and performance. Hinrich has missed his last 13 long-distance attempts.
Up front, there's a little more for the Lakers to worry about, but only a little. Luol Deng is back at small forward after missing the playoffs to injury last year. He's OK, but it's hard to look at his performance and remember why we all once considered him a lynchpin to a possible Kobe Bryant trade. Something tells me if that trade had gone through it would not be viewed fondly by either Lakers fans or Kobe Bryant.
During tonight's broadcast you'll hear at least a few times that Taj Gibson is having a "promising rookie year." This is a stretch, and even that's putting it generously. Gibby has certainly played a fair amount, about 25 minutes a night, but his output hasn't been anything special. He's been turnover happy, he's not a good passer and he hasn't scored efficiently. Also, he's two years older than Andrew Bynum, so please don't think he's bursting with Ridiculous Upside.
If there's a bright spot in Chicago's season so far, it's been Joakim Noah. He has a fun-to-watch all-around game and is rounding into one of the NBA's better centers. With his length and bounciness, you'd think he's one of the few opposing centers who could cause problems for Bynum. Recently, though, both Chris Bosh and Brook Lopez have had big offensive numbers against Noah, so I'm hopeful Drew will rock and roll as usual. When the Lakers beat the Bulls in November, 108 to 93, Drew and Pau Gasol combined for 35 points.
(I pause here to remind everyone that Joakim, whatever his quirks and limitations, did call LeBron a bitch to his face. That alone earns him some affection in these parts.)
Brad Miller and rook James Johnson provide "depth" in the frontcourt, but not really. Miller has fallen off steeply, and Johnson doesn't look ready for The Show yet. Also off the bench we'll see a little Jannero Pargo, who's always fun. He likes to shoot a lot, which shouldn't be confused with being any good at it.
On Saturday the Celtics visited the United Center and won by 26. With Kobe still hurting the Lakers aren't likely to run it up to the same extent, but a comfortable, 15-point W is a reasonable expectation. The goals tonight should be to get the three-point game working again (after shooting 3 for 21 in Utah) and make quick work of a demoralized, fractured opponent. That would give the starters plenty of rest for....
Tomorrow Night: Milwaukee
It's always heated when the Lakers and Bucks face off. That's to be expected when one city has stolen Penny Marshall from the other. There's also the Lew Alcindor thing, but it's mostly about Penny. Milwaukeeans have forgiven... but not forgotten.
The Bucks don't have an obvious talent edge on the Bulls, but they do have the advantage of a coach who's not grossly incompetent. Scott Skiles, true to his rep, has forged a strong D in Milwaukee where just a couple seasons ago was one of the worst in the league. The Bucks rank seventh in defensive efficiency thanks to an aggressive scheme that forces turnovers prolifically.
On Wednesday night Skiles will run waves of big and athletic wing defenders at Kobe. Starters Carlos Delfino and Ersan Ilyasova and reserve Luc Richard Mbah a Moute are all capable or better and are likely to alternate shifts on Mamba Duty. The Laker ballhandlers will need to pay close attention to securing the rock - I'm looking at you, Ron Artest - but fortunately that's been a team strength this year. The turnovers that Milwaukee generates, in any event, come at the cost of a wickedly high foul rate.
The Lake Show bigs will face some combination of Andrew Bogut, Ilyasova, Hakim Warrick and Mbah a Moute. No pushovers in that group, no Eddie Curries, but also nobody that should really bother either Bynum or Gasol. Bogut has the size but not the agility, the other three vice versa.
The Bucks' offense is more a work in progress. The big story this season, as you don't need me to tell you, has been Brandon Jennings, who's like Derrick Rose was last year but better. After his 55-point detonation back in November, Jennings cooled off for a bit. The last two games, though, he's looked rejuvenated as he led his teams to wins over Toronto and Portland. He has a rare ability to get his lefty shot off against anyone along with great range (even if his 45% percentage on threes is very unlikely to hold up). He's moreover an above-average rebounder for his posishe.
Backing up Jennings is veteran Luke Ridnour, who you might be surprised to learn is having a splendido year. His True Shooting is over 60%, which he combines with a low turnover rate to make him one of the best backup PGs around. I doubt that his current performance level is sustainable, but give the guy credit for showing renewed verve in the summer of his career.
For most of the season the Bucks' starting shooting guard has been Charlie Bell. In Saturday's game, however, Charlie got the DNP-CD despite seeming to be in good health. I was about to research why he got benched when I remembered my favorite Andrew Bogut Video:
After watching it three more times and laughing heartily, I forgot all about Charlie Bell. Is he going to play tomorrow? Let's watch and find out together!
The Lakers should have Milwaukee solidly outgunned, but between the Denver and Utah games they haven't really blown us away with their performance in back-to-backs. It's time to fix that. There are plenty of back-to-backs on the horizon, so the Lakers need to get in the habit of sustaining that Night One energy across two games.
The honor of Penny Marshall demands it.
|
Lakers |
Bulls |
Bucks |
|
|
RECORD |
18-4 |
8-14 |
11-11 |
|
NET POINTS PER GAME |
+8.5 (2nd) |
-8.6 (28th) |
+0.9 (14th) |
|
PACE |
94.9 (8th) |
91.8 (21st) |
93.4 (11th) |
|
OFFENSIVE RATING |
108.5 (11th) |
98.0 (28th) |
104.2 (24th) |
|
Turnover Rate (Off.) |
12.8% (4th) |
13.9 (16th) |
13.0 (7th) |
|
FTA/FGA (Off.) |
0.266 (26th) |
0.274 (24th) |
0.227 (30th) |
|
Free-Throw % |
75.4 (14th) |
73.2 (22nd) |
73.7 (1st) |
|
Effective FG% (Off.) |
50.1 (13th) |
44.6 (29th) |
48.9 (20th) |
|
True Shooting% (Off.) |
53.9 (16th) |
48.8 (29th) |
52.0 (26th) |
|
Off Rebounding Rate |
28.0% (10th) |
28.7% (7th) |
25.5% (22nd) |
|
DEFENSIVE RATING |
99.7 (2nd) |
107.4 (19th) |
103.3 (7th) |
|
Turnover Rate (Def.) |
14.6% (11th) |
12.9% (24th) |
15.9% (3rd) |
|
FTA/FGA (Def.) |
0.262 (2nd) |
0.282 (8th) |
0.328 (30th) |
|
Effective FG% (Def.) |
46.0 (1st) |
49.3 (15th) |
49.6 (17th) |
|
True Shooting% (Def.) |
50.3 (1st) |
53.0 (9th) |
54.9 (20th) |
|
Def Rebounding Rate |
72.4% (21st) |
71.4% (26th) |
76.2% (3rd) |
All statistical terms defined here. Parentheses indicate league rankings. Numbers are courtesy of Basketball Prospectus and HoopData and, except for record and net points per game, are through Sunday night's action.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
jesus dexter, you really have it out for vinny del negro. Sure the bulls are really underacheiving. But Gordon was pretty much their only scoring option in the 4th quarter, when D’s try to shut down Rose. Losing that big chunk of your offense, you are going to struggle.
There is NO ONE on that roster that really scares you offensively, and they arent really big enough to really shut anyone down on D. Obviously not a recipe of sucess. Put most coaches in that position, and I really dont think we see any drastic improvement.
Derrick Rose – still a very young guard, can’t expect him to be Nash already
Salmons – Terrible shooter.
Brad miller – at his age. you’d be happy you can get 20 mins outta the guy let alone 15 pts.
Luol Deng – without gordon, he cant utilize his talents the same way
Joakim Noah – this kid is not a center bottom line. At 6’11 and 232. he is gonna get crushed by even average centers.
Looking at their roster, its not like chicago really broke the bank on anyone. 50 year old Brad Miller is probably their best player outside of Derrick Rose. Also considering you have
12 million to Brad Miller
10 million devoted to Deng
9 – hinrich
6 – Jerome James
The Bulls as an organization is at fault, not just Vinny Del Negro. It was a miracle he was able to get the bulls to 7 games last year. He definately deserves some more credit.
In Kobe we trust!
Go to BaB and they'll tell you that the team won despite VDN
Constant coaching gaffes like running out of timeouts late in games, overplaying Miller to exhaustion, and not playing Thomas in rebounding situations were painfully apparent.
The fact that the Bulls’ “offense” is essentially a high screen for Rose at the top of the key shows you how prepared he is to coach in the NBA. There’s far too much talent on this roster to not be a .500 team, and definitely far too much to lose to the Nets at home.
To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.
Chicago sports has been unbelievably dissapoining this year....
The Bears were supposed to be an elite team this year with Culter, a.k.a. “The Savior”. The Cubs were supposed to be great after an outstanding 2008 season (which my Dodgers ended in one of the best upsets ive ever seen!). The White Sox have been trash since 2005 so no surprise there. And the Bulls are self-explanatory. God help them.
actully
the white sox are doing alright,a championship in 2005 makes the white sox the best team in chicago by far.
lakers gonna blow the bulls out tonight. kb24 best of all time
YOU CAN PUT IT ON THE BOARD YES!
www.reverbnation.com/czheckproductions
need to stop taking so many 3's
Their 3-21 performance against Utah is atypical, but their 34% 3pt ers is in the lower part of the league stats. Of those teams with a lower 3pt fg% only Utah has a winning record.
They seem to go down court and chuck up the 3 pointers before the defense even sets up. With the height advantage Pau and Bynum have over Utah and the rest of the league, the 3 pointer should be their weapon of last resort. The 2nd team seems to shoot the three early in the clock too, When the second team is in there after a big Lakers lead, the 2nd teams should be concentrating on running their offense and playing D. Phil should fine any 2nd teamer that chucks up a 3 pointer with more than 10 seconds on the shot clock. Bynum seems to be regressing a little on defense and rebounding these days. Is he worried about his stats for all star selection ? I think Bynum is a lock for the All star game if he doesn’t get injured or start screwing up.
Need to start making threes
Then the opponent’s defense can’t pack it in, the entry pass to the inside man will open up, and you won’t have to take so many threes at the end of the game because you won’t be playing catch-up
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Dec 15, 2009 2:56 PM PST up reply actions
The Celtic's wins are just a mirage
Yes they are the best in the East and will be in the Finals against the Lakers. But they are not playing better than the Lakers. The margin of victory and the fact that more times than not in the 4th qtr when playing against teams that they should win the starters are icing their knees. If you look at the games that the Celtics have played they have struggled against those teams that they should win and their margin of victory is not as impressive as the Lakers. That and the fact that for the first games the Lakers played without their 2nd best player.
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 15, 2009 3:05 PM PST reply actions
If Vinny and Phil traded places tonight, the Lakers would still easily win,
as this post is too kind to the Bulls.
My only disagreement is on the Bulls quitting. What happens is they play hard for the first half, then quit in the third quarter when they realize that they can not come back against a good team. Unless they play the first quarter like trash, e.g. the Toronto game.
As a Bulls fan, I am almost rooting for a Lakers blow-out, just to show how bad the Bulls management was in putting the team together and how poorly coached they are.
Fearless prediction: Lakers 115, Bulls 85.
We miss you, Ben Gordon!
Bold Prediction
I hope you’re right!
Based on your comment, I have placed my life savings on the Lakers beating the 10.5 point spread against the Bulls. With a 19.5 point cushion (since they will win by 30), I can’t lose!
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Dec 15, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions

by 
































