Game Recap: Life's too short to get mad at the Lakers (vs. Mavericks)
From a very young age, I've had a very simple philosophy that has allowed me to lead a happy and fulfilling life. That philosophy really has only one tenet: There's very little in this world worth getting upset about. If your grandmother dies, or you break your leg, sure, feel free to let it get to you a bit. But if somebody cuts you off on the freeway, or you have to wait longer than normal to get your lunch, there really is no point in letting it effect you. I've used this strategy to great success and it's allowed me to live a mostly stress free life. I very much recommend it.
Ironically, sports is where my philosophy breaks down. Maybe it's my uber-competitiveness, maybe it's because sports isn't as fun if you don't care about it, or maybe I just need one area of my life where I have to lose control. Regardless, the fact remains, when sports (or games of any kind) are involved, I lose my mind. It took me until almost adulthood to learn how to not be a poor sport when I lost at something. And God forbid if the team that I root for loses a game. My wife knows that, depending on how surprising or dramatic the loss is, I'm to be left alone for a period that can last anywhere from 15 minutes to two days.
Normally, last night's loss to the Mavericks would be at least a few hours of moping/anger. The Lakers got shellacked, 94-80, and the game wasn't even really that close. The Lakers were done in by the triple threat combination, poor offensive execution, poor defensive execution, and poor ... nah, I'm not going to talk about that. And yet, as the final seconds ticked off the clock, I found myself wanting for any emotion at all. I wasn't angry, I wasn't upset, I wasn't annoyed. I also wasn't happy, joyful, or ecstatic. If anything, I was simply bored.
And you know why this disaster of a game for the Lake Show was given such a reprieve from any grief or fury? Because it's just not worth it. If you wear your heart on your sleeve for this team, night in and night out, you'll be devastated by mid March. I applaud you if you have the courage to do so, but I've come to decide that I can't live and die with the Lakers all the time. That raw level of emotion gets saved for late Spring.
Be happy about Shannon Brown, the one player who actually played a good game. He shot the ball well, and gave us the one moment that might have caused us not to see tonight's game as a colossal waste of time.
If you are angry, that's fine. There's so, so much to be angry about in this game. We'll break down as much as we need to after the jump
Here's a list of good things to be angry about
- Be angry at Kobe. Kobe started off slow, missing some jump shots he usually hits. His response? More difficult jump shots. Those didn't fall, so he responded with further away jump shots. Yes, when he drove, he certainly wasn't getting any ... nah, I'm not going to talk about that. Regardless, a pretty terrible game for the Mamba, especially considering that he wasn't really up to defensive snuff either. Lots of rotating off his man, and when your man is Jason Terry, you might want to just go ahead and stay on him.
- Don't be mad at Ron Ron. He had a rough game, to be sure. He continues to struggle with his shot, but he's not making bad decisions. He picked up his first technical foul, but when you get called for a charge 90 feet from the basket after you just picked up a steal that you were trying to get under control ... nah, I'm not gonna talk about that. Artest had 5 fouls in 23 minutes, 3 of them offensive. The foul trouble definitely took him out of his game. Whether that foul trouble was deserved, well, I'm not going to talk about that. Oh, and by the way, Artest was -2 in his 23 minutes. The rest of the starters averaged 35 minutes, and were all in the -20 range. So the 10-12 minutes that Artest lost because of his foul trouble, the Lakers lost by 18 in those minutes.
- Be mad at a bench that seems to have no desire to play the game the right way. Actually, of all the things, I really am mad at this. What has happened to this bench defies all basketball logic. Two years ago, we had one of the better benches in the league, offensively potent, difficult to contain, capable of providing a huge spark in every game. Almost every major contributor from that bench is still on the team, and all of those contributors were very young players who were playing very good basketball. And every single one of them looks like a player that doesn't belong on any bench in the NBA right now, much less ours. There's a general rule of thumb in the NBA, as in life. Youth tends to get better at what they do with experience. So what the fuck is going on with our bench? How can it be that we have three young players (Vujacic, Farmar, Walton) who were considerably better two years ago than they are now? This is a mystery that I can not explain, and one that plagues me greatly. Somewhere, deep down inside, this bench has the talent to compete with anybody in the league. I'm not just saying this out of my ass. It's happened before. It was there two years ago. It was there at the beginning of last year. But, as this season starts and our bench continues to be a HUGE liability, I'm beginning to lose hope that they will ever be able to recapture that success. I'm not giving up on them for a couple games, I'm giving up on them because they've been unsuccessful for longer than they were successful at this point. So, by all means, be mad at our bench.
- That said? The starters lost this game so be mad at them. Another night, another deplorable effort coming out of the 3rd quarter. They had built up enough of a lead to survive it the other night, but Vitti needs to stop spiking the halftime Gatorade with Nyquil. Most of the bench players actually were positive on the ole +/-/.
- Be angry at the shot selection. 23 three pointers, at 30% shooting on the night. That's just terrible. Terrible decisions, terrible execution. Way too much settling. The Lakers were incredibly lazy on offense tonight, from Kobe on down. First open shot from 25 feet? Take it. First less than open shot from 20 feet? Take it. Been holding the ball for 5 seconds without passing or dribbling? Take the shot. This is another thing to be angry about, not only because it caused the Lakers to lose, but because it was so fucking unappealing to watch.
- Be angry at the Lakers defense. Actually, be mad at the Lakers for giving up on the game, because their defense in the first half wasn't too bad. In fact, Lamar's defense on Das German was downright inspiring for the first half. The Mavs didn't exactly shoot lights out for the game. And be very, very mad at the Lakers vaunted free throw defense. They allowed 78% free throw shooting on the night, which was the key to the game, because of ... nah, I'm not going to talk about that.
- Be angry at all the reactionary storylines you will read over the next couple of days. About how dominant the Celtics look compared to the Lakers. About how bad the bench is. About how Mark Cuban is right about Ron Artest. I'm getting sick just thinking about all this crap.
- Be mad that the Lakers scored as many field goals as the Mavericks did and lost by double digits. And be mad at me, because I'm not going to talk about why.
0 recs |
21 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
I posted them, then saw this was up.
I took it off. I’ll shorten the front page look and re-post in 2-3 hours.
by wondahbap on Oct 31, 2009 8:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bored.
About 5 minutes aftet the Lakers collected their rings, I was bored. When you invest emotionally for a two-month (or so) playoff stretch, it’s tough to get up for these games. I sometimes wonder how the players do it. Well, I guess because they are pros, and because they sort of have to.
I remember Magic’s first game and how he practially molested Kareem after his game-winning sky hook, and Kareem said later that he told young Earvin that there was no way he could maintain that emotional level or they wouldn’t make it to Thanksgiving.
Maybe winning it all softens the blow of a loss like last night. Maybe I am older (well, duh). Maybe there are just too many other tihngs in my life that keep my heart pumping.
One thing we know. The Lakers are going to be there at the end. And you would think that an early-season blowout on their home court would do more good than bad, in terms of, hey, “last year is last year”.
Now if it was the Celtics last night and not the Mavs…well, that’s another story.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 31, 2009 8:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes. You're right.
The loss means nothing right now, and and it definitely is easier to swallow this year.
by wondahbap on Oct 31, 2009 8:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll be angrey at Lamar too.
He insisted on going at Dirk, and failing. He took it personal and played selfishly.
by wondahbap on Oct 31, 2009 8:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
All great teams are gonna lose games they shouldn’t, lose games to teams they shouldn’t lose to, and players are gonna have some off nights. The reason we’re gonna hear the: The Celtics are playing at a much higher level than the Lakers’s, andthe Ron Artest isn’t helping the Lakers’, and the Kobe’s getting too old for this’s is because it’s the begging of the season.Last time I checked, last year the C’s got off to perhaps the best start in NBA history, and then did they win the championship? NO.
"I don't want to be the next Michael Jordan. I only want to be Kobe Bryant,"
-Kobe Bryant
by KobeisGod on Oct 31, 2009 8:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I picked the Mavs to make the WCF against us.
So, while I still think we should beat this team. Losing to them isn’t a surprise. this team is and will be very good.
by wondahbap on Oct 31, 2009 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Lakers weren't running the offense well at all
Clark is right. Kobe was taking to many ill-advised shots. When the Lakers win a good game, Kobe is usually facilitating the triangle. He was taking it upon himself to win the game from start to finish.
They need to get everyone involved first before Kobe can turn into the Mamba.
Also, I’m very glad to read that Clark didn’t use the “we didn’t have Pau” card. We should have beaten this team with or without him. Great points my man. But we’ll be fine. I think the Lakers needed a loss like this. I am just going to hate hearing “the Celtics can play at a high level, why can’t the Lakers?”
Well let me welcome everybody to the wild wild west. A state that's untouchable like Elliot Ness.
by pharoah on Oct 31, 2009 8:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we have to worry about hearing that.
We’re the Champs. We’ll get a pass on one loss. The “Power Rankings” might have the C’s on top when they come out, but those mean nothing.
Also, they didn’t have Josh Howard. Again.
by wondahbap on Oct 31, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
kobe did take some bad shots
though he surprisingly didn’t really take THAT many shots (compred to his normal self). he usually attempts more fadaways in the regular season. i was surprised he drove as many times as he did last night (esp in the 4th i suppose). in any case, last night, it looked like none of the lakers (sans shannon) could hit any shots, good or bad.
by Nostance on Oct 31, 2009 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I blame this loss on the Clippers
I’m sure the Lakers had the mentality on Tuesday that championship teams lose on ring night but that they weren’t going to let that happen because they were going to play hard. It looks like the Lakers just got lucky that they played the Clippers.
IMO the Lakers thought the season was going to be “easy” after an easy game one. Think again. The Clippers are the Clippers for a reason. Obviously the Mavs are better and they showed it.
What I am happy about though is that this loss wakes them up a little earlier than expected. I remember everyone saying we were going to go 21-1 to stat the season. Well we still might. Hopefully this loss triggers something in all the players that every night will be a struggle to defend the crown.
The bright spot of the game. In the post game interview, Bynum said he was going to go look at the tape and that the Lakers needed to have a strong practice tomorrow. That’s what I like to hear out of our 22 year old center. On the other hand, Shannon Brown referred to himself as a “warrior” because of his dunk. C’mon Shannon, you can throw down, don’t let it get to your head. No one is a “warrior” unless your name is Ron Artest or you win.
Lamar = Laker for Life...Go Pads...Go Bolts
by mrbarneydangles on Oct 31, 2009 9:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The anger of a loss, at the longest, should last until the next tip off.....
…or at the very least until the next morning. At least for me that is how long it usually lasts. Every regular season game means something to the players and to the fans. But I can bet that once the next game starts, win or loose the players move on and forget all about it. Oh well, can’t wait till Sunday.
"When I walked into the locker room on my first day as a Laker and saw my gold uniform hanging there, I cried." - Magic Johnson (Best Laker Ever)
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Oct 31, 2009 9:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This game reminded me of that great poll someone (ok me) posted here in September:) It was titled: Greatest obstacle to Lakers repeating as champions?
I’ll list the results here to save everyone a click.
0% – Magic
0% – Mavericks
1% – Nuggets
5% – Blazers
5% – Lakers incorporating new players
7% – Spurs
8% – Something else (see comments)
8% – Cavaliers
22% – Celtics
And the number one answer:
40% – Lakers’ own boredom or lack of focus
I saw ZERO focus on either end of the floor by the gold team. The ring ceremony is over. Time to get back to basics guys.
And yes I am a 2009 World Champion Fan.
by olf on Oct 31, 2009 9:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Something eerily similar about Brown that reminds me of Ariza
When Ariza was first signed and he got to play his athleticism was the first thing to stand out. As the season went on he showed flashes of having good defense. Then he seemed to be the guy that changes the energy of the game when he comes in. But his shooting was not as good. Then this past year happened and Walton goes to the bench and Ariza takes his place. I originally thought that Brown was going to take Farmar’s minutes. I think it is Sasha that will loose minutes this time around. I like the quickness of Farmar at the 1 and Brown at the 2 spot.
The biggest surprise that I am noticing about Brown and it is something I never noticed before until this season. He has probably the quickest first step on the Lakers team and can take anyone off the dribble. He can easily get to the paint. The only issue is his inability to finish. He simply looks confused when he gets in the paint. I hope he works on that. He has a lot of potential to be a really good player.
"When I walked into the locker room on my first day as a Laker and saw my gold uniform hanging there, I cried." - Magic Johnson (Best Laker Ever)
by PURPLE AND GOLD FOR LIFE on Oct 31, 2009 10:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Any team can win any given night
Dallas loses to Washington in Dallas, then beats LA in LA, Cleveland loses to Toronto, then Toronto goes out and loses to the Grizzlies, and on and on … which I am amused at guys like who are constantly saying that the other team “has a chance to win” or that they’re dangerous, so don’t overlook them … Well, yeah, every team is dangerous, and every team is potentially tougher than you think … the real question is, to what degree? Are you willing to put some money on it? (You don’t have to, I just want to see if you really mean what you say). Anyone can say “there’s a chance the Lakers might lose this one” and look like a genius when it happens.
I don’t think the Lakers are going to stomp every team they play and dominate them, even the so-called rollovers of the league.
I just expect them to play better than any other team as the number of games goes to infinity, nothing more.
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gils_Keloids on Oct 31, 2009 10:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A good loss
I did not get to watch the game, I was busy conducting some youth activities, but I am sure that this loss will result as a wake-up call to the Lakers. Yes, they have their minds set, as we have probably read, but your mind and reality are often different. A rude awakening is exactly what they needed, and even though they aren’t on pace to break any regular season records, and Gasol is day-to-not-day, I think the Lakers can pull through this. Powell will gain valuable minutes at the 4, Mbenga at the 5. Shannon Brown and Farmar will get more minutes. Heck, rest Gasol until he’s 110%! When he comes back, let the world beware because the team will be as pumped as ever.
A good loss, a wake up loss, something that the Lakers will use as motivation to crush their next 7 opponents, then they’ll probably relax again, lose, then go on another 7-9 game winning streak…
Go LA!
by Cheetah37 on Oct 31, 2009 12:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Zen Master
can I suggest one more thing to direct anger at? Phil. I mean, it’s hard to argue with a man’s ways when he has 10 rings and we all know his pention for making his guys " play through it". but when IS a good time to call a time out by these methods? when your team is down by 8— 10? 14— 20? …or do we have to wait till were down by 24?
" Defense wins games! "
by Captain $hugg on Oct 31, 2009 1:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sounds familiar
Same thing everyone was harping on PJ for last year and most years before that. By now I think people would figure out that it will never change. It is his coaching style and hasn’t yet been proved to be very ineffective. The Lakers are mostly a team of veterans and should be able to play through stretches of ugliness without coach calling a time out. What is he really going to say to them in the huddle anyway besides “you all have a case of the slows?” That was one of the funniest lines I’ve heard from any coach who has been wired during a game.
by Samurai on Oct 31, 2009 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe he secretly wanted the lakers to lose
after a weak game one, maybe he thought a loss would teach them a lesson and spark some energy?
by Nostance on Oct 31, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To me coaches that constantly ride their players (call quick time outs, bark from the sidelines, etc.) don’t last very long in the NBA. Terry Porter and Avery Johnson for example. And Byron Scott was run out of Jersey after 2 finals appearances and it seems like they have started to tun him out in N O. (Just one reason I don’t think he would be a good choice to take over once Phil is gone.)
Phil tells them what he wants them to do. But then he lets the players try it their way and when that doesn’t work uses the tape to convince them to try his way the next time. Like it or not it is a players league.
by lazNirv on Nov 1, 2009 3:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















