Lakers' "On/Off" switch apparently controls a Supernova
I'm too young to remember a whole lot about the Showtime Lakers. I remember loving that team, I remember enjoying that team, and I remember them winning a lot. I watch them on NBA TV or ESPN Classic whenever I can. But I don't really remember the details: how they went about their business, how they played from night to night, how professional they were.
So my first cognitive introduction to true Laker greatness occurred with the Shaq/Kobe dynasty at the turn of the century. I know that team inside and out. I know how they operated. And that team's hallmark, more than anything else besides just being dominant (and of course, feuding superstars), was that they knew how to "flip the switch". Those teams were famous for playing a mediocre game for 3 quarters, and then "turning it on" to pull out the victory in the 4th. Whether borne out of supreme confidence in their ability, an intimidating aura of invincibility that could permeate the other team's confidence in an instant, or a need for the game to be in it's waning moments before the team could be troubled to give a damn, the Shaq/Kobe years were filled with "flip the switch" victories.
If those years taught me anything, it's that "flipping the switch" is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the ability to simply decide to increase intensity and have it translate to improved performance is a powerful weapon to have. We can't expect anybody, or any team, to be at top gear all the time, and the knowledge and ability to decide "We're going to top gear now" can be a powerful tool. It is the sign of an extremely good team, a team that has great confidence, a team that is capable of performing at a higher level than almost anybody else. On the other hand, a team that can flip the switch, and knows it can flip the switch, will sometimes not play as well as they should, not try as hard as other teams, because they know that in the end, they'll be able to kick it up to a notch that the other team can't reach. Too often, those early 00's Lakers relied on flipping the switch because they knew they could. And every once in a while, you'll find out that when you try to flip the switch, the light bulb has burned out. It can cost a team wins because they don't play with enough effort, expecting their superior talent to manifest itself when called upon. Flipping the switch leaves certain things to chance. Suddenly, a bad shooting night, or an ill-timed turnover, or a lucky three point shot, can lead to an ugly loss.
Well, last night, the Lakers played the ultimate "flip the switch" game. Yet, despite the negative connotations of that statement, there isn't a single Lakers fan who isn't smiling today. The reason is simple. When the Lakers flipped that switch to "On" last night, we saw a power beyond our wildest dreams.
Make no mistake, the Lakers looked like they wanted no part of the game in the 1st half. No, they weren't getting blown out by any stretch of the imagination. As Dex mentioned in the postgame, the entire team seemed uninterested in playing the physical brand of basketball for which the Utah Jazz are known. The Jazz out-rebounded the Lakers by a large margin, including 11 offensive rebounds. The result was a 4 point defecit for the Lake Show, despite shooting a significantly higher percentage than the Jazz. In the 3rd quarter, the Lakers went down by 8 before reeling off a quick 12-2 run to make the game even again. Each team held serve until the 4th quarter, with the Lakers sporting a two point lead entering the final period.
Then, the Lakers flipped the switch, and unleashed the power of a thousand suns.
100% effort and intensity met head on with an extremely lengthy and athletic team, and the result was the best quarter of defense I've ever seen in my life. I can be prone to exaggeration from time to time, but this is honestly not one of those times. The only explanation I can come up with for what I saw is that the Lakers were somehow employing cloaking devices and thus had 7 players on the court. It seemed like every member of the Jazz team was guarded by two men at all times (except for Ronnie Brewer, of course, he remained unguarded by design). The Jazz turned the ball over 8 times in the quarter (against only 5 in the first three quarters). They ended the quarter with MORE SHOT CLOCK VIOLATIONS(3) THAN FIELD GOALS(2)! The numbers speak louder than any argument. 6 points overall, 2-17 shooting, and a points per possession of .25. The Lakers won the quarter by 22.
And here's the kicker. The Jazz are a good offensive team. They entered the night ranked fifth in offense with 110.3 points per 100 possessions. And the offense that they run is not normally predicated on particularly strong outside shooting. They get their points through superb execution of the pick and roll (longtime nemisis of the Lakers) and lots of backdoor cuts. And that offense wasn't bad last night either. The Jazz were holding steady above their average after the 1st half. This wasn't the Charlotte Bobcats or the Chicago Bulls. The Jazz would have put up a bunch of points on most NBA teams last night. Sure, in the 4th quarter they got sloppy, and missed a couple of open jump shots. But more often than not, even the open shots the Jazz got were the ones the Lakers wanted them to have. If the Lakers are capable of shutting down a good offensive team like the Jazz in such ridiculous fashion, then they are as capable defensively as any team in the league.
Some other random thoughts from last night's game
- Interesting game for Jordan Farmar, with a very important positive development. After a couple of careless turnovers in the 1st half, Phil Jackson benched Farmar for the duration of the half. Shannon Brown played the end of the 1st half after Derek Fisher had to come out of the game with foul trouble. Then, in the 2nd half, Phil Jackson put in Shannon Brown AND Sasha Vujacic (who hasn't seen meaningful time in two weeks) before Farmar, in what I thought was a clear statement regarding Farmar's playing time (improve or you won't play). The Farmar that we are accustomed to might have taken this opportunity to sulk, or to display a bad attitude. Instead, when Farmar was re-inserted to the game with 3 minutes left in the 3rd quarter, he proceeded to play his best 15 minutes of the season. 11 points on 4-8 shooting, 3 rebounds, an assist, two steals and a block. He also played the best defense we've seen out of the point guard position in years, and did it against a guy who has previously eaten him alive due to the fact that Deron Williams is the MAC truck of point guards. Major signs of improvement, both in performance and attitude, for Farmar on the night.
- Bynum had a bad game. I love the kid, but 4 rebounds in 32 minutes for the biggest guy on the court just isn't good enough, and his 1st half defense was amongst the worst of anybody. I don't believe in most of the anti-Bynum/defense talk that goes on, but last night is the type of game that affirms those beliefs in others.
- Same goes for Shannon Brown. The oop dunk was nice, but Shannon didn't bring much else to the table last night. And he was clearly out-performed on the defensive end by Farmar, something that is surprising considering Brown's superior athleticism and defensive reputation.
- Kobe was the epitome of a leader, assessing what his team needed most and then providing it. The Lakers sucked on the boards in the 1st half, so Kobe responded by crashing the boards hard in the 2nd, and picked up 5 boards in the half.
- Have to give credit where credit is due. The Machine played meaningful minutes, entering the game with 3 minutes to play in the 3rd and exiting again with 3 minutes gone in the 4th. Those six minutes are six minutes more of relevant playing time than Sasha has had since before Thanksgiving. And he didn't suck. Only one silly foul, he caused a turnover, made his only shot attempt of the night (a 3, of course), and didn't rush things. On one play in particular, Kobe posted up, Sasha's man leaked down to double Kobe and Sasha was visibly and audibly calling for the ball (which was funny by itself). Kobe finally passed the ball to Sasha, and instead of shooting, Sasha pump faked before calmly dumping the ball back down on the block to Kobe. I highly doubt the performance will translate to more PT for Sasha, but give the man credit. PJ surprised everyone by calling on him last night, and he was ready.
0 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
When they flip the switch "on"
It was freakin’ incredible! A 28-6 quarter??? If anyone says that was not pure dominance, they need to go to their restroom, take a long look at themself, and slap the shit out themself.
The Lakers are going to face a different Utah team on Saturday, I can assure you that. They need to keep the switch “on” for most of the game.
Re: Sasha
(I posted this in the Credits comments)
What I liked most was that Sasha got a chance to contribute. He hit a shot that helped open it up – then he was pulled after the timeout just after the shot.
I’ve always maintained that Phil will give him another shot, and for Sasha to contribute in a small way then sit back down (until taco minutes and before he could mess up), is just a small step in him gaining his confidence back. Phil is the best coach for a reason and I suspect that we will see this a bit more. Slowly though. The upside of what good Sasha can do for us is too much to trash all together (plus that contract).
Furthermore
Because of the specific situation, it wasn’t such a bad foul. It happened with 22 seconds left in the 3rd quarter, when the Jazz were just going to run down the clock for the last shot. It’s ok to be aggressive in that situation, and IMO Sasha wasn’t overly aggressive. Millsap showed him the ball after a defensive rebound, Sasha tried to tie him up, and Millsap swung his arms around and created some marginal contact that the ref saw, so he blew the whistle. Millsap isn’t a great FT shooter so there’s always a pretty good chance that he’ll miss one of two. The Lakers then got the ball back, ran the clock down, and hit a three to close the quarter.
by The Dude Abides on Dec 10, 2009 6:47 PM PST up reply actions
He makes some stupid fouls sometimes (all the time? :P)
Although I have to give him credit too; he always brings a high level of hustle to the defensive end.
Glad to see him contribute.
maybe phil is training Sasha
to be the “small x” factor.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
I notice Kobe gave Sasha a very warm hug when he left towards the end of the 4th Quarter...
Maybe some sort of campaign to rebuild his confidence is under foot….
It seems to have worked for Farmar…
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
Utah also switched to off at the same time the Lakers turned it to on
The Lakers led Utah to Utah’s switch of course, but Utah turned it off. OK, enough switch metaphors.
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
let us have our fun, kthx
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
Takes two to tango
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Dec 10, 2009 1:36 PM PST up reply actions
What happened in the 4th...
cannot happen unless both teams contribute to it. As dominant as the Lakers were on defense, no one should expect them to keep teams to single digits in a quarter on a regular basis.
In such one-sided cases, assigning the credit/blame can always be a difficult proposition. Your opinion of the matter (and it is an opinion, not a fact) will often align with your corresponding bias. Jazz fans can say(and have said) that their team just sucked it up. Lakers fans will think that it was all dominant D. The truth lies somewhere in the middle. What I saw clearly seemed to indicate that the Lakers D was the defining factor of the quarter, not the Jazz failure on offense.
Offense breaks down to 3 basic factors. This is an oversimplification, but a generally valid one.
1. Design – Ability of the offense to create high quality shots
2. Execution – Ability of the players to execute the offensive design
3. Result – Whether or not the player makes the shot
The Jazz offensive design is very good, and has been for years, so that’s not a factor to this conversation. It really boils down to execution vs result. In my opinion, failure to execute is more often the result of good D than bad O, while failure to produce results (if the execution is good) is bad O more than good D.
In the 4th quarter, the Jazz only took 4 shots at or around the rim. Most of their shots came from the outside. The Jazz like to take mid-range jumpers (especially D-Will, Boozer and Millsap), but they also like to move the ball around a lot and get a lot of motion to the rim. The Lakers took away all of that, leaving the Jazz with nothing but outside shots, which were often contested. The Lakers caused 5 turnovers while the game was still in doubt: 3 shot clock violations (clearly good D more than bad O), a travelling call on Williams due to Farmar preventing him from making the pass he wanted to, and a Farmar steal that was the result of a very aggresive and well executed trap at the half court line.
Any way you slice it, the Lakers D was spectacular. A stronger offensive performance from the Jazz might have made the difference between a 6 point embarassment and a 14-16 point disappointment, but holding a team like the Jazz to 14 points in a quarter is still an extremely impressive defensive display.
by C.A. Clark on Dec 10, 2009 11:43 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Jazz were shooting like crap even to close the 3rd quarter...
I forget what things were running, the Utah announcers said something like they were 1-for-18 over the end of the 3rd and then the first part of the 4th — then they missed 2 or 3 more. They were at least 1-for-20 and probably more than that…
That just doesn’t happen. It’s non-replicable.
I would not be overly surprised in Utah wins when they get back home against the Lakers. They are a miserable road team and played LAL very tough for the better part of 3 quarters. Switch flipping or no switch flipping, if the Lakers come in to that game cocky and half-assing it, they are gonna lose.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
Oh, Timbo
if the Lakers come in to that game cocky and half-assing it, they are gonna lose.
This applies to just about every opponent, save the New Jersey Nets.
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Dec 10, 2009 1:38 PM PST up reply actions
failure to execute is more often the result of good D than bad O
Huh?? Maybe you ought to take a closer look at that. Failure to execute is the biggest problem of most team’s offense. Coaches can draw up great designs. Players had better be able to make shots. But execution is the hard part – and it gets harder as the players get tired or simply lose momentum. Ever think of that??
I have a song that will help
Since it’s tough to find agreement on the division of responsibility for the poor offensive performance of the Jazz:
You can blame it on the rain
Cos the rain don’t mind
And the rain don’t care
You got to blame it on something
(Blame it on the rain)
(Blame it on the stars)
Whatever you do don’t put the blame on you
Blame it on the rain yeah, yeah
You can blame it on the rain
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Dec 10, 2009 1:43 PM PST up reply actions
I also have some words from my friend Forrest, and then I'll stop
Melman, I dont know if C.A. Clark was right or if, if it’s you. I dont know if the Lakers clamped down the Jazz in the fourth, or if the Jazz offense was just floating around accidental-like on a breeze, but I, I think maybe its both. Maybe both is happening at the same time.
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Dec 10, 2009 1:52 PM PST up reply actions
Duly noted
On the record
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Dec 10, 2009 3:15 PM PST up reply actions
Sure, that's why the operative word is "more often" and not always
While we’re point out things to think about, how about this?
If the coach can draw up great designs, and the players had better be able to make shots (you might want to talk to Ronnie Brewer about that, by the way), and failure to execute is because players get tired or lose momentum or lack focus etc. … why do teams even bother to play defense? According to you, the other team’s defense doesn’t seem to be a very big part of the equation, does it?
I say that failure to execute on offense is more often the result of good D than bad O because THE ENTIRE PURPOSE OF DEFENSE IS TO PREVENT OFFENSIVE EXECUTION. So, if the entire purpose of defense is to prevent execution, and yet failure to execute on offense reflects more on bad offense than good defense, we’re again left with the question: What’s the point of playing D?
by C.A. Clark on Dec 10, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
See, the problem is that you aren't seeing what I'm seeing
I never said that it is all on the offense – only that it is more so a reflection of the offense than the defense.
Look at it this way – take the best defensive team in the league. Why do they allow so many points if they are so great on defense? I mean, if they have incredible defense then a team shouldn’t be able to score more than 40 pts/game on them, right? Even that great defensive team can have an opponent drop 130+ pts on them if the opponent has great execution. I’m just saying that great defense can only go so far and the bulk of the fluctuations in score come as a result of the offensive side otherwise a team with consistent defense could hold all opponents to within around the same amount of points. Looking around the league, that just isn’t the case.
Another way to look at it is this: the Jazz scored 6 pts in the quarter. If it is mostly on the defense then the Lakers should be able to apply their amazing defensive skills and at least hold any given team to, say, 10-15 pts any given quarter. I can tell you now that that ain’t gonna happen. The huge difference in points between the first 3 and the 4th quarters was mostly on the Jazz, not the Lakers.
See the problem is that you aren't seeing what we are seeing....
You are a Nuggets fan. Almost all Nuggets fans that come here and comment are douchebags (notice I said almost all). A lot of Nuggets fans that post on Denver Stiffs are douchebags (notice I said a lot). You may be a great guy, and you may even have a point (I don’t think so, but maybe you do), but when almost all Denver fans that post here have nothing to add but “Kobe is a Rapist”, “The league gave you a creampuff schedule” or, “David Stern tells the referee’s to help you guys out”, we simply tune you out.
Tell you what. You admit all three of my statements above are either a) bullshit or b) most likely bullshit, and we will listen to what you have to say.
I think that is quite fair. Otherwise go back to DS and whine about scheduling or whatever the flavor of the day happens to be.
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
Too harsh?
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
Aside from that, yes still too harsh
He may be wrong (and I’m most certainly working on trying to prove that), but he has refrained for the most part from any behavior that would indicate he’s somebody that should be treated with that kind of animosity. He doesn’t want to give credit to the Lakers for what happened, but that’s no reason to go straight to the “big guns” that may or may not apply to him
Obviously I had nuggets on my mind, I meant Jazz. I must be hungry.
All of the rest still applies. (Where is that edit button?)
Billy Mac: "Lamar, can you see yourself actually getting in the (boxing) ring"?
Lamar Odom: "No. My face is too pretty."
dam DenverStiffs!
they have that effect on you! I ordered a DenverStiffs combo yesterday : ) JK
"These young guys are playing checkers. I'm out there playing chess" - Kobe
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 11, 2009 2:07 PM PST up reply actions
Man, I had a long response that completely dismantled this
and then I accidentally clicked on a link and lost it all, so fuck it. Our teams play again tonight, this conversation is moot.
You completely missed the point of my comments, where I separated offensive execution from actually making shots. The Jazz shot making was horrible in that 4th quarter, but it was horrible in part because poor execution led to poor shots. The Lakers forced the Jazz into bad shots, and then the Jazz failed to hit any of them.
I get what you are saying. Good defenses still give up lots of points. The Lakers can’t force 6 point quarters by sheer force of will. I’ve already said as much, repeatedly. But you act like the Lakers defense had nothing to do with it. 6 point quarters can’t happen without an offense sucking it up. But it also can’t happen without a defense playing out of its mind. If you honestly think that a team can get three shot clock violations in a single quarter just by sucking, then I really don’t know what to tell you anymore.
Focus on what happened to the Jazz because you are a Jazz fan. I’ll focus on the Lakers because I’m a Lakers fan. It’s the natural order of things. But don’t get upset because Lakers fans say that defense was spectacular, because it was spectacular. If you want to say the Jazz offense sucked, fine, because it did suck. The two are not mutually exclusive.
I loved the D in the 4th
If we can maintain that focus on D, there is no way anyone can play with us. The offense is pretty much always there but the intesnsity on the D sometimes wanders off.
" I'm a human, not a sandwich"
2 Roamers = Problems?
Another problem with the Lakers is having Artest and Kobe “roaming” for the highlight steal/block. I cannot tell you how much I was cursing at Kobe for allowing Miles and Brewer to get wide open looks. This is what killed us in the third. On top of that, Artest vacated the weak side help and let Okur drain a couple of threes.
I know you want to defend Bynum, but his EFFORT on defense stunk. Not even bad, he STUNK. This coming from a player with All-Star aspirations? Not how you make the team Andy. Several times I watched him easily get out-hustled for loose balls. He didn’t even try.
If Bynum puts in the same lackidaisacal effort tomorrow against Jefferson and Love, Lakers will lose to an upstart.
i know we're suppose to lose
but itd be a sad start of the weekend if we lose to the timberwolves. As for Bynum, Im tired of complaining about his effort on defense. I just hope he gets utterly destroyed and and humiliated down low so he can wake up and start protecting the lane.
Bynum's effort
His effort at closing out on jump shooters is usually pretty good (especially if it’s his man, i.e. Boozer 5-16 FGA), and he forces a lot of misses. His pick and roll defense has been pretty good this season, too. Where he’s driving us a little crazy is his poor protection of the rim when he has to rotate off his man, and his lack of aggression in going after rebounds. Finally, for the first time in last night’s game, he started to rotate off his man to protect the rim in the fourth quarter. He forced a few drivers to miss (and fouled Millsap on a drive).
by The Dude Abides on Dec 10, 2009 6:54 PM PST up reply actions
Ahhhh, I's good to be a Laker fan
but there’s something I was curious about. Call me supersticous,(or however you spell it) but didn’t the defending champs last year have a huge, dominant win streak gong up until Christmas and then lose to the soon-to-be world champs? Just Saying. (Cavs winning the title? scary stuff)
Shaquille O'Neal: "Tell him Shaq doesn’t respond to juvenile delinquents without a college degree. Tell him to get his degree, and we can talk. In the meantime, he should call me Dr. Shaq because I’m working on my PhD." (Referring to 17-year-old rookie Andrew Bynum, who compared himself to Shaq…except that he can make free throws.)
(courtesy of www.shaqquotes.com)
The difference is...
The Lakers are a good team, the Cavaliers are not.
jk
i hope that doesn't happen to us
i think phil, kobe, and fish should have enough experience in “repeating” not to let us burn out by christmas.
though frankly, i would rather have our streak broken by the likes of OKC or SAC than cleveland (imagine all the crap they would write if it were the cavs…)
Yeah
OKC would be perfect. lol that sounded kinda funny haha
by desecrator09 on Dec 10, 2009 7:39 PM PST up reply actions
it won't happen to us,
Not this year. With kobe, gasol, and phil leading the team theres no way they will let the team become complacent. Plus we have artest who came here to win some bling.
" I'm a human, not a sandwich"
by true_lakerfan on Dec 11, 2009 9:42 AM PST up reply actions

by 


























