Silver Screen and Roll: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Off Tackle Empire interviews Rich Rodriguez

MORE Kobe vs Lebron????

Are you tired of the Kobe-Lebron comparisons? Eh, maybe a little bit. It's like, leave these guys alone and let them be who they be! ... But after the demolition of the Nets, things are slow round Lakers Nation. Just waiting for the tough road games to start to see what we have here with this year's team.

So here's another Kobe-Lebron comparison for you to digest. It's really a guilty pleasure, sorry in advance to Cavs/Lebron fans who will take this personally, I ain't mad atcha. It really is low brow to be picking on Lebron talking in the third person. All in good fun.

IF I didn't know better, I'd say that Charley Rosen was a super-troll!

Please click through to the article at Fox Sports, as I this was so juicy I had to copy and paste the whole section,so give Uncle Charley some clicks at :

http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/10443134/Heat-need-more-than-Wade-to-thrive

Straight shooting

Because of his gigantic talents, his overwhelming power, his freight-train speed, his resounding dunks and his chase-down blocks of breakaways, most NBA watchers believe LeBron James to be the best player in the league.

While conceding LBJ's gargantuan upside, I humbly beg to disagree. By my lights, the honor belongs to Kobe Bryant.

Here's why:

LeBron's pregame hijinx are just another notch against him compared to Kobe. ( / Getty Images)
  • Kobe's low-post game is much more effective than LeBron's. This is somewhat puzzling given LBJ's size, strength and ability to finish.
  • Kobe's left hand is better around the hoop, and his off-handed shots also have better range.
  • Kobe has a better handle, both in and out of traffic.
  • There's no comparison between Kobe's reliable jumper and LeBron's erratic one.
  • Kobe is a more reliable shooter at the free-throw line — 84.0 percent lifetime to LBJ's 73.8.
  • No right-minded observer would disagree Kobe is the best clutch shooter extant.
  • Although he often is hypnotized by the ball, Kobe is still a superior defender.
  • In the attack zone and on the outskirts, Kobe enjoys a considerable advantage in sheer creativity.
  • Given that LBJ measures 6-8, 250, while Kobe is a mere 6-7, 210, their offensive rebounding stats are significant. James averages 1.3 while Bryant's average is 1.2. All things considered, then, it's clear Kobe also out-performs LeBron in this category.
  • Whereas LBJ's pre-game antics are often childish — all of the dancing, fake photo-snapping, showering court-siders with rosin dust — Kobe has a much more serious and focused approach.
  • Unlike LeBron, Kobe doesn't use the imperial third-person when talking about himself.
  • 0 recs  |  Comment 55 comments |

    Story-email Email Printer Print

    Comments

    Display:

    Of course I'm a homer, but LBJ is no where close to Kobe.
    Because of his gigantic talents, his overwhelming power, his freight-train speed, his resounding dunks and his chase-down blocks of breakaways, most NBA watchers believe LeBron James to be the best player in the league.

    LeBron is a force or nature. Skill wise? Not on Kobe’s level.

    by wondahbap on Nov 30, 2009 11:18 AM PST reply actions  

    Bron is still young..

    I agree that he is more power than skill rite now. Kobe just has way too many weapons.

    by true_lakerfan on Nov 30, 2009 11:34 AM PST reply actions  

    Does it matter that Kobe has a better post game and a better jumpshot?

    When Lebron scores more efficiently than him overall?

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 11:37 AM PST reply actions  

    Efficiently?

    Yes, it matters when his efficiency hasn’t actually won anything yet. Greg Oden is probably more efficient than both of them. So what does that really mean?

    by wondahbap on Nov 30, 2009 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

    I'm just pointing out

    that saying Kobe is better because he has a better postgame and a better jumpshot is a “grasping at straws” type argument when you can just look at LBJ’s overall TS% and FG% which is better than Kobe’s.

    I still think Kobe is better than Lebron, but it’s more due to his killer instinct and his proven accomplishments.

    Age shouldn’t matter in this discussion because the debate is who is the best right now.

    If efficiency doesn’t mean anything, it shouldn’t matter that Kobe has a better jumpshot or post game than Lebron. If you don’t want to consider anything other than what’s proven, then the debate simply doesn’t even exist because Kobe has won 4 titles and Lebron has won zero.

    Greg Oden can’t be in the same discussion because he doesn’t dominate the ball or the flow of the game nearly as much as Kobe or Lebron, however I’d say you can make the argument that bigmen scoring 25+ ppg with 60% efficiency ARE the best in the game. Not many guys can do that (cough, Shaq, cough).

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 1:21 PM PST up reply actions  

    I don't think efficiency doesn't matter at all. I never said that.

    I’m just not sure of it’s correlation. How does it relate to making teams or teammates better? Kevin Martin is a so called “efficient” player who does not make his team good. They have been better since he got hurt. I think many people would consider Allen Iverson in-efficient, but when he had a team suited to him, his style was efficient in winning ball games. Now, I’m not comparing LBJ to Kevin Martin, but “efficiency” is somewhat of a myth to me. I’m sure someone could say that for having better skills as well, but I’d like to think it’s about the pressure a player can put on the opposition. Pressure can’t be figured into efficiency stats.

    by wondahbap on Nov 30, 2009 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

    People consider Kevin Martin efficient?

    42% from the field last year for 24.0 ppg. I wouldn’t call that efficient. Martin is(was) a decent first option on a crap team. I’m fairly certain that you could do TS% on Kobe and Lebron and find them both to be significantly higher than Kevin Martin’s. That shows some positive correlation.

    Anyways, this debate is getting real far from my original point so I think I’ll just leave it at that…

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

    I know what your point is/was. You were playing devil's advocate. As was I.

    I’m going by Martin’s PER (since PER is widely considered). Usually at 20, and he was at 25 before he got hurt.

    I

    by wondahbap on Nov 30, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

    I doubt' that if Lebron was resistricted by the triangle offense

    that he would be as efficient. Kobe improved his game more in his first seven years than Lebron has in his firts 6-7 years. He is still the same player that we seen come into the league. He has just become stronger and faster but that is it. What will happen when those attributes start to decline? So far, he hasn’t shown any type of commitment by improving his jump shooting or low post game.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 1:19 PM PST reply actions  

    lebron's shown commitment to improve his jump shot...it's looking better

    but it’s still extremely streaky & unreliable

    the only question is…is it because he still needs more time to develop his shot—or was he just physically not meant to be a jump shooter (like Shaq and his free throws?)

    by Nostance on Nov 30, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

    improved yes

    but to be considered better than Kobe no. I bet if I thought hard enough I can think of other players that have come in with Lebron in the same year who’s jump shot has improved even more.

    As far as the Shaq and his free throws, it has been his lack of dedication to improving. Here is the quote from his free throw shooting coach which taught him during Shaq’s best free throw shooting year. Ed Palubinskas said,

    He was a good student, although not motivated. He did all he had to do and no more. He doesn’t care.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

    but even if he did care

    i have doubts that Shaq can be shooting above 80% even if he had worked 24/7 on them.

    it’s the same reason that kobe doesn’t shoot over 90% on free throws.

    sometimes, there’s just a limit to how well one can shoot, and it’s going to be different for every person out there. or sometimes, it takes a LOT more work or time to improve in comparison to others.

    by Nostance on Nov 30, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

    defenitely agree on that

    But I think that Lebron can still improve his jump shooting. I really think it’s the style of offense that is run by the Cavs. He is only required to attack and find the open man. The Cav’s own head coach has admitted to that. But if he was forced to run a more Trianlge or any offense that would require for Lebron to be hin the post it would seriously damage his FG%. But even then, for someone who is compared to Kobe I doubt that he has hit his ceiling in regards to his jump shooting abilities.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

    btw..

    at this point in terms of skills and talents and accomplishments I don’t think that The King is even better than Wade.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 1:37 PM PST reply actions  

    Skills and accomplishments, yes

    Does it make Wade the better player? Probably not.

    To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

    by Ben R on Nov 30, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

    Just curious

    If not skills and accomplishments what other measures can be used to say that Lebron is better than Wade?

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

    Ben meant...

    Based on accomplishments alone, Wade is a better player because he has a Finals MVP.

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

    I might of read it wrong

    it seems that he said based on Skills and accmplishments that Wade is better. but if that doesn’t make wade better than what other aspects of the game can be used besides skills and accomplishments. oh well, i misunderstood.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

    Oh, then you did read it right

    As for other things : size and athletic ability

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 5:54 PM PST up reply actions  

    I don't know if Wade belongs in the discussion with Kobe and Lebron

    He was my first rounder fantasy pick this season so I’ve paid a bit closer attention to him. There are a lot of holes in his game and lately teams have been defending him rather well.

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

    I think Kobe / Melo would beat Wade / Lebron in a 2on2.

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

    Eh...

    It’s close, but I’d agree, mainly because I can’t see Wade and LeBron stopping Kobe or Melo offensively, while Kobe should be able to slow Wade down somewhat.

    To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

    by Ben R on Nov 30, 2009 2:43 PM PST up reply actions  

    Just my opinion

    but Lebron has way more holes in his game than Wade does. Wade has shown to be more clutch in the playoffs and he is a better jump shooter and he has proven to be able to make his teammates better if not just as good as Lebron.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 4:02 PM PST up reply actions  

    Kobe is definitely better skill-wise

    That’s not really a comparison. If LeBron had Kobe’s skill set, he’d have multiple rings at this point. The other inarguable component is that LeBron is by far Kobe’s superior as an athlete, as his unstoppable forays to the basket will indicate. I don’t buy the “he has more rings” argument because a large part of that is circumstance; we don’t discount Barkley, Malone, and Stockton that much for being ring-less because they were forced to play out their prime in the MJ era. Both are fairly similar defenders as they tend to play a free safety role on defense, although I’d give Kobe a slight edge when he decides to play shutdown defense due to his smarts.

    As such, we’re left with measuring Kobe’s skill set against LeBron’s ability to finish; the former is essentially unstoppable, but the latter is probably more consistent. To illustrate, Kobe can hurt you from practically everywhere on the floor (long range, midrange, post, drives, free throws, etc.) whereas LeBron simply has one extremely well-honed skill (driving to the basket). As such, Kobe can’t really be stopped, as he’s solid across the board — you really just have to hope he’s cold, but he’s not extremely efficient from everywhere. LeBron can be slowed down, however, if you can somewhat negate his ability to drive to the basket. That said, only the best teams have an adequate defensive scheme and the players necessary to slow him down. If he’s able to drive with relative impunity, he can’t really be stopped.

    Only other thing you can throw in is the intangibles (i.e. leadership), in which I’d agree with Rosen that I consider LeBron’s antics pale in comparison to Kobe’s limitless desire to win and improve himself, but that’s also a realm of subjectivity open to interpretation.

    As such, I’d posit that LeBron is probably the better player at the moment simply due to how overwhelming he is, despite his limited skill set, while Kobe is the more complete player (and arguably one of the most complete players in the history of the game). The relative value of either is again subjective, and I don’t particularly care for taking sides on what has become a relatively inane debate.

    To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

    by Ben R on Nov 30, 2009 2:48 PM PST reply actions  

    "relatively inane debate."

    you sure said it. I sometimes glance through the BDL comments on yahoo and any post that has to do with Kobe or LeBron turns into some of the most retarded discussion I’ve ever read.

    As usual I completely agree Ben R :). LeBron has proven he can get his, despite his limited skillset, even against the best defensive teams.

    I think a more interesting question than “who is better?” is “who would you pick if you were starting a team today and you wanted to win a championship tomorrow?”

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Nov 30, 2009 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

    Kobe +1

    LBJ still needs to develope his game. While Kobe is complete in my eyes.

    by John G on Nov 30, 2009 2:59 PM PST reply actions  

    Say you had to win a title this year then definitely Kobe

    but LeBron if you wanted to start a dynasty, simply because he is younger and has more years ahead of him.

    Shaquille O'Neal: "Tell him Shaq doesn’t respond to juvenile delinquents without a college degree. Tell him to get his degree, and we can talk. In the meantime, he should call me Dr. Shaq because I’m working on my PhD." (Referring to 17-year-old rookie Andrew Bynum, who compared himself to Shaq…except that he can make free throws.)
    (courtesy of www.shaqquotes.com)

    by KobeisGod on Nov 30, 2009 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

    I hate to admit it but I would got with Lebron in that case

    The Lakers had a similar choice to make between Shaq and Kobe and they made the right one.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

    Can someone please tell me what is so "overwhelming" about LBJ?

    I hear these “arguments” or adjectives all of the time, but what is it that makes anything LBJ’s done overwhelming? His stats certainly don’t point to overwhelming. Not to the point where it makes him_better_ than a more complete player in his prime. He hasn’t averaged some absurd numbers. Nothing overwhelming. Very good though.

    If he is preferred because of his style. I can live with that. But overwhelming? Not yet.

    by wondahbap on Nov 30, 2009 4:40 PM PST reply actions  

    Here is my theory

    You have to think as to who is responsible for giving LBJ all the hype that he has received. Coming into the NBA I don’t remember as much hype of another player since Shaq enterred the league. I saw him playing an exhibition game in person when he was in high school and I will be the first to admit, he deserved the hype coming into the NBA. He is a freak of nature. But only Cavs fans and the NBA-media give him more credit than he deserves.

    But here is the main reason. It was perfect timing. Prior to 2003 (Kobe’s court case) the NBA fans loved Kobe including the media. He was a perfect marketing tool for the NBA similar to what the NBA tried to do with Grant Hill before his injuries. But then his case came up and guess who was drafted 1st in the same year by the CAVS? That’s right, LBJ. That set up a great scenario. Kobe vs Lebron. and many tried to sale the good vs evil thing. David Stern loves that as long as it isn’t too “thugish” and his NBA is generating money. Ever since Kobe’s court case the NBA became desperate to name someone the new NBA embassador. But fortunately for us Kobe has come back with a vegenance because only one thing kills a bad reputation and that is to win. That is my theory and i’m sticking to it.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Nov 30, 2009 6:00 PM PST up reply actions  

    lol, nice conspiracy theory :p

    it does make sense

    but I also think a lot of the hype with LBJ is the idea of what he “could become”. He is already a freak of nature, still young (24), and despite his limited skillset, he’s already one of the best players right now. In other words, IF he actually DID develop and refine his skillsets, he really can become the best ever in his “prime”. BUT, all that still lies heavily on the “IF”.

    But, if you don’t look too deeply into the matter and variables, many people often just assume that the “IF” will automatic become “TRUE”.

    by Nostance on Nov 30, 2009 6:26 PM PST up reply actions  

    : )

    that is totally me. I am the biggest conspiracy theory believer I know..

    You make a good point about Lebron’s popularity has to do with his ridiculous upside which sounds weird to say for a player who has been in the league since he was 18.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 1, 2009 6:28 AM PST up reply actions  

    A perimeter player who finishes 68.5% of his shots in the immediate basket area

    Can probably be characterized as “overwhelming.” And so far this season, he’s at a mind-blowing 72%. Combine that with his athleticism, size, and power, and that’s nearly impossible to stop.

    To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

    by Ben R on Nov 30, 2009 9:57 PM PST up reply actions  

    90 of 125. Nice

    But he’s 8/22 (36%) in the area just outside of the immediate basket area. Pedestrian.

    I hate to continue a Kobe v. LeBron debate, but Kobe is at 60% (77/128) for the year in the immediate area, AND at 50% (54/108) just outside of the immediate basket area. You have to take away the whole paint area from Kobe. Not just the basket.

    by wondahbap on Dec 1, 2009 9:45 AM PST up reply actions  

    So you've basically agreed with my post above

    Cheers.

    To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

    by Ben R on Dec 1, 2009 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

    I'd say

    Thats more a player who knows his weaknesses, than a player whose overwhelming. Plus it doesn’t make up for the fact that playing against another player his size, i.e. a Gerald Wallace type, he pretty much gives up the same number one-on-one that he scores.

    by Marty Mart on Dec 1, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

    Teams

    I think that LBJ has had pretty good teams. He’s never had a team as bad as Smush, Kwame, and Devean George on his team as the starters. (And one can’t forget the oft-hurt Chris Mihm) A bust, an undrafted, and the first D3 player to be drafted. (And one of the most undersized centers in the league) That said, I’ve noticed the Cavs do better when Lebron passes more and shoots less. He gets assists, but overall I feel him more detriment than truly the only reason they win. Idk if the stats back it up cuz i don’t feel like looking atm, but I’m sure they win just as much win he scores <30 when he scores >30. Like when he plays more like Magic and less like Vince he’s so much better for them. Just saw a game the other day where the ball definitely wasn’t going to him, but he tried to grab it anyway and almost lost it. He finished, but I feel like what people said about Kobe dominating the ball is true for Lebron as well. Like Mo Williams was better than average with the Bucks. When Michael Redd was gone he facilitated the offense to a respectable number of wins and was rly the only reason they were winning. Now, he’s been much less consistent, starting in the playoffs when LBJ started to dominate the ball more. Just saying, I don’t think its coincidence that they were so good last year throughout the season and stalled big time in the playoffs and against better teams. When they seem to be in trouble he starts eating up possession after possession the same way people said Kobe did but no one seems to say this with Lebron even though he’s playing with much better talent. The same problem Kobe had, but with better and more proven talent. Not saying he doesn’t pass, but you all have seen when he dribbles the clock all the way down and has to throw up something trivial.

    Overall, I’d pick Kobe, Wade, or Paul to win now. Maybe Lebron in the future, but I still think D. Wade could have more upside if he had a team even similar to what LBJ has and I think the same with Paul. Melo is like a step down just because he is pretty one-dimensional and a score only player with little defensive acumen thus far. I have more than one-player at each because they are all not far off in terms of capabilities. Kobe’s being highest, but having the shortest time of return for the pick. Lebron has upside, but only if he wants to and his jump shot is still iffy and doesn’t even have consistent release. A product of the fact he consistently puts on muscle to be able to have his way. If he was leaner he’d be less a factor driving, but could focus more on his jumper and it would prolly improve faster. If he played more like Magic from that point on, then I’d take him. Few of the other players I mentioned have to do that much for me to take them. And his efficiency is escalated against poor teams that can’t guard him, but is really nullified once he plays actual competition, excluding the outliers like the Detroit playoff series he rly does not perform as well against any of the better teams when it counts for both sides.

    by Marty Mart on Nov 30, 2009 5:11 PM PST reply actions  

    They are both great and they both excel at different things. Kobe’s game is more refined, Lebron’s game is still “raw”

    The Lakers have Kobe and that’s good enough for me. :)

    by intuitive on Nov 30, 2009 6:48 PM PST reply actions  

    On a random sidenote, did anyone see this?
    LeBron James and the Cavaliers were already struggling with their rhythm in Shaquille O’Neal’s return from injury.

    When Michael Jordan started giving Gerald Wallace pointers on how to play LeBron, Cleveland was doomed.

    Listening intently to Jordan and attacking a foul-prone James, Wallace had 31 points and 14 rebounds, and the Charlotte Bobcats took advantage of the disjointed Cavaliers in a 94-87 victory on Friday night.

    The surprising Bobcats won their third straight game following a seven-game losing streak behind Wallace, who beat James in numerous 1-on-1 matchups in the post — at the urging of the Bobcats managing partner sitting courtside.

    “He’s rooting, but he also has his suggestions on how we should play,” Wallace said of Jordan. “He’s just like any other fan. He just happens to be Michael Jordan — and he’s also the boss.”

    That’s hilarious. Jordan undercutting James.

    To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

    by Ben R on Nov 30, 2009 11:25 PM PST reply actions  

    Oh, link

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=291127030

    To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

    by Ben R on Nov 30, 2009 11:25 PM PST up reply actions  

    good stuff

    you KNOW he has a set of “kobe pointers” too :)

    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

    by Justin N. on Dec 1, 2009 12:18 AM PST up reply actions  

    “He told us to not let up on him and be aggressive, keep attacking LeBron,” Wallace said. “Fortunately, were able to get him into foul trouble.”

    "This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

    by Gils_Keloids on Dec 1, 2009 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

    Oh, Kobe? He doesn’t have any weaknesses.

    "This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

    by Gils_Keloids on Dec 1, 2009 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

    That's a great post

    Jordan was probably the best at learning a players weaknesess during the flow of the game without scouting reports. Similar to how Floyd Mayweather doesn’t watch video of his opponent because he just adjusts during the fight.

    I think smashing the Suns made me realize how far Kobe and the Lakers have come from five years ago, when the Suns had the world at their feet.

    by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Dec 1, 2009 6:30 AM PST up reply actions  

    completely agree

    with Raindrop,

    Sorry guys this Neil Paine,Holinger & Co cooked TS advanced metrics soup is becoming quite wrongly adored and hyped.Kobe has been consistently close to MJ in lots of aspects.LBJ is a tractor and gifted but KB248 is the man.

    Cheers!

    by meeer1171 on Dec 1, 2009 3:56 AM PST reply actions  

    Do I even need to add a comment

    well said Gils_ I completely agree Lebron has a long way to go when it comes to Kobe’s level in my opinion

    There are basic Fundamentals that are needed to move forward in this game. Always keep your guard up at all times to avoid being caught in a trap. Overcome the fouls that will be commited against you REBOUND AND PRESS ON. ADJUST to the LimeLight: ALL-STAR PLAYERS ARE ALWAYS THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. Know what your role is and play your position. Find a game plan and execute it. REMEMBER YOU ONLY GET OUT OF THE GAME WHAT YOU PUT INTO IT.

    by BrittneyM on Dec 4, 2009 6:53 PM PST reply actions  

    Comments For This Post Are Closed


    User Tools

    You are where Hollywood meets the Hardwood
    Start posting about the Lakers »

    Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

    Connect_with_facebook

    FanPosts

    Community blog posts and discussion.

    Recommended FanPosts

    Rodman6_small
    Hey, You. Create Humor. Now! 8/31
    Rodman6_small
    Larry Bird Could Have Been A Laker?
    Rodman6_small
    Greatest Transactions in Laker History
    R8_small
    Rough Cut: Getting to know your fellow SSR-ers
    Owlmuse_small
    Shout Out to Lewis Monroe

    Recent FanPosts

    Small
    Predicted Lakers Stats for Next Season
    Facebook_avatar_kobe_small
    Heat Will Make the Finals - Only If the Celtics Let Them
    Small
    How I felt when the Lakers repeated...
    Small
    Sparks Vs. Storm 11P.M. Eatern Time. I see u Wave Storm going down
    La_g_kobe11_668_small
    2010-2011 Los Angeles Lakers Stats
    Facebook_avatar_kobe_small
    Cry Me a Doc Rivers
    Jelly_bean_p_small
    Will Dampier Be A Good Fit For LA?

    + New FanPost All FanPosts >

    Featured Poll

    Poll
    Was signing Ron Artest the right move for the Lakers?
    Yes, Artest was the best wing available and the Lakers got him cheap
    3801 votes
    Yes, paying Artest the same money Ariza would have gotten is a wise investment
    2027 votes
    No, Ariza fit better into what the Lakers needed from the wing
    645 votes
    No, Artest will ruin the team chemistry
    281 votes

    6754 votes | Poll has closed

    FanShots

    Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

    Recommended FanShots

    nice highlight reel
    :D

http://i36.tinypic.com/21azscn.jpg
for larger image

    Recent FanShots

    The Lakers top 10 plays of the year, according to nba.com
    NBA 2K11 looks sick.

Good preview from IGN here.
    nice mix, except the part after 2:23 sucks
    Biting the Hand that Feeds You: Gary Payton
    I had some time on my hands and thought about doing something productive. Instead, I made this!
    Lakers vs. Celtics: All-Time Teams Match-up
    Good News for Filipinos!
    For entertainment purposes only, do not try this at home

    + New FanShot All FanShots >

    SBNation.com Recent Stories

    NEW YORK CITY NY - AUGUST 12:  Kevin Durant #5 looks on during the World Basketball Festival USAB Showcase at Radio City Music Hall on August 12 2010 in New York City. (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images for Nike) +4 updates

    FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Routs Iran 88-51, Clinches Top Spot In Group B

    Cleveland Cavaliers' Delonte West, right, shoot over Indiana Pacers' Jeff Foster in the first half of a NBA basketball game in Indianapolis, Monday, April 13, 2009.  (AP Photo/Michael Conroy) link

    Celtics Sign Free Agent Delonte West

    Rose +2 updates

    FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Ekes Out 70-68 Win Over Brazil

    More from SBNation.com >


    Blog Managers

    Silver-lg_small C.A. Clark

    Df_logo_-_lakers_small DexterFishmore

    Editors

    Josh_small Josh Tucker

    Ohkproof_1__small wondahbap

    Beat Writers

    Lakers_small vikas_s24

    09_finals_wallpaper_mvp_1920_small Saurav A. Das

    Kobelogo_small Gil Meriken

    Umad_small theshmoes